DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
GIS and Transportation Planning
NCHRP Renaissance Planning Group Rich Kuzmyak Chris Sinclair Alex Bell TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6, 2013 Columbus,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
Presented to Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Feng Liu, John (Jay) Evans, Tom Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 8, 2011.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review Introduction and Context Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Utilizing Multi-threading, Parallel Processing, and Memory Management Techniques to Improve Transportation Model Performance Jim Lam Andres Rabinowicz.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Big Data “Triage” for Long Range Planning Transportation Engineering and Safety Conference Reuben S MacMartin December 12, 2014.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Application of an Activity-based Model for a Toll Road Study in Chicago Matt Stratton Parsons Brinckerhoff May 19, 2015.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
an Iowa State University center SIMPCO Traffic Modeling Workshop Presented by: Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Trip Generation CE 451/551 Grad students … need to discuss “projects” at end of class.
TRB Planning Applications May 2009, Houston,TX Changing assignment algorithms: the price of better convergence Michael Florian and Shuguang He INRO.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt,
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Emme Modeller Applications Puget Sound Regional Council’s Model Conversion via Emme Modeller 22 nd International Emme Users’ Conference September 15-16,
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Converting the North Front Range Model to TransCAD
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Traffic Engineering with VISUM
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014

Travel Models - Overview TIM1.0 First VISUM model, completed in 2009 TIM 2.0 “Best-in-class” 4-step model Networks carry forward TIM 2.1 & TIM 2.2 Minor bug fixes and improvements Tim 3.0 Fully disaggregate microsimulated activity based

Travel Models – TIM 2.0  Classical 4-step model  4 times-of-day  10 trip purpose x income types  Limited bike and walk trip model  Transit by access mode – walk vs. drive  Large network – 26 counties  Open source networks – OSM and GTF  Iterative feedback for system convergence  12-hours to run, 90 GB disk space, 48+GB RAM

Model Enhancements Larger area More time periods More detailed highway network More Traffic Analysis Zones Better representation of transit service and fares More socioeconomic variables More trip purposes Better treatment of non-motorized travel Improved model operations

Extension of the Model Area  Simplified representation of adjacent Counties  Expected benefits:  Full coverage of DVRPC’s home-work travel shed  Easier start-up for studies across MPO boundaries

The OpenStreetMap   Started in 2004  Organization: OSM foundation non-profit, based in the U.K.  Volunteers  They generate the map Upload data from their private GPS devices Edit directly on  Data distribution  Free of charge  Can be used for any commercial or non-commercial purpose  Data content  Routable street network plus other geography  U.S. data derived from an import of the 2005 TIGER file

GTFS Overview  TriMet/Google developed specification  Widely adopted standard for public transit  Series of text files with comma-delimited values  (GTFS = General Transit Feed Specification)

Open Data Mash-up for Modeling  Data integration Data objects of different origin are merged New relationships are created from OSM Stop Point Number Line Name Service Pattern Line Name Route Name Direction Scheduled Run Line Name Route Name Direction Index Travel Demand Data Stop Area Number from GTFS Node Number Link From Node To Node 2 1 or more 0 or more Exactly 1 Legend Connector Zone Number Node Number Direction Zone Zone Number

The TIM 2.0 Network in Numbers Number of network objects TIM1.0TIM2.0 Street segments 50,000580,000 Transit stops (stop points) 5,00018,000 Transit service patterns 2,0006,000 TAZ (traffic analysis zones) 2,0003,400

More Detailed Highway Network  TIM1.0 TIM2.0

Integrated Street & Transit Network

Highway Assignment Example

Demand Model Conventional 4-step model Uses “Hotstart” approach – generic trip table and PnR lot choice pre- loaded for quick convergence 12 hours run time 5/5/5/3 iterations for AM/MD/PM/NT Trip purpose segregation by income TD & MC done using nested logit model in VISUM Trip Generation Trip Distribution Mode Choice Highway Assignment TIM 2.0 Flow

Trip Purposes Home based work Low income High income Home based shop Low income High income Home based school Home based university Home based other Low income High income Non- home based work Non home based other

Trip Generation TOD TG Balancing Directional Factoring to TD Trip Gen Approach: Ps As Os Ds Ps As Daily trip generation using rates and demographic variables Motorized / non-motorized mode split using logit models Time of day factoring Directional factoring to Os and Ds

Socioeconomic Variables Households by Size Number of workers Number of autos Income category School Enrollment K-12 University NAICS Employment Professional services Eds and Meds Arts/Rec/Food services Other services Land Use Variables Parking cost Retail density Land use mix Concentration of low income households

Trip Distribution & Mode Choice Trip distribution in O-D format (e.g. Home to Work handled separately from Work to Home) using gravity model Transit trips nested by mode of approach All trips HighwayTransit Transit Walk Transit Auto

TIM 2.0 Park and Ride Modeling  Basic Method:  Step 0 – Prepare TIM 2.0 zone system (6 virtual P&R zones)  Step 1 – Obtain highway (i  k) and transit walk-access (k  j) skims  Step 2 – Matrix Convolution – determine i  j skim matrix  Step 2.1 Determine Optimal Lot (k) for each i  j pair  Step 2.2 Compose i  j skim from highway portion (i  k) and transit portion (k  j)  Step 3 – Determine Auto access trip table via nested logit model  Step 4 – Split and assign joint auto-transit trip  Step 4.1 Split i  j joint trip into highway and transit portions  Step 4.2 Add i  k portion to total auto trip table and assign  Step 4.3 Add k  j portion to transit-walk trip table and assign Terminology i – auto trip end k – P&R zone j – transit trip end

Model execution Masterbody script handles overall model execution Mixture of “canned” VISUM functions and python scripts ~90 GB free disk space needed At least 16 GB RAM for sequential execution At least 64 GB RAM for parallel execution Visum will use as much computational power as you can provide (current machines have 12 cores)

Overlord

Calendar Scheduler

Master Script (Python) Daily Trip Gen AM Model Midday Model PM Model Initial Main Body Imp. Averaging Trip Dist. Mode Choice Hwy. Assignment End Implementation of TIM 2.0 in VISUM – Model Architecture Night Model

Reporting Tools

Validation Reports