Www.renardus.org Follow the Fox to Renardus: an Academic Subject Gateway Service for Europe Cross-browsing and Cross-searching in a Distributed Network.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting the Pieces Together Grace Agnew Slide User Description Rights Holder Authentication Rights Video Object Permission Administration.
Advertisements

06/02/2014 NORDUnet 2000 : Renardus – The Clever Route to Information Renardus – The Clever Route to Information Janne Kanner CSC – Scientific Computing.
THE DONOR PROJECT Titia van der Werf-Davelaar. Project Financed by: Innovation of Scientific Information Provision (IWI) Duration: –phase 1: 1 may 1998.
DC2001, Tokyo DCMI Registry : Background and demonstration DC2001 Tokyo October 2001 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath Harry Wagner, OCLC
Subject Based Information Gateways in The UK Coordinated Activities in The UK Within the UK Higher Education community, the JISC (Joint Information Systems.
1 Demystifying metadata Ann Chapman UKOLN University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries, the Joint Information.
Cross-browsing subject gateways with the Dewey Decimal Classification in the Renardus Service Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath JISC.
UKOLN, University of Bath
An overview of collection-level metadata Applications of Metadata BCS Electronic Publishing Specialist Group, Ismaili Centre, London, 29 May 2002 Pete.
6th International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam, 2004 Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus Service Michael.
February Harvesting RDF metadata Building digital library portals with harvested metadata workshop EU-DL All Projects concertation meeting DELOS.
The Discovery Landscape in Crystallography UKOLN is supported by: Monica Duke UKOLN, University of Bath, UK – eBank UK project A centre.
Developing a Metadata Exchange Format for Mathematical Literature David Ruddy Project Euclid Cornell University Library DML 2010 Paris 7 July 2010.
A Middleware Registry for the Discovery of Collections and Services Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
Chapter 2. Slide 1 CULTURAL SUBJECT GATEWAYS CULTURAL SUBJECT GATEWAYS Subject Gateways  Started as links of lists  Continued as Web directories  Culminated.
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath JISC Joint Programmes Meeting Brighton, 6-7 July 2004
Metadata and interoperability: Michael Day UKOLN: the UK Office for Library and Information Networking University of Bath
The NSDL Registry Diane Hillmann  Jon Phipps. What We’re Doing Received an NSF grant in Oct. 2006, to: Register metadata schemas, vocabularies, application.
RDF Kitty Turner. Current Situation there is hardly any metadata on the Web search engine sites do the equivalent of going through a library, reading.
1 CS 502: Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Lecture 17 Descriptive Metadata: Dublin Core.
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
Educause October 29, 2001 A GEM of a Resource: The Gateway to Educational Materials Copyright Nancy Virgil Morgan, This work is the intellectual.
UKOLUG - July Metadata for the Web RDF and the Dublin Core Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN.
Collaborative Systems and Tools: Renardus case study Lesly Huxley, Leona Carpenter, Marianne Peereboom.
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation Beijing (China), July.
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Network of Expertise in Digital Preservation 1 Trusted Digital Repositories,
CEN/ISSS DC workshop, January The UK approach to subject gateways Rachel Heery UKOLN University of Bath UKOLN is.
Kate Fernie. MLA MLA is the national development agency for museums, libraries and archives –advises government on policy and priorities for the sector.
1 © Netskills Quality Internet Training, University of Newcastle Metadata Explained © Netskills, Quality Internet Training.
The role of metadata schema registries XML and Educational Metadata, SBU, London, 10 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
8/28/97Organization of Information in Collections Introduction to Description: Dublin Core and History University of California, Berkeley School of Information.
An Example of Multinational Cooperation with a Special View on Multilinguality and Interoperability Hagelin, Ritva and Myllys, Heli, Viikki Science Library,
Automatic Subject Classification and Topic Specific Search Engines -- Research at KnowLib Anders Ardö and Koraljka Golub DELOS Workshop, Lund, 23 June.
PwC SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers Metadata: SCHEMAS and other European projects First Austrian Metadata Seminar, 18 May 2001 Michael Day,
Using IESR Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
A centre of expertise in digital information management The MEG Metadata Schemas Registry Pete Johnston, Research Officer (Interoperability),
Meta Tagging / Metadata Lindsay Berard Assisted by: Li Li.
Metadata: SCHEMAS and other European projects Michael Day UKOLN: the UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath
Metadata: SCHEMAS and other European projects Michael Day UKOLN: the UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath
A centre of expertise in digital information management RDN, e-Prints UK and NOF- Digitise: a (very) small sample of UK OAI activity Andy.
The Resource Discovery Network and OAI Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council.
Creating an Application Profile Tutorial 3 DC2004, Shanghai Library 13 October 2004 Thomas Baker, Fraunhofer Society Robina Clayphan, British Library Pete.
Cultural Heritage Projects Bundesamtsgebäude Wien, June 30, 2000 Cultural Heritage Projects: Renardus Dr. Heike Neuroth Lower Saxony State and University.
1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.
Accessing a national digital library: an architecture for the UK DNER Andy Powell ELAG 2001, Prague 7 June 2001 UKOLN, University of Bath
A Quick Introduction to Metadata Michael Day UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath
Dublin Core Metadata Schema Registry at Tsukuba Shigeo Sugimoto, Mitsuharu Nagamori Graduate School of Library, Information and Media Studies University.
Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day TEL Milestone Conference Frankfurt am Main, April 2002.
1 Dublin Core & DCMI – an introduction Some slides are from DCMI Training Resources at:
JISC Information Environment Service Registry (IESR) Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk DCMI Affiliates: Implications for Institutions Rosemary Russell UKOLN University.
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
Digitization – Basics and Beyond workshop Interoperability of cultural and academic resources New services for digitized collections Muriel Foulonneau.
Open Archive Forum Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives.
RDN Architecture Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN is funded by the Library and Information Commission,
Göttingen State and University Library enardus The European Academic Subject Gateway Service Heike Neuroth & Hans Becker Göttingen State.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
Surveying the landscape: collection-level description & resource discovery JISC/NSF DLI Projects meeting, Edinburgh, 24 June 2002 Pete Johnston UKOLN,
UKOLN Metadata Projects: Subject Gateways and Preservation Metadata Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath Electronic Resources: Definition,
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.
MICHAEL and the European Digital Library: promoting teaching, learning and research The MICHAEL Project is funded under the European Commission eTEN Programme.
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
Accessing a national digital library: an architecture for the UK DNER
Introduction to Metadata
Cataloging the Internet
Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus Service (Michael Day, UKOLN, University of Bath) Searching and browsing multiple subject.
Metadata in Digital Preservation: Setting the Scene
JISC Information Environment Service Registry (IESR)
Presentation transcript:

