1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review SubTask CH TD 3.3.1.3 Day-ahead Scheduling and Real-time Operations Tool Conventional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Validation of W4e Hydropower Turbine Generator PI Henry W Russell Walker Wellington,
Advertisements

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Marine Energy Technology Advancement Partnership (METAP) Hoyt Battey DOE Water.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review OTEC Cold Water Pipe-Platform Sub-System Dynamic Interaction Validation Lockheed.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review [Project/Subtask Title] [Presenter] [Organization] [Contact Info] [Date] [Title.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Wind and Water Power Technologies Office United States Department of Energy Water Power Program: Hydropower.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Deployment and Testing of the Alden Fish-Friendly Turbine by EPRI, Alden Research.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Water Use Optimization: Hydrologic Forecasting Presenter: Mark Wigmosta Organization:
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review 2011 Tidal Energy System for On-shore Power Generation Dr. Allan Bruce Sunlight.
* Finally, along the lines of predicting system behavior, researchers may want to know what conditions will lead to an optimal outcome of some property.
Chapter 6 Database Design
Lecture 13 Revision IMS Systems Analysis and Design.
© 2005 Prentice Hall, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th Edition, Turban, Aronson, and Liang 3-1 Chapter 3 Decision Support Systems:
Chapter 5: Project Scope Management
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sustainable Small Hydropower Innovative System Testing (1.2) Department of Energy,
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Modular Wave Energy Transfer (WET) Jane Vvedensky Shift Power Solutions
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review ADVANCED INTEGRATION OF POWER TAKE-OFF IN VORTEX INDUCED VIBRATIONS AQUATIC CLEAN.
CSC230 Software Design (Engineering)
1 User Interface Design CIS 375 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Near Space Systems Inc. Small Hydropower Research and Development Technology.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review CH TD Task Water Use Optimization Presenter: John Gasper Organization:
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review 51-Mile Hydroelectric Power Project PI: Jim Gordon Earth By Design, Inc.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review The Development of Open, Water-Lubricated Polycrystalline Diamond Thrust Bearings.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review A First Assessment of U.S. In-Stream Hydrokinetic Energy Resources Since the.
Lab 08: AEV Design Analysis Tool Advanced Energy Vehicle (AEV)
1. PROJECT GOAL Our final product will be an interactive public website which will allow the user to view various aspects of our current and future infrastructure.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sensor Fish Redesign Collaboration Z. (Daniel) Deng Thomas J. Carlson Pacific.
SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
RUP Requirements RUP Artifacts and Deliverables
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review WET-NZ Multi-Mode Wave Energy Converter Advancement Project Justin Klure, Program.
Systems Analysis – Analyzing Requirements.  Analyzing requirement stage identifies user information needs and new systems requirements  IS dev team.
INFO425: Systems Design INFORMATION X Finalizing Scope (functions/level of automation)  Finalizing scope in terms of functions and level of.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Klaus Kristo Clem Leung Adam Frieden Chris Davidson Faculty: Professor Ramgopal Mettu Project: iPlanAhead Comprehensive.
SHRP II R-11 Strategic Approaches at the Corridor and Network Levels to Minimize Disruptions From the Renewal Process A Web Presentation to the Technical.
Mantychore Oct 2010 WP 7 Andrew Mackarel. Agenda 1. Scope of the WP 2. Mm distribution 3. The WP plan 4. Objectives 5. Deliverables 6. Deadlines 7. Partners.
ITEC224 Database Programming
©2008 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently exist.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. What are we studying today? Chapter 24 - Project Scheduling  Effort distribution  Defining task set for the.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review PB500, 500kW Utility-Scale PowerBuoy Project Dr. Philip R. Hart Ocean Power Technologies.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sustainable Small Hydropower System and Component Development (1.1) Department.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Integrated Basin Scale Hydropower Opportunity Assessment Initiative Simon Geerlofs.
1/26/2004TCSS545A Isabelle Bichindaritz1 Database Management Systems Design Methodology.
Software Development Cycle What is Software? Instructions (computer programs) that when executed provide desired function and performance Data structures.
KFS Data Mapping Leveraging a new KFS 3.0 feature.
Content The system development life cycle
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Ocean Currents along the United.
Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Outline Information Systems Architecture Information System Architecture components Information Engineering Phases.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Poncelet Kinetics RHK100 Prototype Steven Selvaggio Whitestone Power and Communications.
Lab 07: AEV Design Analysis Tool Advanced Energy Vehicle (AEV)
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review An Assessment of Lifecycle Cost in the U.S. over Time Mirko Previsic RE Vision.
Cmpe 589 Spring 2006 Lecture 2. Software Engineering Definition –A strategy for producing high quality software.
© 2005 Prentice Hall, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th Edition, Turban, Aronson, and Liang 3-1 Chapter 3 Decision Support Systems:
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Abrasion Testing of Critical Components of Hydrokinetic Devices Monty Worthington.
SEAMLESS: Demo Version 1.4 “Presenting current developments and welcoming your feedback” For contact:
Decision Support Systems: An Overview by Dr.S.Sridhar,Ph.D., RACI(Paris),RZFM(Germany),RMR(USA),RIEEEProc. web-site :
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Hydrokinetic Turbines on Fish: Desktop.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Economic Evaluation Program for Transmission Planning in Competitive Power Market LEE, SANG-HO Fusion Technology Research Lab. K-EMS Development.
WG3 Flexible Generation
Water Power Peer Review
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
System Design.
CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review SubTask CH TD Day-ahead Scheduling and Real-time Operations Tool Conventional Hydroelectric and Environmental Resource Systems (CHEERS) Model Thomas D. Veselka Organization: Argonne National Laboratory Contact Info: Date: November 2, 2011 Laboratory Team: Thomas Veselka (Hydropower Expert & Computational Engineer) Mathew Mahalik (Power Systems & Computer Scientist) Mark Jusko (Decision Analyst & Computer Scientist) Day-ahead Scheduling and Real-time Operations

