Why Normal Matters AEIC Load Research Workshop Why Normal Matters By Tim Hennessy RLW Analytics, Inc. April 12, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seasonal Normal Weather Base
Advertisements

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
What is Forecasting? A forecast is an estimate of what is likely to happen in the future. Forecasts are concerned with determining what the future will.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7: Demand Estimation and Forecasting.
OVERVIEW OF LOAD FORECASTING METHODOLOGY Northeast Utilities Economic & Load Forecasting Dept. May 1, 2008 UConn/NU Operations Management.
Chapter 12 - Forecasting Forecasting is important in the business decision-making process in which a current choice or decision has future implications:
Data Sources The most sophisticated forecasting model will fail if it is applied to unreliable data Data should be reliable and accurate Data should be.
Forecasting.
Chapter 3 Forecasting McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Load Forecasting Eugene Feinberg Applied Math & Statistics Stony Brook University NSF workshop, November 3-4, 2003.
Chapter 13 Forecasting.
1 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005.
Forecasting McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2011 Long-Term Load Forecast Review ERCOT Calvin Opheim June 17, 2011.
T T18-06 Seasonal Relatives Purpose Allows the analyst to create and analyze the "Seasonal Relatives" for a time series. A graphical display of.
Business Forecasting Chapter 5 Forecasting with Smoothing Techniques.
Slides 13b: Time-Series Models; Measuring Forecast Error
Identifying Input Distributions 1. Fit Distribution to Historical Data 2. Forecast Future Performance and Uncertainty ◦ Assume Distribution Shape and Forecast.
Part III Exchange Rate Risk Management Information on existing and anticipated economic conditions of various countries and on historical exchange rate.
Estimating Potentials and Forecasting Sales
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Demand Management and Forecasting
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 1 Forcasting © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 6e Operations Management, 8e.
Time-Series Analysis and Forecasting – Part V To read at home.
Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 5th edition © 2002 by John C. Hull 29.1 Insurance, Weather, and Energy Derivatives Chapter 29.
Forecasting supply chain requirements
$$ Entrepreneurial Finance, 5th Edition Adelman and Marks 6-1 Pearson Higher Education ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter.
1 18-Month Outlook October March 2005 Presented by Greg Hine IMO Long-Term Forecasts and Assessments.
© 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 7 Demand Forecasting in a Supply Chain Supply Chain Management (2nd Edition) 7-1.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Time Series Forecasting Chapter 16.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Time Series Forecasting Chapter 13.
MBA.782.ForecastingCAJ Demand Management Qualitative Methods of Forecasting Quantitative Methods of Forecasting Causal Relationship Forecasting Focus.
$$ Entrepreneurial Finance, 4th Edition By Adelman and Marks PRENTICE HALL ©2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 6.
Brian Macpherson Ph.D, Professor of Statistics, University of Manitoba Tom Bingham Statistician, The Boeing Company.
Managerial Economics Demand Estimation & Forecasting.
Y X 0 X and Y are not perfectly correlated. However, there is on average a positive relationship between Y and X X1X1 X2X2.
Forecasting Chapter 9. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Define Forecast.
Weather, Energy, and Insurance Derivatives Chapter 25 1 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2008.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1 “Observations always involve theory.” -Edwin Hubble.
ERCOT UFE Analysis UFE Task Force February 21, 2005.
Applied Quantitative Analysis and Practices LECTURE#25 By Dr. Osman Sadiq Paracha.
Welcome to MM305 Unit 5 Seminar Prof Greg Forecasting.
FORECASTING (overview)
Weather, Energy, and Insurance Derivatives Chapter 25 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th International Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull
Forecasting Demand. Forecasting Methods Qualitative – Judgmental, Executive Opinion - Internal Opinions - Delphi Method - Surveys Quantitative - Causal,
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 14 l Time Series: Understanding Changes over Time.
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING VII-SEMESTER PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY-II 1 CHAPTER NO.4 FORECASTING.
4 - 1 Course Title: Production and Operations Management Course Code: MGT 362 Course Book: Operations Management 10 th Edition. By Jay Heizer & Barry Render.
Forecasting is the art and science of predicting future events.
CHAPTER 12 FORECASTING. THE CONCEPTS A prediction of future events used for planning purpose Supply chain success, resources planning, scheduling, capacity.
Karen Chiang Diane Cunningham Southern Company Load Research 1 When Normal Weather Is Not Normal AEIC Load Research Workshop April 2006.
FORECASTIN G Qualitative Analysis ~ Quantitative Analysis.
Forecasting Demand. Problems with Forecasts Forecasts are Usually Wrong. Every Forecast Should Include an Estimate of Error. Forecasts are More Accurate.
WELCOME TO THE PRESENTATION ON LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS & CORRELATION (BI-VARIATE) ANALYSIS.
13 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Forecasting 13 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
LOAD FORECASTING. - ELECTRICAL LOAD FORECASTING IS THE ESTIMATION FOR FUTURE LOAD BY AN INDUSTRY OR UTILITY COMPANY - IT HAS MANY APPLICATIONS INCLUDING.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 3 Forecasting.
Demand Management and Forecasting Chapter 11 Portions Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Hybrid Forecast for Resource Adequacy Analysis with recommendations Massoud Jourabchi April
Forecasting. Model with indicator variables The choice of a forecasting technique depends on the components identified in the time series. The techniques.
Chapter 11 – With Woodruff Modications Demand Management and Forecasting Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Asymmetries in Forecasting Energy Product Prices APF Conference, Deutsche Bundesbank Frankfurt, Germany 2004 M. E. Malliaris Loyola University Chicago.
Welcome to MM305 Unit 5 Seminar Dr. Bob Forecasting.
Welcome to MM305 Unit 5 Seminar Forecasting. What is forecasting? An attempt to predict the future using data. Generally an 8-step process 1.Why are you.
Determining How Costs Behave
Weather, Energy, and Insurance Derivatives
Independent Load Forecast
Part III Exchange Rate Risk Management
Forecasting.
Presentation transcript:

Why Normal Matters AEIC Load Research Workshop Why Normal Matters By Tim Hennessy RLW Analytics, Inc. April 12, 2005

Normal Matters  Normalizing energy and demand is a routine matter.  It allows plans to be developed under the “most likely scenario”  It allows the comparison of loads without on a consistent basis  The choice of what is “normal” has an economic value.

Normal’s economic impact  Simplistic Rate Making:  Forecast models are developed using history.  Normal weather is applied to the models to determine sales.  Costs are divided by the sales to get prices per unit.  Three possible points of contention:  Models,  Normal Weather  Costs. Were going to focus on the weather

An example  A Utility develops a forecast, using degree days as a independent variable.  The utility chooses a 10 year basis for the Normal degree days.  The PUC says a 20 year basis is more appropriate  The utility determines that the different basis results in over $1M difference in revenue.

The issue: Which basis is better?  Since 1972 there has been a general and consistent decline in DD.  Over the span, 59% of the periods the normal DD based on the previous 10 years are less that the normal DD based on the previous 20 years.  Since 1990, the 10 year normal DD is less than the 20 year normal DD in 87% of the periods.

Approaches to determine the more accurate degree day basis  Analytical Approach:  Forecasting approach based on historical pattern.  Market based approach  What does the market place expect?

Analytical approach  Compares how well a chosen normal DD basis predicts a future period.  The forecast horizon was defined as three years.  The three year average annual DD over starting in month m was compared to the normal DD use a 10 and 20 year basis, ending in month m-1.

Comparison of Normal Degree Days Vs Forecast Period degree Days

Comparison of Error between NDD and Forecast Period DD Using a simple comparison Since 1920Since 1990

Conclusion  In comparing normal DD based on 10 years to those based on 20 years, the 10 year basis has the minimum amount of error.  However, the relationship between historical normal DD and forecast period DD can be used to determine a more accurate DD basis.

Simple Forecast  The relationship can be quantified by using autoregression techniques that would use normal DD to predict the actual DD during a forecast period.

Regression Results 10 Year20 Year

Comparison of Error Predicted Forecast Period DD and Forecast Period DD  The variability, the ranges, and the extremes are virtually identical  The variability of the prediction was substantially reduced by using the model.

Comparison to Chicago Mercantile Exchange  The model generated forecasted DD based on 10 years is within 0.5% of the CME futures.  The modeled generated DD based on 20 years is with 1% of the CME futures. it does not materially matter if a 20 year or a 10 year basis is used if these bases are adjusted for historical patterns.

Conclusions  DD have generally declined since the early 1970s.  The use normal DD to estimate average temperatures during a forecast period will, on average, overestimate the DD observed during that period.  If normal DD are to be used as an expected value during a forecast period, normal DD based a 10 year average will have an average smaller error, or less bias, than normal DD based a 20 year average.  If expected forecast period DD are estimated using autoregression techniques, the difference in estimated average annual forecast period degree days using normal DD based 10 year or 20 year averages are minimal.

Market Value Of Degree Days  Weather Derivatives-A type of insurance  Most are private contracts, but are traded on the publicly Chicago Mercantile Exchange  Can use to determine the put a value on degree day basis.

Example  If the PUC is correct, the Company would meet its revenue requirements when the NDD were 7,060.  However, the Company believes that NDD would only be 6,960.  If the Company’s NDD assumption is correct, it will lose $1M, or $10K/DD.  What value does the market put on DD between 6,960 and 7,060?

Example  We can design a derivate that would pay $10K/DD, with a limit of $1M, for each DD over 6,960.  If the market values this derivative at $1M, that means it would expect that the NDD to be 7,060.

Comparison Market values DD at $6.3K/DD

Comparison of last 10 years Using each

Conclusions  In our example, 6,960 may be a little to low, and 7,060 is too high.  If 7,060 is used, RR should be increased to make up for the projected shortfall. Alternatively, if 6990 is used, RR could be lowered a little.  The choice of Normal can have significant economic impacts.  The market can be used to put a value degree days.