INTERREG III C: Past experiences and future expectations on Interregional Co-operation Brussels, 12.12.02 Thomas Wobben Verbindungsbüro des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

1 Entering through the same door - Universal design put simple Soren Ginnerup Danish Building Research Institute Consultant to the COE group on Universal.
1 Brussels, 18 October 2007 Erwin Siweris INTERREG IIIC/IVC JTS Lille, France.
1 FROM INTERREG III TO EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL CO- OPERATION State of Play January 2007.
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
Days Months January Monday February Tuesday March Wednesday April
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
1 ChemClust as a response to the HLG recommendations to Innovation Usti nad Labem, Thomas Wobben Representation of Saxony-Anhalt to the European.
Using public procurement to foster research and innovation More Research and Innovation COM(2005) 488 of 12 October 2005 Commission communication to the.
Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
1 Tempus Information Day First Call for Proposals Tempus IV London, 22 February 2008 European Commission.
NANPA Oversight Working Group Status Report to the NANC April 17, 2001 Chair Pat Caldwell.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET. 4. July 2002REV02 Luxembourg – Management Issues 2 Management Issues January 2002 – June 2002 Reporting.
Performance of Hedges & Long Futures Positions in CBOT Corn Goodland, Kansas March 2, 2009 Daniel OBrien, Extension Ag Economist K-State Research and Extension.
Planning and use of funding instruments
CeChemNet and the Regional Cluster Strategy of Saxony-Anhalt
What is valorisation ? Growth €
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Regions for Economic Change Communication (2006) 675 of 8/11/2006
1 Support of the innovation developments of small and medium-sized enterprises in South Transdanubia Nikol HUBA-VARGA South Transdanubian Regional Development.
Regional and national initiatives in support of European Technology Platforms Dr. Fiona Williams Chairman, eMobility steering board
Cohesion Policy Incorporating the Lisbon Strategy
ERDF INNOVATIVE ACTIONS 1 The role of Innovative actions in sustainable regional development Jean-Pierre Berg European Commission Regional Policy Directorate.
1 Learning for employment vocational education and training policy in Europe in Europe Greece.
Regional Policy Cohesion Policy Legal Package State of play Porto, 29th April 2013 Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ Deputy Head of Unit DG REGIO.D.1 Transnational.
1 Learning for employment vocational education and training policy in Europe in Europe People disadvantaged in the labour market in the labour market.
INTERREG III Cohesion Forum Brussels, May 2001.
ESafety Work Programme WORK PROGAMME 2004 The eSafety Steering Group, Brussels, 10 February 2004 The eSafety Steering Group, Brussels, 10 February.
1 Preparatory Work Programme For RRC-2004 July May 2004 REV-01( ) Presentation made By Gideon L Mwakatobe.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
NexSAT NexSAT Steering Group Meeting - 8 June 2004 © 2004 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) 1 Welcome to the 4th meeting.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
10/04/20081 TWG of ESF Committee 10 April 2008 Franck Sébert Head of unit DG EMPL/I/1 Relations with Control Authorities Action plan to strengthen the.
VOORBLAD.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
+21 Economic Expectations Europe December 2013 Indicator > +20 Indicator 0 to +20 Indicator 0 to -20 Indicator < -20 European Union total: +14 Indicator.
21 Jan 05 1 Presentation at Bridges for Recognition Leuven January 2005 Mette Beyer Paulsen, Project Manager Cedefop/Thessaloniki EUROPASS - a single.
LP Seminar – Madrid – 20 October 2008 EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND REPORTING & MONITORING PROCEDURES Lead Partner Seminar Madrid, 20 October 2008.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
1 Supporting the cooperation and coordination of research activities carried out at national or regional level The “ERA-NET” Scheme
Week 1.
Visions of Australia – Regional Exhibition Touring Fund Applicant organisation Exhibition title Exhibition Sample Support Material Instructions 1) Please.
Winding-up Declaration and Audit Requirements at the Closure of INTERREG III programmes ( ) Directorate General Regional Policy Audit and.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Clock will move after 1 minute
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Claudia ZiosiSzeged, 16 April ALSO Strand Conference B Szeged, HUngary 16, 17 April 2006.
1 EU Funds for Improvement of Servcies Provided by the Municipalities Future scope of co-operation with EU Structural Funds Thomas Wobben Representation.
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Regional Innovation Strategies in Associated States in Associated States Dr. Michael Busch DG ENTERPRISE.
Information Session University of Novi Sad 20 November, 2007 TEMPUS IV.
Presentation transcript:

