Delivery Ring Abort B. Drendel 3/17/14. Abort Dump Location The AP2 line will stay as-is between the present IQ29 and the Debuncher. This includes all.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.
Advertisements

Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Temporary shielding for the 20" vertical penetration Igor Rakhno November 17, 2008.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
CONSTRUCTING A FIVE CABIN LATRINE
Preliminary studies for Muon shield modification to accommodate LCLS II Alev Ibrahimov December, 2010 BSY.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
MCTF C. Johnstone MUTAC Meeting 8-10 April Debut of the MTA beamline Description, status and commissioning plans.
Beam Transport AIP Beam Transport to Delivery Ring Instrumentation and Controls Update Brian Drendel December 15, 2014.
Mu2e WBS 2 Accelerator Progress Report Mu2e WGM 6/15/2011 Steve Werkema L2 Manager for the Accelerator Systems.
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
H- beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
FNAL, May 10, Introduction for Beam Diagnostics Laboratory Main Mission: R&D on charged particle beam diagnostics for e + /e - linear colliders.
NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
High Power Dumps – RDR 10 atm. Cylinder water vessel with copper plate back end, 1.5m diameter x 6.5m long, in a 15 x 3 x 4 m^3 shielded enclosure, with.
NuMI NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction July 30, 2003 Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction Air system for.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 27, 2001 Target Hall Shielding Review Page 1 Target Hall Shielding Review Radiation Safety Coordinator Nancy Grossman FNAL.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
Loss Limitations and Collimation Angelika Drees, R. Fliller, W. Fu The RHIC Collimation Sytem: history and overview RHIC Loss Limitations Operational limits.
Introduction From a neutron flux (> 20 MeV), with the Leaching model (Lessard) based on SBMS (Tables 1 and 2):
G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Antiproton Acceptance Keith Gollwitzer Dept. of Energy Review March 30, 2005.
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Radiation Protection studies for the Linac4 / Linac2 interface Joachim Vollaire, DGS-RP 28/09/2015 Linac4 Coordination Meeting.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
BOOSTER COLLIMATION AND SHIELDING Proton Source Workshop Fermilab December 7-8, 2010 Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab Accelerator Physics Center.
Project X: 8 GeV Transfer and Injection Collimation and Injection Absorber R&D Kick-off meeting Dave Johnson APC/HINS June 20, 2008 Beams-doc 3125.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
NuMI PS Specs June 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI NuMI requirements are for a very large fraction of the available Main Injector intensity over a period.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
Muon Department Meeting Jerry Annala Staged Commissioning of Muon Campus 17 December 2015.
Activation Issues for ANU Peter Kasper 17-Sep-2007.
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Prompt dose upstream the 12-ft concrete shielding blocks Igor Rakhno May 4, 2007.
Beam Transport and Storage Rings Design Review November 17, 2010 J. Morgan.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Status of the FAIR Antiproton Target K. Knie.
60 1. What is the mass M in the system as given in the
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Large Booster and Collider Ring
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
Presentation transcript:

Delivery Ring Abort B. Drendel 3/17/14

Abort Dump Location The AP2 line will stay as-is between the present IQ29 and the Debuncher. This includes all magnets and instrumentation. Just upstream (aborted beam direction) of IQ28, we will put a horizontal trim, a vertical trim and a rolled dipole (ABV2 in drawing). The rolled dipole is an MDC and redirects the beam line to the center of the aisle (both horizontally and vertically). This magnet will need to be moved into the tunnel. We will move AP2 line toroid Tor724 to near the end of the abort line. We will add a SEM from our spares to near the end of the abort line. The abort line will have a vacuum window or blank at the end. We will move ion chamber IC728 to between the vacuum window and the abort dump.

Delivery Ring Abort Tunnel Location The abort dump is located just upstream of where the the brown AP2 line shielding is currently. The AP2 line brown shielding will be used as the abort dump. It will be moved by iron workers from it's current location, upstream about 12' and moved to the center of the aisle both horizontally and vertically. It will be stacked on top of concrete to get the right height. The egressway will be blocked by the abort dump. Fencing will be put up to cover any gaps between the abort dump and the tunnel walls. New safety system mini loops will be installed on both the transport side and Debuncher side of the abort dump due to safety rules about length of allowed dead ends in tunnels. One mini-loop will be on the Debuncher/Muon Rings enclosure side and the other on the beam transport side. The AP2 transport gate does not move. The Pbar 95 LCW runs overhead down the AP2 line from the Debuncher and ends at the AP2 "left bends." The last element that will need LCW cooling is the rolled down bend. The LCW piping can be cut and capped after that. There are signal cables in the cable tray that runs along the left wall of the AP2 line enclosure (facing the direction of aborted beam). This will need to remain intact as those cable trays carry Controls and Abort links from AP50 to AP0. Everything from the downstream face of the abort to the future M2/M3 line merge can be removed. The mini-loop area between the downstream face of the abort to the transport gate can be used for storage. Rad levels will be only a couple mr/hr at most according to MARS simulations.

