Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Loss Research
Advertisements

Soil N Monitoring, Fall 2012 Webinar October 19, 2012 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois
Scenario Analysis costs per acre for various practices estimate each fully applied practice for N or P then combine for N or P to reach 20 or 45% finally,
Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Developing Nitrogen BMPs from Field Research Gyles W. Randall* and Jeffrey A. Vetsch, Univ. of Minnesota, Waseca, MN Abstract Best management practices.
EFISIENSI PUPUK DAN PEMUPUKAN NITROGEN Bahan kajian MK Pemupukan Dosen: Prof Dr Ir Soemarno MS Jur Tanah FP UB, 2011.
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
Drainage Water Management to meet Agronomic and Environmental goals University of Minnesota Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate Southwest Research and Outreach.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Use of Active Optical Sensor in North Dakota Dave Franzen and Lakesh Sharma, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Using Adapt-N On-farm strip trials on Long Island, NY: Above: A = 93 lb N, G = 159 lb N Below: A = 132 lb N, G = 175 lb N AG AG Incorporating Local Weather.
A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DWM AT LARGE SCALE MOHAMED A. YOUSSEF and R. WAYNE SKAGGS 1 By.
Sensor research and algorithm development for corn in ND L.K. Sharma, D.W. Franzen, H. Bu, R. Ashley, G. Endres and J. Teboh North Dakota State University,
Long-Term Field Research for Developing Nitrogen BMP’s Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center
Stimulating Interest in and Adoption of Precision Agriculture Methods on Small Farm Operations A Discussion of the Jefferson County Experience National.
Nitrogen Sources for Cotton Across the Belt
Soil Testing Procedures for Biologically Based Systems Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, Nebraska
Managing Manure Nutrients for Crop Production – Using DDGS, an Agronomists Viewpoint. Joel DeJong ISU Extension Field Specialist/Crops September 27, 2006.
Soil Nitrogen Cycling & Budgeting
Corn and Soybean Production as Affected by Rotational Tillage Systems Jeffrey A. Vetsch* and Gyles W. Randall, Univ. of Minnesota, Southern Research and.
Wheat Fertilizer Management
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
Soils of North Dakota Dave Franzen Professor, North Dakota State University, Fargo- Extension Soil Specialist.
ISU Agronomy Extension Fertilizer Price Effect on Optimum Corn N Rate Recommendations John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Chapter 5. Crop Production Thomas J. Basden, West Virginia University, A.O. Abaye, Virginia Tech, and Richard W. Taylor, University of Delaware Mid-Atlantic.
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
Value of swine manure to grow finish operations 2015 Wisconsin Pork Expo Jerry May, MSU Extension Educator
Iowa CREP Meeting/Tour October 15, 2007 Why off-field practices/buffers? Jim Baker, IDALS (professor emeritus, Dept. Agric. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State.
Greenbrier Hotel, White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia June 17, 2011 Situation and Outlook for Corn and Soybeans Presented to: National Chicken Council.
Potential for Sensor Based Systems in Corn-Sugar Beet Rotations John A. Lamb Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota – St. Paul.
Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Remote sensing based in-season N recommendations David Clay and Cheryl Reese.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
And Chuck Grantham Presents…. Reduced Inputs Increased Yields Higher Nutritional Value Improved Water Efficiency Less Plant Stress Improved Soil Health.
Current N Fertilization
Enhancing Sorghum Yield and Profitability through Sensor Based N Management Dave Mengel and Drew Tucker Department of Agronomy K-State.
Summary of supplementary data GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23, 2013.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Fertilizing for No-till
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
New Minnesota Nitrogen Rate Guidelines.
Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
SOIL SAMPLING Dr. Dave Franzen Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University.
IRRIGATED CORN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN THE COLORADO ARKANSAS VALLEY Ardell Halvorson 1, Frank Schweissing 2, Michael Bartolo 2, and Curtis.
Plant Roots and P - K Uptake  Relatively immobile nutrients, main uptake mechanism is slow diffusion through soil water to roots from a short distance.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
Nitrogen Stability: Protecting Your Nitrogen Investment
Exploratory Research in Corn
Variable Rate Nitrogen Application in Corn Production
To Side-Dress or Not to Side-Dress (apologies to the Bard of Avon)
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Finding the “Holy Grail” Reflectance Sensing Corn Nitrogen Algorithm
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
Strategies for Split N Applications for Corn
Soil test results and how to use them
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Nitrogen Management Basics
Phosphorus Fertilization in Sugar Beets
Three Key Considerations in Planning Your 2019 Soil Fertility Program
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Presentation transcript:

Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Current published N recommendation for corn- N Rate (pounds N per acre) = Yield Potential (bushels per acre) X 1.2 less soil test nitrate-N to 2 foot depth less previous crop credit

Why I dislike the current N recommendations for corn- Yield Potential N Rate

Began to accumulate modern corn N rate data in Sites eastern, 2 western eastern- western sites lost eastern – 4 western eastern- 4 western Also- 9 sites from southern Manitoba - 21 sites from NW Minnesota - 7 northern South Dakota Total of 117 sites within the past 12 years.

