02. Stages of world politological ideas development

Major Themes of the Declaration of Independence Self evident truths We hold these truths to be self-evident Human equality All men are created equal They are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights Among these rights: Life Liberty Pursuit of happiness Natural rights Purpose of gov’t To secure rights Measure of Justice Consent of the governed Whenever any form of gov’t is destructive of the security of natural rights Right of revolution Limits to the right of revolution Prudence: Long-established gov’ts shouldn’t be overthrown for “light and transient causes” Experience: Men are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable than to right themselves

Political Culture A general set of Ideas, attitudes and beliefs Shapes a region’s politics Political Cultures in the US may identify with certain principles in the Declaration of Independence Political culture sometimes confused with ideology Most communities in the US participate in at least one of the following: Traditionalism Individualism Moralism

Traditionalism Basic features Associated region Advantages Disadvantages Strong attachment to long-established institutions Preference for traditional ‘modes and orders’ Suspicion of change Family legacies Stability Predictability Laws and customs tend to remain constant The “Old South”: South Carolina North Carolina Virginia Tennessee Georgia Mississippi Alabama Louisiana Texas Inflexibility Lack of social mobility Tolerance of corruption in the public sector Hostility to reform Fatalism Examples: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” “You can’t fight city hall.” Uncontested elections Political Dynasties (Bush, Thurmond, Moncrieff, Kennedy)

Individualism Basic features Associated region Advantages Disadvantages Strong belief in self-reliance Preference for individual and independent action; free enterprise Suspicion of public institutions Resistance to regulation “The Self-Made Man” Opportunity Privacy Recognition of individual efforts Accountability The “Old West”: Wyoming Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Nevada Montana North Dakota South Dakota Isolation Lack of community support Intolerance of public sector involvement Tolerance of corruption in the private sector, provided one isn’t caught Examples: “You’ll get my gun when you pry it from my cold dead hands.” “You’ve got nobody to blame but yourself.” Entrepreneurs, independent contractors “Caveat emptor”

Moralism Basic features Associated region Advantages Disadvantages Strong belief in community, “commonwealth” Preference for formal community action Suspicion of private institutions and interests Strong regulatory presence Community Accountability Active social support structures “safety nets” “New England”: Massachusetts New Hampshire Connecticut Maine New York Pennsylvania Also prevalent in the Pacific NW and in capital cities Intrusiveness Tolerance of corruption in the public sector if it serves the “moral duty” of serving the commonwealth Inaction unless initiated by community officials High public debt; high taxes Examples: “Did you bring enough for everybody?” “We’re from the government and we’re here to help you.” Social Security, social welfare programs Public education programs

Political Culture v. Ideology A set of general attitudes, ideas and beliefs Broadly informs and shapes a region’s politics Ideology A set of specific attitudes, ideas and beliefs Provides or advocates a coherent plan for social, political, or economic action

Examples of ideologies Economic ideologies capitalism communism globalism protectionism Keynesianism monetarism Market fundamentalism Political ideologies Libertarianism Liberalism Conservatism Anarchism Socialism Fascism Communism Communitarianism Statism Social ideologies Tribalism Ethnocentrism Nationalism Feminism Multiculturalism Supremacism

What ideology Is A set of specific ideas, attitudes and beliefs Provides or advocates a coherent plan for social, political, or economic action Plan is consistent with, and is explained in terms of, the ideas, attitudes and beliefs held

What ideology is not: Ideology is not political culture Traditionalists are not necessarily conservatives Liberals are not necessarily moralists Ideology is not partisanship Democrats are not necessarily liberal Republicans are not necessarily conservative Ideology is not a policy position E.g. Abortion advocates are not necessarily libertarian or liberal opponents are not necessarily conservative or libertarian E.g. Immigration “Open border” advocates are not necessarily libertarian globalists “Closed border” advocates are not necessarily conservative ethnocentrists

Comparative Ideology 1: Left and Right Wings Motto of the French Revolution: Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité (liberty, equality, brotherhood) Origins in the French National Assembly Advocates of Liberté and Fraternité, sympathetic to the ancien régime, sat on the right side of the room Revolutionary Advocates of Liberté and Egalité, opposing the ancien régime (the Old Order) sat on the left side of the room This distinction grafted onto the American Congress in the early 19th Century

Left and Right: The Political Spectrum The most common comparative model of ideological preference in the US Left Wing Right Wing Communism Socialism Liberalism Centrism Conservatism Statism Fascism

