Timothy E. Gowen NATO Ad Hoc Airworthiness Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATO FINAS Cdr Max Snow, Royal Navy Chairman, NATO FINAS
Advertisements

AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
Role , Responsibility and achievements of SARI 145 Working Group
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Hamid Dom Reg WS March 04 1 INTRODUCTION THE GATS and DOMESTIC REGULATION.
Military Airworthiness Harmonisation Workshop Olomouc, CZ Republic
Military Airworthiness Harmonisation Workshop Olomouc, CZ Republic
EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
EASA and the EU Regulatory Framework
Military Airworthiness and UAS
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS Key Airworthiness Issues Cliff Whittaker, Policy Manager, Airworthiness Division, Civil Aviation Authority, UK UNMANNED AIRCRAFT.
The EDA approach to ATI. A European civil/military way ahead Brussels, 9th February 2012 Giampaolo LILLO, EDA Armaments Director.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
1 Marinus C. F. Heijl Acting Director Air Navigation Bureau ICAO 30 March 2007 SYMPOSIUM OUTCOMES AND THE WAY FORWARD.
Introduction to Military Certification Office
Aviation Safety Management at global, European and Member State level (ICAO, EASP, EASp, SSP, SMS and ESSI) Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
25 August 2014Page 1 Civil Military Cooperation in Enhancing operations Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office 2014 BEIJING, CHINA; 30 JUN-11 JUL 2014.
AIM Operational Concept
Contents of the Presentation
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9110 Alignment to Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) and Original Equipment Manufacturers(OEMs)
Military Use of Data Link Phil Platt ATN2001, IEE, London
HORIZON 2020: FINANCIAL ISSUES
COSCAP -NAApril direction générale de l ’Aviation civile 8th Steering Commitee meeting COSCAP- NA (Beijing, April 2008) direction générale de l’Aviation.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office 1 ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
JAA 19th Annual FAA/JAA International Conference 1 TRANSITION FROM JAA to EASA Institutional changes in Europe Klaus KOPLIN JAA Chief Executive.
Certificates of Airworthiness
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 1 Introduction to EMAR May 2015.
European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness certificates - general Airworthiness Certificates – General introduction Peter Corbeel Rulemaking Directorate.
© ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. ASTM International Committee F38 Vision: Routine, safe UAS operations in civil airspace through standardization.
UAS in civil applications – New challenges - General Aviation Safety Program Diana Dumitrache – President.
Evgeny A. Gorbunov, General Director, Union of Aviation Industrialists
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
NOTIFIED BODIES EC MARKING. index  Notified Bodies. Activities  Notification procedure  Role of accreditation  Notified Bodies cooperation  Notified.
The Sport Aviation Initiative F37 on Light Sport Aircraft A clear strategy for identifying and expediently developing high quality, global, sport aviation.
DG Enterprise and Industry Philippe JEAN Sustainable Mobility & Automotive Industry Unit WP.29 Enforcement Working Group meeting 27 June update.
EASA & UAS Airworthiness Policy – Presented at the Military Airworthiness Harmonisation Workshop, Olomouc, 5 June 2009 EASA & UAS AIRWORTHINESS POLICY.
International Civil Aviation Organization and ISO/TC 211 ISO/TC 211 Seminar Berlin, 29 October 2003 ISO/TC 211 Seminar Berlin, 29 October 2003.
The MIDCAS Program is to be considered as one of the strategic components of the UAV Roadmap 2012 Health Monitoring ATOL Sense & Avoid Frequency Spectrum.
NATO Unclassified Mr. Henrik DAM Chairman SWGI 10/12/2015 NATO Unclassified.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By:T Fazio (FAA)/ C Probst (EASA) Date: 7 June 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining, Reinforcing,
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Harmonizing AOC & Operations Specifications. April 2008ICAO harmonization of the AOC & Ops Specs Outline Historical and current situation – ICAO Problem.
The New Approach and GPSD. Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonization and standards [OJ C136 of June 1985] New Approach.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: James Ballough, FAA, and Claude Probst, EASA Date: June 4, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
NATO Policy on Civil Standards Benefits of Going Civil Greg Saunders Director Defense Standardization Program Office.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Cooperative Development of Operational Safety and Continuing Airworthiness Programme COSCAP South East Asia Program Progress Report Discussion Paper 2.
The Tripartite Working Arrangement (TWA) of EFCA, EMSA and Frontex
AVIATION SYSTEM BLOCK UPGRADES (ASBU)
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
66 items – 70% of circulated products
The Law Applicable to Companies in the EU: Status quaestionis
NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes, April 2016
Military Airworthiness Harmonisation Workshop
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
Baku Azerbaijan, 5 – 7 April 2006
1 Million+ UAS Registrations
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
Briefing to the 5th NARAST Meeting May 2006
Presentation transcript:

Timothy E. Gowen NATO Ad Hoc Airworthiness Group NATO perspective Timothy E. Gowen NATO Ad Hoc Airworthiness Group

Briefing Outline Introduction Current Framework NATO Specific Requirements Latest Developments Future Steps Areas of co-operation

Introduction Airworthiness is about achieving an acceptable level of safety … …is a standard of safety for an aeronautical product demonstrating that it is fit and safe for flight, in conformance with its approved type design, manufacturing and maintenance standards, and operated within its design limits…. ….and, is a discipline that is concerned with the determination of whether or not an aeronautical product has achieved a state of being technically and operationally airworthy, and produces the evidence to this effect.

Current framework Military Aviation Military aircraft have unique requirements: Armament Battle damage Ejection Seats Flight envelope extremes; and Higher levels of risk management Still a National responsibility - each country is responsible for it’s own regulation and management… …but standards and/or unique regulations required

NATO Specifics Common policy, standards and procedures NATO is NOT a “Regulator” but dependent on the availability and interoperability of its Member Nations’ Forces, thus: Standardisation Economy of effort Mutual trust Balance between Military Mission and Safety NATO Wide Minimum Safety Framework Common policy, standards and procedures leverage the benefits for NATO’s existing and future air assets provide for value-added cooperation. are Critical

NATO Specifics Recognized A/W needs NATO Specific capabilities (owned/leased air assets) NATO Airborne Early Warning & Control (NAEW&C) NATO Strategic Air Lift Capability (NSAC) NATO AGS (Air Ground Surveillance), and NATO UAVs, need: Standardised military aviation requirements (including A/W standards) Seamless connection into the overall aviation system Harmonized requirements for airspace usage in cross-border operations ‘Due regard’ to international obligations and general (Air) Law principles

Latest Developments NATO Airworthiness Ad-Hoc Working Group Scope develop specific policy/standards for NATO owned/leased air assets and/or those operating under NATO Aegis provide the necessary framework for the regulation of military aviation that achieves an acceptable level of safety for NATO owned or leased air assets, including those operating under NATO Aegis. Focus: Define the roles and responsibilities of a NATO Military Aviation Authority. Define the minimum Military Aviation Regulations and look into the need to develop standards for minimum A/W requirements. Address both initial (acquisition) and continuing (maintenance) airworthiness. Identify and define a common set of terms and definitions for NATO A/W.

Latest Developments NATO Airworthiness Ad-Hoc Working Group Program of Work address the need to develop a NATO A/W Framework (Principles and Policy); address the need to develop NATO A/W related STANAGs; expand liaison and cooperation with other A/W specialized/affected organizations; address A/W Terminology; continuously update its Terms of Reference. Objectives Achieve an acceptable and known level of safety for military aeronautical products Provide safe flights for all personnel Address liability issues with NATO Aircraft and/or those operating under NATO. Address legal and political scrutiny Increase harmonization of airspace regulations Leverage of common policies, standards and procedures: good business practices. Provide for a common airworthiness policy. Allow for common validation and certification. Enable Exchange of Information.

4th meeting of NATO AWAHWG Future Steps Better coordination between different functionalities - A/W and Safety are all encompassing activities from procurement, through maintenance, material support, and operation, to disposal Coherent approach Military cooperation in Airworthiness has just started Active involvement required Possible establishment of a permanent NATO A/W Body Increased cooperation - strong liaison with A/W related organizations (EDA, EMAAG, EASA, ASIC, etc) 4th meeting of NATO AWAHWG 21-23 April 2009 (NATO HQ)

Areas of Co-operation Common rulemaking principles Harmonisation of regulations and procedures Exchange of best practises Certification of military aircraft Exchange of safety information Working arrangements and Agreements for Technical Co-operation

Airworthiness NATO perspective