Follow the Fox to Renardus: an Academic Subject Gateway Service for Europe Cross-browsing and Cross-searching in a Distributed Network of Subject Gateways: Architecture, Data Model and Classification Dr. Heike Neuroth & Traugott Koch State Library of Lower Saxony and the University Library of Göttingen, Germany NetLab, Lund University Library Development Department, Sweden

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Content n Renardus (aim, partners, etc.) n Subject Gateway (definition, elements) n Renardus Application Profile (working steps, metadata core set, data model, etc.) n Renardus Collection Level Description n Renardus Technical Approach n DDC Mapping for Cross-Browsing (methods, mapping relationships etc.) n Outlook

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch What is Renardus? n EU-funded project: n EC: 1,7 Mio EURO, including non costs: 2,3 Mio EURO n 1 January June 2002 n under the “Information Society Technologies” (IST ) 'Promoting a User-friendly Information Society‘, a major theme of the European Union's 5th Framework Programme n Partners drawn from 7 countries: n Project Management: National Library Den Haag (NL) n Denmark, Finland, Sweden, France, United Kingdom, Germany

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Objectives n to provide access to distributed quality-controlled subject gateways (high quality metadata collections) across Europe via one single interface: n cross-search n cross-browse n and to develop, define: n metadata solutions n Renardus Application Profile, Renardus Namespaces, Renardus Collection Level Description n technical solutions n organizational/business models

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Member Subject Gateways DAINet: German Agricultural Information System Document Server DEPOSIT: Deposit of German Online Dissertations DutchESS: Dutch Electronic Subject Service EELS: Engineering Electronic Library, Sweden FVL: The Finnish Virtual Library NOVAGate: Libraries of Nordic Agricultural & Veterinary Univ. SSG-FI: MathGuide, Geo-Guide, History Guide, Anglistik Guide RDN hubs: Resource Discovery Network (EEVL, SOSIG, OMNI,...) Danish Electronic Research Library (future partner) Les Signets: Collection of Internet Resources (future partner)

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Subject Gateway ”Quality-controlled subject gateways are Internet-services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing.”

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Subject Gateway cont. n Elements: n creation: manual/intellectual, experts etc. n selection and collection development: policy, selection criteria etc. n collection management: maintenance of collection etc. n resource description/metadata: rich set of metadata, formalized content description etc. n subject classification/subject access: controlled vocabularies etc. n standards: allow interoperability etc. n value-adding features: display, usage features etc.

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Working Steps - General n selection of necessary/meaningful elements: n for a service like Renardus: „Meta-Subject Gateway“, European service (multilingual access, search, browse) n for search, filter, sort, and display options n for browse, subject access n selection of common metadata format (exchange format): n Dublin Core Metadata Element Set v1.1 n Dublin Core Qualifiers n others n home-grown

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Working Steps - Analysis n first survey of partners‘ metadata format and detailed descripion of each subject gateway n GENERAL n name of SG, acronym, responsible organization, source of funding, time for record creation, general description etc. n COLLECTION/SELECTION n target user group, common primary language of target audience, collection scope, geographical and language coverage, selection criteria, granularity, resource types, resource formats etc. n CONTENT - METADATA n metadata scheme, metadata set, crosswalks, interoperability, cataloging rules, authority files etc.

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Working Steps - Analysis cont. n CONTENT - OTHERS n metadata browsable, searchable n language(s) of descriptions, thesauri, interface, translation support etc., keywords, classification systems, etc. n INDEX TYPE/TECHNICAL NOTES n search engine, indexing system, structure of data storage etc. n INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) n copyright, branding n VARIOUS n (quality) control, link checking, record checking/update etc. n backlinks of the gateway, statistical analysis of log files etc. n etc.

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch First Results definition of 8 metadata elements without detailed semantics, syntax based on Dublin Core: n DC.Title n DC.Creator n DC.Description n DC.Subject n DC.Identifier n DC.Language n DC.Type n Country

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus Data Model detailed investigations of each element about: n semantics and syntax of each element n qualifiers (refinements, encoding schemes) n cataloging rules (creator, description, keywords) n namespace n repeatability of each element n form of obligation (mandatory, strongly recommended, optional) n language qualifier (for title, description, subject) and: n administrative elements n future elements (rights, publisher), additional elements (format, etc.) n common browsing structure via classification system (home-grown, reuse of an existing system, which one)

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus Data Model cont.

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus Application Profile n Renardus Application Profile based on four namespaces, to be encoded in RDF/XML:  Dublin Core Namespace: [DCMES version 1.1] Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description  Dublin Core Qualifiers Namespace: [DCMES Qualifiers ( )] Dublin Core Qualifiers  Renardus Namespace: [RMES version 0.1, ] Renardus Metadata Element Set  Renardus Namespace Qualifiers: [RMES Qualifiers version 0.1, ] Renardus Metadata Element Set

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus AP cont. “content metadata” Title and Title.Alternative title: DCMES: mandatory, not repeatable, language tag title.alternative: DCMES Qualifiers: optional, repeatable, language tag Creator DCMES: strongly recommended, repeatable RMES Qualifiers (LastName, FirstName): strongly recommended, repeatable Description DCMES: mandatory in text version, repeatable, language tag

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus AP cont. Subject DCMES: mandatory, repeatable, language tag DCMES Qualifiers: strongly recommended, repeatable, language tag RMES Qualifiers (all other encoding schemes): mandatory, repeatable, language tag RMES Qualifiers (Ren-DDC): mandatory, repeatable Identifier DCMES Qualifiers: mandatory, repeatable (probably in the pilot system) RMES Qualifiers: “Operational System” mit Qualifiers “Archive”, “Mirror”... Language DCMES Qualifiers: strongly recommended, repeatable

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus AP cont. Type DCMES: strongly recommended, repeatable DCMES Qualifiers (DCT1): strongly recommended, repeatable DCMES Qualifiers (DCT2): “Operational System” Country RMES Qualifiers: strongly recommended, not repeatable “administrative metadata” Full Record URL RMES Qualifiers: strongly recommended, not repeatable SBIG ID RMES Qualifiers: mandatory, not repeatable

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus CLD Schema n Collection Level Description: simple description of collections, locations and related people or organizations n in Renardus: to provide information about participating Subject Gateways: n users chose Subject Gateways for thematic search (semi- automatic selection for subject) n well-structured background information (human and machine readable) n promotion n registry of Subject Gateways

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus CLD Format n Format: based on RSLP Collection Description (UKOLN): n Dublin Core metadata elements (e.g. DC.Title, DC.Description, DC.Subject) n RSLP metadata elements (cld.country) n Renardus specific metadata elements (e.g. rencld:acronym, rencld:subjectNotation, rencld:resourceLanguage etc.)

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus CLD Tool n WWW based form n RDF, RDF/XML, and text encoding n file is saved locally, each partner is able to update his description at every time n Renardus broker gathers all Subject Gateway descriptions

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus Technical Approach n PREPARATION n investigation: n of available standards and technologies n of functional and user requirements n of service provider requirements n formulation of use cases in UML n development of data model n data model n choosing architecture (decentralized vs. centralized) n architectural diagram n search/retrieval protocol n common profile (map data model to the protocol Z39.50) n Z39.50 profile, Bath compliant

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Renardus Technical Approach cont. n IMPLEMENTATION n data normalization n encoding RDF/XML (RDF normalizing toolkit) n classification mapping (mapping tool adapted from CARMENx) n CLDs (CLD tool adapted from RSLP) n creation of participants Renardus servers (Z39.50, Z'mbol) n implementation of broker software and functionality n cross-searching (Zebril and modified EUROPAGATE simultaneous gateway) n cross-browsing (browsing tool, SQL) n user interface implementation (with use cases) n screen layout (Zebril and HTML, Javascript)

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch DDC Mapping for Cross-Browsing n why subject cross-browsing and classification? n why switching language? n browsing/mapping from DDC to the local systems/browsing structures n why DDC? n comparison to alternatives n research license, allowed changes n analysis of partners classification systems n types, adaptions, number of levels and classes, subject overlap

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch DDC Mapping for Cross-Browsing cont. n mapping approaches and issues n mapping methods n mapping between classes, not between individual resources n priorities: e.g. only well used classes are mapped n recommendations for local improvements n mapping relationships n fully equivalent, narrower and broader equivalent, major and minor overlap n reuse for retrieval result clustering

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch DDC Mapping for Cross-Browsing cont. n technical solution n sources: local classifications, CORC Web Dewey n mapping tool adapted from CARMENx (MySQL, PHP, Javascript) n syntax of the mapping information n creation of the browsing pages n usage of the DDC mapping in Renardus n „browse and jump“ n why not virtual browsing? n DDC classification search (in advanced search) n user interface solutions

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch MSC 2000 DDC DDC

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch DDC Mapping for Cross-Browsing cont. n future n recommendations for subject access efforts in gateways and brokers n multilingual access to the DDC top-levels n automatic mapping (and classification) as support n owners should take over for sustainable mapping n documentation n DDC mapping report (D7.4) n practical mapping guidelines (D7.4) n paper at IFLA Satellite Conf., August 2001

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Outlook n June 2001: Public Deliverable WP 6, D6.5 n Renardus Application Profile n Renardus Namespaces n Renardus Collection Level Description n DDC Mapping n June 2001: Beta-Version of Renardus broker n first DDC mapping results n first evaluations of broker will start n November 2001 n Renardus Workshop for future participating Subject Gateways

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch URLs & References n Renardus n SUB Renardus - (also with D7.4) n News Digest SIGN-UP Form - n Evaluation of existing data models (D6.1) - n DCMI Dublin Core Metadata Initiative - n Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description - n Dublin Core Qualifiers - qualifiers/ n DCMI Agents Working Group - n DCMI Type Working Group -

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch URLs & References n RSLP Collection Description - n CLD Collection Level Description - n RSLP Collection Description Tool - n Subject Gateways (Traugott Koch): Online Information Review, Vol. 24, Number 1, 2000

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Cross-Search n basic index: Title, Description, Subject n field search: n Title n Creator (in DC Simple and later on in RMES Qualifiers) n Description n DDC Captions (also cross-browsable!) n Subject (in future: several encoding schemes for keyword and classification systems of partners) n Type

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Filter Options n Type n DCMI Type 1 (mapping of partners‘ document types to Dublin Core Type 1) n in future also meaningful: mapping to Sub Type List of DCMI? n Probably no Renardus specific type list n Language (of resources and languages of metadata = Language Tag) n Country

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch Sorting n Title (alphabetic sorting) n in future: Type, Language, Country? (central architecture) n Subject: Ren-DDC Classification n mapping relation (fully equivalent, narrower equivalent, broader equivalent, major overlap, minor overlap) n in discussion: n Subject - Keywords: sorting after subject indexing group: controlled vocabulary versus free keywords, but problematic!

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch

ELAG 2001, Prague 6-8 June 2001 Neuroth & Koch