The goods market: Exercises and applications Lecture 19 – academic year 2014/15 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CHAPTER.
Advertisements

13 EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIERS: THE KEYNESIAN MODEL CHAPTER.
Banking, money supply and the instruments of monetary policy Lecture 22 – academic year 2014/15 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
Applications of the AD-AS Model Lecture 25 – academic year 2014/15 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
Recap Lecture 27 – academic year 2013/14 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
PowerPoint Lectures for Principles of Macroeconomics, 9e
1 of 41 PART III The Core of Macroeconomic Theory © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall The Core of Macroeconomic Theory.
Output and Expenditure in the Short Run
Output and Expenditure in the Short Run Aggregate expenditure (AE) The total amount of spending on the economy’s output: Aggregate Expenditure Consumption.
AE Model and the Multiplier
© Based on 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard The Short Term I: The Goods Market.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Expenditure Multipliers PART 8Aggregate Demand and Inflation 23 CHAPTER.
AE = C + I + G + NX AE = GDP = Y = C + I + G + NX
© 2010 Pearson Education CHAPTER 1. © 2010 Pearson Education.
1 of 11 PART III The Core of Macroeconomic Theory © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Prepared by: Fernando Quijano & Shelly Tefft.
LOGO. Microeconomics is the study of how households and firms make decisions and how these decision makers interact in the broader marketplace. In microeconomics,
V PART The Core of Macroeconomic Theory.
Main Macroeconomic Aggregates (I) Lecture 14 – academic year 2014/15 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
The circular flow of income and the Keynesian multiplier
13 EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIERS: THE KEYNESIAN MODEL CHAPTER.
Lecture 15 – academic year 2014/15 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini Main Macroeconomic Aggregates (II)
The demand for money How much of their wealth will people choose to hold in the form of money as opposed to other assets, such as stocks or bonds? The.
Economic Growth Economic Growth, in general, means increase in economic (material) well being of average citizen.
© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Economics Hubbard/O’Brien UPDATE EDITION. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 23 Output and Expenditure.
The Goods MarketEcon 302 Macroeconomic Analysis Slide #1 Introduction Changes in the demand for goods lead to…. Changes in production, which leads to….

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn Quijano 21 Chapter PART V THE GOODS.
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE AND EQUILIBRIUM OUTPUT
© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn Quijano 21 Chapter PART V THE GOODS.
Lecture 5 Business Cycles (1): Aggregate Expenditure and Multiplier 1.
Income and Expenditure Chapter 11 THIRD EDITIONECONOMICS andMACROECONOMICS.
1 Lecture 8 The Keynesian Theory of Consumption Other Determinants of Consumption Planned Investment (I) The Determination of Equilibrium Output (Income)
1 of 33 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. CHAPTER OUTLINE 8 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output The Keynesian Theory of Consumption Other Determinants.
BlCh31 The Goods Market Some definitions (or identities): –Value of final production  –Total output  total output If aggregate sales is the same as aggregate.
In his classic "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" Keynes telling about two important things: If you find your income going up,
Topic 2 – Aggregate Demand, Supply, and Equilibrium.
The Goods Market Lecture 11 – academic year 2013/14 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
13 EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIERS: THE KEYNESIAN MODEL CHAPTER.
CHAPTER 12 Expenditure Multipliers
11 EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIERS © 2014 Pearson Addison-Wesley After studying this chapter, you will be able to:  Explain how expenditure plans are determined.
Financial Markets Lecture 12 – academic year 2013/14 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
Lecture 9 – academic year 2013/14 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini Main Macroeconomic Aggregates (II)
Presented By: Prof. Dr. Serhan Çiftçioğlu
Economics 202 Principles Of Macroeconomics Lecture 10 Investment, Savings and the Real Interest Rate The role of the Government Savings and Investment.
Chapter # 4 MULTIPLIER and ACCELERATOR
1. DETERMINING THE LEVEL OF CONSUMPTION Learning Objectives 1.Explain and graph the consumption function and the saving function, explain what the slopes.
Expenditure Multipliers: The Keynesian Model CHAPTER 12.
C h a p t e r twenty-three © 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Economics R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien—1 st ed. Prepared by: Fernando.
2015/2016 Introduction to Economics Augusto Ninni Main Macroeconomic Aggregates (II)
Academic year 2015/16 Introduction to Economics Augusto Ninni.
The goods market: some exercise academic year 2015/16 Introduction to Economics Augusto Ninni 1.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Income and Interest Rates: The Keynesian Cross Model and the IS Curve.
1 of 27 The level of GDP, the overall price level, and the level of employment—three chief concerns of macroeconomists—are influenced by events in three.
The AD-AS Model Lecture 14 – academic year 2013/14 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
Expenditure Multipliers: The Keynesian Model CHAPTER 12.
LECTURE NOTES ON MACROECONOMICS ECO306 FALL 2011 GHASSAN DIBEH.
1 Chapter 22 The Short – Run Macro Model. 2 The Short-Run Macro Model In short-run, spending depends on income, and income depends on spending –The more.
Saving and investment academic year 2015/16 Introduction to Economics Augusto Ninni 1.
The Short – Run Macro Model
A Basic Model of the Determination of GDP in the Short Term Chapter 16
CASE FAIR OSTER MACROECONOMICS P R I N C I P L E S O F
8 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output
Lecture 1: Simple Keynesian Model
PowerPoint Lectures for Principles of Economics, 9e
PowerPoint Lectures for Principles of Economics, 9e
PowerPoint Lectures for Principles of Economics, 9e
Aggregate demand and aggregate supply
PowerPoint Lectures for Principles of Macroeconomics, 9e
Presentation transcript:

The goods market: Exercises and applications Lecture 19 – academic year 2014/15 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini

What explains the variation of GDP in the short period? How much does the GDP vary following changes in the demand components? How can we explain phenomena such as the expansion of US during the 90s or the recent great recession ( )? Questions of the day

Numerical examples to determine the equilibrium level of GDP Effects of variation in autonomous expenditure Explanation of multiplier Expansion in US during the 90s Great recession in Italy ( ) Savings and investments in equilibrium Plan of the day

We write the equations which describe the components of aggregate demand Consumption is endogenous (behavioural equation) C = ,6Y D Investments, public expenditure and taxes are exogenous (constant values) I = 50 G = 250 T = 100 Which is the value of production in equilibrium (Y E )? Examples on the determination of GDP

Aggregate demand Z is equal to Z = C + I + G By substituting the equation C = ,6 Y D Z = ,6Y D + I + G By substituting the definition Y D = Y  T Z = C 0 + c 1 (Y  ) + I + G By substituting the constant value for I, G e T Z = ,6 (Y  100) So that Z = 0,6Y Examples on the determination of GDP

We impose the equilibrium condition Z=Y, so that Y = 0,6Y (1  0,6) Y = 340 Y = 340 = 850 Equilibrium income -> Y E = 850 Which is the value of the multiplier? Multiplier  = 2,5 Examples on the determination of GDP

Variations in autonomous expenditure Let’s examine the effects of a variations in one component of autonomous expenditure on final product. Let’s suppose that something changes which affects the consumption choices -> Aut. Consumption (C 0 ) C 0 = 100 -> 200 For the other variables we maintain the same values.

Which is the equilibrium value of final product ? Z = C + I + G = = ,6 (Y  100) = 0,6Y Let’s impose the equilibrium condition Z=Y Y = 0,6Y from which we get Y E = 440 = 1100 Variations in autonomous expenditure

We obtained that C 0 = 100 -> 200 caused Y E = 850 -> 1100 An increase in C 0 of about 100 caused an increase in Y E of about 250 Why? Variations in autonomous expenditure

Explanation: a) Autonomous consumption (C 0 ) -> b) Since consumption is a component of aggregate demand (Z=C+I+G) Aggregate Dem. ( Δ Z  Δ C 0 ) -> c) Since in equilibrium Y=Z Production of the same degree  (Δ Y  Δ Z  Δ C 0 ) If the effect of C 0 stopped here we would have Δ Y  Δ C 0 Variations in autonomous expenditure

However the effects continues. Indeed: d) Since GDP  Σ incomes Δ Y = Δ Aggregate income -> e) Since consumption depends on income (C=C 0 +c 1 Y D ), new Consumption (equal to c 1 × ΔY D ) -> f) Since consumption is a component of aggregate demand (Z=C+I+G), new Aggregate demand (Δ  Z = c 1 × ΔY D ) -> Variations in autonomous expenditure

g) Since in equilibrium Y=Z New Production of the same dimension (ΔY = ΔZ ) -> h) New Aggregate income -> … The above described mechanisms starts again… Variations in autonomous expenditure

In conclusion: C 0 causes a sequence of Y This happens because every increase in the product causes an increase in income and therefore a new increase in demand The increases get smaller and smaller because at each new “passage” only a portion of the new income is consumed (c 1 <1) Variations in autonomous expenditure