2 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Purpose, Objectives, & Integration Improve the performance of hydroelectric and environmental resources through the development and application of an enhanced day-ahead scheduling and real-time operation tool The tool is consistent with DOE’s objective to increase the contribution of conventional hydropower to the U.S. renewable energy portfolio –Helps schedulers and operators improve hydropower efficiency, generating more power with the same amount of water –Improves the economic value of both hydropower generation and ancillary services –Strives to increase habitat quality –Supports power grid operations, including wind and solar integration –Provides cash-constrained organizations access to a cost-free tool Integrate with other toolkit components by using: –Inflows from the Hydrologic Forecast tool –Daily and weekly water release targets from the Seasonal Hydro-systems Analysis tool –Habitat parameters and relationships from the Environmental Performance tool –Power characteristics from the Unit and Plant Efficiency tool –Results for economic and environmental indicators posted to the shared DB

3 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach The design meets the requirements of a broad range of applications – Network formulation represents the flow of commodities such as water and electricity – Flexible scope and granularity in terms of time and space – Accommodates a wide range of topology designs – User-defined specifications System relationships & constraints Component attributes Boundary condition options Simultaneously solves energy and environmental objectives 1.Maximize production and economics within environmental operating constraints 2.Optimize environmental quality, resulting in a temporal sequence of dam water releases 3.Weighted multi-objective function

4 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Plan, Schedule, & Budget Schedule Initiation date: November 2009 FY2010 –CHEERS Model Framework and Design Document V1.0 September 2010 Preliminary evaluation of mathematical techniques and solvers Preliminary tool interface and input templates FY2011 –Preliminary proof-of-concept mathematics completed –Complete tool functionality ready for application at demonstration sites F2012 –Complete tool functionality ready for application at demonstration sites –Demonstration site application and continued tool refinements F2013 –Demonstration site application wrap-up and documentation Budget Less spent than budgeted Additional staff have been recruited to assist with the tool GUI, DB, and model input forms Budget History FY2009FY2010FY2011/12 DOECost-shareDOECost-shareDOECost-share 550K 550K (anticipated)

