Doc: IEEE 802.15-14-0124-00-0008 Submission July 2013 Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE Submission November 2013 Dotlic, Li, Hernandez, Miura (NICT), Verso, McLaughlin (Decawave) Project: IEEE P Working.
Advertisements

Nov 2009 Slide 1 Michael McLaughlin, DecaWave IEEE f Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /133r0 Submission March 2003 Michael Park, Samsung Electronics co., LtdSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /214r1 Submission July 2000 Grant B. Carlson, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [TG3a Performance Considerations in UWB Multi-Band] Date.
Doc.: IEEE /235r0 Submission May 2001 Philips SemiconductorsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE Submission November 2013 Dotlic, Li, Hernandez, Miura (NICT), Verso, McLaughlin (Decawave) Project: IEEE P Working.
Doc.: IEEE r3 Submission November 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2014 Li, Hernandez, Dotlic, Miura, NICT Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE a TG4a July 18th 2005 P.Orlik, A. Molisch, Z. SahinogluSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2013 Tae-Joon Park, etc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary PHY.
1 March 2010 Micheal McLaughlin, DecaWave Submission IEEE h Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
May 2005 Patricia MARTIGNE doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE j Submission May 2011 Kiran Bynam, Samsung Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Nov 2004 doc:IEEE b Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, WXZJ Inc./Helicomm Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE f Submission f TG September 2009 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2010 Tim Schmidl (Texas Instruments), Emmanuel Monnerie (Landis & Gyr), Shusaku Shimada (Yokogawa Co.),
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2010 Kuor Hsin Chang, Monique Brown (Elster Solutions, M.B. Brown Consulting) Project: IEEE P
July 2009 Slide 1 Michael McLaughlin, DecaWave IEEE f Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE −05−0393−00−004a Submission July, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
May 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for existing Sub 1-GHz bands in.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
Submission Title: [TG4a General Framework]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
March 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY Proposal for the IEEE a standard]
<doc.: IEEE −doc>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
July 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRDEV HRP PHY Step 1 Consensus – Baseline.
<doc.: IEEE −doc>
Submission Title: [Compatible DSSS g Network Communications Proposal]
Submission Title: [Errors in a] Date Submitted: [19 February, 2010]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<doc.: IEEE −doc>
Submission Title: [DecaWave UWB SFD Proposal]
Submission Title: [Rate one over four code for TG4a]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<doc.: IEEE −doc>
Date Submitted: [26-Oct-2005]
July Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [On unifying PPDU formats] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Errors in a] Date Submitted: [18 March, 2010]
Submission Title: [FEC Options summary for TG4a ]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
Submission Title: [Rate 1/4 code for TG4a]
Submission Title: [HRP UWB PHY enhanced mode converged consensus]
March, 2003 doc.: IEEE /127r0 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Alternate PHY.
Date Submitted: [26-Oct-2005]
Submission Title: [Example UWB Tx Data]
Submission Title: [Uniform bandplan for TG4a Modulation]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [FEC Multipath performance for TG4a ]
Submission Title: [DecaWave Preliminary PHY Proposal]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<author>, <company>
Presentation transcript:

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [UWB PHY contribution to TG8] Date Submitted: [11 th March 2014 ] Source: [Billy Verso, Michael McLaughlin] Company: [DecaWave] Address: [Adelaide Chambers, Peter Street, Dublin 8, Ireland] Voice:[ ] Fax: [] [billy.verso “at” decawave.com, michael.mclaughlin “at” decawave.com ] Re: [In response to call for contributions to TG8] Abstract:[ Gives details of UWB PHY for TG8] Purpose:[Material for discussion in IEEE TG8] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 UWB PHY contribution to TG8 Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 2 Previously proposed a BPM/BPSK IR-UWB PHY based on 4a as a good general purpose PHY option within the 15.8 standard with especial utility in applications that require fast and accurate range and location estimation This contribution serves to –Outline the elements of the BPM/BPSK PHY for incorporation into 15.8 –Recommend enhancements to improve the PHY performance –Show how it sits with the OOK UWB PHY proposed in shared common elements shared band plan low interference even when operating in same band

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Previous submissions Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 3 IEEE uwb-phy-proposal-to-tg8.pptx Other related submissions IEEE nict-impulse-radio-ultra-wideband-phy- proposal-to-ieee pdf IEEE merged-decawave-and-nict-ir-uwb-phy- proposal-to-ieee ppt

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 UWB PHY Recommendation for Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 4 Doc details why we recommend a BPM/BPSK IR-UWB PHY based on a to TG8, in summary: –This PHY meets the specified requirements and has all the necessary characteristics for peer-aware-communications. precision ranging support allows peer relative positioning immunity to multipath effects 15 channels cover unlicensed UWB bands from 3 to 10 GHz low and high data rates depending on application needs efficient spectral usage modulation and coding combination close to ideal perfect channel sounding choice of complexity in receiver implementations –coherent or non-coherent receiver –a non-coherent receiver is possible with a simple energy detector –systematic FEC - convolutional code, and, Reed Solomon code –Low time to market as commercial implementations are available

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 MAC FRAME BPM/BPSK UWB PHY MAIN ELEMENTS Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 5 UWB PHY Frame Structure: PREAMBLE PHR PHY DATA PAYLOAD SFD MAC header MAC payload FCS

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Preamble and SFD Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 6

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 PHR and Data Symbols Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 7 Represents 0Guard interval 0Represents 1Guard interval 1 Posn 0 Posn 1Posn 2 Posn 3 Posn 4 Posn 5Posn 6 Posn 7 Symbol is split into 2 valid intervals (one for a ‘0’ and the other for a ‘1’) And two guard intervals to provide protection for the multipath Each valid interval is subdivided into possible hop positions. Here it is shown divided into 8, other possible divisions are 2 or 32. Bursts are positioned in these according to a pseudo- random sequence. The burst can consist of up to 512 pseudo-random pulses or chips. The burst shown here has 16 chips

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Convolutional Coding of Data and PHR Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 8 All data bits are encoded with the convolutional encoder The systematic bit determines the burst position in the symbol (PPM) The parity bit determines the polarity, i.e. whether or not entire burst is inverted Represents 0Guard interval 0Represents 1Guard interval 1

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Reed Solomon Encoding Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 9 –Applied to data payload only The PHR has a SECDED code for error detection and correction –Bytes reshaped into sextets –Every 55 sextets has 8 parity sextets added –Shortened code used for less than 55 sextets

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 BPM/BPSK UWB PHY – NEW ELEMENTS Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 10 The following new elements (wrt 4a) give improved performance and utility to the BPM/BPSK UWB PHY –Alternative SFD sequences that give 6 dB performance boost to 110 kbps data rate at 1% PER, and 7 dB performance boost in 850 kbps data rate at 1% PER –A wider set of preamble lengths allowing PSR selection to match data rate and application needs more closely 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 1536, 2048, 4096 –Support for longer PHY data payload for PAC applications needing more throughput or longer messages –Additional PRF options under consideration

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 UWB PHY for Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 11 Two IR-UWB modulation schemes have been proposed to TG8 –a BMP/BPSK UWB PHY –an OOK UWB PHY These can be considered as complementary UWB operating modes that can sit together in the standard –Doc: IEEE describes their merger Essentially: –Sharing the same concatenated coding scheme –Operating with a very low level of mutual interference due to having different pulse repetition frequencies and different preamble sequences –Having a common band plan

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 UWB PHY COMMON BAND PLAN Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave) Slide 12 Notes: Minimum 10 dB bandwidth shall be 400 MHz For interworking between units that occupy less than the full band width available within a channel, the receiving device needs to know which of the mandatory frequencies are occupied by the transmitting device It is expected that this will be specified by a channel index number and a single octet bitmap with a bit for each of the mandatory frequencies a to h. Channel index Lower band edge (MHz) Upper band edge (MHz) bandwidth (MHz) RegionComment Available mandatory frequencies ChinaLow band in Chinaa Europe, Korea Low band in Europe and Korea a,b,c JapanLow band in Japana,b,c USALow band in USAa,b,c Europe, China High band in Europe and China d,e,f,g JapanHigh band in Japane,f,g,h KoreaHigh band in Koreae,f,g,h USAHigh band in USAd,e,f,g,h USAWideband in USAd MANDATORY FREQUENCY ALLOCATION (frequencies at which PSD is < 6 dB below max) Index Mandatory frequency (MHz) Index Mandatory frequency (MHz) a3500e7500 b4000f8000 c4500g8500 d6500h9000

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave)Slide 13 Conclusion This contribution outlined the main elements of the BPM/BPSK UWB PHY, while previous submissions have shown that it gives excellent performance, with operational choices for range vs. data rate, and choices for implementation complexity The BPM/BPSK UWB PHY has excellent properties for accurate message time-stamping allowing precision location and peer relative positioning This contribution introduced new elements enhancing the performance of the BPM/BPSK UWB PHY Finally this contribution also reiterated the merged elements between the BPM/BPSK and OOK modulation modes

Doc: IEEE Submission July 2013 Verso, Mc Laughlin (DecaWave)Slide 14