EPAA Annual Conference Regulatory acceptance and implementation of 3Rs approaches Plant protection products Patricia Brunko European Commission - DG SANCO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SARQA/DKG Conference 3-4 October SARQA/DKG Conference 3-4 OCTOBER 2002 Annex 13 Update An Industry Perspective Michael J Cooke Director, Global.
Advertisements

What Can SAFEFOODERA do for EFSA? GEOFFREY PODGER Executive Director EFSA.
Slide 1 Workshop on NAPs and IPM – Brussels, January 2009 FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE ON THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF PESTICIDES - What is new for Member States.
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
EPAA Conference 5 November 2007 Georgette LALIS Enterprise and Industry DG European Commission The international dimension of regulatory acceptance.
1 European Commission, DGENV.D. 3 Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes.
EPAA Annual Conference 2007 Regulatory Acceptance and Implementation of 3Rs approaches Challenges for industry and regulators Dr. Hennicke Kamp BASF Aktiengesellschaft.
EPAA Annual conference November Regulatory acceptance of alternative approaches for pharmaceuticals Jean-Marc Vidal Safety & Efficacy of Human Medicines.
Introduction to Article 45 (5) of the CLP Regulation
1 Development, Implementation and Use of Alternative Test Methods in Regulatory Hazard Assessment in OECD Member countries Herman B.W.M.Koëter, Principal.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry # European Standardisation: Proposal for a Regulation Presentation to IMCO – 5 October 2011 European Commission.
Francesca Arena European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate General Future data requirements related to bees for the authorisation of plant protection.
Revision of Regulation 1107/2009 & Regulation 396/2005
Regulation of Food Additives in the EU
MRL implementation process Learning from 5 years of implementation of Regulation 396/2005 ResEG proposal – March 13th, 2013.
Karin Nienstedt - DG SANTE / E3
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers ECPA/ECCA Regulatory conference on March 2014 Developments in the area of pesticide residues – Commission.
1 Reform of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications What it means for Access to Emergency Services Reform of the EU regulatory framework.
Bénédicte Vagenende Pesticides Unit Crop Protection European Regulatory Conference, March 2015 EFSA’s role in the evaluation of active substances 1.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Improving the efficiency of the regulatory process Rob Mason Head of Regulatory Policy Chemicals.
Value of in vitro assays in your REACH dossier Frédérique van Acker 18 November 2014.
STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICAL DEVICE LEGISLATION 3rd National Conference on Medical devices Roma, 13th April 2010 Sabine Lecrenier Head.
“The Revision of the PARNUTS Directive”
Health and Safety Executive Feedback from Post-Approval Issues Group Darren Flynn Chemicals Regulation Directorate.
AUDACE & PMFAI – Recent developments in EU Regulations – Kuala Lumpur, Malayia January
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Registration Report: General aspects M. Trybou Federal Public Service of.
June 2008 Proposal for a Regulation to replace Directive 91/414/EEC July 2008 T Lyall.
EU Food/Feed Safety Rules Industry Information Session June 16, 2005 Presented by AAFC.
Delegated Acts and Implementing Acts in Food Law
Preparing for REACH implementation: The RIP process Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Institute for Health and Consumer Protection DG Joint Research Centre.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
Advisory group on fruit and vegetables 7 March 2008
1 Legislation and Institutional/Administrative Capacities - PLANT PROTECTION - - PLANT PROTECTION - Sub-Committee for Agriculture and Fishery European.
REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
European Commission - DG Environment Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes “Opportunities and challenges” Berlin,
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Commission view on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 ECPA/ECCA Brussels Regulatory Conference.
Import controls Timothy McKillen Belfast Port Health
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
Bangkok A Strong Generic Competition for a Sustainable Agriculture and an Innovative Dominant Industry.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Registration Report Part Residues Frédéric Joris and Bruno Dujardin Federal.
EU Regulation on type-approval of hydrogen vehicles HFCV GTR – 4th SGS meeting Tokyo, Japan, September 2008 Ferenc PEKÁR Automotive Industry Unit.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Horizon 2020 Ian Devine European Advisor – UK Research Office University of Manchester, 11 September 2014.
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Management of hazards in feed 2.
Workshop on Standard operating procedures in the phytosanitary field, September Belgrad Serbia Monica Maria COJANU, Romania.
October 2010 Implementing Regulations on pesticide statistics Johan Selenius.
New data collection-State of play Residues of Veterinary Medicinal Products in live animals and animal products Anca Stoicescu, Scientific Officer Zagreb,
1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.
EFSA Trusted science for safe food Guilhem de Sèze
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Multinational collaboration in the Authorisation of VMPs: the EU approach VICH Outreach Forum Tokyo, Nov 2017 Noel Joseph European Commission.
Vytenis Andriukaitis European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety
UA – Same biocidal product SPC translation review
OECD Principles of GLP and Test Guidelines
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
PEST Committee hearing, 6 September 2018 Stakeholders' recommendations on the current EU regulation on the approval of plant protection products Franziska.
PEST Committee hearing, 6 September 2018 Stakeholders' recommendations on the current EU regulation on the approval of plant protection products Franziska.
Minor Uses Developments in the European Union
Health and Consumer Protection Sector: Biotechnology
Review of the WFD priority substances list
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
Delegated and Implementing Acts
Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC
Revision of the technical annexes of the BPR
13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero
Update on EU draft Regulation
Presentation transcript:

