Financial Aspects of MDUFMA Presentation at Public Meeting by Frank Claunts November 18, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What’s In the Proposed FY 2012 Budget? CNHED/DCFPI FY 2012 Budget Briefing April 21, 2011 DC Fiscal Policy Institute (
Advertisements

Mod 0508 Revised Distributed Gas Charging Arrangements  Proposed change to take into account that flows from DN Entry points to DN Supply Points should.
Review of Budgeting Process. State General Fund Revenues.
Funding Outlook for the Housing Choice Voucher Program Barbara Sard Forum on Impact of Sequestration November 1, 2013.
Chelan County PUD Alcoa Power Sales Agreement Credit Rating Premium Amendment December 15, 2014.
Municipal & Financial Services Group Water and Sewer Rate Study Revenue Requirements and Rates Workshop April 18, 2012 King George County Service Authority.
2010–2011 CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY.
Formula Funding For Fiscal Year 2012 and beyond. Budget Issues – Good News FY11 Budget includes 2.3% growth in state revenues. As of October 1, year-to-date.
January 7, 2011 Overview of Governor’s Introduced Amendments to the Direct Aid to Public Education Budget (and other Public Education Funding)
Rockland Public Schools Budget FY 15 April 28, 2014.
Quarterly Update to Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly March 13, 2012 Joe Arness, Board President Steve Atwater, Superintendent.
Sonoma County Junior College District Budget Update Presented to the Board of Trustees August 9, 2011.
Louisiana Hospital Association The Budget Challenge of Healthcare
State Budget Update Scott Cummings Virginia Department of Planning and Budget 1.
SENATE BUDGET AND EVALUATION OFFICE Overview of the Georgia State Revenues and Budget Slides are up to date as of 4/29/10. Please note that numbers are.
BUDGET PROCESS Original Revenue less Expenditures, will determine if the Clerk is a deficit or a surplus. Clerk will only use the fine and fee amounts.
Budget Update September 19, FY 2008 Spending Plan FY 2008 Spending Plan.
2012/13 Educational and General Budget Finance, Administration, and Facilities Committee Board of Governors October 5, 2011.
Northern Arizona University University Budget Office.
Mt. San Antonio Community College District Budget Impact Assumptions As of February 28, 2011.
Michigan Association of Counties Traverse City, September 19 th, 2011.
Financial Planning. How to get the “estimated” statements: The proforma financial statements Three important uses: –(1) Forecast the amount of external.
Convocation October MATC Budget  Operating Budget Funds all operating expenses (e.g. wages, benefits, utilities, supplies, leases, etc.) Subject.
School District of Waupaca Budget Hearing Tax Levy Certification October 29, 2013.
1 Draft NYISO 2003 Budget Report BS&P Report to Management Committee October 16, 2002.
DSM Incentive Returns Proposal – Benefit/Cost Ratio Approach Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 Supplemental.
The Budget Process. The Phases Information Gathering Information Gathering Department Requests Department Requests Financial Projections Financial Projections.
May Revision 2013 Escalon Unified School District.
CLARION UNIVERSITYCLARION UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL UPDATE ANDFINANCIAL UPDATE AND FY 2016 BUDGET REVIEWFY 2016 BUDGET REVIEW COUNCIL OF TRUSTEESCOUNCIL OF.
2015 Financial Plan. PROCESS Staff began work on this budget in September 4 meetings including today are scheduled – Jan 26, 28 and Feb 2 and further.
1 Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA II) Legislative Recommendations April 30, 2007.
Financial Presentation Five-Year Forecast October 17, 2005.
PASSHE Operating Budget Finance, Administration, and Facilities Committee Board of Governors July 8, 2013.
Reading Budgets. This presentation Explains how to read the budget tables in the February budget votes Explains how to read the budget tables in the annual.
Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis and FY 13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director,
LAO California’s Fiscal Outlook Legislative Analyst’s Office Jennifer Kuhn November 17,
Innovation Today for Better Healthcare Tomorrow How is the User Fee Process Working? December 3, 2003 (November 18, 2004) MDUFMA Stakeholder Meeting Mark.
Jefferson City Revenue Forecast Staff Analysis. Accuracy in Estimates Important to Make Best Use of Tax Payer Money.
Big Walnut Local School District March 2015 Financials 3 rd Quarter FY2015 Summary May 2015 Forecast Summary.
Funding Outlook for the Housing Choice Voucher Program Barbara Sard Forum on Impact of Sequestration November 1, 2013.
PRESENTERS ■Rita Cortes, Fiscal Manager, San Mateo Department of Child Support Service ■Ignacio Guerrero, Deputy Director, San Mateo Department of Child.
Chair/Director Orientation David J. Cummins Vice President for Finance & Administration/CFO August 21, 2013* *[ David Cummins has added the following correction.
City and County of San Francisco 1 Budget Ground Rules: General Fund Reserves, Baselines, & Set-Asides March 13, 2013 Budget & Finance Committee Controller’s.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Senior Vice President Ashley Venturoni – Project Consultant Presented by: FY 2013 Water, &
Ad Valorem – Everything you always wanted to know!
WPCSD BUDGET DISCUSSION FY2016 & 2017 JANUARY 28, 2016 REVISED 3/16/2016 REVISED 3/25/2016 PAUL JOHNSON, CFO WHIT PINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1135 AVENUE.
City of Port Moody Draft Financial Plan Tuesday, February 26 th, 2013.
2018 Preliminary Tax Levy Preliminary tax levy must be certified to the County by end of September for property tax statements mailed in late November.
Rockland Public Schools Budget FY 17
Budget Process and Timeline
City of richmond FY mid-year budget review
RDLA's July Legislative Webinar
The Size of Campus – Considerations and Analyses
Comparison of Major Contract Types
University of Oregon Financial Briefing
Proposed Expenditure Budget
University of Oregon Financial Briefing
Spring 2014 Budget Update March 2014.
Bronx Community College
FY 2018/19 Recommended Budget Town of Manchester, Connecticut
2018 FIRST Quarter Results NASDAQ: fult
DDS Presentation to CT Nonprofits January 21, 2010 Why are we moving to Utilization Payments? Connecticut continues to have economic issues that started.
Why are we moving to Utilization Payments?
2018 THIRd Quarter Results NASDAQ: fult
PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE UPDATE November, 2011
Roanoke County Public Schools Budget
DDS Presentation to CT Nonprofits (revised February 3, 2010) Why are we moving to Utilization Payments? Connecticut continues to have economic issues.
College Council November 29, 2018.
School Finance Update CASE Nuts & Bolts
The New Mexico Rural Universal Service Fund
Presentation transcript:

Financial Aspects of MDUFMA Presentation at Public Meeting by Frank Claunts November 18, 2004

MDUFMA How fees are set FY 2004 financial results What’s working well What’s not

MDUFMA How Fees are Set

MDUFMA-- MDUFMA--How Fees are Set Determined by three things: 1. Revenue Target 2. Statutory Relationship of Fees 3. Numbers of Fee-paying Applications

HHS/FDA/Office of Management5 How Fees are Set— Revenue Target Estimate 2007 Estimate Target In 2003 $ $25,125,000$27,255,000$29,785,000$32,465,000$35,000,000 % Increase %Inflation Adjusted $ Target % Change Year to Year

HHS/FDA/Office of Management6 How Fees are Set— Revenue Target Estimate 2007 Estimate Target In 2003 $ $25,125,000$27,255,000$29,785,000$32,465,000$35,000,000 % Increase8.5%9.3%9.0%7.8% %Inflation Adjusted $ Target % Change Year to Year

HHS/FDA/Office of Management7 How Fees are Set— Revenue Target Estimate 2007 Estimate Target In 2003 $ $25,125,000$27,255,000$29,785,000$32,465,000$35,000,000 % Increase8.5%9.3%9.0%7.8% %Inflation4.3%4.4%4 % Adjusted $ Target % Change Year to Year

HHS/FDA/Office of Management8 How Fees are Set— Revenue Target Estimate 2007 Estimate Target In 2003 $ $25,125,000$27,255,000$29,785,000$32,465,000$35,000,000 % Increase8.5%9.3%9.0%7.8% %Inflation4.3%4.4%4 % Adjusted $ Target $25,125,000$28,418,789$32,429,908$36,761,380$41,217,134 % Change Year to Year

HHS/FDA/Office of Management9 How Fees are Set— Revenue Target Estimate 2007 Estimate Target In 2003 $ $25,125,000$27,255,000$29,785,000$32,465,000$35,000,000 % Increase8.5%9.3%9.0%7.8% %Inflation4.3%4.4%4 % Adjusted $ Target $25,125,000$28,418,789$32,429,908$36,761,380$41,217,134 % Change Year to Year 13.1%14.1%13.4 %12.1 % Revenue Amounts before Workload and Compensating Adjustments

HHS/FDA/Office of Management10 How Fees Are Set— Compensating Adjustment Purpose—Stable & Predictable Revenues Essential to have dependable revenue stream for program to grow Other FDA user fee programs use product, establishment and sponsor fees for stable revenue Device industry rejected these Preferred compensating adjustment instead Compensating adjustment: any shortfall would be added to revenue target for future years

HHS/FDA/Office of Management11 How Fees are Set Statutory Fee Relationships Application TypeFull Fee % of PMA Small Business % of Full Fee for Same Type PMA/BLA/Panel Track100% 180 Day Supplements Real Time Supplements 510(k)’s

HHS/FDA/Office of Management12 How Fees are Set Statutory Fee Relationships Application TypeFull Fee % of PMA Small Business % of Full Fee for Same Type PMA/BLA/Panel Track100% 180 Day Supplements21.5% Real Time Supplements 510(k)’s

HHS/FDA/Office of Management13 How Fees are Set Statutory Fee Relationships Application TypeFull Fee % of PMA Small Business % of Full Fee for Same Type PMA/BLA/Panel Track100% 180 Day Supplements21.5% Real Time Supplements7.2% 510(k)’s

HHS/FDA/Office of Management14 How Fees are Set Statutory Fee Relationships Application TypeFull Fee % of PMA Small Business % of Full Fee for Same Type PMA/BLA/Panel Track100%38% 180 Day Supplements21.5%38% Real Time Supplements7.2%38% 510(k)’s

HHS/FDA/Office of Management15 How Fees are Set Statutory Fee Relationships Application TypeFull Fee % of PMA Small Business % of Full Fee for Same Type PMA/BLA/Panel Track100%38% 180 Day Supplements21.5%38% Real Time Supplements7.2%38% 510(k)’s1.42%+80% + For 510(k)’s, fees are to be set to generate a level of revenue as if all applications were charged 1.42% of the full PMA fee, but adjusted so that revenues from reduced fees (80%), when added to revenues from full fees, equal this overall revenue level.

How Fees are Set Numbers of Fee-paying Applications 03/04 Estimate 03 Actual 04 Proj Fee Basis PMA/BLA58 “ S.B Day171 “ S.B.24 Real-Time86 “ S.B (k)4000 “ S.B.

How Fees are Set Numbers of Fee-paying Applications 03/04 Estimate 03 Actual 04 Proj Fee Basis PMA/BLA5846 “ S.B Day “ S.B.2422 Real-Time86136 “ S.B (k) “ S.B.

How Fees are Set Numbers of Fee-paying Applications 03/04 Estimate 03 Actual 04 Proj Fee Basis PMA/BLA “ S.B Day “ S.B Real-Time “ S.B (k) “ S.B.482

How Fees are Set Numbers of Fee-paying Applications 03/04 Estimate 03 Actual 04 Proj Fee Basis PMA/BLA “ S.B Day “ S.B Real-Time “ S.B (k) “ S.B

HHS/FDA/Office of Management20 How Fees are Set for FY 2005 Doing the Math to Total $32,429,908 Application TypeFull Fee % of PMA Small Business % of Full Fee for Same Type PMA/BLA/Panel Track$239,237$90, Day Supplements$51,436$19,546 Real Time Supplements$17,225$6, (k)’s$3,502$2,802 + For 510(k)’s, fees are to be set to generate a level of revenue as if all applications were charged 1.42% of the full PMA fee, but adjusted so that revenues from reduced fees (80%), when added to revenues from full fees, equal this overall revenue level.

MDUFMA FY 2004 Financial Results

HHS/FDA/Office of Management22 Revenue Percents by Quarter

HHS/FDA/Office of Management23 Revenue Percents by Quarter

HHS/FDA/Office of Management24 Numbers of PMA/BLA/Panel Track 03 Actual 04 Actual Original Forecast 05 Fee Basis Full Fee S.B. Fee64106 Fee Paying Exempt S.B.1619 Exempt Ped.01 Bundled24 Non Fee-Paying1824 Total6968.5

HHS/FDA/Office of Management25 Numbers of 180-Day Supplements 03 Actual 04 Actual Original Forecast 05 Fee Basis Full Fee S.B. Fee Fee Paying Exempt Ped.21 Bundled134 Non Fee-Paying155 Total154111

HHS/FDA/Office of Management26 Numbers of Real Time Supplements 03 Actual 04 Actual Original Forecast 05 Fee Basis Full Fee S.B. Fee Fee Paying Exempt Ped.11 Bundled2126 Non Fee-Paying2227 Total177204

HHS/FDA/Office of Management27 Numbers of 510k’s 03 Actual 04 Actual Original Forecast 05 Fee Basis Full Fee S.B. Fee Fee Paying Exempt 3 rd Party Fee Exempt1321 Not a device/etc Non Fee-Paying Total

HHS/FDA/Office of Management28 FY 2004 Preliminary Revenue Summary Full FeeSB FeesTotal PMA/BLA/etc.$8,375,846$314,352$8,690, Day Supp’s$4,179,616$219,648$4,399,264 RT Supp’s$2,322,840$118,818$2,441, k’s$10,001,520$1,149,328$11,440,848 Subtotal$26,971,968 FY 2003 Adj.($139,932) Net Collected$26,832,036

