Describe what your team accomplished.  Rock Creek campus instituted a monthly “V&C Teaching Chat”  Across college sharing of ideas including: readings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada
World’s Largest Educational Community
Update on Goals 1 and 2 Curricular Domain Curricular Domain – accomplishments to date Developed baseline information about current level of faculty.
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
History, Status and Challenges as of August 2010 Outcomes, Assessment and Accreditation.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Implementing the new Australian Medical Council standards: The focus on Indigenous health Professor Michael Field Chair, Medical School Accreditation Committee,
A Summary of Recommendations From the National Conference C. Brewer, U MT, 2/2010.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
●Created collaborative Canvas course to share assessments, learning activities, concept inventories and scientific research related to PULSE goals. ●Used.
FOR THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION’S ACADEMY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING YSU’s Sustainability Plan 1.
Course development and SFCC Curriculum Committee approval Fall Spokane Community College (SCC) Curriculum Committee approval Winter Biology.
IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Bringing Vision and Change to Tulsa Community College (TCC) Biology Department, Tulsa Community College Tulsa, Oklahoma Melissa Masse, Jennifer Kneafsey,
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
General Biology (Bio142) Lecture & Lab. Obtaining exam copies of recommended books. Requesting successful lab materials from peers. Weekly meetings to.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Faculty Engagement in Partnership Work Nancy S. Shapiro University System of Maryland AACU 2007.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Accomplishments:  We determined lab and course needs: 8 sections of 18 students each; 36 students per lecture section.  380 students/year  Most labs.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Science Case Network How an RCN-UBE on Case Studies and PBL Can Help You Pat Marsteller and Ethel Stanley Channeling Margaret Watrerman Networking Conference.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
VISION – Vertical integration of the life science curricula at OSU across four departments (Microbiology, Integrative Biology, Botany and Plant Pathology.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
SNU HLC/NCA Accreditation Update SNU Graduate & Professional Studies Fall Meeting October 24, 2008.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Professional Development for Online Faculty Meeting diverse needs through a centralized initiative Judith Giering, Ph.D., Ray Lum, MPhil, MS, Fran Cornelius,
3A – The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible 3B --
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Intro to GETSI-Field Development Model & Guiding Principles
Online Teaching Conference
Products / Reflections / … UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES?
Products / Reflections / … UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES?
A five-year community effort to improve geoscience literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports.
Products / Reflections / …
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Products / Reflections / …
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES Products / Reflections
Products / Reflections / … UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES?
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
PRODUCTS / REFLECTIONS / …
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
Committee # 4: Educational Program For The MD
Products / Reflections / … UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES?
Developing Student Learning Objectives and Metrics for Program Review
Presentation transcript:

Describe what your team accomplished.  Rock Creek campus instituted a monthly “V&C Teaching Chat”  Across college sharing of ideas including: readings & critical thinking, case studies, a video promoting team-thinking in A&P  More part time faculty included in discussions about teaching.  Inform—Awareness Activity (Our Vision & Change group has activities at each SAC meeting)  Inventory Success—We had the SAC assess how well courses addressed the V&C outcomes  Invest in Trust and Division of Labor—All campuses (Cascade, Rock Creek, Southeast, and Sylvania) are part of the V&C subcommittee.  Implement with Assessment—Working on integrating assessment of college outcomes with V&C outcomes  Iteration—V& C inspired discussions and activities at every SAC meeting with the goal of building on past successes and responding to newly identified challenges. Weave V&C into future assessments for assessing college mission outcomes and program review Creating a Google drive/Dropbox method for sharing of teaching ideas, articles, etc., for all Teaching and pedagogy experts, resource map, professional development, V&C rubrics for accreditation assessment Faculty, SAC chair, POD-Gabe, TLC & TLC Coordinators, Grants Office, Deans, Deans of Instruction/Presidents, CCURI/CUR, PULSE, NSF, PCC Foundation, MakerSpace, Stacey Kiser PRODUCTS / REFLECTIONS / … ACTIONS BARRIERS & CHALLENGES SUSTAINABILITY RESOURCES & ALLIES NW Biology instructors Conference 2015 Creation of a Google drive/Dropbox method for sharing teaching ideas, articles, etc., for our 96+ instructors. Faculty team members have experience with innovative teaching V&C document recommendations lever for engaging SAC. V&C rubrics provide tool for idea collection activity at January 2015 SAC meeting Breadth of faculty academic training and research experience contributes to a valuable diversity of ideas Enthusiasm, commitment to student success, breadth of faculty academic training VISION – Planning for change. Dieterich Steinmetz, Nora Stevens, Josephine Pino, Alexie McNerthney, April Ann Fong, and Linda Fergusson-Kolmes Creating a Shared Vision Portland Community College, Sylvania, Rock Creek, Cascade, and Southeast Campuses MAIN GOAL – Transforming our Subject Area Committee (SAC), a multi-campus committee. Note: A Subject Area Committee (SAC) is composed of all faculty throughout the PCC district who teach in a subject area or program. SACs address the instructional and curriculum concerns of its program(s) or discipline(s). SACs represent and articulate subject area and program issues which are defined by the PCC Mission Statement, the Core Outcomes, and the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities. As the curricular and content experts for their subject area, SACs will make recommendations and must be consulted regarding all relevant academic and curricular issues. Products: ongoing monthly informal chat. New laboratory modules in 211 and 212 RC t& SY that require open- ended inquiry and student engagement, faculty working together toward improvements Assessments include surveys, reflections, feedback forms, interviews, pre and post tests This work was supported in part by an NSF RCN UBE award # FUTURE GOALS Challenge: Very little PCC awareness of V&C, although we are remedying this unawareness by presentation and engagement in activities at SAC meetings Barriers: Distances between campus, heavy workloads present communication challenges, changing enrollment patterns, are resulting in fewer sections and changing staff, i.e., lost PT faculty who would otherwise be involved, laboratory rooms are not stocked with a wide breadth of supplies making open ended inquiry difficult, high percentage of course sections taught by faculty with part-time status and thus reduced time availability STRENGTHS & LEVERAGE