Data handling Sabine Beulke, CSL, York, UK FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10 Water-Sediment Studies Jeremy Dyson Basel, Switzerland.
Advertisements

Theory Metabolites Karin Aden (BVL, Germany)
30 Jan 2006 Page 1 FOCUS Kinetics training workshop Chapter 7 Recommended Procedures to Derive Endpoints for Parent Compounds Ralph L. Warren, Ph.D. DuPont.
Claude Beigel, PhD. Exposure Assessment Senior Scientist Research Triangle Park, USA Practical session metabolites Part II: goodness of fit and decision.
26-27 Jan 2005 Page 1 FOCUS Kinetics training workshop Chapter 7 Recommended Procedures to Derive Endpoints for Parent Compounds Ralph L. Warren, Ph.D.
Claude Beigel, PhD. Exposure Assessment Senior Scientist Research Triangle Park, USA Practical session metabolites Part I: curve fitting.
FOCUS Kinetics Training: Parameter Estimation with MatLab
Introduction to parameter optimization
26-27 Jan 2005 Page 1 FOCUS Kinetics training workshop Chapter 7 Recommended Procedures to Derive Endpoints for Parent Compounds Practical Exercise Ralph.
Outline Introduction Kinetic endpoints General fitting recommendations
Demonstration of fitting with Berkeley Madonna FOCUS Degradation Kinetics, Ton van der Linden, January 27, 2005.
Introduction to ModelMaker
Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 26, 2005.
Kinetic Models Considered Jeremy Dyson Basel, Switzerland.
1 FOCUS Degradation Kinetics Training course January 2005 Regulatory use of degradation endpoints Sylvia Karlsson Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate.
Estimating the False Discovery Rate in Multi-class Gene Expression Experiments using a Bayesian Mixture Model Alex Lewin 1, Philippe Broët 2 and Sylvia.
Instrumental Analysis
Guidelines for reporting FOCUS Degradation Kinetics, Ton van der Linden, January 27, 2005.
Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 30, 2006.
Chemistry, Environmental Fate and Transport, Production and Uses Charge Question 2-1: Please comment on whether the information is used appropriately in.
Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October Registration report : Partim Fate and Behavior in the environment 23 rd October.
Nonlinear Regression Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse Didier Concordet ECVPT Workshop April 2011 Can be downloaded at
World Health Organization
Handwriting: Registration and Differential Equations.
Chapters 3 Uncertainty January 30, 2007 Lec_3.
Curve-Fitting Regression
Stat 2411 Statistical Methods
1 (Student’s) T Distribution. 2 Z vs. T Many applications involve making conclusions about an unknown mean . Because a second unknown, , is present,
Inference for regression - Simple linear regression
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Chapter 7 Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation.
How to Select a Test Method Marlene Moore Advanced Systems, Inc. June 15, 2010.
Bias and Errors. Some Terms Used to Describe Analytical Methods Accuracy Precision LOD RDL LOQ Selectivity Sensitivity Linearity Ruggedness.
Statistics PSY302 Quiz One Spring A _____ places an individual into one of several groups or categories. (p. 4) a. normal curve b. spread c.
Data Analysis: Quantitative Statements about Instrument and Method Performance.
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall Lecture 6.
Means & Medians Chapter 4. Parameter - Fixed value about a population Typical unknown.
EC 532 Advanced Econometrics Lecture 1 : Heteroscedasticity Prof. Burak Saltoglu.
Chapter 14: Inference for Regression. A brief review of chapter 4... (Regression Analysis: Exploring Association BetweenVariables )  Bi-variate data.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
B. Neidhart, W. Wegscheider (Eds.): Quality in Chemical Measurements © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000 W. WegscheiderValidation: an Example 1 Learning.
Charge Question 3-1 Comment Summary for HHCB Peer Review Panel Meeting January 9, 2014.
Chapter Sixteen: Production Costs. Types of Production Costs.
Data handling Sabine Beulke, Central Science Laboratory, York, UK Kinetic Evaluation according to Recommendations by the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation.
Chapter ?? 7 Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation C H A P T E R.
Chapter 10 Notes AP Statistics. Re-expressing Data We cannot use a linear model unless the relationship between the two variables is linear. If the relationship.
Chapter 9 Sampling Distributions 9.1 Sampling Distributions.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Development of guidance for evaluating and calculating degradation kinetics in environmental media. W.P. Eckel 1, D.S. Spatz 1, R.D. Jones 1, D. Young.
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
BAE 6520 Applied Environmental Statistics
BAE 5333 Applied Water Resources Statistics
Chapter 5 Normal Probability Distributions.
Outdoor Water Sediment Study – Adding Effects of Sunlight to Aquatic System Exposure Assessment Cecilia Mucha Hirata (DuPont Crop Protection, Newark DE,
Basic Estimation Techniques
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
Basic Estimation Techniques
Analytical Method Validation
Statistics PSY302 Review Quiz One Fall 2018
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
Numerical Descriptive Measures
CHAPTER 15 SUMMARY Chapter Specifics
Statistics PSY302 Review Quiz One Spring 2017
Chapter 5 Normal Probability Distributions.
Sampling Distributions
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Numerical Descriptive Measures
Model selection and fitting
Presentation transcript:

Data handling Sabine Beulke, CSL, York, UK FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies in EU Registration Brussels, January 2005

Outline Data quality Replicates Concentrations below LOD or LOQ Experimental artefacts Outliers Time zero samples Data weighting For more information see Chapter 6.1 of the FOCUS report

Data quality Dissipation pattern and - for metabolites and sediment data - the increase, plateau and decline phase must be clearly established No. of data points (n) >> no. of parameters (p) (theoretical minimum n = p+1, but this is often not sufficient) The better the quality the smaller the no. of datapoints needed

Replicates Use true replicates individually in the optimisation Average replicate analytical results from same sample prior to curve fitting Average all replicates prior to calculating 2 statistics

Concentrations below LOD or LOQ Parent in soil, total water-sediment system, water column Set all concentrations between LOD and LOQ to measured value or 0.5 x (LOD+LOQ) Set first sample < LOD to 0.5 x LOD Omit samples after first non-detect unless later samples > LOQ Set to measured value Set to 0.5 x LOD Omit

Concentrations below LOD or LOQ Metabolite in soil and parent and metabolite in sediment Set time zero samples < LOD to 0 Set concentrations between LOD and LOQ to measured value or 0.5 x (LOD+LOQ) Set sample <LOD just before & after detectable amount to 0.5 LOD Omit all other samples < LOD (exceptions)

Experimental artefacts Discard results clearly arising from analytical or procedural errors before analysis If microbial activity declined significantly during study: Include all data initially, then exclude later sampling points and repeat fitting

DT50 42 daysDT50 34 days Outliers Include all data in curve fitting as a first step Omit outliers based on expert judgement Statistical outlier test where possible

Time zero samples Include initial amount of parent (soil, total w/s system and water column) in parameter estimation as a first step M0 variable: DT50 = 68 days M0 fixed: DT50 = 48 days Note: This hypothetical dataset is not described well by SFO kinetics and is only used to illustrate the effect of fixing or estimating the initial concentration.

Time zero samples Add time-zero concentrations of metabolites > 0 to parent unless due to impurity in application solution Add time-zero concentrations > 0 of parent or metabolite in sediment to water M0 variable: DT50 = 68 days M0 fixed: DT50 = 48 days Note: This hypothetical dataset is not described well by SFO kinetics and is only used to illustrate the effect of fixing or estimating the initial concentration.

Data weighting Always use unweighted data as a first step! No transformation: DT50 = 51 days Log transformed: DT50 = 57 days No transformation: DT50 = 54 days Log transformed: DT50 = 108 days Note: This hypothetical dataset is not described well by SFO kinetics and is only used to illustrate the effect of log-transformation.