RtII: Data Analysis Teaming. Goals of Today’s Session  Compare and contrast types of collaborative teams Building-wide teams Grade-level teams Intervention.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

SAS and RTII ED 517 Spring Edward G. Rendell, Governor Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak, Secretary of Education Standards Aligned System Integration Trainer.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
ELL Reading Committee 1 School House Road Reading, PA x321 Improving Reading Performance for ABC School District Presented to: ABC.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
DATA TEAMING IN AN RTI MODEL Part 1 of the 2008/2009 webinar series hosted collaboratively by the Montgomery and Chester County Intermediate Units.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux,
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Initial Group Data Meeting Preparation & Facilitation August 23, 2012.
Intervention Team / Tier III Overview Harding University High School
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Agenda Introduction of Team Changes Presentation of Tiers Questions.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
TES Faculty Meeting 4/26/07 RTI in TES’ PLC. Response to Intervention in Our PLC 3 Critical Questions: 1.What do we want each student to learn? 2.How.
NASDSE November 14, 2006 Margaret McGlinchey Kim St. Martin.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Response to Intervention Response to Intervention: Reflections on Year One.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
District Response to Instruction and Intervention Reflection and Planning.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Response to Intervention
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Response to Intervention = RTI
Student Support Team (SST) Training
Presentation transcript:

RtII: Data Analysis Teaming

Goals of Today’s Session  Compare and contrast types of collaborative teams Building-wide teams Grade-level teams Intervention (tier) teams

Take Stock of Where We Are  List all of the sources of assessment data in your school.  Examples: PSSA 4Sight AimsWeb DIBELS STAR DRA

Types of Assessments  Summative  Assesses what students have had an opportunity to learn – after instruction  The “Educational Autopsy”  Cumulative in nature  Used to determine whether students have met the course goals  Examples: –State Tests –Mastery Tests –Unit or Chapter Tests –Final Exams

Types of Assessments  Formative  Assesses what students have had an opportunity to learn – during instruction  Identifies material which needs to be clarified or re-taught  Should not be used to evaluate or grade students  Formal or Informal  Examples: –Benchmark Assessments –Progress Monitoring Measures –Quizzes –Ticket out the Door, White boards, Thumbs Up/Down

Types of Assessments  Diagnostic  Provides insights into the student's current skills in math, reading, and writing, etc.  Identifies underlying skill deficits  Used to define reason(s) for failure to make progress  Examples: –CTOPP –DRA –GORT –Diagnostic & Prescriptive Math Survey

Assessment Classifications  Benchmark Administered at grade level Three to five times per year Measures students against end of year targets Predictive of performance on end of year assessment  Universal Screening Administered at grade level Used to identify students performing at, above or below grade level Identifies students in need of additional instruction, support or assessment  Progress Monitoring Administered at instructional level with greater frequency Usually skill specific Measures progress in a skill Used to make instructional decisions  Diagnostic Administered to students performing below grade level Used to define instructional needs

Literacy Measures  Early Literacy Letter identification Phonological/Phonemic Awareness Phonics  Fluency Automaticity with component skills of reading Automaticity and accuracy of decoding  Comprehension Making meaning from text Answering Questions Summarizing/Retelling  Written Expression Fluency Mechanics Quality

Mathematics Measures  Early Numeracy Number Identification Missing Number Counting Quantity Discrimination  Computation Fluency and accuracy with computation  Problem Solving Concepts and Applications

Behavior Measures  Behavior Data Attendance Referrals to office Detentions Suspensions Expulsions  Location of Incidents  Outcome of Incidents

Take Stock of Where We Are  List all of the meetings that take place in your school.  Examples: IST CST Data Meetings Faculty SAP Team Meetings ER/IEP

Define Each Meeting  What students are being discussed?  What data are “on the table” for the meeting?  What results from the meeting?

Data Analysis Teaming in an RtII Framework

Teaming Principles  Collaborative  Focused and analytical  Structured (time, place, etc.)  Scheduled in advance  Standard agenda  Facilitated

Data Teaming is… Data Teaming is… Staff members working together to…  Access critical data on all students’ performance related to achievement of standards

Building-Wide Teaming  View skills critical to meeting standards: Identify how many (%) students have attained skill (proficient/advanced). Identify how many (%) students are developing the skill (basic). Identify how many (%) students are deficient in the skill (below basic).  Scrutinize patterns in school data to inform core instruction and plan adjustments  Set measurable school goals

Building Wide Data Meetings Schedule:After school-wide assessments Participants:All professional staff Facilitator:Building administrator or leader Data: PSSA, End of year 4Sight, PVAAS Time:2 hours (or more)

Preparation Before the Meeting  Facilitator:  School-wide data prepared in a teacher-friendly format and sent to teachers in advance Graphs best No student names No teacher names Longitudinal data if available for comparison  Participants:  Review data prior to meeting  Be prepared to share your insights

Outcome  Monitor fidelity of core instruction Provide training or support needed for implementation of core curriculum  Set school-wide goals and plan to achieve them  Look for trends within and across grades  Reflection

Grade Level Teaming  View skills critical to meeting standards: Identify how many (%) students have attained skill (established). Identify how many (%) students are developing the skill (emerging). Identify how many (%) students are deficient in the skill (deficit).  Scrutinize core instruction and adjust based on assessment data  Set measurable goals to close the gap  Identify and implement research-based instructional strategies/interventions

Grade Level Data Meetings Schedule: After any common grade level assessment Participants: All staff working with the grade level (general and special education teachers, specialists, coaches, administrator, etc.) Facilitator:Rotates among team members Data:4Sight, DIBELS, Aimsweb, etc. Time:30-45 minutes

Preparation Before the Meeting  Facilitator:  Prepares data in a teacher-friendly format  Data/Agenda sent to teachers in advance  Remind participants of roles assigned for each meeting  Participants:  Review data prior to meeting  Anticipate target skill and bring ideas to share

Outcomes  Identification of possible weaknesses in core instruction and adjust accordingly  Common grade level goals  Selection of instructional strategies, plan for use, differentiation  Provide training or support needed for implementation  Plan assessment to document student response  Monitor fidelity of strategy use  Share ownership and responsibility

Intervention Teaming  Establish/adjust intervention group assignments  Access grade level and progress monitoring data  Analyze data and find which students are or are not responding to interventions (look for trends)  Responders stay in intervention, change groups or move down a tier  Non-Responders adjust intervention, change groups or move up a tier  Scrutinize interventions and adjust based on assessment data  Consider other assessments  Set new targets/goals as appropriate

Intervention Level Data Meetings Schedule:Every 4 to 6 weeks Participants: Intervention providers, Grade level teachers, Reading and/or Math specialists, Principal Others as appropriate: special education teachers, speech and language clinician, literacy/math coach, school psychologist, etc. Facilitator:Rotates among team members Data: Progress Monitoring Data, Benchmark Data Time:30-45 minutes

Preparation Before the Meeting  Facilitator  Prepares standard agenda  Participants:  Progress monitoring data for assigned students  List of interventions and strategies being used  Targets for students  Concerns or questions for discussion

Outcomes  Examine data regarding student progress  Adjust intervention programs and strategies for groups or individuals  Determine need for additional data (diagnostic)  Consider referral for evaluation

What We Need: TASK  T ime  A ttitude  Respectful, positive  Student-centered  Non-judgmental  Non-evaluative  S trategies  K now-how (to work together)