OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _______________________ Workshop 11E18: Structural Funds 2007 – 13:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden First level controls - Certification of Expenditure INTERREG IIIC.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
EN Regional Policy - Finance & Budget EUROPEAN COMMISSION Annual Meeting with managing authorities of crossborder programmes Brussels - 25 Octobre 2011.
CLEARANCE OF ACCOUNTS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES RICHARD CROFT.
Agency for Restructuring and Modernisation of Agriculture ARMA Polish Paying Agency Experiences & Accomplishments Brussels, 3-4 October 2007.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
EN DG Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11 October 2007 Management and control arrangements OPEN DAYS 2007 Financial Control : New.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Planning and use of funding instruments
2 Slovenia Signed Contract of Confidence for the period Compliance assessment for one programme for the new period Experience of a Certifying.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Regional Policy Delegated Acts. Regional Policy 2 Delegated ActsImplementing Acts 32(10): Purchase of land and combination of TA with FI 33(3)(a):FI complying.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
“Train the trainers” seminar
A d d V Alue to public management Winding-up declaration Portuguese experience Carlos Trigacheiro Inspecção-Geral de Finanças (IGF) General Inspection.
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Click to edit Master title style 1 In the run-up to closure Main tasks for managing authorities, paying authorities and winding-up bodies European Commission.
Performance Framework
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Financial Management and Control Annual Meeting of ISPA PARTNERS 2003 Preparation for post-accession Management of Community Funds : Nicholas Martyn Regional.
European Union Cohesion Policy
AUDIT AND CONTROL UNIT EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (ERDF) AND COHESION FUND (CF) QUIRINO MEALHA DIRECTOR.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 ANNUAL MEETING OF ISPA PARTNERS 2003 FROM ISPA TO COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS BRUSSELS,
Subsidy Contract Lead Partner seminar October 2008, Riga Arina Andreičika Managing Authority
Financial Institute for Regional Development, PI Understanding the roles and functions of Certifying and Audit Authorities in European Territorial Cooperation.
Winding-up Declaration and Audit Requirements at the Closure of INTERREG III programmes ( ) Directorate General Regional Policy Audit and.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Jan Gregor THE NATIONAL FUND VS. NATIONAL BUDGET PROCESS Seminar.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Hungarian Delegation Lisbon, 28 October 2008 Financial Institute for Regional Development.
Single Audit Strategy LATVIA. Audit System The Audit Authority functions are carried out by the Internal Audit Department of the Ministry of.
MEETING WITH 28 th April 2011 Portuguese Certifying Authority ERFD and CF.
Financial Management and Auditing First Level Controls 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
ESPON 2013 Programme 3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010.
THE ROLE OF EMIR UNIFIED INFORMATION SYSTEM IN MANAGEMENT VERIFICATIONS National Development Agency 9th June 2009.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
Audits of pre-accession funds in the State Audit Office of the Republic of Latvia 2000/2001 Uldis Kremers Auditor of the Audit Department of the State.
Croatian Experience with Management of EU Funds Nataša Mikuš, Deputy State Secretary Central Office for Development Strategy and Coordination of EU Funds.
29 March 2011 Audit Authority Audit Department Ministry of Finance 1.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes DG AGRI, October 2005.
Structural Funds in Ireland Structural Funds in Ireland Financial management, Financial management, control & audit - Ireland Dermot Byrne Head of Unit.
24 March 2011 Management and control system 1. Contents 1.Changes in the management and control system in The progress of the control/audit activities.
Structural Funds in Ireland Structural Funds in Ireland Financial control & audit - Financial control & audit - ERDF & Cohesion Fund operations Dermot.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
Financial management system of structural funds. Entities involved in financial management system Managing Authorities (MA) Managing Authorities (MA)
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
Financial Implementation of the Assistance from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the EU Sylvia Indjova Head of Certifying Authority Director.
Transnational training seminar for potential Lead Partners and Partners to INTEREGG IIIB-CADSES procedures for 3° call for proposal CADSES implementation.
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Experiences of Audits of the European Commission in the Region of Saxony-Anhalt Mechthild v. Maydell Head of the Audit Authority for the Region of Saxony-Anhalt.
Role & Responsibilities
Role & Responsibilities
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Commission Regulation (EC)
ESF Training Seminar Reinforced role for the Audit Authority
Presentation transcript:

OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _______________________ Workshop 11E18: Structural Funds 2007 – 13: The New Control and Audit Requirements Gabriella SEBESTYÉN Vice Head of the Paying Authority in Hungary

The way from the National Fund to the Certifying Authority How do we cope with the changes of EU regulations and requirements?

3 The next presentation will give answers to the following questions: 1.How the pre-accession requirements have contributed to the design of the SCFs implementation system in Hungary and what are the main differences? 2.How a paying authority can meet the requirements of the certifying authority and why do I consider it important for the certifying authority to fulfil the role of the paying authority?

