Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data The SLO Process – Part 3 Setting the SLO Achievement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Special Educators Leading Change 2014 Virginia Stodola Teacher Evaluation Audra Ahumada Alternative Assessment Lisa.
It’s All About Student Growth Objectives
Round Table Discussion- Evaluating Arts Teachers William Kohut, Principal- Denver School of the Arts Dr. Mark Hudson- Director of Arts- Denver Public Schools.
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Upper Perkiomen School District August 2013.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Administrative Student Learning Objectives.
Snapshot of the Kansas Teacher Evaluation Requirements Kansas Components of Teacher EvaluationSome Potential Sources of Evidence Learner and Learning-Observations.
Group 3 Teachers: No Growth Model Classes
Student Learning Objectives Part 2: A Deeper Dive Leading Change 2014 Virginia Stodola Susan Poole Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES PART 1: AN OVERVIEW LEADING CHANGE 2014 VIRGINIA STODOLA & SUSAN POOLE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS AND LEADERS UNIT.
Arizona Group B Teachers SLO Informational Webinar Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone Deputy Associate Superintendent of Research & Evaluation.
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Teacher Evaluation Training June 30, 2014
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
 Student Learning Objectives February 26, 2015 Work and Creation Session.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 4 Monitoring Progress and Refining.
MULTIPLE MEASURES What are they… Why are they… What do we do… How will we know… Dr. Scott P. Myers KLFA Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Student Learning Objectives: Considerations for Teachers of Career and Technical Education Courses Name Title Date 1 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
COTTON INDIAN ELEMENTARY LEADER IN ME WHAT IS A TITLE 1 SCHOOL? Each year the Federal Government provides funding to schools that qualify based.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data The SLO Process – Part 1 Determining Students’ Level.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 5 Reviewing and Establishing a Summative.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
1 Arizona Department of Education Evaluation Model Implementation Summer Institute July 22-24, 2013.
Unleash the Potential of Student Learning Objectives Leading Change 2015 Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit Arizona Department of Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
ANALYSIS AND ATTRIBUTES OF APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENTS Coastal Carolina University.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Setting ambitious, yet realistic goals is the first step toward ensuring that all our students are successful throughout school and become proficient adult.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Student Learning Objectives. An SLO is a measurable, long-term, academic goal informed by available data that a teacher or teacher team sets at the beginning.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
10/25/10 SPS Goals Somers Public Schools Building and Department Goals Academic Year.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Understanding Growth Targets and Target Adjustment Guidance for Student Learning Objectives Cleveland Metropolitan School District Copyright © 2014 American.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data The SLO Process – Part 3 Setting the SLO Achievement and Growth Goals May 7,

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) 2 Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit

Acknowledgements 3

Objective: To gain knowledge about establishing the SLO Achievement and Growth Goals for Group A and B teachers 4

Federal Highly Qualified Requirements Transition from “Highly Qualified” to “Highly Effective” Federal Initiatives -Race to the Top -SFSF -ESEA Waiver State Legislation: Laws 2013, ARS § SB1040 -HB2823 -HB2500 Full Implementation of Educator Evaluation Systems in SY How Did We Get Here? 5

ESEA Waiver Federal Requirements At least 20% of a teacher’s total summative evaluation must include Student Academic Growth At least 33% of a teacher’s total summative evaluation must include Student Academic Progress The 33% includes both the growth and achievement requirements 6 AZ Framework for Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Student Academic Progress 7 AZ State Framework-2010 At least 33% based on Student Academic Progress Must use the AZ State Assessments if Available Federal Waiver % Student Academic Progress based on GROWTH! 33%

8 AzCCRS Assessments Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Student Academic Progress

Arizona Framework For Measuring Educator Effectiveness – April 2011 Group A Teachers: 9 Elementary Teachers Grades 2-6 Special Education Teachers Math & English Grades 9-10 Science Teachers Grades 4, 8, & 10 Reading and Math Interventionists

Arizona Framework For Measuring Educator Effectiveness – April 2011 Group B Teachers: 10  CTE  Performing Arts  Computers  P.E.  Gr. K-1 Elementary  Gr Social Studies  Gr. 7 & 9 Science  Gr All Subjects

SLO Process-ADE Model 1. Determining Students’ Preparedness 2. Choosing Quality Assessments 3. Setting SLO Goals 4. Monitoring and Adjusting Instruction 5. Establishing Summative Score What do we expect students to learn? How will we know if students have learned it? What will we do if they don’t learn it? What will we do if they already know it? 11

1. Determining Students’ Preparedness 2. Choosing Quality Assessments 3. Setting SLO Achievement & Growth Goals 4. Monitoring and Adjusting Instruction 5. Establishing Summative Score 12

SLO Goals ACHIEVEMENT GROWTH 13

SLO Achievement Goal 14

Full Knowledge of Standard SLO Achievement Goal 15 75% Our expectation is that all students should at least reach this threshold 100% STANDARDS The reality is that some will surpass and some will fall short so the rubric will compensate for adjustment.

