WP8: Knowledge Sharing Lead: UDE Partners: UMA, CICE, MTA KSZI, FR, RICYT Month 1 - Month 36.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

H-KNOW NMP Advanced Infrastructure for Knowledge Based Services for Buildings Restoring Project Overview FSMLR/LABEIN Dr. Mikel Sorli.

Advertisements

Managing Research and Policy Connection 16 th Metropolis Conference March 13-15, 2014.

Modeling the Way.

Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.

Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.

Linking the Fairs to the 2013 Ontario Curriculum Social Studies 1 to 6 and History and Geography 7 and 8.

Mr. Brooks Foundations of Technology.  Students will: ◦ Develop an understanding of the relationships among technologies and connections with other fields.

The Quiet Revolution in Building Design and Construction: BIM.

Community Manager A Dynamic Collaboration Solution on Heterogeneous Environment Hyeonsook Kim  2006 CUS. All rights reserved.

Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

10 December, 2013 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: DPM Meta model CWA1Page 1.

An Observatorium for Science in Society based in Social Models Kick-off meeting SISOB Kick-off Meeting.

WP5 Strategy Domenico Giardini SED ETHZ. WP5 Objectives Harmonize national implementation Integrate the European scientific community Establish Centres.

I NTRODUCING FRONTIERS Richard Walker 13 January, 2011.

DEMOLOGOS: Development Models and Logic of Socio-Economic Organization in Space Ambitions of DEMOLOGOS DEMOLOGOS seeks to bypass the limitations of mainstream.

Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.

Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?

W ORK P ACKAGE 2 C ONCEPTUAL MODEL Richard Walker 13 January, 2011.

Glenda Kruss 15 November 2013 The role of diverse types of universities in innovation for inclusive development Social science that makes a difference.

Network of Excellence in Internet Science Network of Excellence in Internet Science (EINS) Joint Workshop and 4 th Plenary Meeting Bologna June 13, 2014.

Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.

Overview of WP1 at a Glance Pierre Bonnal Engineering Department Scientist-in-Charge for CERN.

Proposal under Science With and For the Society Sofoklis A. Sotiriou.

WP4/T4.1 D4.1 Detailed Report on Indicators. Overall stragtegy Case studies Types of networks Types of impact indicators (Network) Model definition Algorithm.

Satellite Session on Social Science in prevention and vaccine research 17 th January 2013.

An Observatorium for Science in Society based in Social Models Kick-off meeting SISOB Kick-off Meeting.

The Areas of Interaction are…

Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.

Network Management FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)

Across Latitudes and Cultures Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence Durban, South Africa; September 16, 2011 General Assembly 1.

Exploring the Intentional Dimension during Software (Architecture) Design adding the “why” and the “who/where” to the “what” and the “how” Daniel Gross.

I NTRODUCING FRONTIERS Richard Walker 13 January, 2011.

Overview of Chapter The issues of evidence-based medicine reflect the question of how to apply clinical research literature: Why do disease and injury.

Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Characterization, Inventory and Monitoring of trends in indigenous livestock Dr. E. D. Ilatsia D. N. Kamiti 23-Oct-15Animal Breeding and Genomics Group1.

CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd

Case study of a successful proposal Rob Davies. Parts of a proposal Part A - Proposal Administrative Overview - forms Part B- Description of objectives.

Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.

Developing the Next Generation Science Standards.

ESPON / Social Preparatory Study on Social Aspects of EU Territorial Development Status: Interim Report Erich Dallhammer (ÖIR)

1 The FNR Foresight A participative Process. 2 Aims of the Foresight exercise Identification of National Research Priorities in the public sector with.

2 nd Knowledge Area : Project Scope Management. Importance of Good Project Scope Management 1995 CHAOS study cited user involvement, a clear project mission,

Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.

Evidence Based Decision Making The Application of Evidence Based Decision Making Within the Department of HCS January 23, 2003 Robert Thompson Deputy Minister.

AKE and other regional work, capacity building and knowledge sharing GeSCI Team Meeting 9 February 2010.

What is a research proposal? What is research?. University research is scholars working on problems that are  collective  systematic  global.

L. M. Camarinha-Matos © L. M. Camarinha-Matos WP5 – STATUS OVERVIEW WP5 meeting – Paris, June 2004 Luis M. Camarinha-Matos

Research Methods for Business

WP3 Indicators of e-learning Partners : CANEGE, Centro METID Politecnico di Milano, Polish Virtual University Thierry GARROT University of Nice Sophia.