4 National Fund and Paying Authority 1998 – 2004 (2006) Pre-accession funds (Phare, SAPARD, ISPA) The Central treasury entity through which EU funds are channelled towards the Recipient. Functional independence from IAs Main partners: implementing agencies (3), national control authority, EC Delegation for ex- ante control in DIS, full liability of NAO after EDIS approval Framework Agreement, Memorandum of Understanding, Financing Agreement IT system: Perseus, Memor 2004 – 2006 (2008) Structural Funds: ERDF, ESF, EAGGF, FIFG (5 operational programmes), Cohesion Fund (projects) Authority which draws up and submits payment applications and receives payments from the Commission. Functional independence from MAs Main partners: managing authorities (5), intermediate bodies (22), body responsible for 5-15% checks, body responsible for issuing the winding-up declaration Council Regulations and Commission Regulations IT system: SFC, EMIR

5 Paying Authority and Certifying Authority 2004 – 2006 (2008) Structural Funds: ERDF, ESF, EAGGF, FIFG (5 operational programmes), Cohesion Fund (projects) Authority which draws up and submits payment applications and receives payments from the Commission. Main partners: managing authorities (5), intermediate bodies (22), body responsible for 5-15% checks, body responsible for issuing the winding-up declaration 2007 – 2013 (2015) Structural Funds: ERDF, ESF; Cohesion Fund (15 operational programmes) draws up and submits to the Commission certified statements of expenditure and applications for payment (reception of payments is not the responsibility of the CA by definition) Main partners: managing authorities, intermediate bodies, audit authority

6 Milestones towards better regulation pre-accession funds were regulated independently from national aid schemes based on bilateral agreements with EC and complementary Government Decrees as implementing rules SAPARD and EDIS accreditation have resulted in establishing main functions and implementing good practices in the preparation of procedures manuals, audit trail, main actors of EU funds management were selected, some experience had been gained, implementation systems in Member States could have been studied through twinning programmes After accession for Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund and CAP the already established bodies have been continuously operating as managing authorities or intermediate bodies, also central horizontal functions have remained within the same organisations with wider authority (National Aid Coordinator as Community Support Framework Managing Authority, National Fund as Paying Authority, Government Control Office as body responsible for 5% check and as winding-up body)

7 Milestones towards better regulation (cont.) There are a lot more bodies involved in the management of SFs, as previously for pre-accession funds, therefore some bodies with only national experiences have entered the SCFs implementation system. However strong central structures, Objective 1 coverage for the whole country, intensive audit activity, the need for efficiency and effectiveness, and a single IT management and monitoring system have required (and also allowed for) simplification and standardisation of procedures. Until the end of 2006 a simplified and standardised implementation system will be in place, equally complying with either the , or the 2007 – 2013 programming period.

8 What should be certified? (i) the statement of expenditure is accurate, results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents; (ii) the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of operations selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the programme and complying with Community and national rules;

9 Certification activities to ensure accuracy of expenditures (i) the statement of expenditure is accurate, results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents Ex post transfer of EU contribution to the Managing Authority Even though the reception of Funds is not the responsibility of the Certifying Authority by definition, we still consider this function to be of great importance in order to be able to fulfil the certification function, because most of the checks are done in the course of financial management and accounting Accounting (double entry accrual based accounting system) Fact finding assessments (desk check of invoices and supporting documents on a sample basis to verify the proper entering of data into the IT system) Check of evidence for the application of the four-eye principle (signature rights, user rights)

10 Certification activities to ensure compliance (ii) the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of operations selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the programme and complying with Community and national rules Assessment of Procedures manuals Assessment of Audit reports (internal audit and 5%) Assessment of Irregularity reports Assessment of MA verification reports (summary of controls and audits performed), including information of on-the-spot checks Fact finding visits (a step-by-step overview of procedures applied compared to the procedures manual and the audit trail at managing authorities and intermediate bodies on-the-spot)

11 Coordination of control activities Prevention, perception, correction Financial management and control, treatment of irregularities, accounting National implementing regulations, operational manuals, guidelines 4-eye-principle, desk supervision, managerial approval Application of checklists Possibility to stop a procedure Possibility to correct errors Application of sanctions Desk check is 100%, on-the-spot check is sample- based

12 Coordination of audit activities Internal audit 5% checks (15% ) Winding-up European Commission audit units within DGs responsible for the different funds Audit plans are based on risk assessment, but scope and depth are always different which makes synchronization nearly impossible Auditors address management when making recommendations, therefore results are dependent on management decisions Follow-up of audit activities require a lot of administrative work Audit findings must always be taken into account for future risk assessments and audits

13 Our continuing and challenging obligations Reception and transfer of EU funds, closure of previous programmes, reporting of irregularities Increasing number of partners Increasing variety and amount of funds and programmes, different implementing rules Widening responsibility under shared management Increasing level of assurance (larger sample), intensity of ex-ante control Rather strategic role of managing authorities limits their potential for verification which implies for direct relationship between Certifying Authority and intermediate bodies

14 Gabriella SEBESTYÉN Deputy director HUNGARY, Ministry of Finance Office of the National Authorising Officer (Paying Authority)