Comparative Ideology 2: The Political Compass ? First suggested in Jerry Pournelle’s Doctoral dissertation in 1964 Appeared in Meltzer, Albert and Stuart Christie. The Floodgates of Anarchy. (London: Sphere Books, Ltd., 1970) Seeks to address limitations of the Political Spectrum Describes two independent dimensions: Moral: Individualism to Collectivism Economic: Capitalism to Collectivism Clarified for American audiences in 1971 by David Nolan Economic Freedom v. Economic Control Personal Freedom v. Social Control Favored by those whose ideologies do not fit well with the Political Spectrum, especially libertarians Widely used by online political actors, pundits & campaigners

Limits of the Political Compass Equates policy positions with ideology in their tests (See the Nolan Quiz) Identifies attitudes on “personal” and “economic” issues Does not identify organizing principles or the general purpose of government Ill-equipped to distinguish moderates from extremists communists from welfare liberals anarchists from libertarians fascists from conservatives Does not distinguish one kind of “centrist” or “moderate” from another Fails to identify some known ideological positions Communitarianism Anarcho-communism Anarcho-syndicalism Nazism (with its fascist rhetoric and anarchist means) Unable to account for real linkages within its framework liberal-leaning conservatives conservative-leaning liberals Assumes liberals and conservatives are opposites

Comparative Ideology 3: Ideological Space Suggested by Steven Kautz in 1995: “enduring controversies regarding the nature of popular government give rise to three distinct strains: liberals (who love liberty) democrats (who love equality) republicans (who love virtue)” Problems with Kautz’ formulation Order more fundamental than virtue Political “virtue” depends on the political order it inhabits Kautz’ vision clouded by the American partisan/ideological debate “Liberal” has different meanings inside and outside the US “liberal” is an ideology “democrats” and “republicans” are coalition political parties in the US Alternative principles of ideological preference Liberty Equality Order “Ideologies…map the political and social worlds for us. We simply cannot do without them because we cannot act without making sense of the worlds we inhabit.” Michael Freeden, Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford UP, 2003.

Liberty, Equality, Order Widely held political principles Regardless of expressed ideology Held in different proportion by different ideological adherents Ideologies can be identified by different proportional attachment to or rejection of these three principles Suggests measurability Attachment to: positive ideology Rejection of: negative ideology May be used to describe an ideological map with three axes Liberty Equality Order

LEO Space Three axial principles (Dimensions) Six levels Liberty Equality Order Six levels Describe distance from ideological center Centrist Moderate Ideologue Hard-Liner Radical Extremist

Ideological Regions in LEO Space L+E+O+ (Standard Ideological Preference) L-E+O+ (Anti-libertarian) L+E-O+ (Anti-egalitarian) L-E-O+ (Anti-libertarian and Anti-egalitarian) L+E+O- (Anti-establishmentarian) L+E-O- (Anti-communitarian) L-E+O- (Anti-libertarian and Anti-establishmentarian) L-E-O- (Universal Opposition) Most ideological preferences found in only 1st region

LEO Made Simple Principle Centrist Ideology Moderate Ideology Radical or Extreme Ideology Libertarian Centrist Libertarian Left Libertarian Right Libertarian Anarchist Anarcho-Communist Anarcho-Syndicalist Liberty Liberal Centrist Liberal (US), Labour (UK) Liberal Egalitarian Liberal Communitarian Conservative Liberal Socialist Communist Equality Conservative Centrist Conservative Libertarian Conservative Conservative Communitarian Liberal Conservative Statist Fascist Order

Other Ideologies in LEO Communitarianism Equal parts Equality and Order Liberty subordinate The Reagan Coalition Equal Parts Liberty and Order Equality subordinate Thomas Hill Green’s Welfare Liberalism Equal Parts Liberty and Equality Order subordinate

Critique of the LEO Model Advantages Identifies a wider range of ideologies than either Spectrum or Compass Suggests linkages between ideologies Renders ideological claims testable Distinguishes mere negative opposition from true preference Predicts accusations of extremism by opponents Independent of policy position Independent of partisan assumptions Disadvantages Complexity Abstraction Potentially awkward or unfamiliar ideological nomenclature Posits potentially absurd ideological possibilities Still unable to explain Nazism (fascist rhetoric, anarchist means)

Fields of Political Science comparative politics comparing countries specific countries international politics the political process public administration, public law and public policy normative theory

Thanks for your attention!