INTERREG III C: Past experiences and future expectations on Interregional Co-operation Brussels, Thomas Wobben Verbindungsbüro des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt Boulevard Saint Michel 78 B-1040 Brüssel Tel.: Fax: INTERREG III update Seminar

2 Content: Status quo of interregional co-operation Experiences interregional co-operation Fundamental thoughts INTERREG III C Timetable INTERREG III C Actions Aims and objectives of implementing INTERREG III C Consortium for a RFO on SME and Tourism Process of interregional co-operation Content of a Regional Framework Operation on SME and Tourism Implementation of a RFO Possible work plan for a Regional Framework Operation RFO Management Structure Regional Partnerships within a Regional Framework Operation The next steps

3 Status quo of interregional co-operation Regions in Europe have very different functions, structures and competencies (often in sharp contrast to local level government in Europe) and they are only able to co- operate in a limited way interregional co-operation up to now was mainly focuses on a project based co-operation of individual organisations (single dimensional co-operations) due to the centralised tendering many regional actors did not apply for interregional co-operation

4 Experiences with interregional co-operation Up to now interregional co-operation was managed at central level: –1999 ECOS/OUVERTURE last Call: more then 400 applications, of which finally 40 were chosen –heavy selection and modification process after project selection –time gap between application and project start partly more then 15 months result: –high efforts for application necessary with a very low success rate, very strict tender and administration procedures –high administrative burden at Commission level with build in conflict potential

5 Fundamental thoughts In order to achieve a Europe of the Citizen it necessary to include local and regional authorities much closer in the integration process To learn from each other and to find joint solution for similar related problems can only be achieved if there are lasting and strong co-operations between the local and regional level in Europe More understanding for the European integration process can only be achieved, if local and regional authorities in Europe can develop their own models for communication, participation and co-operation

6 INTERREG III C Timetable March 1999: adoption of AGENDA June 1999: adoption of General Provision for Structural Funds 28. April 2000: adoption of INTERREG Guidelines 7. May 2001: Communication on INTERREG III C 31. December 2001 adoption of INTERREG III C Operational Programme 20. September Presentation of INTERREG III Programme Complement 15. October 2002 Launch of First Call First Call for INTERREG III C submissions Mid 2003 start of first project implementation !

7 Programme Individual projects Networks Regional Framework Operations INTERREG III C Actions

8 –long term co-operation of regions –multi-dimensional co-operation of regions –bottom up approach through a programme based implementation –strengthening of interregional co-operation also in light of the future financial perspectives of SF programme Ressources year INTERREG Mainstream Programmes 2006 Aims of Implementing INTERREG III C

9 Consortium for a RFO on SME/Tourism SME/Tourism North of England, UK Limburg, NL Valencia, E Sachsen-Anhalt, D

10 Process of interregional co-operation 1999 start of INTERREG Steering Group end 2000 setting up RFO consortium 18./ : 1st Seminar of RFO Consortium (Magdeburg) August 2001: Involvement of Process Consultant 12./ : 2nd Seminar of RFO Consortium (Valencia) : 3rd Seminar of RFO Consortium (Brussels) : Presentation at INTERREG III C Info Day : 4th Seminar of RFO Consortium (Brussels)

11 Content for a RFP on SME and Tourism

12 Implementation of a RFO

13 Possible workplan for a Regional Framework Operation

14 RFO Management Structure

15 Regional Partnerships in within RFO Region 1 Towns Enterprises Chambers of Commerce Associations Regional INTERREG Partnership:

16 From the co-operation of the Partners.... Region 2 TownsEnterprises Association Chambers of Commerce Region 1 TownsEnterprises Association Chambers of Commerce Region 3 Towns EnterprisesAssociations Chambers of Commerce Region 4 Towns Enterprises Associations Chambers of Commerce Co-operation- Project

17... to the co-operation of Partnerships Region 2 TownsEnterprises Association Chambers of Commerce Region 1 TownsEnterprises Association Chambers of Commerce Region 3 Towns EnterprisesAssociations Chambers of Commerce Region 4 Towns Enterprises Associations Chambers of Commerce

18 Timeframe: Deadline for INTERREG III C applications from mid 2003 onwards: Joint implementation Unsolved Questions: simultaneous implementation of INTERREG III C in the four zones simple administration and implementation Next steps

Thank you very much and GOOD LUCK for your RFO!