MODEL-BASED SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES.  Models of software are used in an increasing number of projects to handle the complexity of application domains.

© The ATHENA Consortium. EM1 - Enterprise Modelling as a way to achieve Interoperability Module 3 - What interoperability problems does Enterprise.

WP4 – Policies, strategies, plans and innovative energy efficient solutions in urban transport Steering Committee Meeting Rijeka, Croatia 26/02/2015 Presented.

Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.

National Research Council Of the National Academies

An Overview of Business Research Process

NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS (NGSS) Millard E. Lightburn (Ph.D.) Science Supervisor Ms. Mary Tweedy and Ms. Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists.

Click to edit Master title style Overview of the NGSS Framework.

The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.

Science Education Collaborative.

Funded by the Library of Congress.

Chapter Two Copyright © 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Marketing Research Process.

JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, Austria, web: ISO 9001 zert.

© The InfoCitizen Consortium Project Presentation Agent based negotiation for inter- and intra-enterprise coordination employing a European Information.

Horizon 2020 Secure Societies European Info Day and Brokerage Event

Opening Gateways: A Practical Toolkit for Designing Information Access Programs Sharon S. Dawes.

Elayne Colón and Tom Dana

General presentation of SMART GROUND project

A Dual System Approach to Policy Process

This project is co-funded by the European Union

Eight research work packages:

Presentation transcript:

WP8: Knowledge Sharing Lead: UDE Partners: UMA, CICE, MTA KSZI, FR, RICYT Month 1 - Month 36

Overview  Social dimensions and models related with scientific processes with respect to knowledge sharing and knowledge flows  Research question: How the new knowledge is generated, can be identified by patterns, is spread within scientific communities, can be transferred to other areas of society  Will provide and exemplify tools and indicators (based on WP 6) to measure the social appropriation of knowledge among different actors

Specific objectives  Definition of indicators for knowledge flow and sharing in scientific communities  Identification and characterisation of examples  "Deep" (software-supported) analysis of selected examples  Provision of guidelines for decision makers. WP8 will be aware of possible effects between knowledge sharing and mobility, productivity and development of new disciplinary fields to make results comparable with the other case studies.

T8.1: Taxonomy of indicators for knowledge flow and sharing 1.Critical review of existing approaches to modeling knowledge flow and sharing in scientific communities 2.Identification of the main types of  actors and relationships,  communication channels,  "knowledge objects" (documents or data types) 3.Integration in a taxonomy of specific indicators Additional aspects: distinction formal/informal knowledge; including meta knowledge “who is doing what” R: RICYT (2PM) C: UDE (2PM), MTA (2PM), FR (2PM), CICE (1PM)

T8.2: Ident. and first charact. of example communities 1.Identify interesting communities for case study by:  innovativeness  social and scientific relevance  accessibility to data and results 2.Description of the communities by the taxonomy (8.1) baseline for systematic theoretical sampling of the cases for the deeper analysis Preferred: life sciences and nanotechnology, e.g. CENIDE UDE and Gene Ontology R: UDE (2PM). C: RICYT (2PM), FR (1PM)

T8.3: Software-based "deep" analysis 1.Identify relevant data sources 2.Access data by inventory from WP6 3.SNA and semantic analysis of data considering dynamic (time dimension) 4.Characterize by structural and process patterns 5.Adapt and verify data format (semantic, structural, dynamic) 6.Evaluate and interpret considering indicators from WP4 R: UDE (2PM) C: UMA (2PM), CICE (1PM), FR (1PM), RICYT (1PM)

T8.4: Best practices and recommendations Characterize best practices in the evolution of scientific communities to support:  strategic decisions around scientific innovations  right balance between informal and formal science  right sense of with whom one should share knowledge at which phase of research or growth of the field R: UDE (2PM) C: FR (2PM), RICYT (2PM), CICE (1PM), MTA (1PM)

Deliverables  8.1 Report on data collection and specification of needs for the construction of mobility indicators (RP:UDE,RV:CICE, C: all inv. / M8)  8.2 Preliminary report - taxonomy and examples (RP: UDE, RV: RICYT, C: all inv. / M30)  8.3 Analysis report (RP: UDE, RV: FR, C: all inv. / M26)  8.4 Guideline for decision makers for knowledge sharing (RP: UDE, RV: CICE, C: all inv. / M30)

WP dependencies