1 Streamlining Sampling and Analysis to Support Site Cleanup: The Triad Approach 25 Years of Contaminated Land Management: Achievements and Work Still.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Decision Making
Advertisements

IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
TO-1 ConSoil 2008 Milan, Italy Joint U.S. – E.U. Panel: Employing Best Management and Technical Practices in Site Cleanup Programs June 6, 2008.
Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management System Overview.
1 What is Remediation Process Optimization? How Can It Help Me Identify Opportunities for Enhanced and More Efficient Site Remediation? Mark A. Gilbertson.
Facility Lead Corrective Action Approaches Voluntary Agreements RCRA National Meeting August 13, 2003 Jennifer Shoemaker EPA Region 3.
Reuse / Revitalization. What is Reuse / Revitalization? Restoring contaminated and potentially contaminated sites to productive use.
PREPARED WORKBOOK Kathy Castagna, EPA Region 1 Mark Lewis, CT DEEP John Podgurski, EPA Region 1 March 25, 2015.
UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
Redevelopment of Former Industrial Lands in the Australian Capital Territory Toby Hobbs Coffey Geosciences, Australia NATO/CCMS Pilot Study June
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
Chapter Learning Objectives
1 ITRC Mission ITRC is A state-led coalition working together with industry and stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance of environmental technologies.
Fermilab Environmental Management System (EMS)
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Chapter 8 Assuring the quality of external participants’ contributions
Environmental Engineering
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
The Mission of the Math/Science Initiative To provide data-driven tools and supports that enable schools to improve student access to and achievement in.
S/W Project Management
Software Project Management Lecture # 8. Outline Chapter 25 – Risk Management  What is Risk Management  Risk Management Strategies  Software Risks.
Risk Management & Liability Informa Brownfield Hospital Development Summit June 2009.
ITEW Evaluation of Teacher Learning Experience 2015 Oulu UAS, Kotkantie Campus, Engineering, Natural Resources, Media and Performing Arts Bastian Fähnrich.
Deana M. Crumbling, M.S. Technology Innovation Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. (703) Northeast.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Sustainable Procurement & Life Cycle Analysis Heather Pearce 9 th February 2010.
Software Project Management Lecture # 8. Outline Earned Value Analysis (Chapter 24) Topics from Chapter 25.
2011 ITRC Spring Membership Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota April 6, 2011.
A Modern Strategy for Hazardous Waste Site Clean-Up: The "Triad" Approach Sept. 27, 2001 ENRY Belgrade, Yugoslavia Daniel M. Powell Technology Innovation.
MEDIATING NATURAL RESOURCE CONFLICTS: USEFUL TOOLS AND CONCEPTS MICHAEL BROWN SENIOR MEDIATION EXPERT STANDBY MEDIATION TEAM UN DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL.
When Partnering Fails… Gayle Waldron President, The Management Edge.
Environmental auditing
TRP Chapter Chapter 5.4 Facility development.
Triad Approach / Best Management Practices. Triad Approach and BMPs Systematic Planning – Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Dynamic Work Strategies Real-Time.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Presented by Rosalie Olson Dynamic Resource Management Re-Framing Manitoba’s Workplace Conference, December 2, 2010 Achieve Strategic Results Expanding.
Object-Oriented Software Engineering Practical Software Development using UML and Java Chapter 1: Software and Software Engineering.
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
Object-Oriented Software Engineering Practical Software Development using UML and Java Chapter 1: Software and Software Engineering.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
1 Project Management C13PM Session 2 Project Initiation & Definition Russell Taylor Business Department Staff Workroom
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR COMMUNITY EVENTS. Today’s Session Risk Management – why is it important? Risk Management and Risk Assessment concepts Steps in the.
EPA Staying Flexible: Adaptive Management Approaches for Superfund Redevelopment An Enforcement Perspective Helena Healy Branch Chief Office of Site Remediation.
1 Overview of The Triad Approach Presented to: Society of American Military Engineers Orange County Post Presented by: Bill Girolamo and Bill Musser Environmental.
Performance-Based Management for Brownfields - Best Practices and Approaches November 2006 Eliana Makhlouf, Ph.D., P.E. Marsh Environmental Practice.
Stages of Research and Development
Environmental Acquisition Strategy Performance-Based Contracting
Continuous Delivery- Complete Guide
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Assist. Prof. Magy Mohamed Kandil
Internet Interconnection
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Objectives Provide an overview of the triad approach and its application Describe the elements of the triad approach for practical application Describe.
Presentation transcript:

