Intriguing Observations of a Failed Eruption? We present observations of a (partially) failed eruption of a magnetic flux rope following an M9.3 flare.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRACE and RHESSI observations of failed eruption of magnetic flux rope and oscillating coronal loops Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of.
Advertisements

The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.
S.L. Guglielmino eHeroes 3 rd General Meeting Davos – March, 2014 High resolution spectro-polarimetric observations of a delta spot hosting eruptive.
Analysis of a C4.1 flare occurred in a δ spot using SDO and SST data
Spatial and temporal relationships between UV continuum and hard x-ray emissions in solar flares Aaron J. Coyner and David Alexander Rice University June.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Trend of the magnetic helicity flux during the formation and the destabilization of flux ropes F. Zuccarello 1, S.L. Guglielmino 1, P. Romano 2 and F.P.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR Yingna Su 1,2 Collaborators: A. A. Van Ballegooijen 1, E. E. Deluca 1, Leon Golub 1 P. Grigis 1, B. Lites 3,
A flare compilation Lots of people including Louise Harra, Lidia van Driel Gesztelyi, Chris Goff, Sarah Matthews, Len Culhane, Cristina Mandrini, Pascal.
Multi-Wavelength Studies of Flare Activities with Solar-B ASAI Ayumi Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University Solar-B Science February 4, 2003.
X-Ray Observation and Analysis of a M1.7 Class Flare Courtney Peck Advisors: Jiong Qiu and Wenjuan Liu.
9th RHESSI Workshop, Sept. 1-5, 2009, Genova On Broken-up Spectra of RHESSI Flares Y. P. Li & W. Q. Gan Purple Mountain Observatory.
Multiwavelength Study of Magnetic Reconnection Associated with Sigmoid Eruption Chang Liu BBSO/NJIT
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
One mask to group them all, One code to find them, One file to store them all, And in a structure bind them. William (Tolkien) Simpson m.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
RHESSI OBSERVATIONS OF FLARE FOOTPOINTS AND RIBBONS H. Hudson and M. Fivian (SSL/UCB)
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Nonlinear Force Free Field Models for AR J.McTiernan, H.Hudson (SSL/UCB) T.Metcalf (LMSAL)
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
S.L. Guglielmino eHeroes Final Meeting Leuven – 8 th February 2015 Analysis of a C4.1 flare occurred in a δ spot S.L. Guglielmino 1, F. Zuccarello 1, P.
LINE OF SIGHT MAGNETIC FIELD EVOLUTION & DATA ANALYSIS Dandan Ye.
PROBA2 a Space Weather Monitor Matthew J West ESWW10 - Nov 2013.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
First Results on Solar Irradiance Variability from PROBA2/LYRA/SWAP R. Kariyappa (guest investigator), S. T. Kumar, M. Dominique, D. Berghmans, L. Dame,
Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Probing Energy Release of Solar Flares M. Prijatelj Carnegie Mellon University Advisors: B. Chen, P. Jibben (SAO)
RHESSI and Radio Imaging Observations of Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD G. Trottet, Observatoire.
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated decimetric/metric radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
1 The Astrophysical Journal, 601:L195–L198, 2004 February RAPID PENUMBRAL DECAY FOLLOWING THREE X-CLASS SOLAR FLARES H. Wang, 1,2 C. Liu, 1 J.
Pre-flare activity of M1.2 flare 김수진 1,2, 문용재 1, 김연한 1, 박영득 1, 김갑성 2 1. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute 2. Kyung Hee University.
ASAI Ayumi Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University July 12, Evolution of Flare Ribbons and Energy Release.
SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August 28, 2008, Ghent SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August.
Analysis Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares: the Importance of Spines and Separators Angela Des Jardins 1, Richard Canfield 1, Dana Longcope 1, Emily.
SH 51A-02 Evolution of the coronal magnetic structures traced by X-ray and radio emitting electrons during the large flare of 3 November 2003 N.Vilmer,
Selected highlights of SWAP observations M. Mierla 1,2,3 and SWAP team 1. Royal Observatory of Belgium 2. Institute of Geodynamics of the Romanian Academy.
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
High resolution images obtained with Solar Optical Telescope on Hinode
Direct Spatial Association of an X-Ray Flare with the Eruption of a Solar Quiescent Filament Gordon D. Holman and Adi Foord (2015) Solar Seminar on July.
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Flare Irradiance Studies with the EUV Variability Experiment on SDO R. A. Hock, F. G. Eparvier, T. N. Woods, A. R. Jones, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Pulsed Flows Along a Cusp Structure Observed with SDO/AIA B. J. Thompson 1, P. Démoulin 2, C. H. Mandrini 3, M. L. Mays 1, L. Ofman 4, S. L. Savage 1,
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University Explosive Phenomena in Magnetized Plasma – New Development.
Observations of the Thermal and Dynamic Evolution of a Solar Microflare J. W. Brosius (Catholic U. at NASA’s GSFC) G. D. Holman (NASA/GSFC)
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR Yingna Su 1,2 Collaborators: A. A. Van Ballegooijen 1, E. E. Deluca 1, Leon Golub 1 P. Grigis 1, B. Lites 3,
Mid-term Periodicities of the LYRA data spectrum
Dong Li Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS
HXR emission and flare ribbon expansion – X3.8 flare of 17-Jan-2005
Multiwavelength Study of Solar Flares Chang Liu Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Seminar Day November 2, 2007.