5 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Accomplishments and Results Work in progress on the GUI and data input screens (behind original schedule) – GUI manages project inventory (databases) – Can create and edit nodes, links, and system data through GUI menus and spreadsheet forms – Most spreadsheet input forms have been designed and implemented – Most input forms are successfully linked to the GUI and the database – Can load, edit, and save data successfully – Database is mostly designed and implemented – More tables need to be added and modified along with input form progress – Input and result values can be displayed in the network along nodes and links – Preliminary results spreadsheets have been created (e.g., energy balance, economic, unit dispatch, etc.) Work in progress on the mathematical formulation (behind original schedule) –Structure of the formulation and definition of equations is nearly complete –A stand-alone model consisting of a single spread sheet and LINGO was developed for prototyping and testing –Spreadsheet proof-of-concept for the formulation has been implemented –GUI successfully linked to LINGO solver –Work in progress on reading all data and creating all equations within the model Interaction with demo sites and others in hydro industry (on schedule) –Met with CDWR staff and toured demo site facilities. Also meet with WAPA schedulers and BOR plant dispatchers –Preliminary topologies for both demo sites systems have been drafted. Document detailing CRSP operational practices and constraints has been completed –Conducted web meetings with demo site staff and others to demonstrate model concepts, interface features, and receive feedback. Significant modification to operational rule approach based on feedback –Secure file server in place and being used with sensitive demonstration site data

6 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Challenges to Date “Fool-proofing” input forms –Some possible user actions can cause errors or corrupt data –For the time being we will warn users of such actions Identifying all possible user actions and all data states when testing input form – database interaction –Input forms may behave differently depending on what data is currently in the database Optimization logistics –Formulating the problem given the flexibility built into the input forms and modeling system –Revisions of mathematical formulations may be required for more complex unit-commitment problems –Need to explore alternative solvers including Dakota for consistency with the Seasonal tool, CPLEX, and gurobi

7 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Next Steps CHEERS Data Collection Finalize network drawings for each demonstration site and collect basic information. (12/31/2011) In CHEERS, finalize and construct demo site topology with a finer level of granularity. (3/31/2012) Collect real-time data for model applications. (7/1/ /30/2012) Toolkit Database (DB) Given initial demo site data and toolkit implementation plans, meet with DB representatives from the 4-lab modeling team to identify outstanding DB requirements for toolkit applications. (12/31/2011) Enhance the toolkit DB to accommodate demo site data and toolkit modeling requirements. (4/1/ /31/2012) Complete algorithms that expedite data transfers between demo site SCADA systems and the toolkit DB. (9/30/2012) CHEERS Demo Site Applications Using the GUI, create CHEERS topologies, perform preliminary optimization runs and analyze model results (12/31/2011) Refine CHEERS implementations and add topology details as needed for day-ahead scheduling. (3/31/2012) Continue to refine/improve day-ahead scheduling optimization. (6/30/2012) Perform preliminary CHEERS application for real-time operations. (9/30/2012) Finalize demonstration site day-ahead scheduling and real-time CHEERS model applications. (12/31/2012) CHEERS Model Enhancements Refine and debug spreadsheet input forms. (9/1/ /31/2011) On an ongoing basis work with demo site staff to identify and implement supplementary model features to meet the specific requirements of each site. (1/31/ /31/2012) Create auxiliary spreadsheet tools to aid with demo site applications. (7/1/ /30/2012) Refine spreadsheet input forms to accommodate demo site real-time data requirements. (7/1/ /31/2012) CHEERS Model Application and DB Documentation Document CHEERS demo site applications and performance metrics. (2/28/2013)