The final increase in Y is greater than the initial one in C 0 in because of the mechanism that we have just described Analytically this mechanism is represented by the multiplier (Multiplier -> “multiplies” the variations in autonomous expenditure) The mechanism the we have just described can be expressed also graphically Variations in autonomous expenditure

Demand -> Z = SA+c 1 Y Supply -> Line at 45° Equilibrium -> Y=Z -> punto A -> Y=Y A ZZ Z 45° A Y YAYA, Y

Let’s see the effects of an increase in C 0 C 0 -> Z Z -> Y ZZ Z,Y 45° A ZZ’ B C

Y -> C -> Z Z -> Y and so on… ZZ Z,Y 45° A ZZ’ B C D E

Final effect: A -> A’, so that Y A -> Y A ’ The increase in Y is greater then the one in C 0 ZZ Z,Y 45° A ZZ’ A’A’ YAYA YA’YA’ B C D E

The previous results hold for all component of autonomous expenditure In particular, since Y E = AE -> ΔY E = ΔAE where ΔAE is the variation in autonomous expenditure Variations in autonomous expenditure

 Δ  AE = Δ of its components so that Δ  Y E = (Δ  C 0  c 1 × Δ  T 0 + Δ  I 0 + Δ  G 0 ) This implies that, in the short period, GDP depends on: Variations in autonomous consumption (C 0 ) Variations in the choices of investors (I 0 ) Variations in the choices of government on taxes (T 0 ) and public expenditures (G 0 ) Variations in autonomous expenditure

The decomposition of demand in its different component can be used to interpret some recent events. In particular: Expansion of the United States in the 90s Great recession during the period in Italy Variations in autonomous expenditure

Expansion of the US during the 90s In the period the US underwent a phase of great expansion (on average +3,7% a year; +4,1% from 1996 to 2000) The average growth was superior to the average of the other industrialized countries (for instance UE on average +2%) The previous analysis can help us to understand this fact

We saw that Δ  Y E = (Δ  C 0  c 1 × Δ  T 0 + Δ  I 0 + Δ  G 0 ) What happened in the US economy? Mainly two things: a) The development of new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) lead firms to innovate the productive processes -> I 0 Expansion of the US during the 90s

b) There had been a very good trend in the stock exchange indices (in particular the stocks associated with the “new economy”) -> households’ financial wealth -> C 0 Expansion of the US during the 90s

In particular, on average: Consumption + 3,4% + 4% Investments + 6,7% + 8,4% GDP + 3,7% + 4,1%  I 0 and C 0 explain Y Important: Another component that contributed to growth was the increase in productivity (medium/long period phenomenon) Expansion of the US during the 90s

Great Recession 2 nd semester of > World financial crisis (“subprime crisis”) Recession (negative growth) in (almost) all biggest world economies Italy1.6%-1.3%-5.1% France2.1%0.3%-2.5% Germany2.5%1 %-4.9% EU2.7%0.5%-4.1% US2%0.4%-2.4%

Let’s focus on the Italian economy During the period the Italian economy underwent a deep recession with a total decrease in GDP greater than 5% in the two years. What does this trend depend on? How do we link this result with the trend in the components of aggregate demand? Great Recession

The financial crisis had an effect on investment and consumption On the investment side: Difficulties in firms’ external financing -> (in the current model) I 0 Worsening of the expectations on profit -> (in the current model) I Great Recession

On the consumption side: Decrease in income (increased unemployment) -> Y d -> c 1 Y d -> C Fall in stock indices (cause by the worsening of the expectations on firms’ profitability) -> households’ financial wealth -> C 0 Worsening of the expectations on the future -> C Great Recession

The dynamics of consumption and investments explain the dynamics of GDP ITALY GDP1.6%-1.3%-5.1% Consumption1.6%-0,4%-1.2% Investments1.3%-4%-12.1% Great Recession

The equilibrium condition on the good market is Y=Z We can obtain an equivalent condition based on investment and savings Let’s start from Y = Z = C + I + G We have Y - C - G = I By subtracting and summing T from/to the first term Y - T - C + T - G = I Savings and investments in equilibrium

Y - T - C + T - G = I The expression Y - T – C is the difference between the available income and consumption -> private saving (S pr ) The expression T – G is the difference between the earnings and costs of the Government -> public saving(S pu ) By substituting in the original expression, we get S pr + S pu = I Private saving + public saving = saving (S) Therefore, the equilibrium condition suggests that S = I Savings and investments in equilibrium

In equilibrium, investments equal savings -> Say’s Law It is an alternative way of defining the equilibrium in the goods market Savings and investments in equilibrium