Combining SWAP and LYRA observations
RHESSI Working Group 4 Program – Taos workshop
Phillip Chamberlin Solar Flares (303) University of Colorado
Magnetic Topology of the 29 October 2003 X10 Flare
The CME-Flare Relationship in Homologous Eruptive Events
Evolution of Ha Flare Kernels and Energy Release
Teriaca, et al (2003) ApJ, 588, SOHO/CDS HIDA/DST 2002 campaign
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release
GOES/RHESSI Overview M1.5/1 N flare from the outskirts of AR 9973
Nonthermal Electrons in an Ejecta Associated with a Solar Flare
Presentation transcript:

Intriguing Observations of a Failed Eruption? We present observations of a (partially) failed eruption of a magnetic flux rope following an M9.3 flare on 24 October 2013 around 00:05. Figure 1. shows a PROBA2 SWAP 171Å image of the source active region (AR A), where the initial flare was observed. The flare was accompanied by a destabilization of the surrounding field and intriguing flows. During the initial stages of the eruption multi-thermal material trapped on the erupting field was observed to rise before abruptly changing direction and flowing to the adjacent AR (B). There was no clear accompanying CME signature observed in SOHO LASCO C2 observations. The flare produced irradiances over 5 W m -2 in the Zirconium channel (6-20 nm + a contribution <2 nm) of the PROBA2 LYRA Radiometer (see Figure 2). West, M.J. 1, Zuccarello, F. 2,3, Seaton, D. 1, Rachmeler, L. 1, Ryan, D 1, Mierla, M 1 and Vansintjan, R 1 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium (Belgium) 2 Leuven (Belgium) 3 Obs. Paris-Meudon (France) In Figure 3 material is seen to emerge from AR (A) around 00:20 UT before abruptly changing direction around 00:50 UT, and flowing towards AR (B). The final flow speeds are ~271±42 km s -1. We constructed a field line extrapolation of the surrounding field around the time of the eruption, based on the methods described in Alissandrakis (1981), also see Zuccarello (2011). The reconstructed topology is shown in Figure 4. The two ARs are highlighted by the red bipolar field lines. The overlying fields are connected to a null point located between the ARs. The material erupting from AR (A) may interact with the overlying (brown) field lines, which are restructured through a series of magnetic reconnections. The material then follows the new topology to footpoints B and C indicated in Figure 4 (ii). The material flowing towards the footpoints can be seen in Figures 3 (iv) and (v). A brief analysis of RHESSI data (See Figure 5) reveals several peaks in the and 6-12 keV bandpass observations. These peaks correlate with brightenings observed around the time of the change in direction of the erupting material. This may be evidence of the field lines restructuring and reconnecting. Further analysis is required. Figure 6. shows the post eruption corona and transition region in multiple bandpasses of AIA, showing that the erupting material had a broad temperature and energy range. Figure 2. PROBA2 LYRA aluminum (blue) and zirconium (black) irradiance curves showing the magnitude of the associated M9.3 flare. Figure 6. SDO AIA images. (i) 170Å – 5×10 3 K; (ii) 304Å – 5×10 4 K; (iii) 160Å – 5×10 3 K - 1×10 5 K; (iv) 171Å – 6.3×10 5 K; (v) 193Å – 1.2×10 6 K; (vi) 211Å – 2×10 6 K; (vii) 335Å – 2.5×10 6 K; (viii) 94Å – 6.3×10 6 K; (ix) 131Å – 4.0× ×10 7 K and (x) HMI magnetogram at ~21-Oct :00. The erupting material can be seen emerging from AR (A) in all EUV band passes. Figure 1. PROBA2 SWAP Image of the failed eruption of 24 Oct The flare occurred in AR (A). The eruption flows started in AR (A), and later connected to AR (B). The grey inset shows a running difference image. (A) (B) 00:06 UT - Flare occurs around 00:05 UT in AR (A). AR becomes active with several down-flows observed. 00:26 UT - The eruption emerges from AR (A). Connections with AR (B) already seen. 00:34 UT - The eruption slows and the eruptive material begins to change direction. 01:13 UT - The eruptive material is abruptly changes direction. This may be due to new magnetic connectivities with overlying fields. 01:22 - The majority of the emerging material changes direction and flows to AR (B). Some material flows back to AR (A). 01:33 UT - the last of the material flows to AR (B). 01:48 - Both ARs slowly return to pre eruptive states. Figure 3. A sequence of SWAP running difference Images showing the various stages of the failed eruption. (A) (B) iiiiiiivvvivii Figure 4. Magnetic field extrapolation based on the methods described in Alissandrakis (1981). Field lines from different magnetic domains are highlighted with different colors. (A) (B) i ii iii iv C B Figure 5. Summary count rates from RHESSI. Several peaks in the 3-6 and 6-12 keV bandpass correlate with brightenings observed when the erupting material changes direction. This research is on-going work, we continue to investigate this intriguing failed eruption in various observations and models. The pair of ARs were dynamic throughout their lifetimes producing multiple eruptions and flows. The unanswered question as to why this eruption failed remains to be discovered. iiiiiiiv viviiviiiix v x