Review of the data reporting cycle for the Environmental Noise Directive Núria Blanes and Jaume Fons ETCLUSI / UAB Eionet National Reference Centres for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
Advertisements

European Commission: DG Environment Monitoring, Reporting and Verification in the EU ETS: Status and Implementation Stakeholder Day on the EU MRG Cologne.
IHCP - Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Ispra - Italy Joint Research Centre (JRC) EEA Copenhagen 7-8 October.
European Commission: 1 Environmental Noise Directive 7-8 October 2010 EEA, Copenhagen.
Towards a Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS) European Biodiversity Data EIONET/NRC Meeting 29/30 October 2007 Ivone Pereira Martins/Rania Spyropoulou.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
Final Report Anton Schrag REGIO D1
1 Reportnet – an introduction Reportnet – an introduction Presentation for the Meeting on Noise Copenhagen, 12 November 2008 Søren Roug, EEA
1 European Environment Agency Workshop on noise assessments and noise data management June 2007, Copenhagen General Presentation of EEA.
Water.europa.eu Introduction WFD reporting training Copenhagen, 4 February 2010 Jorge Rodríguez Romero WFD Team DG Environment, European Commission.
EIONET ANNUAL WORKSHOP Session 1 Streamlining the data – Towards a shared Water Information System for Europe Water Framework Directive Reporting Sheets.
The Pegaso project Spatial Data Resources for Coastal Land and Ecosystem Accounting Alejandro Iglesias-Campos ETC-LUSI/Junta de Andalucía EIONET Workshop.
WISE Main River and Main Lakes Water Information System for Europe Walter Simonazzi – ETCLUSI/UAB WISE TG meeting 2009 – Copenhagen (DK), 3-4 Sept 2009.
Review of the Electronic Noise Data Reporting Mechanism (ENDRM) Meeting of the EIONET National Reference Centres for Noise 7-8 October 2010 Copenhagen.
CDDA storage and publishing in EUNIS on the European Community Clearing House Mechanism G. LOÏS, EEA-ETC/BD.
PART 1 Jaume Fons and Núria Blanes (ETCLUSI)
Environmental Noise Directive First results Núria Blanes and Jaume Fons ETC-LUSI / UAB NRC for Noise Meeting Copenhagen, 12 November 2008.
Expert Conference Accompanying the Informal Meeting of Ministers for Family and Gender Equality: "Mechanisms for reconciling professional and family roles.
1 AirBase developments and EoI2005 reporting cycle Patrick van Hooydonk and Wim Mol European Topic Centre on Air and Climate Change (ETC/ACC) under contract.
UNIT 11: E-JUSTICE Francisco de Paula PUIG BLANES Senior Judge.
CMEF Requirements for the Monitoring tables as part of the Annual Report RD committee 24/10/2007.
1 FAIRMODE Forum for AIR Quality MOdelling in Europe Plenary 18 th November 2009 in Ispra, Italy Co-chaired by JRC and EEA Hosted by the Joint Research.
DIKE TSG Workshop 4 July 2013 EEA regular dataflows: WISE-SoE Reporting on Transitional, Coastal and Marine Waters Constança Belchior - EEA.
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
European Environment Agency EEA –State of informatics for biodiversity Content Vs Functionalities? Rania Spyropoulou, EEA Biodiversity and Ecosystems group.
WISE GIS-IT Workshop – Copenhague, 7-8 May 2012 WISE main rivers WFD-ECRINS matching and advances in linear referencing Right click to “Change Picture”
1 Future plans for the development and implementation of WISE Tim Lack ETC Water.
