Safety assessment. Safety and efficacy What is the most important? You can’t have one without the other! Equally important but with very different characteristics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
Advertisements

Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING
ADVANCED STATISTICS FOR MEDICAL STUDIES Mwarumba Mwavita, Ph.D. School of Educational Studies Research Evaluation Measurement and Statistics (REMS) Oklahoma.
Understanding Statistics in Research Articles Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management Assistant Professor,
Serious Adverse Events
Pharmacovigilance Dr. Muiris Dowling,
Basic Design Consideration. Previous Lecture Definition of a clinical trial The drug development process How different aspects of the effects of a drug.
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
Update: 21 CFR PART 312 FDA Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs
1 CLINICAL CHEMISTRY-2 (MLT 302) LIVER FUNCTION AND THE BILIARY TRACT LECTURE FOUR Dr. Essam H. Aljiffri.
Fulfilling the Promise of Medicine Together New FDA Safety Reporting Requirements 2010 John McLane, Ph.D. COO & Vice President Clinical and Regulatory.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of DTG at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL.
Statistics for Health Care
Sample Size Determination Ziad Taib March 7, 2014.
Basic Pharmacovigilance Training
Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) Trial Adverse Event Reporting Catherine Dillon.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Ezetimibe Coadministered with Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Heart.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Gil Harari Statistical considerations in clinical trials
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
1 Nuts and Bolts of Safety Reporting The Role of the CRO Dr. Noa Lowenton Spier Pharma-Clinical S.A.G.
H. Lundbeck A/S21-Sep-151 Pharmacovigilance during clinical development SAE reporting, ASUR and PSUR IFF Seminar, 21. February 2007.
ESTIMATION. STATISTICAL INFERENCE It is the procedure where inference about a population is made on the basis of the results obtained from a sample drawn.
Collecting data in clinic.  Aim of BADBIR  Definition of Adverse Events  Adverse events in BADBIR  Adverse event recording in hospital case notes.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF DRUGS Phase II May Adverse Drug Reaction An adverse reaction to a drug is a harmful or unintended response. ADRs are claimed.
CTD, Safety Tanja Braakman Genzyme Europe BV Pharmacovigilance Department.
AE/SAE/EAE Identification and Reporting AE/SAE/EAE Identification and Reporting.
Copyright © 2011 Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd SERAPHIN: RESULTS FROM A LANDMARK STUDY.
VIOXX ™ Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting February 8, 2001 Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA.
RATES AND RISK Daniel E. Ford, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Introduction to Clinical Research July 12, 2010.
EAE Training EAE Reporting and Assessment Overview DAIDS Regional Training Event, Regulatory Compliance Center Kampala, Uganda, September 2009 DAIDS Regional.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Medical Statistics as a science
Critical Appraisal of an Article on HARM. Clinical Question Is there potential harm after administering allopurinol in patients with gout and azotemia?
INPULSIS® trial design and baseline characteristics
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
IMPORTANCE OF STATISTICS MR.CHITHRAVEL.V ASST.PROFESSOR ACN.
Teriparatide or LY Eli Lilly & Company NDA Metabolic-Endocrine Drugs Metabolic-Endocrine Drugs Advisory Committee Advisory Committee Bethesda,
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Start-up Meeting March 25, 2010 Kingston, ON.
Role of Site Investigator Ensure subject safety is protected & well-managed Full compliance with requirements of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Conduct the.
C-1 Safety Results S. aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Study Gloria Vigliani, M.D. Vice President, Medical Strategy Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
From: PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseaseJanuary 2014 Presented by Pavitra Charoensrisakkul and Peeraya Permkarnjaroen 3 rd year medical cadet Phramongkutklao.
Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano.
Measures of disease frequency Simon Thornley. Measures of Effect and Disease Frequency Aims – To define and describe the uses of common epidemiological.
REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS AND COMPLETING THE REPORT FORM
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Safety and tolerability
Assessing expectedness of an adverse event
8. Causality assessment:
Expedited Adverse Event Reporting Requirements
Statistical Considerations on the Evaluation of Imbalances of Adverse Events in Randomized Clinical Trials Haijun Ma, Chunlei Ke, Qi Jiang, and Steven.
3. Key definitions Multi-partner training package on active TB drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) July 2016.
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Expedited Adverse Event Reporting Requirements
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
WHAT TO DO IF A PATIENT DEVELOPS AN UNEXPECTED PROBLEM?
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Ramy Abdelrahman, MD Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health (DPMH)
Interpreting Epidemiologic Results.
Safety analysis of clinical trials in NDA submissions JSM 2018, Jul
ESTIMATION.
Adverse Event Reporting _____________________________
Dr Tim England TICH-2 SAE adjudicator
Adverse Event Analysis
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

Safety assessment

Safety and efficacy What is the most important? You can’t have one without the other! Equally important but with very different characteristics

