Passive Antenna Measurements vs. Over-The-Air Active Measurements and Associated Metrics for Wi-Fi Testing Dr. Michael D. Foegelle ETS-Lindgren June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-Lindgren doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 2 Overview Introduction Terminology Conducted Testing Passive Antenna Testing Active Antenna Testing & Over-The-Air (OTA) Performance Metrics Summary & Conclusion

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 3 Introduction This presentation will give an overview of current radiated performance testing concepts and methods. It will describe existing metrics. It will list a range of obstacles and issues to be addressed in the standardization of a test requirement. Future work will propose solutions.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 4 Terminology For the purposes of this presentation, I will use the following definitions: –Component – represents a network system level component or device such as an AP, Wi-Fi enabled computer, NIC (in a computer), etc. Implies a consumer level product in its usage configuration. –Sub-component – represents pieces that go together to make an operational wireless device, including antennas, NIC or AP without antenna, radio, PC without wireless NIC, etc.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 5 Terminology Obviously there are shades of gray between these definitions, but metrics are only finally important at the component level. May or may not be possible to combine sub- component metrics into component metrics. Can divide metrics into categories: –1. MAC layer metrics unaffected by PHY layer. –2. PHY layer metrics unaffected by OTA performance or directly correlatable to simpler OTA metrics. –3. PHY layer metrics including OTA performance. –4. OTA sub-component performance

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 6 Conducted Testing Best Solution for Categories 1 and 2. –Only practical solution for MAC related performance metrics. –Assumes 50  test connector available. Problem for built-in antennas. Modify circuit for test of most metrics. –Fastest way to measure metrics. –Most data can correlate to OTA metrics or antenna performance. No need to measure twice.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 7 Conducted Testing Important metrics related to radiated performance: –Communication performance Throughput, etc. - vs. - –TX/RX signal strength Total Radiated Power Sensitivity –Frequency (Channel)

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 8 Passive Antenna Testing Assumes Conducted Performance + Antenna Pattern = OTA Performance + = ?

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 9 Passive Antenna Testing Cabled Connection to Antenna Under Test (AUT) –Assumes 50  input impedance Actual antenna impedance could be different –Cable introduces contributions to pattern

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 10 Passive Antenna Testing Antenna alone doesn’t represent real world condition. –“Hotwiring” cable to antenna on complete component is a first step. –Still missing radiated interactions with active components.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 11 Passive Antenna Testing Passive testing IS practical and even necessary for remote mount antennas with specific mounting requirements. Always useful as an R&D tool. Typically faster than equivalent OTA tests. Current interim solution until OTA metrics are developed.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 12 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Why test Active Devices Over-The-Air? –Reproduces real-world behavior that cannot be determined by other means. Determine antenna interaction with near-field environment, including packaging. Determine behavior of RF circuitry under load of de- tuned antenna impedance. Determine behavior of circuitry under exposure to radiated RF and surface currents. –Tests entire RF signal path at one time.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 13 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics OTA Testing is SLOW –Repeat testing of same sub-metric at each angular position. –Sub-metrics are defined as the equivalent RF performance metric from a cabled test. –OTA metrics add magnitude and direction (pattern) information to sub-metrics. –Need to identify only most important metrics for OTA testing.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 14 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Need metrics that represent RF behavior and performance of device. –Metrics may not actually represent communication quality directly, but allow prediction when coupled with site model and OTA metrics for other components. –Can be coupled with conducted metrics vs. signal level (attenuation) to provide all necessary communication quality information.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 15 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Common metrics for Wireless Mobile Station testing are: –Total Radiated Power (TRP) Sum of energy radiated in all directions. Mobile broadcasts at full power. Only tests reverse channel (mobile to base) performance. Blanket metric for course inter-comparison. Weighted metrics (Near Horizon Partial Radiated Power) help predict usage performance. Pattern information available for further analysis.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 16 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics TRP Testing Configuration Receive Antenna GPIB-Bus Spectrum Analyzer Universal Radio Communication Tester Relay Switch Unit Communication Antenna on ceiling Communication Antenna on MAPS Mobile Phone Measurement Signal Path Communication Path Fiber Optics for MAPS system MAPS Controller

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 17 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Common metrics for Wireless Mobile Station testing (continued) are: –Total Isotropic Sensitivity (TIS) Inverse sum of sensitivity from any one direction. (Response to isotropic incoming wave.) Measure forward (base to mobile) power required to generate a given bit/frame error rate (sensitivity level). Mobile broadcasts at full power to simulate condition when far from base station. Provides test for interaction between broadcast signal and circuitry (self jammers). Different frequency from TRP (reverse channel) test. Considerably longer test at coarser resolution. Same availability of total, weighted, and pattern metrics.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 18 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics TIS Testing Configuration Transmit Antenna GPIB-Bus Spectrum Analyzer Universal Radio Communication Tester Relay Switch Unit Communication RX Antenna on ceiling Communication RX Antenna on MAPS Mobile Phone Communication Return Path Measurement Signal Path Fiber Optics for MAPS system MAPS Controller

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 19 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Through these two metrics, performance of a mobile station on a network can be predicted. –Use of empirical evidence based on known performance of other devices on the network. –Establishment of link budgets to determine required density of base stations for a given level of mobile performance. –General performance comparison between different models for device selection. –Selection of pass/fail criteria to meet minimum performance requirements.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 20 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Current Wi-Fi OTA System uses combined signal communication performance metric: –Throughput vs. Attenuation (path loss) Variable attenuator inserted between AP and measurement antenna directed to DUT. Attenuation plus range path loss simulates total free-space distance. –Times packet throughput on either communication leg (AP to DUT or DUT to AP) –Measures attenuation effects on both forward and reverse link simultaneously.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 21 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Wi-Fi Throughput Testing Configuration Fiber Optics for MAPS system Transmit Antenna GPIB-Bus Wi-Fi Access Point Programmable Variable Attenuator Relay Switch Unit Wi-Fi DUT Measurement Signal Path Network Cable MAPS Controller

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 22 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Typical Throughput vs. Attenuation (Single Position)

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 23 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Current Wi-Fi OTA System limitations: –Unable to distinguish between RF effects at either endpoint or on either link direction. Transmit power of DUT vs. sensitivity of AP. Transmit power of AP vs. sensitivity of DUT. Forward vs. Reverse link. –Link loss a problem. Slow to recover. –AP Un-calibrated. No correlation to other sites. –No software control of channel. Unable to automate frequency dependence measurements.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 24 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Wide variety of throughput curve shapes –Need better understanding of RF interactions.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 25 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Broad range of products to test:

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 26 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Broad range of products to test: –Need to define standardized test methods for each type of product. –Need to keep in mind limitations of test equipment (positioners) and system (range length vs. EUT size vs. max frequency)

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 27 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Are these all the same product?

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 28 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Are these all the same product? –Certainly they have different patterns and may have significantly different overall performance. –Need to define standardized orientations and configurations for given product types.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 29 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Just how many variations do we test?

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 30 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics What about these? –Component or Sub-component? –How do you standardize testing of (sub)components that can’t be tested alone?

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 31 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Don’t forget real world usage! –We don’t have this:

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 32 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics We have this!

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 33 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Need to define standardized simulations of real- world conditions. –Phantom objects for simulating blockage and loading of antenna. Antenna behavior is always different. Active RF circuitry may behave different due to extreme mismatch of antenna load. –Cabling specifications. Current on cables can have huge effects. –Don’t need to cover every possible condition, but ideally cover extrema to determine expected range of performance.

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 34 Active Antenna Testing & OTA Metrics Crossover Devices. –PDAs and SmartPhones will have Cellular, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi. –Laptops and Desktops may as well. –Need to avoid conflicts with CTIA OTA Test Plan. (Ideally leverage from it.) –What about inter-op testing?

doc.: IEEE /675r1 Submission June 2004 Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 35 Summary & Conclusion We have a LOT of work to do! –OTA testing is the only way to get real world results. –Need to determine what (sub-)metrics really need repeating in OTA test. Requires determining conducted RF metrics first. –Need to determine repeatable test methods given available equipment. –Need to leverage existing efforts and avoid onerous requirements that would compete or conflict with existing tests and systems. –I have some ideas…