1 AQ data flows: Summer ozone reporting (SOR) & near real-time air quality data exchange (NRT) IPA support Air Quality kick off meeting, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Outlook for Citizen Participation in Europe On the Outlook for Citizen Participation in Europe A Spanish View Dr. Javier A. González Vega Education Counsellor.
WISE European System for Water Information WISE – part of Eionet (European Environment Information and Observation Network) http//
1 Introducing Reportnet Miruna Badescu. 2 A linear view of Reportnet process.
1 Reportnet for Noise: Feedback from member countries Colin Nugent Eionet National Reference Centres for Noise meeting Copenhagen October 2009.
1 Reportnet for beginners Hermann Peifer, EEA. 2 What is Reportnet? The EEA’s data collection machinery.
Implementing air quality e-Reporting Data deliverables in 2013 and 2014 and the process of reporting Tony Bush ETC/ACM AQ e-Reporting task leader 18th.
Eurostat 1 7a. Practical use case 1: Pesticides Use Project Blanaru Cristina Eurostat Unit B5: “Central data and metadata services” SDMX Basics course,
International Federation of Accountants Translation Activities in IFAC – an Update Kelly Ånerud, Senior Technical ManagerKelly Ånerud, Senior Technical.
Shared Environmental Information System for Europe for Europe SEIS 25 October 2007, Dublin.
1 Reportnet – an introduction Reportnet – an introduction Presentation for the Meeting on IPPC/WI Brussels, 3 March 2009 Søren Roug, EEA
1 Data management and QA/QC with priority data flows in EEA 8 th Joint TFEIP/EIONET meeting Dublin, October 2007 Sheila Cryan, EEA.
European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity EIONET NRC Meeting on Biodiversity October 2011, Copenhagen Progress.
Attribute inheritance between country deliveries and Wise Main Rivers and Lakes version 0 Test case with Germany Walter Simonazzi ETCLUSI / Roger Milego.
1 New reporting tools for WISE Stefan Jensen WFD Art.8 – WISE GIS workshop
EEA water report 2012 Upcoming EEA report state of our water environment 2012 In support of the Commission Report on WFD implementation Peter Kristensen.
EEA - recent developments and national comparisons David Lee Environment Statistics and Indicators.
SIIF pilot support group Meeting 17 Apr 2013
NEC National Programmes
Revision of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU
Meeting of AEMH and FEMS
Bernhard Berger, Marco Paviotti DG Environment, European Commission
Natura 2000 dataflow & Standard data forms
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
Status on eu actions from the kick-off meeting
Progress on Natura 2000 filtered database
&file 22/02/2019 National Programmes under the National Emission Ceilings Directive (NECD) André Zuber, European Commission, DG Environment Working group.
Unit D.2 – Water and Marine, DG Environment, European Commission
The Biodiversity Information System for Europe (BISE)
Update on Derogation Reporting
Date/ event: EEA Drafting group meeting SoE guidance, Copenhagen
Reference Manual update Item 5.2 of the agenda
EEAs assessments of the status of Europe’s waters
Directive 2007/60/EC Draft concept paper on reporting and compliance checking for the Floods Directive.
Reportnet 3.0 Requirements Catalogue
Submitting national data through Reportnet
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
2018 Freshwater data call Stéphane Isoard
Summer Ozone Data Exchange
Large Combustion Plants dataflow management
State-of-play of current Water Directive integration into WISE
WISE and INSPIRE By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

