VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Stepan Potiyenko ISS Sr.SW Developer.
School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology.
Managing the Information Technology Resource Jerry N. Luftman
Software Project Transition Planning
EMIS Chapter 6. EMIS Chapter 6 EMIS Chapter 6 Fig 6.2 shows where the SEMP fits into the earliest program stages. Fig 6.5 has an.
Chapter 5: Project Scope Management
Systems Engineering Management
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Project Execution.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
FIELDS iCDR Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Introduction 1Peter Harvey.
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
From Research Prototype to Production
Software System Engineering: A tutorial
PPMT CE-408T Engr. Faisal ur Rehman CED N-W.F.P UET P.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Rev. 0 CONFIDENTIAL Mod.19 02/00 Rev.2 Mobile Terminals S.p.A. Trieste Author: M.Fragiacomo, D.Protti, M.Torelli 31 Project Idea Feasibility.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
Configuration Management Non Government Std: EIA Standard-649 “A management process for establishing and maintaining consistency of a product’s performance,
Refined ECSS Software Process Model Elements SD-TN-AI-0570, Issue 5 APPENDIX D.
Project Life Cycle.
Apply Project Scope Management Techniques Project Scope Processes – Part 2 Certificate IV in Project Management Qualification Code BSB41507 Unit.
Develop Project Charter
Request for Proposal (RFP)
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
DPE CSSW Process Model Annex A WP-400 ECSS Case Study.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 1 Diploma of Project Management.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
Lesson 1: Examining Professional Project Management Topic 1A: Identify Project Management Processes.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
Project management Topic 1 Project management principles.
Configuration Management Romuald Duperrier Head of Systems Engineering Division April 22, 2015.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Apply Project Scope Management Techniques Project Scope Processes – Part 2 Week 4 Certificate IV in Project Management Qualification Code BSB41507.
Team-Based Development ISYS321 Managing the Information Systems Project.
Introduction to Project Management Darren Trofimczuk.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
BSBPMG502A Manage Project Scope Manage Project Scope Project Scope Processes Part 2 Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Supportability Design Considerations
Software and Systems Integration
Project Management Processes
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Request for Proposal (RFP)
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
Engineering Processes
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
EMIS 7307 Chapter 6.
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
Project Management Processes
HART Technologies Process Overview
Engineering Processes
CS/EE/ME 75(a) Nov. 19, 2018 Today: Prelimnary Design Review Homework.
PSS verification and validation
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Typical Project Life Cicle D. Fierro WBSWBS 0n0n Requirements Definition Production & Verification THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Phase 0 (MDR) Project scope/needs identification Identificate the project scope, final user needs, expected performance, and project constraints Develop the preliminary requirements Identify possible concepts Perform preliminary assessment of programmatic aspects (market and economic studies) Define the risk policy and perform preliminary risk assessment D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

MDR Mission (Project) Definition Review Identification of user requirements and initial concepts The primary objective of this review is to release the project statement to assess the preliminary technical requirements and programmatic aspects. THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS D. Fierro

Elaborate possible system, operations concepts and system architectures and compare these against the identified needs, to determine levels of uncertainty and risks. Develop the preliminary management plan, system engineering plan and product assurance plan for the project. Assess the technical and programmatic feasibility of the possible concepts by identifying the project constraints. Identify critical elements and propose pre development activities. Elaborate the risk assessment Propose possible adjustment solutions, including model philosophy and verification approach. Phase A (PRR) Feasibility THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS D. Fierro

PRR Preliminary Requirement Review User requirements converted into overall system requirements, project feasibility and validation of system architecture The primary objectives of this review are: Validation of System Architecture Release of the overall system requirements. Release of project sub-system func. requirem Selection of system and operations concept(s) and technical solutions, including verification approach. Confirmation of the technical and programmatic feasibility of the system concept(s). D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Phase B (SRR, PDR) Preliminary Definition Finalize the project management, engineering and product assurance plans. Establish the baseline master schedule. Elaborate the cost baseline. Conduct “trade off” studies and select the preferred system concept, together with the preferred technical solution(s). Establish a preliminary design definition for the selected system concept and retained technical solution(s). Determine the verification program including model philosophy. D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Phase B (SRR, PDR) Preliminary Definition Identify and define external interfaces. Prepare the next level specification and related business agreement documents. Initiate pre development work on critical technologies or system design areas when it is necessary to reduce the development risks. Initiate any long lead item procurement required to meet project schedule needs. Conduct reliability and safety assessment. Finalize the product tree, the work breakdown structure and the specification tree. Update the risk assessment. THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS D. Fierro

SRR System Requirements Review System technical specification established The primary objectives of this review are: Release of system requirements specifications including ext interfaces Assessment of the preliminary design vs system functional requirements. Release of preliminary management, engineering and product assurance plans. Assessment of the preliminary verification program. Release of the controlled configuration procedure D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

PDR Preliminary Design Review Preliminary design established The primary objectives of this review are: Verification of the compatibilty between design and technical solutions against project requirements. Design Analisysis, TRL Release of technical requirements on each subsystem Release of final management, engineering and product assurance plans. Release of product tree, work breakdown structure and specification tree. Release of the verification plan (including model philosophy). Development of ICD Long-lead material procurement plans D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Organization Plan D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Roles and Responsibilities The PI, Project Investigator, has overall responsibility for the direction, execution, and completion of the project. He leads the Project ensuring that the scientific goals are achieved. The PM, Project Manager, have day to day responsibility for managing the project to achieve the goals within the approved schedule and budget. He develops the Project Program and supervices the Tender definition. The PE, Project Engineer, is responsible for overall engineering, logistics, production, integration and test tasks coordination and performance. The PE has the responsibility to establish the tech. spec, controls the common interfaces, defines the overall design and establishes procedures and plans D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

The Project Controller monitor the progress of work and will provide the PM with the status of the activities. They makes periodic updates of the scheduling baseline and propose corrective actions, if necessary, to prevent and reduce any slippage that could occur during the project life. The Project Scientist, define the scientific requirements and has the responsibility of ensuring that the scientific objectives, specifications and programmes are adequately met. The AIV manager is the responsible of the final Instrument integration and logistic activities and supervises the execution of the final tests. The Documentation Manager has the responsibility of the codification, archiving and distribution of the Documentation. The DM can be in charge of the Configuration Control with the objective to establish and maintain a systematic change management process. (CIDL) Critical Item Data List Roles and Responsibilities D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Product Tree D. Fierro M1 CELL MECHANICS CELL STRUCTURE AXIAL ACTUATORS LATERAL SUPPORTS FIXED POINTS (AX. & LAT.) SAFETY SYSTEMS ELECTRONICS & SW AXIAL ACTUATORS CONTROL BOARDS AX. ACT. POWER DISTRIBUT. BOARDS HARNESS CONTROL SW AUXILIARY UNITS ADC ROTATOR CO-ROTATOR ADAPTER PROBE TECHNICAL CCDs OPTICS PRIMARY MIRROR ADC OPTICS PROBE OPTICS DUMMY OPTICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT M1 HANDLING DEVICE M1 COATING INTERFACE TOOL TCS WORKSTATION M1 ELECTRONICS CABINET THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

WBS – Main level D. Fierro COLOUR LEGENDA INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES VST TEAM ACTIVITIES THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Phase C (CDR) Detailed definition Completion of the detailed design of the system at all levels in the customer supplier chain. Production, development testing and prequalification of selected critical elements and components. Production and development testing of engineering models, as required by the model philosophy and verification approach. Completion of assembly, integration and test planning for the system and its constituent parts. Detailed definition of internal and external interfaces. Issue of preliminary user procedures. Update of the risk assessment. Made or buy definition Justification file D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

CDR Critical Design Review Detailed design established Development testing completed. D. Fierro The primary objectives of this review are: Assessment of the qualification and validation status of the critical processes. Design justification files Confirmation of compatibility with external interf. Release the final design. Release of hardware/software manufacturing procedures. Release assembly, integration and test planning. Release of user manual. THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Complete qualification testing and associated verification activities. Complete manufacturing, assembly and testing of hardware/software components/prototypes. Prepare acceptance data package Complete the operational procedures Phase D (QR, AR, ORR) Qualification & production THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS D. Fierro

QR Qualification Review Integrate and test the qualification models or prototypes. Qualification of the design The primary objectives of this review are: To confirm that the verification process has demonstrated that the design, including margins, meets the applicable requirements. To verify that the verification data package is complete at all lower levels in the customer ‐ supplier chain. To verify the acceptability of all waivers and deviations. THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS D. Fierro

Qualification and test Tables D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Verification Matrix D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

AR Acceptance Review Integrate and test the full system The primary objectives of this review are: To confirm that the verification process has demonstrated that the product is free of workmanship errors and is ready for operational use. To verify that the acceptance data package is complete at lower levels in the customer ‐ supplier chain. To verify that all deliverable products are available. To verify the “as ‐ built” product components against the required “as designed” product. To verify the acceptability of all waivers and deviations. To authorize delivery of the product. To release the certificate of acceptance. THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS D. Fierro

ORR Operational Readiness Review Operational readiness established The primary objectives of this review are: To verify readiness of the operational procedures and their compatibility with the operational environment. To verify readiness of the operations teams. To accept all system for operations Declaration of operational readiness D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Risk Areas Requirement phase. Programmatic risks are first reduced by assessing the system requirements. Excessive requirements are avoided. Development/production processes. Margin in performance may be included in the specification of subsystems. Where the performance of a subsystem can deviate from an ideal value a budget error will be calculated. Operational risks demand the following types of responses: avoidance of hazardous conditions (processes, materials, operational procedures), reduce the consequences of failure (e.g. by redundancy), management of degradation (by monitoring of condition). A Risk Register will be maintained following the PDR. Each risk source will have an “owner”, whose task it is to manage the risk D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

The primary objectives of this review are: Perform all activities in order to allow the starting of operation. Perform the commissioning activities. Perform all the operations in order to achieve the project objectives. Perform all maintenance activities to support the operations. Finalize the disposal plan. Phase E (CRR, ELR) Operation/Utilization D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

CRR Commissioning Results Review Performance fine tuning The primary objectives of this review are: Verification of the system readiness for final routine operations/utilization. Verify that all elements of the system are performing within the specified performance parameters. Approve the formal handover of the system to the project initiator or to the system operator. D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

Maintenance Table D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

ELR End of Life Review End of useful time of operation or service The primary objectives of this review are: To verify that the system has completed its useful operation or service. To ensure that all elements are configured to allow safe disposal. D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

D. Fierro Implement the disposal plan & procedures Phase F (MCR) Disposal THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS

MCR Mission Closure Review The primary objectives of this review is: To ensure that all mission disposal activities are adequately completed D. Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS