UCLA’s Statewide Evaluation of Proposition 36 Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Association for Criminal Justice Research (California)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration State Care Coordination 1.
Advertisements

Gender Differences in Health Status Among Opiate Users in a 25-Year Follow-up Study Christine Grella & Luz Rodriguez UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs.
1 ORANGE COUNTY SACPA/PC1210 Three-Year Report Sandy Hilger, Research Division, OC Probation Mack Jenkins, Director Adult Court Services Division, OC Probation.
 Johnny was born on February 14, 1994  Resides with his mother, father, and two year old sister  Mother works as a full time nurse  Father is self.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
Re-Entry and Recidivism
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
SMART JUSTICE SYMPOSIUM Lt. Joanne Lake Spokane County Sheriff’s Office Detention Services Assistant Facility Commander-Geiger.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Drug Medi-Cal Waiver Evaluation Planning Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs January 5, 2015 The author’s views and recommendations.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Managing drug- involved offenders with HOPE Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD October 22, 2010 ACJRCA.
Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies American Society of Criminology November 16, 2011.
WISP Assessing Implementation and Early Outcomes Seattle City Council Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD December 12, 2011.
Chapter 13 Parole Conditions and Revocation. Introduction Parole conditions determine the amount of freedom versus restriction a parolee has Accomplishment.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Ebony S. McDonald, MSW, LSW, MBA p VISN 4 HCRV Specialist Lebanon VA Medical Center.
Table 1 Introduction  Overview  While predictors of recidivism and technical violations are often examined in probation and parole outcome research,
Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies American Society of Criminology November 17, 2010.
 The Youthful Offender Block Grant (YOBG) Program was established through enactment of Senate Bill 81 in  Under YOBG, non-serious, non-violent,
C:\laam\lamAPA.ppt 8/04/98 Heroin Addiction Treatment: A Comparison of Methadone and LAAM M. Douglas Anglin, Ph.D. Douglas Longshore, Ph.D. Jeffrey J.
BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Missouri Re-Entry Program Analysis of offender release factors from 2005 to 2011 and selected demographics Boone County Prepared for Boone.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Collecting & Analyzing Baseline Data January 2009 Follow-up Calls (Call #2) Based on the fall 2008 CATES Training Series Contra Costa County, San Bernardino.
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Addiction Services Substance Abuse Treatment Services Provider Performance Report Substance Abuse Treatment.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
MIA: STEP Toolkit Overview. NIDA-SAMHSA Blending Initiative 2 What is an MI Assessment?  Use of client-centered MI style  MI strategies that can be.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAM SUPERVISED BY THE COURT BERGEN Inhabitants: app Number of injecting abusers: 1000 – 2500 OSLO Inhabitants: appr
Drug Abuse Trends in the State of California Presented to: CA Association for Criminal Justice Research March 17, 2005 Presented by: Kiku Annon, MA, WestEd.
Missouri’s State and Provider Partnership Terry Morris Missouri Division of Alcohol & Drug Abuse August 2008 Advancing Recovery in Missouri.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Implementing SACPA: Orange County’s Experience October 16, 2008 ACJR Semi-annual Conference Christie Gardiner, Ph.D. California State University, Fullerton.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
The Heroin Epidemic in rural Maryland Rural Health Learning Collaboration Sept. 28, 2015 James A. Cockey, MD, FACP Deputy Health Officer.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Richard Rawson, Ph.D. Rachel Gonzales, Ph.D. Funded by: California Alcohol and Drug Programs CalOMS Training for.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Kathryn P. Jett Director California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
First Steps System of Care Family Systems Collaborations Systems to Systems Nancy Gottlieb, MFT.
1 Assessment Guided Life Planning: The San Diego SB 618 Prisoner Reentry Experience Criminal Justice Research Division Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Forest County Community Wellness Court
Summit County Probation Services
Sentencing Reform in CA
California State Association of Counties
Beyond the referral Presented by:
Evaluation of California’s Hub and Spoke System
Presentation transcript:

UCLA’s Statewide Evaluation of Proposition 36 Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) October 16, 2008

Topics What is Prop 36? What is Prop 36? Show rates Show rates Completion rates Completion rates Arrests Arrests Cost Cost Recommendations for Reducing No-Shows Recommendations for Reducing No-Shows Employment Employment Narcotic Replacement Therapy Narcotic Replacement Therapy Incentives & Sanctions Incentives & Sanctions Process Improvement Process Improvement

What is Prop 36? Passed by California Voters in November 2000 Passed by California Voters in November 2000 Enacted into law as the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) of Enacted into law as the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) of If an adult is convicted of a drug offense or commits a drug related parole violation and meets other eligibility criteria, the offender is given the option of receiving supervision with substance abuse treatment. If an adult is convicted of a drug offense or commits a drug related parole violation and meets other eligibility criteria, the offender is given the option of receiving supervision with substance abuse treatment.

Prop 36 Treatment Client Characteristics Primary Drug: Meth 57.0%, cocaine/crack 13.1%, marijuana 12.5%, alcohol 8.2%, opiates 8.0%. Primary Drug: Meth 57.0%, cocaine/crack 13.1%, marijuana 12.5%, alcohol 8.2%, opiates 8.0%. Sex: 73% male Sex: 73% male Average age: 34.8 Average age: 34.8 Ethnicity: 43.9% non-Hispanic White, 35.9% Hispanic, 13.6% African-American. Ethnicity: 43.9% non-Hispanic White, 35.9% Hispanic, 13.6% African-American. First time in treatment: 50.4% First time in treatment: 50.4% Probation: 86.8%, Parole: 13.2% Probation: 86.8%, Parole: 13.2%

Prop 36 Offender Pipeline Referred Assessed Placed in Treatment (Step 1) (Step 2) (Step 3) 85.6% 82.8% 85.6% 82.8% 48,996 Yes 41,925 Yes 34,702 No 7,071 No 7,223 No 7,071 No 7,223 All categories may include people who “opted out” later Data Source: SACPA Reporting Information System, adjusted Overall Show Rate: 70.8%

Prop 36 Treatment Clients by Modality (CADDS), 7/1/05 – 6/30/06 (N = 40,358)

Discharge Status by Referral Source (CADDS admissions ) Discharge Status by Referral Source (CADDS admissions ) Note: Requirements may differ - Prop 36 completers spend about 30 days longer in tx.

New Arrests During 42 Months After Offense Prop 36 Offenders, July 2001 – June 2002 (N =17,519)

New Arrests During 42 Months After Offense Prop 36 Year One vs Pre- Prop 36 Comparison Group

Crime Trends Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reports, National Archive of Criminal Justice Data Statewide, drug crime arrests rose more in California than nationally (21% vs 14%). Statewide, drug crime arrests rose more in California than nationally (21% vs 14%). Statewide, property crime arrests rose more in California than nationally (6% vs 0%). Statewide, property crime arrests rose more in California than nationally (6% vs 0%). Statewide, violent crime arrests dropped more in California than nationally (12% vs 9%) Statewide, violent crime arrests dropped more in California than nationally (12% vs 9%)

Cost Analysis by Treatment Status 42 month follow-up Hawken, Longshore, Urada, Fan, & Anglin (2008)

Cost Analysis: 42 month followup Hawken, Longshore, Urada, Fan, & Anglin (2008)

Recommendations

Suggestions we hear most often Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding !

“Classic” Recommendations for Reducing No-Shows Co-locate assessment units in/near court Co-locate assessment units in/near court Assess in a single visit Assess in a single visit Allow walk-in assessments Allow walk-in assessments Incorporate procedures used in drug courts Incorporate procedures used in drug courts

Employment: Focus Group Ideas Lower cost suggestions: On-site “one-stop shopping” employment services, professional job counselor On-site “one-stop shopping” employment services, professional job counselor “Felon-friendly” job lists “Felon-friendly” job lists Vocational education (regularly, weekly, evenings) Vocational education (regularly, weekly, evenings) Tap into networks of alumni who can provide job search assistance, contacts Tap into networks of alumni who can provide job search assistance, contacts GED graduation ceremonies GED graduation ceremonies Funding stability Higher Cost Suggestions:

Narcotic Replacement Therapy Methadone: still the “gold standard” to treat opiate addiction but there is exceptional resistance Methadone: still the “gold standard” to treat opiate addiction but there is exceptional resistance Trainings needed, but valid concerns, barriers exist. Trainings needed, but valid concerns, barriers exist. Suboxone (Buprenorphine + Naloxone) an alternative for areas without a methadone clinic. Suboxone (Buprenorphine + Naloxone) an alternative for areas without a methadone clinic.

Sanctions & Incentives Incentives work and are preferable to sanctions. Incentives work and are preferable to sanctions. Literature: Testing and sanctions programs implemented with certainty and consistency have led to reduced drug use, recidivism. Literature: Testing and sanctions programs implemented with certainty and consistency have led to reduced drug use, recidivism. Examples: DC Drug Court Experiment, HOPE Examples: DC Drug Court Experiment, HOPE Literature: When sanctions were not delivered with certainty, the program failed Literature: When sanctions were not delivered with certainty, the program failed Example: Maryland’s Break-the-Cycle Example: Maryland’s Break-the-Cycle

Treatment Provider Perceptions – would jail sanctions improve treatment completion? Source: UCLA 2007 Proposition 36 Treatment Provider Survey

Process Improvement: Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) Process Improvement: Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) Designed to help treatment providers improve their own programs Designed to help treatment providers improve their own programs Goals: Goals: Increase admissions Increase admissions Reduce waiting times Reduce waiting times Reduce no-shows Reduce no-shows Increase client continuation in treatment Increase client continuation in treatment

Conduct a “walk-through” to understand the processes that facilitate or inhibit treatment goals from a client’s perspective. Conduct a “walk-through” to understand the processes that facilitate or inhibit treatment goals from a client’s perspective. Identify a measurable goal. Identify a measurable goal. Establish a Change Team to select and test changes to address the problem. Establish a Change Team to select and test changes to address the problem. Collect data before, during, after a change to see whether the change resulted in improvement. Collect data before, during, after a change to see whether the change resulted in improvement. Make adjustments to improve continuously and sustain changes. Make adjustments to improve continuously and sustain changes. Key Steps

LA County Pilot Project Change Example Southern California Alcohol & Drug Programs, Inc. Normally assessor would call program and whoever answered phone scheduled intake. Change: When assessment center called, a Prop. 36 counselor would talk with the potential client on the phone. Counselor introduced self Counselor introduced self Told client about the program Told client about the program Asked if client had any specific needs that should be addressed during treatment Asked if client had any specific needs that should be addressed during treatment Motivational interviewing-type strategies used Motivational interviewing-type strategies used

Tracking Change Results

Overall Results

For more info UCLA Prop 36 Reports: NIATx: Comments / Questions