Review of the data reporting cycle for the Environmental Noise Directive Núria Blanes and Jaume Fons ETCLUSI / UAB Eionet National Reference Centres for Noise – Copenhagen, 7th – 8th October

NOISE – Noise Observation and Information Service for Europe

Directive 2002/49/EC on environmental noise To the MS…... designate the competent authorities and bodies responsible for implementing this Directive apply the noise indicators Lden and Lnight for the preparation and revision of strategic noise mapping ensure that strategic noise maps have been made for ensure that competent authorities have drawn up action plans......ensure that the information from strategic noise maps and summaries of the action plans is delivered to the Commission Where it is requested… To the Commission…... establish common assessment methods set up a database of information on strategic noise maps... publish a summary report of data from strategic noise maps and action plans every five years submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the implementation of this Directive...

So… what do you do, then? Transpose the Environmental Noise Directive to national law Start to produce noise data: –Source identification and localisation –Determine competent authorities –Establish noise limit values –Develop strategic noise maps –Drawn up Noise Action plans Send this data to the European Commission

And… what do we do, then? Comparison of the different calculation methods (JRC) Proposal to establish common calculation methods (DG ENV and JRC) Proposal to harmonise the way to report noise data (EEA) Quality check of the data delivered (ETCLUSI) Compilation into the European noise database (ETCLUSI) Provide a content management system to report the data (EEA) Dissemination (EEA and ETCLUSI) Compliance with the law (DG ENV)

So… putting a timeline … END MS Reporting Obligations Noise sources – 1st round, competent authorities and limit values (DF1, DF2, DF3) Strategic noise maps (DF4) Noise sources – 2nd round, control programmes and action plans (DF5, DF6, DF7) Noise sources – 1st round update (DF1) END Reporting Mechanism (Relational database) Reportnet - DF5, DF6, DF7 (Common Repository + Automatic QC rules) Improvements in Reportnet – DF1 + Adaptation to C-NOSSOS outcomes Microsoft Excel template to report data (not longer applicable) Reporting System improvements

Data harmonisation 2003 – 2005 period First spreadsheet templates where provided to the MS MS send them to the EC and EC uploaded into CIRCA, communicating the delivery by to EEA and to ETCLUSI

Data delivered in December 2005: –Dataflow 1: Major noise sources –Dataflow 2: Competent Authorities –Dataflow 3: Noise limit values Repository: –CIRCA Which data has been sent? 2003 – 2005 period Which is the status of these dataflows?

Major noise sources – 2005

Competent authorities

Noise limit values

Basic quality check consisting on: –Timeliness –Adoption of the template provided –Completeness of the data delivered Outcome of the quality check: –QC Report –Detailed list of areas where noise strategic maps will be developed Which quality check has been done? 2003 – 2005 period

Main problems encountered: –Data sent to the Commission with different formats (modification of templates) and through different means ( , fax, CD/DVD,…) –Difficulties in establishing the control of the data delivered and of the data updates in CIRCA –Impossibility to collect the data in a systematic way –Language –Data quality (empty cells, completeness of the data) –GIS data nearly not delivered Problems / advantages encountered 2003 – 2005 period

Timeline … END MS Reporting Obligations Noise sources – 1st round, competent authorities and limit values (DF1, DF2, DF3) Strategic noise maps (DF4) Noise sources – 2nd round, control programmes and action plans (DF5, DF6, DF7) Noise sources – 1st round update (DF1) END Reporting Mechanism (Relational database) Reportnet - DF5, DF6, DF7 (Common Repository + Automatic QC rules) Improvements in Reportnet – DF1 + Adaptation to C-NOSSOS outcomes Microsoft Excel template to report data (not longer applicable) Reporting System improvements

Data harmonisation 2006 – 2007 period EC and EEA establish a reporting mechanism based on a database model (ENDRM) + spreadsheet templates MS send spreadsheets to the EC and EC uploaded into CIRCA

Data delivered in December 2007: –Dataflow 4: Strategic noise maps Noise exposure data Noise contour maps Repository: –CIRCA Which data has been sent? 2006 – 2007 period Which is the status of this dataflow? Deliveries up to 30 June 2010

Strategic noise maps of agglomerations

Strategic noise maps of Major Roads

Strategic noise maps of Major Railways

Strategic noise maps for Major Airports

Noise contour maps delivered… and included in NOISE

Which quality check has been done? 2006 – 2007 period Excel Shapefiles Access application Data model Data base Quality check 2 Georeferenced database Reference layer / Statistical analysis Quality check 1 INPUT OUTPUT Zero values Empty cells Completness Coherence Zero values Empty cells Completness Coherence Metadata Spatial reference Correctness SD DF1 vs DF4: data coincidence Metadata Spatial reference Correctness SD DF1 vs DF4: data coincidence Unique ID 1 to 1 relationship Unique ID 1 to 1 relationship COUNTRY Quality check 1 (1) TIMELINESS of the delivery & (2) Use of the TEMPLATES provided & (3) Manual QC and Manual processing

Outcomes of the quality check: –QC Report –European Noise Database –Noise Reference Layer Which quality check has been done? 2006 – 2007 period

Main advantages: –Data to be delivered standardized in a data model –Establishment of a codification system –Data can be collected in a systematic way if no modifications are done in the spreadsheet templates Main problems encountered: –Modification of the spreadhseet templates no systematic collection of the data –Difficulties in establishing the control of the data delivered and of the data updates in CIRCA –Language –Data quality (empty cells, completeness of the data, meaningless values, hundreds,…) –ENDRM recommended but not obligatory Problems / advantages encountered 2006 – 2007 period

Timeline … END MS Reporting Obligations Noise sources – 1st round, competent authorities and limit values (DF1, DF2, DF3) Strategic noise maps (DF4) Noise sources – 2nd round, control programmes and action plans (DF5, DF6, DF7) Noise sources – 1st round update (DF1) END Reporting Mechanism (Relational database) Reportnet - DF5, DF6, DF7 (Common Repository + Automatic QC rules) Improvements in Reportnet – DF1 + Adaptation to C-NOSSOS outcomes Microsoft Excel template to report data (not longer applicable) Reporting System improvements

Data harmonisation 2008 – 2010 period The ENDRM is implemented in Reportnet (content management system of the EEA) MS download the templates, fill in with the data, upload the templates and run an automatic quality check the delivery of the corresponding data is done.

Data delivered in December 2008 / January 2009 / June 2010: –Dataflow 5: All noise sources –Dataflow 6: Noise control programmes –Dataflow 7: Noise Action Plans –Dataflow 1 update: Major noise sources Repository: –Reportnet –CIRCA Which data has been sent? 2008 – 2010 period Which is the status of these dataflows? Deliveries up to 30 September 2010

All noise sources (30/09/2010)

Noise control programmes (30/09/2010)

Noise Action Plans (30/09/2010)

Automatic quality check done in Reportnet Manual quality check: –Timeliness –Adoption of the template provided –Unique codes between different dataflows or updates –Deliveries Manual processing –Spatial information Outcome of the quality check: –QC Reports –Noise Reference Layer version 2 (containing all sources) Which quality check has been done? 2008 – 2010 period

Problems / advantages encountered 2008 – 2010 period Main advantages: –Standardized format to report the data –Data dictionary and automatic QC (immediate preliminary feedback) –Reportnet allows for an adequate control of the data delivered –Data can be collected and QC in a systematic way if no modifications are done in the spreadsheet templates Main problems encountered: –Spatial data delivery and process –Duplication of reports (Reportnet /CIRCA) –ENDRM and Reportnet recommended but not obligatory

Timeline… next steps! … END MS Reporting Obligations Noise sources – 1st round, competent authorities and limit values (DF1, DF2, DF3) Strategic noise maps (DF4) Noise sources – 2nd round, control programmes and action plans (DF5, DF6, DF7) Noise sources – 1st round update (DF1) END Reporting Mechanism (Relational database) Reportnet - DF5, DF6, DF7 (Common Repository + Automatic QC rules) Improvements in Reportnet – DF1 + Adaptation to C-NOSSOS outcomes Microsoft Excel template to report data (not longer applicable) Reporting System improvements

Muchas gracias Moltes gràcies Eskerrik Asko Muitas gracias * * * * * Dziekuje Merci beaucoup Mного Благодаря Obrigado Paldies Ευχαριστώ Tack Thank you very much Dank u Hvala Köszönöm Dekuj Multumesc Dakujem Danke Takk Aitäh Grazzi Kiitos Grazie Dêkuji Cпаси́бо شُكْرًا For further information, please contact: ETCLUSI Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Facultat de Ciències, Edifici C-5, 4ª Planta E BELLATERRA (Barcelona) Spain, EU P: F: Or visit our website at: