Chapter 11 Prisoner Reentry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Advertisements

A Brief History of Parole
The History of Parole: From Its Origin to the Present
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Chapter Fourteen Institutional Programs
Irish Penal Reform Trust Reforming the Early Release System in Ireland.
Parole. Parole What is Parole? Jails and Prisons What is the difference between jail and prison? Jail: Prison:
Prisons and Jails Early Punishments Lex Talionis Flogging Mutilation Branding Public Humiliation: Shaming Workhouses Exile.
13 Prison and Jails.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 15 Release from Incarceration.
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT.
Chapter 15: Criminal Justice Process ~ Sentencing & Corrections Objective: The student should be able to list the various options to sentencing & identify.
Community Based Corrections, 7th edition
CRIMINAL LAW: CORRECTIONS. RETRIBUTIVE REHABILITATIVE RESTORATIVE HOW DOES THE PUNISHMENT SIDE OF OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM WORK?
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice
Probation and Parole Chapter 12.
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Frank Schmalleger Criminal Justice Today 13 th Edition.
Chapter 7 Probation Modification and Termination.
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC.
Prison Systems Unit 6.2.
Mainstream and Crosscurrents, Second Edition Chapter 11 History of Control and Punishment.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Irwin/McGraw-Hill © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Chapter 14 Alternatives: Community.
4 Parole and the Indeterminate Sentence.
Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry 1.
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
Criminal Justice Chapter 9 Presentation Assignment By: Ciara Hairston & Kiya Holland May 4, 2012.
Define corrections in terms of criminal justice… Then, provide three examples of corrections used in the US today. Provide pros and cons of each. Corrections.
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTRO TO CORRECTIONS. WHAT IS CORRECTIONS? Corrections is that portion of the criminal justice system charged with carrying out the sentences.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Sentencing and Corrections. Judges Options Suspended Sentence: Sentence is given but is not imposed until the defendant messes up again (arrested or violates.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY (ACE) A program designed to increase the success of high risk offenders returning to the community from prison Western District.
Chapter 9 Flashcards. citation a legal document roughly equivalent to a traffic ticket.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
The Correctional System Lesson 50. The Correctional System “Most people come out of jail eventually. So you have to consider what’s going to be the effect.
Criminal Law Sentencing Youth Justice May Sentencing The Goal of sentencing is Deterrence Rehabilitation Retribution Segregation Taking into account.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
BJS ReEntry Highlights (note: yearend 2002). BJS ReEntry At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80%
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
CJS 230 EDU Experience Tradition/cjs230edu.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Chapter 9 Nonresidential Intermediate Sanctions. Intensive Supervision Probation is an enhanced form of probation, and includes: Closer surveillance More.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Prisoner Reentry and Parole:
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Criminal Law: Corrections
Class Name, Instructor Name
Chapter Eight Parole and Prisoner Reentry
Chapter 8 Parole and Parolees.
The History of Parole & Mandatory Release
The Correctional Context
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 11 Prisoner Reentry

Introduction 95% of all prisoners will one day be released from prison, most on either mandatory supervision or discretionary parole release Reentry means the process of preparing for release from prison and the release into the community itself while remaining under supervision

About 600,000 prisoners are released from state and federal prisons every year Unconditional releases, receiving no supervision because they have served their full sentence, account for 20% Parole is the conditional release of an offender, under continued custody, to serve the remainder of the sentence under supervision

Mandatory release (postrelease supervision) is granted automatically at the expiration of time served plus good time credit and is established by law Discretionary release is determined by members of a parole board who decide that a prisoner has earned the privilege of release while remaining under supervision in the community

The Origins of Parole Parole is derived from the French parole d’honneur, meaning “word of honor” Parole originated almost simultaneously in Europe with: Manuel Montesinos, a Spaniard, in 1835 Georg Michael Obermaier, a German, in 1842 Alexander Maconochie, an Englishman, in 1837

A 1597 English law provided for the transportation of English prisoners to America The king granted reprieves and stays of execution-pardons-to convicted felons who could be put to work in the colonies Upon arrival in the colonies, the services of the prisoner were sold to the highest bidder, resulting in indentured servitude

The Revolutionary War ended the transportation of criminals to America and resulted in same practice to Australia in 1788 In 1811, the ticket of leave was adopted to shorten the sentence The Marks System was proposed by Alexander Maconochie in 1837 The Norfolk Island penal colony was transformed by Maconochie using the Marks System as superintendent in 1840

The Irish System was modeled after Norfolk Island by Sir Walter Crofton in 1854, based on: Strict imprisonment Indeterminate sentence Ticket-of-leave Prisoners released under the Irish System were supervised by police in rural areas and an inspector in Dublin

Development of Parole in the U.S. Parole was first tried in the U.S. at the New York Elmira Reformatory in 1876 Four concepts justified parole in the U.S.: Reduction in the length of incarceration as a reward for good conduct Supervision of the parolee Imposition of the indeterminate sentence Reduction in the rising cost of incarceration

The indeterminate sentence was adopted in 1876 in New York By 1944, every state had adopted parole and indeterminate sentencing The Medical Model, based on rehabilitation, was the primary philosophy from 1930-1960 A philosophical change occurred in the 1970s as individualism, rehabilitation, sentence indeterminacy and parole all fell from favor

The medical model and indeterminate sentencing were replaced by the justice model and determinate sentencing because of: Steadily increasing crime rates The perceived failure of rehabilitation programs The perception that parole boards were incapable of making predictive judgments about offender’s future behavior

In contrast to the rehabilitative idea, the just desserts or justice model changed the focus from the offender to the offense Determinate sentencing abolished or tightly controlled discretion The Justice Model sought to end the “haphazard and irrational manner” that sent some offenders to prison and said the goal of sentencing should be punishment

From Discretionary Parole to Mandatory Release In 1977, about 88% of prisoners were released by a parole board By 2003, the percentage was reduced to only 24%-39% of released prisoners, while mandatory release numbers increased As of 2001, 15 states had abolished parole and another 5 abolished discretionary release

Parole Today After abolishing parole boards, some states have reintroduced discretionary release to control for institutional crowding In 2005, 765,300 (347 of 100,000 population) were on parole 53% were on mandatory release 40.5% were on some form of discretionary release Less than half successfully complete their term

Functions of Parole Parole is tasked primarily with protecting the public from released offenders, and accomplish this goal by: Enforcing restrictions and controls on parolees in the community Providing services that help parolees integrate into a non-criminal lifestyle Increasing the public’s level of confidence in the system

Parole boards have functioned in some states as the “back door” of America’s prisons Medical parole, or compassionate release, is the conditional release of prisoners with a terminal illness The optimal solution regarding the indeterminacy of sentencing and the proper role of parole is not yet at hand and will continue in the public policy debate.