Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 2 Overview.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Integrated Learning Environment ??? Changing School Culture – Using IT to Cope with Individual Learning Differences in Schools 1 st December 2003 Final.
Framework for Teaching Planning and Preparation Day 1 Summer 2012.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training Implementing English K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement.
The NFL IMPACT Program Teacher Dinner and Overview.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Application and Concept Development.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License -
Changing School Culture – Using IT to Cope with Individual Learning Differences in Schools 28 th March 2003 Lee Kar Tin Department of Information & Applied.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
CMI Leadership & Management Expansion of eAuthoring services for all academic staff Gareth Compton.
Macquarie University Library1 LAMS, e-learning & Information Literacy: possibilities & practicalities Margaret Wright, Macquarie University Heather Cooper,
Jude Carroll, author of Tools for Teaching in an Educationally Mobile World (Routledge 2015) Supporting teaching across cultures: the role of good practice.
Deep Learning ThroughLiteracy-Rich Instructional Strategies Sara Overby Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
The Arkansas Department of Education teamed up with Teacher Created Materials to design rigorous teaching sessions to address the seven STEM individual.
The draft NSW English K-10 syllabus Version 2 February, 2012.
Local Evaluation Overview and Preliminary Findings Diane Schilder, EdD.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
Exploring Strategies for the Secondary Level in Mathematics Patricia Latham and Cathie McQueeney September 28, 2006.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Working Together School-Family-Community Partnerships A Toolkit for New Mexico School Communities Module 3: Enhancing Student Learning.
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
The draft NSW Science K-10 syllabus - Version 2 (incorporating Science and Technology K-6) February, 2012.
Reading and Writing National Standards workshop phase 2 Term
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library
Curriculum for 21 st Century Learners Written by Karen Green & Amanda Dressing.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Foundation Subjects MFL: optional module 9.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
EPL 3 – Week 3 Professional Knowledge Domain Knowing learners & learning.
LIFE Brusselles Meeting 23rd, 24th September 2010.
Can one online teacher education course really help teachers help LESLLA learners? LESLLA 2010 Koln, Germany Nancy Faux.
Summary of Local Seminars & Focus Groups 20/06/ Athens WP8 – TESTING II coordinated by IFI.
Final Portfolio The Roles of the School Library Media Specialist Stephanie Warmoth Spring 2012.
11 Report on Professional Development for and Update Developed for the Providence School Board March 28, 2011 Presented by: Marco Andrade.
School of Education, CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla.
Overview of the IWB Research. The IWB Research Literature: Is overwhelmingly positive about their potential. Primarily based on the views of teachers.
Using UDL to Set Clear Goals and Support Every Student’s Learning.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Speaking and Listening Tools:
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Presented by: Budor AL-Ahmadi. Presented to: Dr. Antar Abdellah.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
TECHNOLOGY AWARENESS & INTEREST COMMUNITY EVENT SPONSORED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND COMMUNITY CENTER.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
Integration of Australian Curriculum English Implementation Workshops Term 3, 2015.
Dr Deirdre Burke: National Teacher Fellowship project Copies of all materials can be found in
Advice to non-specialist EALD teachers of EALD students in SACE Essential English.
The Common Core August 14, 2012 Unpacking. Goals and Objectives of this Training Participants will:  Become more familiar with the Common Core Standards.
Tameka Cobb EDU/645. What evidence did you see and hear by watching Mr. Pronovost Differentiating Instruction Through Interactive Games that supports.
Group Presentation.  Students don’t meet at regular times in a regular classroom.  They won’t meet with many or any of their class mates face to face.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION (DI) Melody Murphy Week 4 Discussion.
Advanced Preparation Sample Prompt
MDE Mississippi Teacher Center Beginning Teacher Support Training Program.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
What is an Internship and what is expected of me in this placement?
STEM education Science, Technologies, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) and STEM education have become the focus of considerable political, industry and.
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Meeting the needs of all students
Alabama Quality Teaching Standards
Unpacking the Common Core August 14, 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia

 Background ◦ National Professional Standards ◦ TPACK  Methodology  Results & discussion  Conclusion

 The Australian Government has recognized the importance of developing the ICT capabilities of both teachers and students through the DER  The Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF) project recognised the importance of ensuring that graduating teachers possessed the required skills and preparedness to integrate ICT into their teaching  One of the strategies was to develop exemplar online modules.  The online modules were developed by Education Services Australia for the TTF project and were made available through the Learning Federation econtent repository ( ome). ome

 ICT is explicitly mentioned in the standards for beginning teachers  As part of project ICT Statements for Graduate Teacher Standards were developed eg.  1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of strategies for differentiating teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities. Select and use specific digital resources and tools that are matched to teaching strategies designed to meet students’ individual and diverse learning needs.