EPAA Annual Conference Regulatory acceptance and implementation of 3Rs approaches Plant protection products Patricia Brunko European Commission - DG SANCO Unit E3 – Chemicals, contaminants and pesticides 5 November 2007

DIRECTIVE 91/414/EEC Approval of active substances at EU levelApproval of active substances at EU level Authorisation of plant protection products at Member State levelAuthorisation of plant protection products at Member State level Harmonised DATA REQUIREMENTS Currently under revisionCurrently under revision Annex II / Annex IIIAnnex II / Annex III Physical and chemical properties (Dir 94/37/EC) Physical and chemical properties (Dir 94/37/EC) Analytical methods (Dir 94/46/EC) Analytical methods (Dir 94/46/EC) Efficacy data (Dir 93/71/EC) Efficacy data (Dir 93/71/EC) Toxicogical studies (Dir 94/79/EC) Toxicogical studies (Dir 94/79/EC) Residues in or on treated products, food and feed (Dir 96/68/EC) Residues in or on treated products, food and feed (Dir 96/68/EC) Fate and behaviour in the environment (Dir 95/36/EC) Fate and behaviour in the environment (Dir 95/36/EC) Ecotoxicological studies (Dir 96/12/EC) Ecotoxicological studies (Dir 96/12/EC)

PROPOSAL FOR A NEW REGULATION Will replace Directive 91/414/EEC Will incorporate data requirements of Directive 91/414/EEC Will incorporate data requirements of Directive 91/414/EEC Currently under co-decision procedure Currently under co-decision procedure

PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION replacing Directive 91/414/EEC Implementation of 3Rs approaches PROHIBITION OF DUPLICATIVE VERTEBRATE TESTING PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE TESTING

PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION replacing Directive 91/414/EEC Rules should be laid down to avoid duplication of tests and studies. In particular, repetition of studies involving vertebrates should be prohibited. There should be an obligation to allow access to studies on vertebrates.Rules should be laid down to avoid duplication of tests and studies. In particular, repetition of studies involving vertebrates should be prohibited. There should be an obligation to allow access to studies on vertebrates. To allow operators to know what studies have been carried out by others, EFSA makes summary dossier available + Member States keep a list of such studies.To allow operators to know what studies have been carried out by others, EFSA makes summary dossier available + Member States keep a list of such studies. PROHIBITION OF DUPLICATIVE VERTEBRATE TESTING Recital 32 + Art Art Art. 59

PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION replacing Directive 91/414/EEC PROHIBITION OF DUPLICATIVE VERTEBRATE TESTING Article 59 - Sharing of tests and studies involving vertebrate animals Tests and studies involving vertebrate animals shall not be repeated.Tests and studies involving vertebrate animals shall not be repeated. Industry:Industry: Before undertaking tests and studies, verify that they have not already been performed or initiated. Before undertaking tests and studies, verify that they have not already been performed or initiated. Every effort to share tests and studies involving vertebrate animals. Every effort to share tests and studies involving vertebrate animals. Inform competent authorities, if no agreement for test sharing. Inform competent authorities, if no agreement for test sharing. Competent authorities:Competent authorities: Shall use the already available tests and studies. Shall use the already available tests and studies. National Courts to determine the costs to be shared.National Courts to determine the costs to be shared.

PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION replacing Directive 91/414/EEC PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE TESTING In order to avoid animal testing, testing on vertebrate animals for the purposes of this Regulation should be undertaken only as a last resort. This Regulation, and the legislation establishing data requirements for active substances, plant protection products, safeners and synergists, should ensure that testing on vertebrate animals is minimised and that double-testing is avoided, and promote the use of non-animal test methods and intelligent testing strategies. EP amendment for an additional recital On-going revision of data requirements in line with this objective

PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION replacing Directive 91/414/EEC PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE TESTING The summary dossier shall include the following: […] […] for each test or study involving vertebrate animals, a justification of the steps taken to avoid animal testing and duplicative testing on vertebrate animals. for each test or study involving vertebrate animals, a justification of the steps taken to avoid animal testing and duplicative testing on vertebrate animals. EP amendment for additional requirement in Art 8 (Dossiers)

Revision of data requirements of Directive 91/414/EEC Drafts developed from 2002 in close consultation with Member States and industry Drafts developed from 2002 in close consultation with Member States and industry EFSA opinion EFSA opinion Revision Revision One single directive for all sections One single directive for all sections New data requirements to be transferred into new Regulation New data requirements to be transferred into new Regulation

Revision of data requirements of Directive 91/414/EEC Implementation of 3Rs approaches TIERED APPROACH/ DELETION PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE TESTING AVOID REPETITION OF ANIMAL TESTING

PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE TESTING Toxicology section (draft May 2007) Revision of data requirements of Directive 91/414/EEC non-test methods reduction and refinement methods reduction and refinement methods Tests on animals to be undertaken only where no other alternatives are possibleTests on animals to be undertaken only where no other alternatives are possible When no alternatives are available, other appropriate testing strategies shall be used to keep the number of animals used to a minimum. These include:When no alternatives are available, other appropriate testing strategies shall be used to keep the number of animals used to a minimum. These include:

AVOID REPETITION OF ANIMAL TESTING Toxicology section (draft May 2007) Studies conducted in the past, although not fully compliant with todays standards and GLP, may be integrated into the assessment, if scientifically valid, thereby removing the need for repeating animal tests, especially for carcinogenicity and reprotoxicity studies. Revision of data requirements of Directive 91/414/EEC

Toxicology section (draft May 2007) Tiered approach applied throughout the sectionTiered approach applied throughout the section Revision of data requirements of Directive 91/414/EEC Deletion/replacement of studies:Deletion/replacement of studies: Short term toxicity: deletion of the 1-Year dog studyShort term toxicity: deletion of the 1-Year dog study Genotoxicity: deletion of the rodent dominant lethal assayGenotoxicity: deletion of the rodent dominant lethal assay Multi-generation studies: F1-extended one generation study to be considered as alternative approach to multi-generation study as soon as developed and validated.Multi-generation studies: F1-extended one generation study to be considered as alternative approach to multi-generation study as soon as developed and validated. TIERED APPROACH/ DELETION

CONCLUSION Replacement by regulatory acceptance of alternative methods Replacement by regulatory acceptance of alternative methods+ Reduction and Refinement by prohibition of duplicative vertebrate testing + testing strategy Reduction and Refinement by prohibition of duplicative vertebrate testing + testing strategy Proposal for a Regulation replacing Directive 91/414/EEC Draft Data requirements to Directive 91/414/EEC