Evaluating Training Effort Organisations are under pressure to justify various expenses. Business heads and training managers are under pressure to prove.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring ROI to Make the Case for Training HRPYR Topic by Table Thursday, April 17, 2008.
Advertisements

Return on Investment: Training and Development
Program Evaluation. Overview and Discussion of: Objectives of evaluation Process evaluation Outcome evaluation Indicators & Measures Small group discussions.
Training Evaluation Presentation by Ranjith Menon.
Training Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Kelly Arthur Richard Gage-Little Dale Munson Evaluation Strategies for Instructional Designers.
Reasons for Evaluating Training Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage. To justify the costs.
Creating a Quality Instructor Competency Program and Observation Form
Managing Learning and Knowledge Capital Human Resource Development: Chapter 11 Evaluation Copyright © 2010 Tilde University Press.
Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.
2/5/2004CEdMA Europe CEdMA Toolset 2004 ROI in Training Norman Buckberry Chairman CEdMA Europe
Accountability in Human Resource Management Dr. Jack J. Phillips.
Evaluation of Training
Training OS352 HRM Fisher Oct. 23, Agenda Debrief on mid-semester feedback In-class writing Review training cycle Technology and training.
OS 352 3/13/08 I. Reminder: Exercise 3 due Thurs. after break. II. Coaching & feedback (continued) III. Greenwald article IV. Training V. Development.
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation
Chapter 9 Employee Development
TRAINING AND COUNTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT
Chapter 5 Training Discuss how training can contribute to companies’ business strategy. Explain the role of the manager in identifying training needs and.
Staff Development and Support Higher Administration Admin Services Outcome 3.
HFT 2220 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. Development Programs Helps our employees get better every day Helps employees achieve their goals Puts the person in sync.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
The Vision Implementation Project
Module 3: Five core practices of effective trainers MOA – FAO – TCP Workshop on Managing Training Institutions Beijing, 9 July 2012.
Training & Development
Chapter 6 Training and Development in Sport Organizations.
Performance Technology Dr. James J. Kirk Professor of HRD.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Learning Programs ITEC 860 Fall 2003 Aniruddh Mukerji.
EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING Group 5. Effectiveness of Training  What is “effectiveness of training”? Effectiveness means producing an intended result.
People, process and software working together for improved business results Established in 2003, Business Performance Pty Ltd provides business and management.
5 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Part 2. Evaluation FORMATIVE SUMMATIVE Why Evaluate ? Makes good economic sense Allows for accountability Answers the increased scrutiny of Budgets Fulfills.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Training and Developing Employees.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Training & Development
Presenter : Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for E-learning Application: From Functional Usability to.
1 Presentation to TCS. 2 Who we are What we can offer What we do Our products & services.
TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?
Evaluation and Case Study Review Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
Human Resource DevelopmentMuhammad Adnan Sarwar 1 Training and Development Human Resource Management.
1© 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd. Chapter Ten Transfer of Training.
Intel ® Teach to the Future Pre Service Evaluation across Asia - Gaining the Country Perspective - Deakin University Faculty of Education Consultancy and.
Introduction to Development Centres Sandra Schlebusch The Consultants.
Managing Human Resources Chapter PowerPoint Presentation by Monica Belcourt, York University and Charlie Cook, The University of West Alabama Training.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
Training and Developing a Competitive Workforce 17/04/2013.
Introduction To Performance Consulting by Dr. James J. Kirk Professor of HRD Western Carolina University.
Evaluation of Strategic HRD Chapter 11. Why Evaluate ? The Purpose of Evaluation: Viewpoints & Challenges Evaluation is a core part of what makes us compete.
Human Resource Management Lecture-22.  Learning Theory and Employee Training.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation
1© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd. CHAPTER TEN Transfer of Training.
Shared Service Review Organisational Development and Training Approach  Stakeholder group established  Models from other NHS systems reviewed  Analysis.
1© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd. CHAPTER FIVE Training Design.
DAY-5 Evaluation and Control Process 6 Yes Determine what to measure. Measure performance. Take corrective action. STOP No Does perform- ance match.
Performance Consulting: Make Performance Your Business! (and Prove It)
Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation
 Training – the process of teaching new employees the basic skills they need to perform their job.  Development – learning that goes beyond today’s.
A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Learning Effectiveness in the Workplace Presented by Dr Cyril Kirwan.
Output of Development Phase Training Title: Training Duration: Trainer: Seating: Target Population: Overall Training Objectives: After having attended.
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Building a Resilient Workplace. 2 Is this a psychological and healthy place to work? -64% agree -19% unsure -17% disagree Plus other organisational factors.
The Learning Practitioner: A performance in five acts
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Evaluation of Information Literacy Education
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
OD Interventions Unit-3.
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Training Effort Organisations are under pressure to justify various expenses. Business heads and training managers are under pressure to prove the effectiveness of training. Two basic issues to address when evaluating:-  How to design the evaluation study?  What to measure?

Measuring Training Effectiveness Basically three things that we can measure: Participants’ reactions to the program; What the trainees learned from the program; To what extent on-the-job behavior changed.

Designing the Evaluation Study Time Series:- Series of measures before and after the training program. Controlled Experimentation:- Formal methods for testing the effectiveness of a training program, preferably with before- and-after tests and a control group.

What to Measure? Kirkpatrick’s Taxonomy Reactions: Through “ Happy sheets questionnaire” or “360-degree questionnaire”. Learning Behavior Results

360 Degree Questionnaire Benefits of using a 360-degree format include: Workplace behaviour improvements The pre-program assessment can be used by the participant as a focus for their learning. The participant is given a much broader appreciation of the application of their behaviours. The reporting after the post assessment allows the individual to see how they have grown or developed as a result of the training program. It provides the facilitator with hard data for proving the cost- effectiveness of the training intervention to Management.

Issues against The Kirkpatrick framework represents a trainer’s notion of what constitutes effective evaluation, not a business manager’s. The second issue deals with hierarchy, the assumption that each level has more value than the previous one. The third issue deals with causality, the assumption that each level is caused by the previous one. Kirkpatrick’s taxonomic model is conceptually flawed as it does not fully identify all the constructs underlying the phenomena of interest. Furthermore, the results provided by the model can lead to incorrect decisions since major intervening variables are not included.

Other Approaches…. QAI India QAI is a leading global consulting organization (Asia’s largest and world’s third largest organization) addressing ‘Operational Excellence' in IT, BPO and Knowledge intensive organizations. Effectiveness of a training program is measured at 5 levels: I. Need for training II. Satisfaction of participants III. Learning at the classroom IV. Change in Behavior V. Improvement in results

ROI approach by Jack Phillips ROI = Net Program Benefits X 100 % Program Costs ROI couches results and expectations in the language of business and is often a hurdle a project must clear in order to secure funding. Given that learning is increasingly perceived as an investment by the organization, it seems only natural that it should be evaluated in the same way as other large investments, in terms of costs and benefits

Software Companies: They use Heuristic Evaluation Quality Score (HEQS) Steps of HEQS are:

1. Identify the application, parameters and the severity ratings 2. Standardize the scope of evaluation 3. Provide a knowledge transfer (optional) 4. Standardize the time for evaluation 5. Standardize the evaluation format 6. Proceed to evaluate 7. Use the individual evaluations to arrive at a benchmark 8. Use this benchmark to measure the skills of each evaluator 9. Derive Insights

The IBM Certified Trainer (ICT) program is a comprehensive program for Trainers' Preparation and Certification. Validates skills using three proficiency levels: IBM Authorized to Teach. (IAT) IBM Professional Trainer (IPT) IBM Training Expert (ITE) E.g. Blended learning programs encompasses multiple learning strategies and delivery formats, ranging from those that are solely technology-based to those that support interactions between people. Training effectiveness is measured by a control group of employees who receive no training. Provides real-world-based assessments with feedback Increase in its annual investment in learning programs that are blended (with increases between 30 and 40 percent each year for the past four years).

Management Development Programmes(MDPs) have been institutionalised. Wipro has different programmes catering to different life-cycle stages of the manager. Different people may get different amounts of training at different times. 360 degree feedback. Training Quality measured against six sigma.

Manufacturing Company Featherlite India Training given on various topics Training conducted every 3 months or 6 months depending on requirements In-house and external trainers Happy sheet Questionnaire known as “ Survey Forms” Monthly Performance Appraisal Interview Rating Sheets

Conclusion Measuring Training Effectiveness is different for software and manufacturing companies. The purpose of Evaluation is to improve the probability of investment providing a good return to the business. Measurement of training effectiveness is a hallmark of good management.