The “Return to N” model- Developed by John Sawyer, Iowa State and Emerson Nafziger, Illinois (2005, Proc. Ext-Ind Soil Fert. Conf.) This model is used in several corn-belt states, including Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, and Michigan

Medium Texture Sites- All Return to N $3-$8 corn 20 cent to $ N

West River MERN $3 corn, 40 cent N = 167 lb N/acre $4 corn, 40 cent N = 200 lb N/acre $5 corn, 40 cent N = 219 lb N/acre

Long term no-till sites, Return to N $3 (bottom) to $5 corn price 20 cent to $1 N costs MERN- $3 corn 40 cent N 174 lb N/acre $4 corn at 40 cent N 192 lb N/acre $5 corn at 40 cent N 204 lb N/acre

High Clay Yields Greater than 160 bushels per acre MERN $3 corn, 40 cent N =223 lb N per acre $4 corn, 40 cent N = 242 lb N per acre $5 corn, 40 cent N = 253 lb N per acre

High Clay with Yields Less than 160 bushels per Acre. MERN $3 corn, 40 cent N = 233 lb N/acre $4 corn, 40 cent N = 266 lb N/acre $5 corn, 40 cent N =287 lb N/acre

Medium Texture Eastern Sites Yields Greater than 160 Bushels per Acre MERN $3 corn, 40 cent N = 208 lb N/acre (185 bu/acre) $4 corn, 40 cent N = 222 pounds N/ acre (185 bu/acre) = 232 pounds N/acre (187 bu/acre) Range for $1 return lb N/acre

Eastern Medium Texture sites yields < 160 bu/acre MERN $3 corn, 40 cent N = 292 lb N/acre $4 corn, 40 cent N = 312 lb N/acre $5 corn, 40 cent N = > 355 lb N/acre

Day 1 Day 45 Day 80 Day 120 Corn N timeline Application Period of greatest uptake

In high clay soils, leaching is not an issue. Downward movement of water in a Fargo soil series is about inches per hour, or about 1/3 inch per day.

Clay soils have a denitrification issue. Denitrification- NO 3 under anaerobic conditions enables a suite of bacteria to convert NO 3 to NOx and N 2 gas Any of the gases are plant unavailable.

Range of values for loss of nitrate per day when soil is saturated range from 1-3% per day. In May, 2010, soils in the Valley were saturated for about 30 days. Losses of N were estimated at about 80 lb/acre that is about 40% available N over 30 days, or about 1.3% per day. In 2011, soils were saturated for about 45 days. Losses were estimated at about 150 lb N, or about 1.7% per day.

Image taken June 28, 3 days after area was covered by 6 inches of water

TreatmentYield, tons per acre Per cent net sucrose Recoverable sugar per ton Recoverable sugar per acre Conventional till b Strip Till ab No Till a NS LSD 5% 513 All N Early21.3 ab16.1 a322 a6848 a Split N Timing22.2 a15.4 b309 b6835 a All N Late19.8 b14.7 c295 c5838 b LSD 5% 1.6 LSD 5% 0.6LSD 5% 12 LSD 5% 513 Yield and quality of sugar beets with tillage treatment and N timing.

These are soils with issues, often leaching related. Leaching is easier to understand compared to gas loss after denitrification. Splitting N application is also a solution to some of these soil problems.

Incubation study, 10 g soil treated with 200 ppm urea-N and 0, 0.2, 1, 5, and 25 ppm of nitrapyrin as N-Serve emulsifiable, nitrapyrin as Instinct, DCD, sulfur as ATS, or maleic- itaconic polymer as NSN-QDO Four soils – Renshaw (slow nitrification) – Glyndon, Ulysses, Bearden (rapid nitrification) 1, 2, 3, 4 week sampling Paper submitted to SSSAJ

Conclusion – Instinct less effective than N-Serve at equal rates of nitrapyrin – No effect of Nutrisphere-N with three soils with rapid nitrification Nutrisphere-N less effective than ATS with the soil with slow nitrification

Active optical sensors have been identified as a tool to increase nitrogen-use efficiency Greenseeker (Trimble) Holland Crop Circle Sensor (Holland Scientific)

Use zone sampling to direct the initial N-rate to field Example field- 160 acres Apply about 200 lb N to a small reference area

When applicator enters the field to apply side-dress application, the reference area serves as the INSEY that is the maximum supported by an application, less an INSEY of 5%. Example field- 160 acres Reference area previously highly fertilized with N

INSEY Yield Reference INSEY Reference Yield

INSEY Yield Reference INSEY Reference Yield INSEY in field Field Yield estimate

INSEY Yield Reference INSEY Reference Yield INSEY in field Field Yield estimate

INSEY Yield Reference INSEY Reference Yield INSEY in field Field Yield estimate Corn yield difference in pounds per acre. X 1.25 % N in corn grain divided by efficiency factor 0.6 = N rate

Example- Reference yield predicted- 220 bushels In-field yield estimated- 160 bushels difference = 60 bushels X 56 lb N/bushel = 3360 pounds X = 42 lb N 42 /0.6 efficiency factor = 70 lb N at that location.

New Corn N Recommendations will be out Summer Print and web-based West River Eastern Long-term No-till, diverse rotation Eastern High Clay, yield >160 bu/a Eastern High Clay, yield < 160 bu/a Eastern Medium textures, yield > 160 bu/a Eastern Medium textures, yield < 160 bu/a