1 Streamlining Sampling and Analysis to Support Site Cleanup: The Triad Approach 25 Years of Contaminated Land Management: Achievements and Work Still to Be Done Bordeaux, France Tuesday, October 4, 2005 Daniel Powell, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Acting Chief Technology Integration and Information Branch

2 Waste Site Cleanup 25 Years Young 3000 BC 500 BC 1790 AD1903 AD1930 AD1960 AD1980 AD

3 Waste Site Cleanup 25 Years Young 3000 BC 500 BC 1790 AD1903 AD1930 AD1960 AD1980 AD

4 Changing Times in Site Cleanup 1980’s  Enforcement/litigation drivers  Long timeframes, large budgets  Repeatable processes  Standard methods basis for analysis  Limited applied knowledge/expertise  Limited technology, early research  Reliance on off-site, laboratory-based methods Present  Land Recycling/ Brownfields  Faster, cheaper (limited budgets, real estate drivers)  Site-specific needs  Flexibility, performance basis  Increasing knowledge base  Rapid sampling/analysis tools  Field methods provide both qualitative and quantitative results

5 Problem Statement  Perception: contaminated site cost too much and take too long to cleanup »Unexpected findings »Regulatory processes »Investigation – mobilization after mobilization; never enough data »Cleanup – systems do not work as planned  Unfortunately, that perception has basis in common experiences, often due to: »Inadequate understanding of site conditions »Insufficient management of all sources of uncertainty »Lack of tools sufficient to affordably manage uncertainties

We need more information 33 It ends when the $$ runs out!! Start: “Define the nature and extent of contamination.” 2

7 What We Have Seen Idealized Models, Few Data Points

8 Slide adapted from Columbia Technologies, Inc., 2003 What We Now See Subsurface CSM from high density data (DP-MIP sensing)

9 Systematic Project Planning Dynamic Work Strategy Real Time Measurement Technologies The Triad Approach Synthesizes practitioner experience, successes, and lessons-learned into an institutional framework

10 Triad Benefits Statement Increases Confidence in Saves Time Saves MoneyDecisions Fewer mobilizations Reduces debate Move through “stages” faster To closure To reuse Sampling events (sometimes) Cleanup/remedy Total project costs Reduce “overdesign” Insurance costs Reducing Decision Uncertainty Representative Thoroughness (did we miss anything) All data users

11 Systematic Planning Is Essential to…..  Identify key decisions, decisionmakers, needs  Identify and address (all sources of) uncertainty  Develop data collection accordingly  Adjust expectations according to: »Evolving site needs »New information »Budget »Schedule »Community needs, goals  Guide open, rational discussions on assessment, cleanup and reuse »Possibilities »Strategies

12 Examples of Decisions  Presence of contamination  Types of contamination, contaminants of concern  Extent (relevant to site goals)  Location and extent of hot spots  Costs/approaches of cleanup  Receptors/pathways  Cleanup levels  Areas to develop for specific uses  Performance of remedy  Disposal options

13 So How Is Triad “Planning” New?  A formalized, integrated package that restructures how project planning and implementation are done: »Focus: Identify and manage decision uncertainty »Focus: Recognize the impacts of heterogeneity »Front-loaded (anticipate vs. react) »Conceptual Site Model essential; evolution guides field »Integrated project team (understand data user needs) »Start with end in mind (where are we going)  Second generation approach maximizing improvements and advances in »Knowledge »Technologies

14 Social Capital and Triad Projects  The “people” aspects of a project are critical  Triad systematic planning encourages participants to: »Share knowledge and insights »Test assumptions, beliefs, and personal perspectives »Evaluate legal, budgetary, and technical constraints »Achieve clarity about where disagreements lie »Negotiate over concerns and interests  Facilitation needed if team doesn’t possess the necessary social skills or if conflict and distrust too ingrained  Uncooperative participants means Triad probably not a viable option for project management