Beam Assumptions Horizontal emittance 30 pi-mm-mr Vertical emittance 4 pi-mm-mr (double injected beam size) 6σ transverse beam size (99.7% of gaussian) Vertical dispersion displacement added to transverse size (conservative, instead of adding in quadrature) Black ellipse is upstream beam size, red downstream Trims are ignored (should have adequate aperture) J. Morgan

Lattice functions J. Morgan

Abort Beam Numbers Maximum single pulse rate = 1E12 protons/pulse Expected Rate = 5E11 protons/sec – Expected rate = abort clean up + permit trips + safety margin Abort clean up (assume 5% leftover) = [2 batches x 4E12 x 0.05]/1.33 sec = 3E12/sec Permit trips (one per minute max) = ([1E12] protons/min) / (60 sec/min) = 1.67E10 Safety margin 58% (chosen to even out numbers) Power = [5E11 protons/sec]x[8E9 eV]x[1.6E-19 J/eV]x[1KW/1000W] = 0.64 KW Yearly rate (assume 80% uptime) = [5E11 protons/sec]x[31,536,000sec/yr]x[0.80] = 1.26E19 protons/yr

In the center of the steel shielding is a 6"x 6" hole where the AP2 beam pipe runs. This hole will be filled with steel. The steel to fill the hole will need to be moved into the tunnel. The abort dump will be surrounded by concrete blocks as shown in the attached pictures. The concrete blocks will need to be moved into the tunnel.

MARS Runs Last MARS simulations were ran Fall ap.fnal.gov/users/rakhno/mu2e/absorber_debuncher_AP2_line/ 2012/ver_August/ Igor Rakhno completed the MARS runs – Igor is not available for further MARS runs this spring. Kaman Vaziri completed the calculations.

Hadron Flux Igor Rakhno

Hadron Flux Igor Rakhno

Average Flux The flux averaged over the volume of the air in this part of the tunnel is approximately 3.3E-7 (cm^-2 proton^-1) which, at 5E11 proton/sec, is equal to 1.65E5 (cm^-2 sec^-1).

Star Density Igor Rakhno

Star Density Igor Rakhno

Ground and Surface Water The highest level in the soil is 2.9E4 star/(cm3*sec). It is for 5.E11 proton/sec. We can definitely see the top- bottom star density asymmetry in the elevation view. If the sumps run only once a year, the concentrations of the radionuclides in the discharge will be about 40% of that allowed for surface water. However, if the sumps run once a month, the combined concentrations will be about 3% of the surface water limit. For the groundwater after 10 years of operation of this absorber, the ground water concentrations will be eight orders of magnitude less than the groundwater limit. Kaman Vaziri

Residual Dose Igor Rakhno

Residual Dose Igor Rakhno

Residual Dose Numbers Maximum residual dose on the front face of the dump is in the ballpark of 1mSv/hr (100mrem/hr). Maximum residual dose on the sides in the gap between concrete and the tunnel walls were slightly higher, but the front and back faces of the dump will be fenced off to prevent human access to these areas. The residual dose on the back face of the dump is only and 0.01 mSv/hr ( mrem/hr).

Tony’s Concern The muon campus shielding assessment (beams doc.db at 4513-v2) shows that the cleanup abort design is insufficient. The normal dose rates for a 400 watt steady state operation is about 100 mrem/hr at the berm surface. That could work according to the FRCM if we wanted to put a large area fence on the berm at the 40 arc. That’s really not such a good idea in my opinion. The dump design should be redone to get dose rates on the berm down to more reasonable levels. T. Leveling

Supplimental Slides

Magnet operating currents Septum – Approximately 25,000 Amps Q405 (SQE) – 1,570 Amps (2004 Collider lattice) Q733 (SQE) – 340 Amps (395 Amps in Run II) Q732 (SQE) – 340 Amps (368 Amps in Run II) Q731 (SQD) – 340 Amps (343 Amps in Run II) V730 (CDC) – 1,135 Amps (Same in Run II) Q730 (SQD) – 400 Amps (410 Amps in Run II) Q729 (SQD) – 400 Amps (411 Amps in Run II) Vnew (MDC) – 715 Amps J. Morgan