Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: What are the Key Research Questions? Alistair BA Boxall, Murray A Rudd, Bryan W Brooks,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Strategy on Invasive Species and National Invasive Species Information System VIII Trilateral Committee Meeting Invasive Species as a Trilateral.
Advertisements

Exposure and Effects Workgroup Study Ideas Five-Year Plan: Risk to Birds Is there clear evidence of pollutant effects on survival, reproduction,
Health and Safety Executive Ecotoxicology Annex II and III data requirements Mark Clook Chemicals Regulation Directorate Health and Safety Executive UK.
Dra. Argelia Castaño Ministry of Science and Technology National Institute Food and Agrarian Research (INIA) Animal Health Research Center (CISA) Dra.
Battlement Mesa Health Impact Assessment and Exposure/Health Study Stakeholders Meeting Roxana Witter, MD, MSPH John Adgate, PhD, MSPH Lee Newman, MD,
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
1. Identify challenges and opportunities using questions that reference the six research for development themes defined in the AAS Program Proposal. This.
David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011.
Risk and RACI: Defining Clear Roles
BISE platform on Ecosystem assessments EIONET Biodiversity NRC – European CHM network November 2012, Copenhagen, EEA Valérie LAPORTE.
O.de Funded by in cooperation with Expert meeting on biodiversity standards and strategies for sustainable cultivation of biomass for non-food purposes.
Building open regional innovation strategies: New opportunities provided by Smart Specialisation Strategies Claire Nauwelaers Independent STI policy expert.
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
Why Horizon Scanning?. And, why now? -Other disciplines (e.g., conservation biology) have benefited from horizon scanning and prioritization -Environmental.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Parameterising Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in Ecological Risk Assessment Carmel A. Pollino Water Studies Centre Monash University Owen Woodberry, Ann.
Key issues in biopesticide regulation Pesticides Safety Directorate 19 June 2007.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Ecological Risk Asssessment Part I – The Basics. Introduction Subject normally taught at end of course, after exposure to background material Subject.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Environmental Risk Assessment Part II. Introduction Eventual goal of much environmental toxicology is ecological risk assessment (ERA) Developed as a.
BIOSAFETY CONCERNS IN THE CONTEXT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. Presentation for Training Workshop for Regional Advisors Bangkok, Thailand May 2006.
Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Introduction
TRAIN THE TRAINERS Environment Education Program.
Howard Fillit, MD Executive Director Improving Animal Trials for Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations for Best Practices.
EPA/Office of Water’s Strategy for Contaminants of Emerging Concern Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water U.S. Environmental.
Randall Wentsel, Ph.D. 7 September, Background  Problems  PBT process is based on principles developed for organic substances that do not apply.
Health Sciences and Practice Subject Centre Mental Health Special Interest Group 22 nd April 2009 Tracy Lindsay & Jenny Oates.
Experiences and lessons learned from the TNA of China WANG Can Tsinghua University, China UNFCCC workshop on Technology Needs Assessments Bonn, Germany.
UN Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics (FDES) Why shape does matter Adriana Oropeza IV.
Health and Safety Practices in the Nanomaterials Workplace: Results from an International Survey Joseph Conti Nanotechnology and Occupational Health and.
The Antimicrobial Resistance Issue A briefing for the Secretaries Advisory Committee on Animal Health June 19, 2014.
Access to Personalised Medicine for PDAC patients STSM of the application of an EU-index for barriers Denis Horgan (EAPM) & Angela Brand (IPHG) on behalf.
1 Environment and health information Content Scott Brackett.
Research & Science Advancing Risk Assessment Presentation March Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic Monique Marrec Fairley.
Estimating non-market values across scale and scope John Rolfe.
Thuan Chau EMERGING CONTAMINANTS PHARMACEUTICALS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS (PPCPs) “Contaminants of Emerging Concern” (CECs) – EPA University of Utah.
Strategy and Policy Cohesion: “The One Health Agenda: will it deliver” Elizabeth J. Phillips, MD, FRCPC,FRACP, FACTM Professor & Director, Centre for Clinical.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
M & E TOOLKIT Jennifer Bogle 11 November 2014 Household Water Treatment and Water Safety Plans International and Regional Landscape.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
THIRD ECENA EXCHANGE PROGRAMME Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Key Findings and Major Trends (EEA expert workshop, January 2009) Istanbul.
Systematic Review: Interpreting Results and Identifying Gaps October 17, 2012.
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
The AMR One Health Policy Toolkit: Animal - Human Interface Dr Mark Schipp December 2014.
Participants Q.1: Which of these categories describes your work best? 1.Work on sustainable development regarding pharmaceuticals mainly at national level.
Global Symposium Round Table Session – 23 rd June, 2006 Status & trends in Madagascar’s biodiversity Zo Lalaina Rakotobe Conservation International.
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AARHUS UNIVERSITY PestNaB: Presentation of pesticide risk indicator developed at national level in Denmark Christian.
Biological & Research Programs. Overview Status Future Direction.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation The key principles of pharmacology.
1 Future Strategies to Address PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Global Terrestrial Observing System National and regional dimensions Linking scientists and policy makers to collaborate on global and regional environmental.
HEX-Tox paper reading Tue Hye Young Choi.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Communication: Safety Summary
10 – BIOMARKERS Introduction
Group on Neural Issues.
Stefan Berggren Marine and Water director, Sweden
Strategy and Policy Cohesion: “The One Health Agenda: will it deliver”
Stefan Berggren Marine and Water director, Sweden
JPIAMR Joint Research Calls – Update and Future Calls
Wes Flynn PIs: Marisol Sepulveda, Jason Hoverman, Linda Lee
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
SRIA Roadmap Jonathan Pearce
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: What are the Key Research Questions? Alistair BA Boxall, Murray A Rudd, Bryan W Brooks, Daniel J Caldwell, Kyungho Choi, Silke Hickmann, Elizabeth Innes, Kim Ostapyk, Jane P Staveley, Tim Verslycke

Why a prioritisation exercise?