15 Why Emphasize Decision Uncertainty?  Inherent in environmental decision making  Always need to be managed  Essential for accelerated progress »Helps make decisions when “perfect information” is not available »Resolution of all uncertainties or unknown conditions is unlikely »Triad encourages distinction between significant and insignificant uncertainties  Triad encourages teams to evaluate tradeoffs »Counteracting uncertainties (RA contingency planning) »Reducing uncertainties (additional data collection)

16 The Triad and Data Quality  Intensive systematic planning ensures project decisions and goals focused on exit strategy; all parties must understand them before fieldwork begins  Experienced chemist an intimate member of planning & field teams »Sets type & frequency of analytical QC procedures to ensure data reliability  CSM used to capture heterogeneity & physical reality »Mediates the mismatch between sampling /analytical scales (grams) an project decisions (tons)

17 The Triad and Data Quality  Data representativeness is KEY: defined in terms of CSM and decisions »Use CSM (analyte variability) in conjunction with decision scale to determine proper sample support (the physical dimensions and volume of a sample) »High sampling density or compositing often required: contamination typically heterogeneous; so infrequent sample results easily misleading »Pre-project demonstrations of methods applicability (DMAs) ensure proper selection and application of tools to reach correct decisions »Collaborative data sets generated throughout project (especially at critical decision points) to ensure continued agreement between field and lab results

18 Directions and Experience From Theory to Practice  Triad Profiles (14 now online, another 40+ under development) »Real sites, completed work »All shapes and sizes »  Case Studies  Experience, lessons learned

19 Triad: Real World Applications  Brownfields sites »Milltown, NJ  Resource Concservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) »Lockheed Martin Facility  Superfund sites »McCormick and Baxter  UST Sites »South Dakota  State Cleanup sites »Wenatchee Tree Fruit  Department of Defense »Avon Park, FL (USAF)  Department of Energy »Ashland FUSRAP Site

20 Summary/Cost Savings  Average Time Savings: almost 2 years —Minimum: 6 months —Maximum: 3 years  Average Cost Savings : 45% reduction in costs —Minimum: 35% —Maximum: 50% –Ex: One DoD site reported a cost avoidance of $2.5M and 3 years saved  All profiled projects have cited reduced costs and time savings due to: fewer mobilizations, shortened work schedule, and greater data density that reduces uncertainty at site

21 Changing Behavior and Perception  Will require a change in how we have done business for 25 years »Commitment to Triad planning; front-loaded, intense »Very site-specific, decision-specific »Innovations in procurement aspects —Flexibility —Planning —Contractor expertise, abilities (e.g., data management) »Look at regulations, procedures —SW-846 —No “boxes to check” —New guidance, support, expertise

22 Change Is Good  Evidence is pointing to fact that change is worth investment; does not mean we were “wrong” »Lower TOTAL project costs »Increase confidence in decisions »Closure faster —Stages —Sites »Lessen likelihood of unexpected findings, costs —Hidden cleanup costs (worse than we thought) —Regulatory delay —Lenders, insurers »On to reuse, revitalization

23 The Triad is an innovative approach to decision-making for hazardous waste site characterization and remediation. The Triad approach proactively exploits new characterization and treatment tools, using work strategies developed by innovative and successful site professionals. The Triad Resource Center provides the information hazardous waste site managers and cleanup practitioners need to implement the Triad effectively. "The NJDEP supports and encourages the use of the Triad for sites undergoing investigation and remediation within the Site Remediation and Waste Management Program where feasible.“ Joseph Seebode New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Assistant Commissioner for Site Remediation and Waste Management Triad Overview Triad Management Regulatory Information Technical Components User Experiences References/Resources Glossary FAQs Acronyms

24 Training Information  Remediation and characterization »Internet seminars — —Live and interactive —Low time commitment (2 hours) —No travel commitment —Archived —163 seminars since 1998, over 21,000 participants, from over 900 cities in over 40 countries  Classroom » »