The Technical Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework (Mishra & Koehler 2006) highlights the relationship between the three types of knowledge: content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and technological knowledge. A clear understanding of the relationship between the three components is essential for successful ICT integration. Provides the theoretical underpinning for the TTF Project

 Online learning offers many positive benefits. Learner: ◦ has flexibility around when and where they access the resources. ◦ can revisit the module at any time ◦ has control over their interactions with the media which may also prompt learner reflections (Means et.al, 2009).  Online learning provides the opportunity to review the resources at a later date and offers “just in time” training.  Means et.al. (2009) suggested in a meta –analysis of the literature that online learning was” more conducive to the expansion of learning time than is face to face instruction” (p.xvii) as learners have more time for reflection.

 The students involved in this study were enrolled at a South Australian University in one of the Secondary Teacher Education programs and completing either a secondary Science or Mathematics methodology course. ◦ As one of their coursework activities students were required to complete the TTF online module appropriate to their subject area and an online survey about the module. ◦ In addition they were expected to post on a discussion board a response to a set question and respond to two other student posts. ◦ The students were expected to complete the module in their own time during a week when there were no face to face classes scheduled, by watching the videos, reading through the support materials and reflecting on the questions posed within the module. ◦  The data for this study was drawn only from the online survey responses.  The survey consisted of seven statements that the students needed to complete by selecting from a number of options, a question about how long it took them to complete the module and two text responses. ◦ The statements were used to gain an overall perception of the students’ views on the usefulness of the materials, while the text responses were used to elicit the most useful aspects as well as any areas for improvement to the module. ◦  A total of 171 students completed the module and the online survey; of these 24 students completed the Mathematics Module and 147 completed the Science Module.

 Econtent website

Student comments indicated that it was the TPACK material that was new to them. “Without looking through this material I would have overlooked many of the information mentioned in the lesson plan section, for example cyber safety and digital literacy. I think these kind of information could easily overlooked when preparing a lesson.”

The ICT aspects were considered by many of the students to be the most useful e.g. “Demonstrations of the use of the IWB and how to incorporate this into more relevant and engaging approach to mathematics.”

However while the focus was on the use of ICT in the teaching of science or mathematics, some students identified a more general value in terms of their learning, looking at teaching strategies in general. “The most useful parts of this material was when it related back to how it could be implemented in a class as a teacher. The aspects that were also most useful were the sections on teaching strategies, classroom management and cooperative learning!” The comments also indicated that the students were aware that some of the material would not be useful straight away but may be useful in the future and will still need to be trialled by them. “Links to curriculum and standards good - don't necessarily mean a great deal right now but can see that will be valuable as I become more familiar (as is required) with curriculum.”

The future usefulness highlights the value of having the material online as students can revisit the material when they will need it to refresh and expand on their understanding of what was covered. “I will probably gain most by revisiting this material a number of times - there is lots of information that is covered and it is a bit hard to absorb it all in one sitting.”

The structure of any online material is very important to its success. The modules contained a variety of material and as such students needed to be able to follow that material in a logical manner but also are able to return and find the material they were after. It is clear that almost all of the students found the modules easy to navigate. “I found the lesson plan structure followed by the step by step explanation of how they would teach such a unit the most useful. The presentation of the material was very logical and straight forward, easy to read and understand, and the navigation bar on the side was very helpful when I wanted to go back and re-read something.”

 The flexibility to move through the material at their own pace and to revisit material as required obviously suited the students.  An examination of the access logs showed that the majority of the students accessed during “working hours”.  A considerable number of students also accessed the online module during the evening and in fact, one student did the work a 2:00 am.  The amount of time spent on the module varied between modules, 65 minutes on average for the science module and 72 minutes on average for the mathematics module.  There was also a difference between how long individual students took on the material which varied from 20 minutes to 2 hours.

“The external links were great - allowing you to research and develop a lesson plan to suit you.” “The videos were the most useful part - seeing a real classroom implementation of some of the technology was very valuable. I found the ways in which they were used, and in the case of sticky notes strategically not used, to be interesting, and it made me think about the strategies used and how they might work. “

 The online modules were clearly well received by the students who valued the information and the ability to engage at their own pace and at their own time.  The students valued the video as indicated by the data from the questions. This was further supported in their comments from the text responses.  While this study focussed on the use of the TPACK modules it does show that teacher education students do value quality online materials that they can access when and where they need them and that have a pedagogical focus.  The students are discerning users of online materials, who value multiple perspectives and like to be able to see how things work in real classrooms.