16 SLO Summative Rubric Achievement and Growth Score % - 90% of the students met the SLO 89% - 80% of the students met the SLO 79% - 60% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO

80% of 8 th grade students will score at least an 75% on the end-of- course 8 th Grade Social Studies final by May % of the students in music will reach the proficiency level of (3) on the LEA-developed music performance rubric 17

Achievement Goal “Why is it important to focus on “mastery” or “proficiency” of the content for both Group A and Group B Teachers? 18

SLO Growth Goal A measure of student growth between two points in time in order to master the standards in the content area and to close the achievement gap. 19

Student Growth Target 20

Potential Growth Formula 21

Option #1: Levels of Preparedness Growth Approach 22

Growth Formula Averaged baseline score + (Total possible points – Baseline score) multiplied by.50 = Cut score Let’s say the Low Level of Preparedness students averaged 40 points on the U.S. History Baseline Assessment ( [100 – 40] x.50 ) = Cut Score 40 + ( 60 x.50 ) = Cut Score = points is the cut score (-5%) 65 – 100 points is the growth range The students in the Low Level of Preparedness Group will need to score a minimum of 65 points on the Post- Test Exam to reach the growth score. 23

Your turn In the Adequate Level of Preparedness Group the average on the baseline assessments was 75%. Using the potential formula what would the SLO Growth Cut Score be for this group? 75 + (100-75) x.50 = 88 points. (-5%) range Cut Score Range In the High Level of Preparedness Group the average was 85%. What would the SLO Growth Cut Score be for this group? 93 points (-5%) range 88 – 100 Cut Score Range 24

SLO Growth Goals All students in the Low Level of Preparedness Group will score at least a 65% on the U.S. History End-of-Course Final by April PreparednessBaseline Assessment SLO Growth Cut Score Range Low Level40%65-100% Adequate Level75%83-100% High Level85%88-100%

PERFORMANCE RUBRICS 26

27

Measuring Growth in Performance Rubrics A student moving over at least one category on a 4 point rubric is considered to have made sufficient growth and met the SLO Growth Cut Score. Inter-rater reliability is crucial when scoring performances/projects/portfolios/products with a rubric. The rubric must be at the appropriate level of rigor and alignment of the content standards. 28

SLO Growth Goal Music 15 out of the 15 students who scored a 1 in the beginning range on the LEA-developed music performance assessment rubric measuring intonation, reading music, and fingering skills will move from a 1 to a 2 on the end of year performance assessment. 29

30

Differentiates the amount of growth for each individual student based on a prescribed formula and/or rubric Option #2: Individualized Growth Goals 31

DIBELS SLO GROWTH GOAL EXAMPLE Letter Naming Fluency Status Beginning of Year Month 1-3 Status End of Year Month 7-10 Comments Did the student reach the minimum growth goal? Barney Intensive at risk Benchmark low risk Increased two levels YES Betty Intensive at risk Intensive at risk Did not increase one level NO Wilma Strategic some risk Benchmark low risk Increased one level YES Fred Strategic some risk Intensive at risk Decreased one level NO 32

SPED SLO Individualized Growth Statements Each of the targeted students will move over at least one category on the Brigance Assessment by May

Follow Through  What are two ideas you will take back to share with a colleague at your site?  Are you interested in joining our SLO Consortium?  Technical Assistance in SLO Implementation  Networking Support 34

SLOs Across the Nation Arizona Dept. of Education Student Learning Objectives link on right side of screen Center on Great Teachers & Leaders Community Training and Assistance Center Reform Support Network 35

Thank You A survey link will be sent to you by the end-of-the day. After the survey a link should be provided for your certificate. We are truly sorry about previous certificate glitches. 36

Questions? Feedback Virginia Stodola Effective Teachers and Leaders Arizona Department of Education David Gauch Effective Teachers and Leaders Arizona Department of Education