ERAC ad-hoc working group on the European Semester and on Monitoring ERA Ward ZIARKO June 2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Why does ERA Need to Flourish

Advertisements

The White Paper – a policy paper to contribute to the integration process of the WBC in the ERA Dr. Erika Rost, Dr. Andreas Kahle Federal Ministry of Education.

Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.

Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA – State of Play ERA Monitoring and ERA progress report Fabienne Gautier Dublin, 14th June 2013.

Research and Innovation Research and Innovation R&I policy monitoring: - Research & Innovation Observatory Presentation & discussion ERAC, 6-7 September.

Annual Growth Survey What is the AGS? A communication, which sets out the economic and social priorities for the EU in 2013 Launches the next European.

Regional Policy Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities Ad hoc expert meeting 6 March

ERAC ad-hoc working group on the European Semester and on Monitoring ERA (main messages) Krzysztof GULDA on behalf of Ward Ziarko 19th April 2013.

Strategic Plan Working Group Process forward. 1. Start the development of the SP Produce concept note to highlight the approach identified by the SPWG:

The Young People and Democracy Project Peter McLaverty.

1 Developments to the Family Resources Survey Family Resources Survey (FRS) and the EU-Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) Valerie Christian.

Overview EC-WG on Capacity Development 13 (afternoon) -15 December 2011 –Activity: Consider WG Terms of Reference Discuss Elements of WMO Capacity Development.

Member States reporting on R&I reforms in view of NRP Update by the group on the European Semester and ERA monitoring Ward Ziarko – ERAC december 2013.

TRADE MICRODATA: The OECD-Eurostat Trade by Enterprise Characteristics (TEC) Database Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Trade in Services.

ET 2020 Working Groups DG EAC Unit A1.

FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.

The quality framework of European statistics by the ESCB Quality Conference Vienna, 3 June 2014 Aurel Schubert 1) European Central Bank 1) This presentation.

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.

Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation MSP Generic Process.

. Results of the Consultation on the Handbook on Measuring Quality of Employment A Statistical Framework Conference of European Statisticians June 2015.

IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.

Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain Heads of Agencies Workshop on Measuring Outcome 3-4 April 2014 Feedback to the MANCP WG (May 2014)

European Commission Preparation of the Innovation Union Flagship Initiative European Commission Presentation to ERAC 11 June 2010.

Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.

Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy

Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.

Preparation of the National Reform Programmes in the context of Europe 2020 Gerard de Graaf SG Pierre Vigier RTD.C3.

Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy

DEVELOPING SHORT-TERM INDICATORS OF BUSINESS DYNAMICS BUSINESS BIRTHS AND DEATHS Entrepreneurship Indicators Steering Group DEVELOPING SHORT-TERM INDICATORS.

BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.

1 Sharing Advisory Board Report from the MSIS Sharing Advisory Board www1.unece.org/stat/platform/display/msis Steven Vale Marton Vucsan MSIS may 2012.

THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER for Central and Eastern Europe Integrated planning and Assessment of National Development Plan of the Czech Republic.

SC. Asia Project Training on Developing National Action Plans on Sustainable Consumption Adriana Zacarias & Fu Lu UNEP SC. Asia Project 17 March 2005 Manila.

OECD World Forum “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Palermo, November

The European Indicator of Language Competence Presentation Policy Forum, Council of Europe, 7 February 2007.

1 SUMMARY OF ISSUES EMERGING SINCE 2003 STESEG MEETING SUMMARY OF ISSUES EMERGING SINCE 2003 STESEG MEETING SHORT-TERM ECONOMIC STATISTICS EXPERT GROUP.

1 STESEG MANDATE IN CONTEXT OF OECD COMMITTEE ON STATISTICS STESEG MANDATE IN CONTEXT OF OECD COMMITTEE ON STATISTICS SHORT-TERM ECONOMIC STATISTICS EXPERT.

1 Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February Brussels.

Roadmap & Actions Expert Consultation Health in All Policies.

Kerstin Ödman Chair of the Strategy Working Group Ad hoc NDPHS Strategy Working Group Report for the NDPHS committee of Senior Representatives Riga,

Why does ERA Need to Flourish European Research Area Policy Fabienne Gautier, DG RTD, Unit ERA Policy and Reform 10 March 2016.

Project Planning and Management Gail Campbell and Tom Broadhurst.

Network of Experts on Student Support in Europe – NESSIE Liaison with the Social Dimension Working Group Brian Power Chair of the BFUG Working Group on.

Update on Management Action Plan (MAP) 13 th Board Meeting April 27, 2006.

Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA priority 1: More effective National Research Systems Workshop for enlargement countries 10 March.

44th Meeting of the Standing Committee Bonn, Germany, October 2015 Report on activities of the Strategic Plan Working Group Ines Verleye,

European Network on teacher Education Policies

New Work Programme and mandates 2005/2006

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)

Chemical Monitoring mandate

Follow us: June 15-16, 2017 Steering Committee Meeting Summary of Conclusions and Action Items Follow.

Conclusions and Next Steps

The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.

Implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights: what is needed to guarantee a positive social impact Extraordinary Workers' Group Meeting Sofia-

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Draft Methodology for impact analysis of ESS.VIP Projects

Study on the Experience and Actions of the Main European Actors Active in the Field of Development Education and Awareness Raising (DEAR) Karina Chircu.

The mandate to develop crime statistics

Ad-hoc Activity: Biodiversity and Water Progress Report

Preparatory Workshop of the Pilot Boreal Natura 2000 Seminar

Item 5.2 Standardised social variables

Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.

Ad-hoc Activity: Biodiversity and Water Progress Report

Structural Funds: Investing in Roma

European Marine Strategy

WG A ECOSTAT Intercalibration guidance : Annexes III, V, VI

Activity on Eutrophication

EU Water Framework Directive

Towards PCSD: building on the experience of the European Commission in the promotion and the implementation of PCD Hellenic MFA and Hellenic Aid, 7 May.

Presentation transcript:

ERAC ad-hoc working group on the European Semester and on Monitoring ERA Ward ZIARKO June 2013

Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on European Semester NRP is not (and can not) be a detailed reporting on all R&I activities No state of play; bias towards new activities Role of other instruments (databases, surveys,…) to get a complete overview on R&I landscape (e.g. R&IO) NRP : “guidance” note to ensure common understanding on what and how to report

Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on European Semester (2) Interest for exploring an OECD-type survey (possibly with OECD) on the R&I landscape in order to be able to produce R&I trend reports Need to carefully synchronise ERA monitoring with European semester 27th of june : first draft on guidance note could be produced (?)

Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on ERA progress report (1) State of play : Group was informed on the process Milestones, data output and structure of the report were clarified Stakeholder survey : Open discussion on scope of results, strengths and weaknesses partial vision (first step) Concerns about representativeness and use for policy conclusions (at European council)

Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on ERA progress report (2) Stakeholder survey (2) : Concerns on insufficient time to comment on results and data Agreed on the invitation to collaborate and work together to improve the whole exercise Indicators : First discussion : concrete proposals on limited number is needed Discussion on the need to test the indicators Caution ! High quality standards !

Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on ERA progress report (3) Expert group : discussed the role of the group in the prioritisation of the ERA actions Most urgent homework : Look at the country fiches (countries individually, not the group) Take a look at the list of indicators

Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on ERA progress report (3) Elements to reflect on (Homework part 2) : Identify how to steer the policy process Reflect on possible links between the European semester and the ERA progress reports How do we cope with the lack of time to evaluate the results ? Possible link with R&IO

Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on ERA progress report (4) Next meeting : 27 june Mandate : written procedure