Safety and efficacy Hypotheses for efficacy are (should be) well-defined Clinical trials are most often dimensioned for the primary efficacy variable Hypotheses concerning safety assessments are less well-defined Dimensioning for safety would require very large studies, since also very rare events could be of outmost importance

Safety assessments We don’t know what we are looking for, just that we will not like it when we find it! Adverse events Laboratory data (bilirubin, creatinine, calcium, haemoglobin,…) Vital signs (pulse, blood pressure) ECG Physical examination (skin, head and neck, lungs,…)

Extent of exposure How many? –Number of patients exposed to drug How long? –Duration of exposure How much? –Dose Toxicity =f (exposure)

Extent of exposure: Examples Number of subjectsNumber of dosesDoses received 8260 mg mg mg mg mg Treatment A (n = 1698) Treatment B (n = 1699) Duration (patient years)Total Duration (days)Total Mean SD Range

Terminology for adverse events Adverse event Adverse experience Serious adverse event Severe adverse event Risk Significant adverse event Toxicities Side effect Adverse drug reaction

Adverse event Definition (ICH): An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigational subject administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not it is related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

Serious adverse event Definition (ICH): A serious adverse event or reaction is any untoward medical occurrence that any dose: –Results in death –Is life-threatening –Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalisation –Results in persistent of significant disability/incapacity –Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect

Coding of adverse events Dictionaries needed in order to group similar events Many different dictionaries available: Coding Symbols for a Theaurus of a Adverse Reaction Term (COSTART) World Health Orginasation Adverse Reaction Terminology (WHOART) Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA)

MedDRA coding MedDRA Structure Hierarchy System Organ Class (SOC) High Level Group Term (HLGT) High Level Term (HLT) Preferred Term (PT) Lowest Level Term (LLT) Example Infections and infestations Infections – pathogen unspecified Upper respiratory tract infections Nasopharyngitis Common cold

Types of adverse events Different types of events: Absorbing events (e.g. death) –Probability of occurrence Recurrent events with negligible duration (e.g. ) –Number of events Recurrent events with nonnegligible duration (e.g. headache) –Proportion of time affected Different measures and analysis are relevant!

Analysis of adverse events Descriptive statistics often the primary approach –Number and proportion of AEs –Number and proportion of patients with AEs Rates of occurrence of adverse events –Number of events per patient years Relative risks used to compare treatments –Hazard rate –Stratified Mantel-Haenszel estimate of relative risk

Treatment A N = 87 Treatment B N = 83 Number (%) of patients with AE Any AE57 (65.5%)64 (77.1%) SAE with outcome death0 (0%)1 (1.2%) SAE5 (5.7%)4 (4.8%) AE leading to discontinuation of study drug4 (4.6%)11 (13.3%) AE leading to discontinuation of study0 (0%) Total number of AEs Any AE SAE65 Number (%) of patients with at least one AE and total number of AEs

Analysis of adverse events Treatment A N = 87 Treatment B N = 83 Patients with any SAE 5 (5.7%)4 (4.8%) Preferred term Back pain 1 (1.1%)1 (1.2%) Cerebrovascular accident 1 (1.1%) Hypotension 2 (2.3%)1 (1.2%) Lower limb fracture 1 (1.2%) Major depression 1 (1.1%) Pneumonia 1 (1.1%)2 (2.4%) Number (%) of patients with SAEs by preferred term

Estimating relative risk Assume k trials, each with two treatments (A and B). The relative risk of a certain (absorbing!) event is assumed to be the same in each trial and the number of events are assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. –i = 1,…,k (trials); j = A,B (treatments) –E ij = number of events in trial i on treatment j –e ij = observed number of events in trial i on treatment j –t ij = total exposure time in trial i on treatment j –E ij Po(λ ij t ij ) –Var[E ij ] = λ ij t ij –λ ij = e ij / t ij

The Mantel-Haenszel estimate Mantel-Haenszel estimate (stratified by trial) of the common relative risk, RR MH : λ j = Σ i w i · λ ij / Σ i w i w i = 2 / (1/t iA + 1/t iB ) RR MH = λ A / λ B log RR MH = log λ A – log λ B

Variance Variance of the Mantel-Haenszel estimate : Var [λ j ] = (Σ i w i 2 · e ij / t ij 2 ) / (Σ i w i ) 2 Var [log λ j ] = 1/λ j 2 · Var [λ j ] = (Σ i w i 2 · e ij / t ij 2 ) / (Σ i w i · e ij / t ij ) 2

Confidence intervals Confidence intervals: CI λ j = λ j ± 1.96 · (Var [λ j ]) 1/2 CI λ A - λ B = λ A - λ B ± 1.96 · (Var [λ A ] + Var [λ B ]) 1/2 CI logRR MH = log λ A - log λ B ± 1.96 · (Var [log λ A ] + Var [log λ B ]) 1/2 CI RR MH = λ A / λ B · exp { ±1.96 · (Var [log λ A ] + Var [log λ B ]) 1/2 }

Example Treatment ATreatment B NEventsExposure (pt yrs) Event rate (per pt yr) NEventsExposure (pt yrs) Event rate (per pt yr) Trial Trial Trial Trial Summary of exposure and number of patients with renal impairment

Example Estimate95% confidence interval Treatment A0.037[0.025, 0.056] Treatment B0.026[0.014, 0.048] Estimate95% confidence interval Risk difference (A-B)0.011[ , ] Relative risk (A versus B)1.44[0.68, 3.05] Mantel-Haenszel estimates of the event rate (per pt yr) for renal impairment Mantel-Haenszel estimates of the risk for renal impairment for treatment A compared to treatment B

Lab Variable = Variable indicating biological function observed from biological sample observed from biological sample (analysed in a lab) (analysed in a lab) Safety variables Adverse Events Adverse Events Vital signs (pulse, weight, blood pressure) Vital signs (pulse, weight, blood pressure) Labvariables by organ class Labvariables by organ class

Clinical chemistryHaematology aspartate aminotransferase, alanine haemoglobin, aminotransferase, alkaline haptoglobin, leukocyte count, thrombocyte phosphatase, bilirubin (total), count, reticulocyte count, leukocyte creatinine, thyroid stimulating differential count, mean corpuscular hormone, thyroxin (free), urate, albumin, C-reactive protein volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration glucose, sodium, potassium, calcium (albumin corrected), creatine kinaseUrinalysis protein, glucose, haemoglobin

Reference limits Lower limit of normal Upper limit of normal May differ between males, females, agegroups Created from a population data set, often specific to each lab leading to different labs having different reference limits Used to indicate abnormal values.

What are we looking for? Shift in population agerage Shift in population agerage Reactions in few sensitive patients Reactions in few sensitive patients Long term gradual effects Long term gradual effects Actue toxic reactios Actue toxic reactios

Examples An increase in the percentage of patients with ALT>3*ULN indicates potential liver issues developing over time. No indication of acute effect of a single dose on the liver.

Examples Liver values for a single patient

Pre-doseLast visit a Change b Lab variable (unit)TreatmentMean (SD) ALT (µkat/L )AZDXXXX 25 mg0.51 (0.30)0.52 (0.30)0.01 (0.22) AZDXXXX50 mg0.50 (0.27)0.54 (0.30)0.05 (0.21) AZDXXXX5 75 mg0.51 (0.29)0.53 (0.34)0.02 (0.22) AST (µkat/L )AZDXXXX5 25 mg0.41 (0.20)0.41 (0.15)0.00 (0.17) AZDXXXX5 50 mg0.39 (0.14)0.42 (0.18)0.03 (0.13) AZDXXXX5 75 mg0.40 (0.15)0.41 (0.16)0.01 (0.14) ALP (µkat/L )AZDXXXX5 25 mg1.37 (0.40)1.34 (0.39)-0.03 (0.18) AZDXXXX5 50 mg1.35 (0.40)1.34 (0.39)-0.01 (0.17) AZDXXXX5 75 mg1.36 (0.39)1.33 (0.37)-0.02 (0.19) CK (µkat/L )AZDXXXX5 25 mg2.84 (14.54)2.18 (1.57)-0.66 (14.36) AZDXXXX5 50 mg2.20 (1.55)2.17 (1.77)-0.03 (1.81) AZDXXXX5 75 mg2.13 (1.44)2.14 (1.37)0.01 (1.37) Creatinine (µmol/L )AZDXXXX5 25 mg78.80 (17.45)77.42 (16.71)-1.38 (11.00) AZDXXXX5 50 mg80.52 (18.03)78.12 (16.06)-2.40 (13.78) AZDXXXX5 75 mg80.31 (17.59)78.38 (16.48)-1.92 (10.54) Bilirubin, tot (µmol/L )AZDXXXX5 25 mg9.66 (4.53)9.56 (4.81)-0.10 (3.57) AZDXXXX5 50 mg10.29 (5.36)9.33 (4.45)-0.97 (3.82) AZDXXXX5 75 mg9.69 (4.80)8.90 (4.00)-0.79 (3.55) Sodium (mmol/L )AZDXXXX5 25 mg (2.51) (2.75)0.41 (2.90) AZDXXXX5 50 mg (2.49) (2.71)0.14 (2.70) AZDXXXX5 75 mg (2.38) (2.57)0.42 (2.75) Table 1Pre-dose and last visit observations of clinical chemistry variables, Safety Population

Issues Multiplicity – to test or not to test Multiplicity – to test or not to test Population vs individual – one patient can kill the drug Population vs individual – one patient can kill the drug Data cleaning Data cleaning What is extreme – multiplicity again What is extreme – multiplicity again