Key Questions Approach Horizon scanning method Systematic way to identify major research and policy directions Previous exercises on ecology, conservation, biodiversity and agriculture Int. J. Agric. Sust. 8(4): 2010

20 Question Exercise Run by the SETAC Pharmaceuticals Advisory Group (PAG) Effects and risks of PPCPs Global exercise Approach Web-based survey Expert workshop (April 2011) Out of scope: analysis, occurrence, treatment etc Future dissemination to policy makers and research funders

An ideal question Address important gaps in knowledge Be answerable through a realistic research design Have a factual answer that does not depend on value judgments Cover a spatial and temporal scale that could realistically be addressed by a research team($10M over 5 years) Not be answerable by it all depends or yes or no If related to impact and interventions, should contain a subject, an intervention, and a measurable outcome

Input Geographical inputSector input 403 Questions

SETAC PAG 20 Question Exercise

General categories of questions prioritisation of substances for assessment routes of exposure bioavailability and uptake effects assessment risk antibiotic resistance risk management

Prioritisation What parameters should be used to prioritize PPCPs for research on environmental and human health exposure and effects? >4000 PPCPs properties usage mode of action side effects QSAR predictions therapeutic dose etc. Compounds of most concern

Routes of exposure What are the environmental exposure pathways for organisms (including humans) to PPCPs in the environment and are any of these missed in current risk assessment approaches? ?

Bioavailability and uptake How can the uptake of ionizable PPCPs into aquatic and terrestrial organisms and through food chains be assessed? What is the bioavailability of non-extractable residues of PPCPs?

Effects characterisation How can pharmaceutical preclinical and clinical information be used to assess the potential for adverse environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals? What can be learned about the evolutionary conservation of PPCP targets across species and life stages in the context of potential adverse outcomes and effects? How can non-standard ecotoxicological responses (e.g., biomarkers), observed for PPCPs, be translated to traditional ecologically important endpoints such as survival, growth and reproduction of a species?

Non standard vs traditional endpoints SETAC 20Q Exercise 2011

Effects characterisation How can ecotoxicity test methods, which reflect the different modes of actions of active PPCPs, be developed and implemented in customized risk assessment strategies? How can effects from long-term exposure to low concentrations of PPCP mixtures on non-target organisms be assessed? Can non-animal testing methods be developed that will provide equivalent or better hazard data compared to current in vivo methods?

Risk and relative risks How can regions where PPCPs pose the greatest risk to environmental and human health, either now or in the future, be identified? How important are PPCPs relative to other chemicals and non-chemical stressors in terms of biological impacts on the natural environment? Do PPCPs pose a risk to wildlife such as mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians?

Risk and relative risks How can the environmental risks of metabolites and environmental transformation products of PPCPs be assessed? How can retrospective analyses be used to validate prospective risk assessments?

Antibiotic resistance Does environmental exposure to PPCP residues result in the selection of antimicrobial resistant micro-organisms and is this important in terms of human health outcomes? How can the risks to human health, arising from antibiotic resistance selection by PPCPs in the natural environment, be assessed?

Risk management If a PPCP has an adverse environmental risk profile what can be done to manage and mitigate the risks? What effluent treatment methods are effective in reducing the effects of PPCPs in the environment while at the same time not increasing the toxicity of whole effluents? How can the efficacy of risk management approaches be assessed?

Ranking of questions Niagara workshop participants only Web-based Participants asked to select top ranked and lowest ranked questions from sets of four to generate a top 20 list identify challenges/barriers to addressing a question

Ranked order of 20 Important PPCP Questions: Means calculated with Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) 95% CI now calculated with sample mean (vs HB)

How important are PPCPs relative to other chemicals and non-chemical stressors in terms of biological impacts on the natural environment?

What parameters should be used to prioritize PPCPs for research on environmental and human health exposure and effects?

How can pharmaceutical preclinical and clinical information be used to assess the potential for adverse environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals?

How can effects from long-term exposure to low concentrations of PPCP mixtures on non-target organisms be assessed?

What is the bioavailability of non-extractable residues of PPCPs?

Can non-animal testing methods be developed that will provide equivalent or better hazard data compared to current in vivo methods?

Follow-up workshops: E. Asia; Australia/NZ Niagara workshop

Additional questions Global How can we better communicate risk issues to the public? Local What are the risks of natural medicines to the environment? Should cultural considerations be incorporated into the environmental risk assessment process?

Next steps Manuscript submitted to EHP - under revision Dissemination to policy makers etc. Pellston style workshops on selected questions Web-based survey to rank questions Local workshops Special symposium at SETAC world meeting in Berlin

Acknowledgements Astrazeneca Americal Cleaning Institute Health Canada Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson Workshop delegates and those who submitted questions

Contact details: Pharmaceuticals Advisory Group open to everyone