HHS/FDA/Office of Management29 FY 2004 Cumulative Fee Revenue Shortfall FY 2004 Revenue Target$31,654,207 FY 2004 Net Collected$26,852,036 Shortfall$4,802,171 Collection of shortfall will be spread between FY 2006 and 2007

MDUFMA What’s Working Well

HHS/FDA/Office of Management31 What’s Working Well Fee Collection Process Keeping Collection Apart from Review Small Business Determinations Setting Fees Timely Utilizing Fees for Device Review Work Without MDUFMA in 2004 – Program would have contracted – Performance would have deteriorated Visibility and Respect for Device Review Program

MDUFMA What’s Not Working Well

HHS/FDA/Office of Management33 What’s Not Working Well Revenues are NOT Stable and Predictable Fee revenues less than envisioned Appropriations less than envisioned Therefore – Staffing has increased more slowly than originally envisioned – Urgent need to add staff to meet MDUFMA goals

HHS/FDA/Office of Management34 What’s Not Working Well— Unstable Fee Revenue FY 2003FY 2004Combined Revenue Target Without Compensating Adjustment $25,125,000$28,418,789$53,543,789 Received Shortfall

HHS/FDA/Office of Management35 What’s Not Working Well— Unstable Fee Revenue FY 2003FY 2004Combined Revenue Target Without Compensating Adjustment $25,125,000$28,418,789$53,543,789 Received$21,889,582$26,852,036$48,741,618 Shortfall

HHS/FDA/Office of Management36 What’s Not Working Well— Unstable Fee Revenue FY 2003FY 2004Combined Revenue Target Without Compensating Adjustment $25,125,000$28,418,789$53,543,789 Received$21,889,582$26,852,036$48,741,618 Shortfall$3,235,418 (-13%)

HHS/FDA/Office of Management37 What’s Not Working Well— Unstable Fee Revenue FY 2003FY 2004Combined Revenue Target Without Compensating Adjustment $25,125,000$28,418,789$53,543,789 Received$21,889,582$26,852,036$48,741,618 Shortfall$3,235,418 (-13%) $1,566,753 (-6%)

HHS/FDA/Office of Management38 What’s Not Working Well— Unstable Fee Revenue FY 2003FY 2004Combined Revenue Target Without Compensating Adjustment $25,125,000$28,418,789$53,543,789 Received$21,889,582$26,852,036$48,741,618 Shortfall$3,235,418 (-13%) $1,566,753 (-6%) $4,802,171 (-9%)

HHS/FDA/Office of Management39 Fixing Fee Shortfalls Revised estimated number of fee-paying applications when fees were set for FY 2005 Fix may have been too modest Still expect collections closer to revenue targets in 2005 through 2007 Bigger issue now is appropriations shortfalls

HHS/FDA/Office of Management40 FY 2003 Funding Shortfalls In Millions of Dollars Appropriation Shortfall-- $12.4 Million or 6%

HHS/FDA/Office of Management41 FY 2004 Device Appropriations In Millions of Dollars Actual Appropriation down by $2.2 million from FY 2003 level Pay raise alone cost $8.5 million Cut over $11 million for IT and admin savings Impact of appropriation cuts barely offset by fee revenue Appropriation Shortfall-- $19.5 Million or 9%

HHS/FDA/Office of Management42 Appropriations Issues Increases in staffing have been less than planned due to FY 2004 appropriations Administration recognizes funding needs in 2005 & future years and will request funds at MDUFMA trigger levels Two things essential for program to survive and thrive

HHS/FDA/Office of Management43 Appropriations—Urgent Issues 1. FY 2005 device appropriations must be at level envisioned in MDUFMA ($217 million) 2. MDUFMA must be amended to eliminate the catch-up appropriation requirement for FY 2003 and FY 2004 Otherwise MDUFMA program will end October 1, 2005 – Performance will deteriorate dramatically – Fix needed now or staffing in jeopardy

HHS/FDA/Office of Management44 Brighter Prospects for FY 2005 Indications are that in FY 2005 the device program will get the appropriations increase envisioned in MDUFMA. The combination of increased appropriations and fee revenues should result in FDA receiving the amount envisioned in MDUFMA.

HHS/FDA/Office of Management45 FY 2005 Funding Prospects In Millions of Dollars Senate mark meets appropriation minimum— House mark is very close.

HHS/FDA/Office of Management46 FY 2005 Funding Prospects In Millions of Dollars In FY 2005, 85% of funds come from appropriations and 15% from fees

HHS/FDA/Office of Management47 Urgent Issues 2005 Appropriation that meets MDUFMA triggers MDUFMA must be amended to eliminate the catch-up appropriation requirement for FY 2003 and FY 2004