New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
History of Predicting Yield Potential TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University.
Advertisements

May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Nitrogen Management for Wheat and Corn, What you Shouldn’t Do.
Use of remote sensing on turfgrass Soil 4213 course presentation Xi Xiong April 18, 2003.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
GreenSeekerTM Variable Rate Applicator Equipment and Applications
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Economics of Precision Agriculture, What Technologies are Being Adopted and Why Danny Dallas Soil 4213.
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp Mobile Analysis V2.0.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Precision Agriculture Oklahoma State University NTech Industries Redball.
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp_Mobile_Analysis Program V.1.
Ask the Expert Improve Yields and Make Money by Saving Inputs with GreenSeeker Products Daniel Rodriguez Russ Linhart.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Presented by: Keri D.Brixey
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Enhancing Sorghum Yield and Profitability through Sensor Based N Management Dave Mengel and Drew Tucker Department of Agronomy K-State.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
Optical-Sensors. Wavelength nm Visible Light Near Infrared % Reflectance.
John SolieIvan Ortiz-Monasterio Bill RaunCIMMYT Marv Stone Oklahoma State University John SolieIvan Ortiz-Monasterio Bill RaunCIMMYT Marv Stone Oklahoma.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Precision Agriculture an Overview. Precision Agriculture? Human need Environment –Hypoxia –$750,000,000 (excess N flowing down the Mississippi river/yr)
Fact vs. Myth, What is Holding Precision Agriculture Back Daniel Edmonds Cody Daft Zimbabwe, January 2008.
No-till Oklahoma Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Through Use of Optical Sensors Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University
Variable Rate Technology in Wheat
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution Resolution for Sensing/Soil Sampling And Yield Measurements.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Ag Leader Crop Sensors. May 2008 announced worldwide distribution of Holland Scientific (HS) crop sensor Holland Scientific Crop Sensor Commercializing.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y E VOLUTION OF N ITROGEN R EFERENCE S TRIPS.
Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
Soil Fertility in Muskogee County
How the adoption of the N-Rich Strip has changed N Management
Components of a Variable Rate Nitrogen Rec
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Precision Agriculture
Sensing Resolution in Corn
Stewart Reed Oklahoma State University
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Predicting Yield Potential, 2007
Sensors and Fertility Management
REVIEW.
Determining Nitrogen Application Rates with SBNRC and RAMP Calculator
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Presentation transcript:

New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management

Traditional N Recommendations 2 lbs/bushel of wheat 2 lbs/bushel of wheat 1.2 lbs/bushel of corn 1.2 lbs/bushel of corn 50 lbs/ton of bermudagrass 50 lbs/ton of bermudagrass 60 lbs/ton of fescue, small grain pasture 60 lbs/ton of fescue, small grain pasture

Average profit from N = $36/acre/yr Conventional Strategy is Easy and Profitable. Crop N requirement = 2 lb N/bu yield

Temporal and Spatial Variability In season environmental conditions Within field variability

What Scale is Necessary for Precision Ag?

Temporal Variability Historically, it was thought that if N was not applied annually crop production would eventually deplete the soil of its N reserve. Historically, it was thought that if N was not applied annually crop production would eventually deplete the soil of its N reserve. $17/A Benefit from in-season yield estimate

Optimum N Rate (Grain N Uptake Max Yield – Grain N Uptake Check)/0.50 “After the FACT” N Rate required for “MAX Yields” Ranged from 0 to 140 lbs N/ac Long-Term Winter Wheat Experiment Lahoma, OK

GreenSeeker ® Sensor Function Emits Red & InfraRed Wavelengths Outputs NDVI — indicates Biomass and Plant Vigor Day or Night Use No Effect from Clouds

Normalized Difference Vegetative Index - NDVI Calculated from the red and near-infrared bands Calculated from the red and near-infrared bands Measures Biomass Measures Biomass Correlated with: Correlated with: Plant biomass Plant biomass Crop yield Crop yield Plant nitrogen Plant nitrogen Plant chlorophyll Plant chlorophyll Water stress Water stress Plant diseases Plant diseases Insect damage Insect damage

Can Yield Potential (similar to “yield goals”) be Predicted MID-SEASON? Sensor Reading

Winter Wheat, Enid, 2005

Handheld Unit – Temporal Variability In season environmental conditions

Sensor Based Nitrogen Recommendations N Rates Vary from one year to the next, and field to field N Rates Vary from one year to the next, and field to field When you fill up your gas tank, do you put in 20 gallons every time no matter what? When you fill up your gas tank, do you put in 20 gallons every time no matter what? Sensors allow in season decisions for nitrogen rates Sensors allow in season decisions for nitrogen rates

Progress timeline 1991: Developed optical sensors and sprayer control systems to detect bindweed in fallow fields and to spot spray the weed 1993: Sensor used to measure total N uptake in wheat and to variably apply N fertilizer. 1994: Predicted forage biomass and total forage N uptake using NDVI (Feekes 5). 1994: First application of N fertilizer based on sensor readings. N rate was reduced with no decrease in grain yield. 1996: Worlds first optical sensing variable N rate applicator developed at OSU 1997: OSU optical sensor simultaneously measures incident and reflected light at two wavelengths, (670 ±6 nm and 780 ±6 nm) and incident light is cosine corrected enabling the use of calibrated reflectance. 1997: Variable rate technology used to sense and treat every 4 square 1998: Yields increased by treating spatial variability and OSU’s In-Season-Estimated-Yield (INSEY) 1998: INSEY refined to account for temporal variability 1999: Found that adjacent 4 square foot areas will not always have the same yield potential 1999: Entered into discussions with John Mayfield concerning the potential commercialization of a sensor-based N 2000: N fertilizer rate needed to maximize yields varied widely over years and was unpredictable; developed RI 2001: NDVI readings used for plant selection of triticales in Mexico. 2001: NFOA algorithm field tested in 2001, demonstrating that grain yields could be increased at lower N rates when N fertilizers were applied to each 4 square feet (using INSEY and RI) 2002: Ideal growth stage in corn identified for in-season N applications in corn via daily NDVI sampling in Mexico as V : CV from NDVI readings collected in corn and wheat were first used within NFOA’s developed at OSU. 2003: When site CV’s were greater than 18, recovery of maximum yield from mid-season fertilizer N applications was not possible in wheat 2004: Calibration stamp technology jointly developed and extended within the farming community 2004: OSU-NFOA’s (wheat and corn) used in Argentina, and extended in China and India. 2005: USAID Grant allowed GreenSeeker Sensors to be delivered in China, India, Turkey, Mexico, Argentina, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, and Australia. 2006: Delivery of 586 RAMPS and 1500 N Rich Strips (using RCS and SBNRC approaches respectively) in farmer fields across Oklahoma resulted in an estimated service area exceeding 200,000 acres and increased farmer revenue exceeding $2,000,000.

Handheld Unit – Temporal Variability In season environmental conditions Handheld GreenSeeker™ units located in several NE District Extension Offices

Wheat GreenSeeker/N Rich Strip 1 Farm – 43 wheat fields – 1665 Acres 1 Farm – 43 wheat fields – 1665 Acres Traditional Program – 100 pounds N/A Traditional Program – 100 pounds N/A Handheld GreenSeeker ($3600) Saved 149,529 lbs of Urea, $14.59/A, $24,300 Handheld GreenSeeker ($3600) Saved 149,529 lbs of Urea, $14.59/A, $24,300

Regional GreenSeeker Grain Yields

Regional GreenSeeker Profits

2006 NE GreenSeeker/Corn Trials Gross Return ($/A) Treatment Miami South Coffeyville Webbers Falls Ft. Gibson All Site Average Check Farmer Practice N-Rich lbs N – Pre + GreenSeeker N – Pre + GreenSeeker

2006 NE GreenSeeker/Corn Trials Grain Yield (Bu/A) Treatment Miami South Coffeyville Webbers Falls Ft. Gibson All Site Average Check Farmer Practice N-Rich lbs N – Pre + GreenSeeker N – Pre + GreenSeeker

2006 NE GreenSeeker/Corn Trials Total N Applied (lbs N/A) Treatment Miami South Coffeyville Webbers Falls Ft. Gibson All Site Average Check 0 Farmer Practice N-Rich lbs N – Pre + GreenSeeker 112 (37) 93 (17) 110 (35) 132 (57) 112 (37) 0 N – Pre + GreenSeeker

Calibration Stamp Visual Interpretation of “Stamps” provides mid-season fertilizer N recommendation

Nitrogen Stamp N Stamps applied – Nov. 16, 2004

80 N 120 N 40 N N Stamp – Sperry, OK Jan 27, 2005 Wheat planted Sept. 30, 2004 Optical Sensor Alternative N Stamps

40 lbs N 80 lbs N 120 lbs N Ottawa County February 15, 2005 GDD 74 NDVI N Rich.562 NDVI FP.364 Yield Potential 0 N – 42 bushels Yield Potential + N – 73 bushels N recommedation – 75 lbs./A

Distance N Rate NDVI RI = 1.5

N Ramp Calibration Strip

Ramp Calibration Strip Walk it off Walk it off Or use Hand-Held Sensor Or use Hand-Held Sensor Walk it off Walk it off Or use Hand-Held Sensor Or use Hand-Held Sensor 0 N 195 N

RAMP Calibration Strips Ramped calibration strip is superior than yield based N recommendation Ramped calibration strip is superior than yield based N recommendation It can be easily implemented, be used for other fertilizers and amendments It can be easily implemented, be used for other fertilizers and amendments

0 N 325 N 200 N McIntosh County 2007 Visual Estimate from Ramp

0 N 200 N Delaware County 2007 Visual Estimate from Ramp 325 N

We have the capability to fertilize individual plants

Soil Testing Still Needed Every 3 years or less Every 3 years or less Routine test for P,K, pH Routine test for P,K, pH To diagnose production problems To diagnose production problems