Corporate Giving Trends in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region Presentation by: Richard Kiy International Community Foundation & Kenn Morris Crossborder Business.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNV is administered by the UN Development Programme Volunteerism and Disaster Risk Reduction & Management Oliver Wittershagen Portfolio Manager East Asia.
Advertisements

CSR In Kazakhstan: Looking Forward Ken Mack, President American Chamber of Commerce in Kazakhstan.
The Civic 50. Marcia Bullard Chair America’s Charities Points of Light Board Member Former President and CEO of USA Weekend.
18 September 2003CSR Practice - Private Sector Development Vice Presidency1 Public Policy, CSR & El Salvador The World Bank Corporate Social Responsibility.
Community Partnerships STRONGER COMPANIES. STRONGER COMMUNITIES.
Peace Through Commerce Partnerships As a New Paradigm Reflections From Pact Congo and USAID Working With the Mining Sector in the DRC Christian Roy, Pact.
ICF: A Case Study of International Giving to Mexico Richard Kiy International Community Foundation Reunión Annual de CEMEFI Nov. 27., 2002.
Council of International Students Australia (CISA) THOMSON CH’NG NATIONAL PRESIDENT.
The Community and the Corporation The Business-Community Relationship Community Relations Corporate Giving Corporate Giving in a Strategic Context Building.
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review Brenda Gainer Schulich School of Business York University.
Global Philanthropy + Development Trends: Opportunities for Social + Financial Innovation Tim Draimin Executive Director, Social Innovation Generation.
The Community and the Corporation
Hitchcock ISD Education Foundation Presenter: Dr. Barbara Derrick Superintendent of Schools.
Scotland’s Volunteering Frameworks: UK, Europe, the World Vilnius, Lithuania 11th December 2008 Karl Monsen-Elvik Volunteer Development Scotland & European.
Summary Report of CSO Meeting GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop (ECW), Southern Africa 15 th July 2013 Livingstone, Zambia (
Overview of District Operations Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 5.
A Report on Progress toward the Strategic Goals Presented to the Valencia District Board of Trustees on behalf of the College Planning Council.
© 2005 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 1 Business and Community Stakeholders Search the Web The Foundation Center is a clearinghouse.
Monday May Who are the collaborators? Community Health Charities is a federation dedicated to improving the lives of people affected by disability.
Jennifer Connolly Junior Achievement of Western Massachusetts.
UNDP & the Business SectorBureau for Resources and Strategic Partnerships Business, sustainable development and the MDGs: A changing landscape.
Review of the Legal Framework regarding the NGO sector in Mauritius Pierre Rosario DOMINGUE Chief Executive Officer Law Reform Commission Thursday, November.
UTHUNGULU COMMUNITY FOUNDATION.  Community Foundations are basically grant- making organisations that, among other things, do the following:  Seek to.
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
United Way of Allegheny County 2014 | 2015 Key Messages.
Program of Cooperation between Government and the Non -Profit Sector Croatia.
In the Business of Doing Good: Integrating Philanthropic & Community Involvement Programs into a Small Business Presented by Jessica Haynie December 13,
Mobilizing Resources An Environmental Networking and Partnering Forum Environmental Legacy Fund Advisory Committee Community Foundation of Whistler Presented.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process. © 2006 The Finance Project About The Finance Project  TFP is a specialized non-profit research, technical.
Making a Difference in Baja California through Venture Philanthropy Richard Kiy International Community Foundation Baja Social Venture Partners Fund Organizational.
Pre-conference Survey Results Questions on Issues, Strategies, Regions, and Themes November 14, 2005.
©2011 LarsonAllen LLP 1 11 Member Survey Results 2012—2015 Strategic Planning Prepared for:
The Wheel Campus Engage Building Networks December 2013.
Business & Society Business & Society Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management Eighth Edition Archie B. Carroll Ann K. Buchholtz © 2012 South-Western,
Estonian Civil Society Development Concept “Cooperation Between the Government and Civil Society Organisations in Estonia” Kaja Kaur Chief Specialist.
Securing Corporate Partnerships. What You Will Learn Today Why companies give What companies give How to determine if your organization is ready to seek.
Building Community Partnerships to Serve Immigrant Workers Funded by the Ford Foundation Nonprofit and Community College Collaborations.
Mainstream Market for Products produced by Micro Entrepreneurs and means to sell in Larger Market Place.
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
CSR Action and Engagement in the workplace
Using Intermediary Organizations to Gain Access to Quality Internships Presented by: Deanna Hanson, California Director, NAF.
Roma Education Fund Presentation by Rumyan Russinov Deputy Director.
Community Foundations Enable Accountable Local Ownership: An Example from Palestine HLF4 KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION SPACE Partners: Dalia Association, Palestine’s.
Legislative Efforts Aimed at Reducing Waste Tires Piles Along the U.S. – Mexico Border Region.
Strategic Planning for the Arts Summary of Online Surveys Buena Vista Conference Center December 16, 2009.
© 2003 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Global Citizenship Walt Rosenberg.
Developing a sustainable apparel and footwear industry Responding to the economic crisis and beyond MFA Forum Mexico Committee, Mexico City, August 2009.
Ministerul Mediului si Gospodaririi Apelor Session 6 - Enhancing National GEF Coordination, Communication and Outreach Developing the National Capacity.
Kelly Desy Adriana Suarez Carla Ricchetti Deborah Batista
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Nurses At the Table Serving to Transform Health care through Nursing.
A Case Study of San Diego-Oaxaca Community–based Structured Remittances: Key Challenges and Lessons learned By Richard Kiy,ICF Harvard Global Equity Initiative.
PREPARED BY: NICHOLAS ANASINIS MARIA ISMAIL PATRICIA JURCA LEI YANG CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY WORKOUT TEN YEAR SUSTAINABILITY PLAN APRIL 30, 2010.
2012 EFA Global Monitoring Report Skills development: Expanding opportunities for marginalized groups.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
FEBRUARY 2015 BUILDING THE CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN THE ARTS Research conducted by the Strategic Counsel Canadians are engaged in the arts & business is.
The BPP and how we are cultivating Latino Philanthropy NALCAB September 2009.
Meat processing cluster Selami Xhepa Albanian Center for International Trade (ACIT)
Teachers Out of Pocket and Personal Time  90% of teachers spend personal money and time for school-related activities (National survey)  $800 to $1,500.
U.S.-Mexico Border 2012 Program.  Sub-Objective 3A. By 2012, develop capacity building materials for scrap tire pile prevention and scrap tire management.
GCRFPC Mission : To promote a healthy, equitable, and sustainable food system for all within Greater Cincinnati’s ten-county region. We Value: Health and.
Chapter Demonstrating Social Responsibility C H A P T E R.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
The Culture of Giving in Mexico WINGS meeting Sao Paulo, Brazil March 2016 Marilú Villalón Promotion Coordinator of Memberships and Services Mexican Center.
Social Responsibility Ethics in Business January 8, 2016.
Credit Suisse Americas Corporate Citizenship Lalita Advani, Director of Community Engagement.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
MGMT 452 Corporate Social Responsibility
Furthering the Field GROWING THE MOVEMENT
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
Presentation transcript:

Corporate Giving Trends in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region Presentation by: Richard Kiy International Community Foundation & Kenn Morris Crossborder Business Associates Border Philanthropy Partnership February 28, 2006

Study Objectives

1.Raise awareness and provide insights about corporate giving trends in the border region; 2.Encourage more active engagement and collaboration between border area community foundations, nonprofit organizations in the region, and major corporate givers; 3.Promote legal reforms to encourage, not discourage, the development of civil society and maquiladora charitable contributions; and 4.Expand the overall level of corporate giving by both major maquiladora employers, industry service providers, and businesses in general. Study Objectives

Study Partners

Funding was made possible through the support of:

Key Findings

1.Maquiladora giving is proportionally lower in Mexico border communities compared to contributions made in the U.S. –Two-thirds of maquiladoras gave $10,000 or less in cash donations; –Less than 10% gave over $10,000 annually; –25.5% gave nothing ($0); 2.Maquila’s giving is due to several factors: –Mexico’s tax rules for maquiladoras creates disincentive for companies to give — legislative change is necessary; –Need to expand charitable giving linkages between HQ and maquiladoras; –Border NGOs need to tell their story better, and better respond to corporate giving objectives.

Key Findings (continued) 3.Corporate giving in the border region takes many forms: financial support, in-kind gifts of products and services, employee volunteerism, employee matching gifts; 4.Companies committed to staying in border region are more inclined to give; 5.Corporations give for a variety of reasons: corporate citizenship-CSR; employee morale; good general business practice; image or brand; 6.Most important factor for charitable giving is presence of a strong local champion (plant manager).

Key Findings (continued) 8.Proximity of Corporate HQ to border matters; 9.Some maquiladoras collaborating with United Way and/or local service clubs; 10.Preference to give to more established nonprofits as well as those with tax deductibility (also, those with a 501c3 designation or connections in the U.S.); 11.Exists a widening gap between the “haves’ and ‘have nots” among nonprofit organizations; 12.Opportunities exist to expand giving in border region – but requires changes in policy, attitudes and perceptions by the Mexican Government, U.S. companies (HQ & Maquilas) and NGOs.

Expanding Border Corporate Giving Recommendations What the Mexican Government can do: Mexico’s tax code (Ley del Impuesto Sobre la Renta - LISR) should not penalize maquiladoras for charitable contributions made to Mexican nonprofits; Create more efficient and encompassing procedure for NGOs to receive charitable deductibility status; Create a formal procedure within the Finance Ministry (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público) that allows a provisional registration status for nonprofits while they collect all the necessary information.

Expanding Border Corporate Giving Recommendations What Maquiladora Parent Companies & their Plants Can Do: Consider raising their level of corporate giving commensurate with proportion of Mexico border operations compared to global operations; Expand cross-border giving options by working through U.S. intermediary organizations that are capable of granting into Mexico; –U.S. and Mexican community foundations have an important role to play in serving as trusted partners to border area NGOs. In addition to cash and in-kind contributions, provide technical and training support to local nonprofits; Create incentives for local plant managers to become more actively engaged in their local communities.

Expanding Border Corporate Giving Recommendations What NGOs can do: Beyond financial support, consider seeking technical and capacity training assistance from companies; Better inform companies of how their work benefits the community, and better describe the value-added benefits they can provide to corporate supporters; Promote greater transparency and accountability within the nonprofit sector; Assist companies to identify ways to align their corporate goals and objectives with programs of border NGOs; Facilitate greater corporate participation in the boards of worthy border area nonprofits; and When good corporate citizenship is exhibited, publicly recognize it!

Next Steps

BPP Next Steps In partnership with CEMEFI, advocate for change in Mexico’s tax code to create incentives for expanded corporate giving in the border area; Expand outreach to companies, maquiladoras and their suppliers to increase corporate giving in communities along the border; Increase linkages with maquiladora sector and BPP; Promote expanded involvement of maquiladora senior management in the boards of Border area NGOs; Consider border corporate philanthropy conference (2007)

The Border Philanthropy Partnership believes that strategic collaboration and a passionate commitment to the border region in partnership with the maquiladora sector and their suppliers can go a long way towards effectively addressing the region’s persistent social, economic and environmental challenges.

Survey Highlights Profile of Respondents –Developed randomized listing of firms in border states, participation voluntary –Over 800 maquiladoras contacted –110 maquiladoras participated –46% from Baja California Slight overrepresentation of Baja CA, Coahuila, and Tamaulipas firms –Nearly 70% had US-based headquarters –85% had 100 or more employees Highest response from largest firms

Survey Highlights Levels of Giving –Over 75% of maquiladoras provided some degree of charitable contributions to their local community Two-thirds gave less than $10,000 in 2004 About one-fifth did not give charitably Despite tax implications, over 9% gave more than $10,000 in 2004 –Nearly 70% gave some level of in-kind contributions to local NGOs Nearly 60% gave $10,000 or less of in-kind contributions (usually products) Appears to be slightly more common to give contributions in the $25,001- $50,000 range in form of in-kind instead of cash

Survey Highlights Broad range of charitable activities, but cash contributions, community events, and supporting local schools were top activities in 2004

Survey Highlights Authority & NGO Preferences –Authority for cash donations of up to $1,000 is primarily held at local level (62% of maquiladoras) Sizable proportion (25%) of maquiladoras also able to make decisions of $1-$10K, and nearly 10% can make local decision for cash donations of more than $10K. –Maquiladora charitable giving most focused on education (75% rated high/very high), health (71% rated high/very high), environment (61%), and supporting civic groups (35%). –31% reported providing support to 4 or more NGOs