What can we achieve with e-Safety Dr B. COUSYN PSA Peugeot Citroën e-Safety Working Group Brussels June 10, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pete Thomas Professor in Road and Vehicle Safety Vehicle Safety Research Centre Loughborough University, UK A review of ITS and their safety.
Advertisements

ESafety 8 July e-Safety Working Group Brussels 8 July 2002 Sub-group 1: Autonomous In-vehicle Technologies.
E-Safety 29 April 2002 e-Safety High-Level Meeting Brussels 25 April 2002 CONCLUSIONS.
ESafety Conclusions April e-Safety Working Group Brussels 8 July 2002 Sub-group 4: Societal and Business Issues Co-chaired by Messrs. J. Mateu (RACC)
1 Towards a comprehensive eSafety Action Plan for improving road safety in Europe Erkki Liikanen 25 April 2002.
the European Union policy
Field Operational Tests in 7FP Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector DG INFSO - ICT for transport.
Developing intelligent safety technologies for future traffic Risto Kulmala 10 June 2008 VTT Press Conference Via Nordica.
Date: 1 October2013 Meeting: Concertation meeting VRA Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, TNO [ Roadmap Automation in Road Transport.
Vehicle-infrastructure integration: creating co-operative mobility systems and services Hearing EU Parliament, 22 January 2009 Hermann Meyer, CEO.
Powered-Two-Wheelers Road Safety The commitment of Piaggio & C. SpA Ljubliana, 23 April 2008.
58 th Traffic Safety Conference Romell Cooks Regional Administrator Central Region May 10,
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2013 Overview of International Activities to Limit Distraction Document No. ITS (21st ITS,
Stakeholder meeting on the SHIFT²RAIL Strategic Master Plan Manuel Pereira, IST Lisbon ERRAC Vice Chairman 20 th June 2014, Brussels 1.
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
User outreach and eSafety awareness Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications ETSC Conference, Brussels 21 February 2006.
66th ECE Commission Geneva, April 2015 Connectivity and Competitiveness for Sustainable Lives Sustainable Connectivity Includes Safe Mobility Which.
The Vehicle Industry, Regulation and Safety Philip McKenzie Australia.
Driving Intelligence Robert R. Arguelles Continental Teves, N.A. February 2 nd, 2004 Active Vehicle Safety: Advanced Vehicle Mobility and Stability Control.
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Initiative May 2005, ITS America Annual Meeting Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office U.S. Department.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Legal issues addressed in the EU funded AdaptIVe project
 Road Safety the European Union Policy Carla Hess European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport Road.
Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
IntelliDrive Policy and Institutional Issues Research Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy, ITS Joint Program Office, RITA May 4, 2010.
Gzim Ocakoglu European Commission, DG MOVE World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 24/06/2010.
Bringing intelligent systems to the market: the new European research challenge of Field Operational Tests Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector ICT for Transport.
ITS for freight and logistics …Bringing intelligence into the mobility of people & goods 22 June Zeljko Jeftic.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Smart cities Rasmus Lindholm, Director, ERTICO – ITS
EB Workshop on eSafety Conclusions. 2 How do you interpret the CEDR vision with regards to your national approach? Basically in line with national strategy.
AHS – The Vision. The Automated Highway System (AHS) and The Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI)
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
PRIVATE/PROPRIETARY Integrated Safety & Drowsy Drivers 2007 Wake Up, Michigan! September 20 th 2007 The Worldwide leader in Automotive Safety Systems Autoliv.
International Telecommunication Union No 1 The Executive Round Tables High-level perspectives and strategies regarding the present and future use of ICT.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
Activities of BASt in the area of ITS Dr. Christhard Gelau Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen/Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) Department “Automotive.
IntelliDriveSM Update
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
ESafety Forum Meeting with Member States Risto Kulmala 18 October eSafety Implementation Road Map Results and Recommendations of the Implementation.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
FP6 IST Call 4 SO eSafety – Co-operative Systems for Road Transport European Commission - DG Information Society and Media Unit C.5: ICT for Transport.
GRIDLOCK? – TRANSPORT IN 2030 THE FUTURE FOR PRIVATE TRANSPORT Professor Mike McDonald Director, Transportation Research Group Vice-Chair, European Road.
New Services in Mobility: C-ITS
TMALL 0143 Presentation engelsk v 1.0 Dr. Matts-Åke Belin Swedish Transport Administration Vision Zero Academy
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
ERTICO – ITS Europe The eSafety Initiative Ghassan Freij Director of Operations June 2003 United Nations, Geneva.
ESafety 22 Jan What is eSafety? Goal: To accelerate the development, deployment and use of new technologies for increasing road safety in Europe.
20-April-07UNECE Transport Division Road Safety Week 23 – 27 April 2007.
EUCAR IST Workshop 23 May Active Safety Vehicle Systems and HMI. Topics in need of a Holistic Approach for Integrated Solutions Ulf Palmquist EUCAR.
1FK/WSMAY2000 European Commission Information Society DG FROM THE 4TH TO THE 5TH FP Fotis Karamitsos European Commission DG INFSO/B/5.
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
 ROAD SAFETY: the European Union Policy European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport «Road Safety.
EDR in the context of the context of the general safety Regulation Second CDR User Summit Europe 26 June Antony Lagrange - DG GROWTH, Unit C4 Automotive.
Engineering College, Tuwa. Design Engineering 1 - B  Guided by, SUBMITTED BY, PRAGNESH PATEL SHAH HETAXI ( ) RAJPUT VIVEK ( ) SOLANKI.
O2 “eSafety” – status report Risto Kulmala Leiden 2 February 2007.
ERTRAC - Information Day Brussels, 06 November 2015 Liam Breslin Ludger Rogge Patrick Mercier Handisyde Unit – Surface Transport DG Research & Innovation.
ESafety WG “Digital Maps” Ad Bastiaansen (Tele Atlas) - Chair Yiannis Moissidis (NAVTEQ) - Co-Chair The 4 th Plenary Session of eSafety Forum Thursday,
Loughborough University research areas
Intelligent Transportation System
Autonomous Vehicles in California
ISO TC204 Structure 12 Active Working Groups: WG1: Architecture
ISO TC204 Structure 12 Active Working Groups: WG1: Architecture
Accelerating the Introduction of
NHTSA Research Overview: Automation, ADAS, and Human Factors
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
Presentation transcript:

What can we achieve with e-Safety Dr B. COUSYN PSA Peugeot Citroën e-Safety Working Group Brussels June 10, 2002

Contents Introduction: Historical Background - ITS and main ITS Programs - European Projects ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) Safety Model Principles- Vehicle Safe Performances e-Safety technologies : –Autonomous vs Interactive technologies Conclusions and recommendations

The main ITS programs ( Europe, USA, Japan) 1 st Period2nd Period3rd Period EU USA ALI ERGS CACS PROMETHEUS DRIVE 1DRIVE 2 TELEMATICS / TAP - IST MOBILITY 2000 IVHS ITS IVI / ITI RACS AMTCS VICS ARTS SSVS ASV UTMS AHS 92 ITS : AHS-i, AHS-c, AHS-a, ASV JAPAN

Information and Communications Technologies Integrated system of people, roads and vehicles Vehicles Driver Infrastructure utilizing advanced data communication technologies in a complex environment Transport efficiency, comfort, safety

Advance Driver Assistance Systems Research from the different programs ( PROMETHEUS, DRIVE, and projects from the 4th and 5th Framework programs) indicated the potential for ADAS systems to provide additional comfort to drivers and to improve safety. Example for ADAS : ACC, stop&Go, lane departure warning, emergency braking, collision avoidance, enhanced vision systems..

4 Th Framework Program ( ) ADAS projects (Telematics Application Prog.) Infrastructure Based Driver Support Collision Warning and Mitigation Emergency Management Autonomous Driving Green Wave & Stop & Go – Urban Drive Control Longitudinal Driver Support - Anti-Collision ASSIST Lateral Driver Support - LACOS Drivers Status Emergency Management - SAVE Integrated Driver Support – IN-ARTE Adaptive Diagnosis and Management – ADAPT Centralised Vocal Interfaces Management - CEMVOCAS Tow-Bar / Platooning - CHAUFFEUR Legal aspects and User Acceptance – RESPONSE Benefits and Deployment Issues - AHSEA

5 th Framework Program ( ) some ADAS projects ( IST program) Common PlatformsSafety Applications Public Transport Autonomous Driving Multifunctional Radar Network - RADARNET New Sensor Systems and Data fusion – CARSENSE New Attributes for Digital Maps - NEXTMAP Vehicle Harmonised Multimedia HMI - COMUNICAR Pre-Crash Detection - CHAMELEON Protection of Vulnerable Road Users - PROTECTOR Intelligent In-Vehicle Terminal - INVETE Tow Bar / Platooning - CHAUFFEUR II

ITS Applications More Technology pushed than Market pulled Not totally technology mature Difficulties : various actors,different product life cycles Dont forget the Customers ! Are customers ready to pay for ITS products and services ?

Phase 4 In Crash IMPACT Phase 2 Danger Phase Phase 1 Normal Driving Primary Safety Model (Draft from ACEA TF AS) PRIMARY* SECONDARY** TERTIARY Phase 3 Crash Unavoidable Phase 5 Post Crash *: Active or Primary Safety = Accident Avoidance and/or Crash Severity Reduction **: Passive or Secondary Safety = Injury Avoidance and/or Injury Severity Reduction Abnormal driving Access to the system Ergonomics Lighting Visibility Braking Handling

Principles Vehicle Safe Performance Reliable Manufacturers cannot allow faults in vehicles Active systems are here to help drivers, they are not going to replace them Affordable e-safety requires expensive technologies or services that customers are not always willing to pay for Compatible Different actors, different regions, different dynamics between products (cars/electronics, telematics, multimedia equipments…) Limits of Drivers abilities (workload)

How to improve Safety ? To achieve reduction in fatalities we need to develop clear priorities based on potential impact and cost e-safety initiative is one of the tools which will enable us to achieve results in the area of Safety Safety is not only about technology, other issues need to be solved, such as : legal, liability, certification, privacy and standardization issues

How to improve Safety ? Fatal accidents in France (2001) young drivers, motorcycles drivers… Main causes for fatalities ? main causes are driver-related Violation (seat belt usage, Alcohol/drug, speed…) Drowsiness, distraction Errors, misjudgements… consistent accident causation data is still needed

What can we achieve with e-Safety ? Source : ADASE II

What can we achieve with e-safety? Autonomous vehicle Technologies Vehicle manufacturers and their suppliers need to develop the electronic architecture and standard interfaces Standardization of those technologies is the responsibility of manufacturers and their suppliers We need to give answers on different challenges (to clarify legal liability issues, to remove any regulatory barriers..)

What can we achieve with e-safety? Interactive Technologies: Vehicle/Infrastructure communication: (ongoing projects with ERTICO) Real time traffic information RTTI Emergency call … Vehicle/Vehicle communication

What can we achieve with e-safety? Vehicle/Infrastructure communication: Example of projects : Aida, Alzira,Marta, Delta.. Emerge Vehicle /Vehicle communication: example of projects: IVHW ( Inter Vehicle Hazard Warning)

Example : Emergency Call E-call Technologies issues are well identified – some private initiatives are operational. A European-wide least cost e-call system as soon as possible. EMERGE project just launched. Joint reflection of industry and Commission is needed towards deployment, viable business model.

Conclusions and recommendations Manufacturers will maintain responsibility for vehicle-related technologies with enabling assistance from the Commission (legal, research, regulatory barriers) will work in partnership on other priorities

Conclusions and recommendations ERTICO must act on e-Call to ensure the success of EMERGE and that its outcomes are implemented Nomad HMI to ensure equivalent compliance RTTI to support data collection and processing from all sources and broadcast by a central body Interoperability of communications

Conclusions and recommendations Commission to act on : e-Call ensuring the implementation RTTI as catalyst ensuring access to data collection, processing & broadcast Elimination of legal and regulatory bottlenecks Continuous support of Integrated Safety through RTD program