Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International): Process and Experiences Dr. James Simpson Dr. Yeqing Bao College of Business.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation and Institutional Renewal Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President Institutional Research and Planning University.
Advertisements

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
A “How–To Guide” for Higher Education Institutions that are Balancing Requirements From Multiple Accreditation Agencies: Where the Rubber Hits the Road.
The Priority of Research and Doctoral School Nino Zhvania Head of the Quality Assurance Office.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
College of Business Spring 2013 Advisory Council Meeting AACSB Standards Update.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
A Definition of Distance Education Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the learning occurs when student and instructor.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
W. Ken Farr Economics and Finance GCSU Assessment Day 2010 The Economics Major Assessment Methodology.
HAAGA-HELIA’s accreditation process stages for AACSB Fall 2010Spring 2011Fall The applicant school establishes AACSB International membership.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
1 C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs Bob Smallwood, University of.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Learning Assurance School of Business & Industry Faculty Retreat August 19, 2008.
Shaping the Future of Management Education 2013 AACSB Business Accreditation Standards Dan LeClair EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
The Unit of Academic Accreditation Coordinator of the Male Section: Dr. Adel Saker Al-Khasawnah EXT.....
Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
College of Business Administration Lessons Learned Part I Assurance of Learning: Strategic Planning through Programmatic Assessment Kathleen A. Krentler.
1 Project Management Graduate Programme Chris Stevens Associate Professor and Programme Director The Sun.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Mission Mission To prepare students to be successful and ethical leaders capable of making valued contributions within the global marketplace; to advance.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). SACS Principles of Accreditation Integrity Quality Enhancement.
IDEA Ad Hoc Committee Report Submitted by: Andreas Veh, Diane Erickson, Nelta Edwards, Kerri Morris UAA Faculty Senate, Dec. 7, 2007.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Mission Mission The Raj Soin College of Business provides leadership and innovation to: Develop successful and ethical leaders capable of making valued.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Strategic Plan of the MACU School of English 20011—2012 Submitted by Mark S. Harris, Chair, School of English 15 Nov
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Peer reviewer Workshop Presented by: Prof. Dr. Hussein Mahmoud El Magraby National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Presentation to the Faculty Senate on General Education Beth Rosenberg, Dir. of Gen. Ed. – Jeff Jablonski, Asst. Dir.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Curriculum and Accreditation
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Curriculum and Accreditation
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Accreditation and curriculum
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Graduate Program Update
February 21-22, 2018.
The Road Less Traveled Cynthia V. Fukami Daniels College of Business
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Presentation transcript:

Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International): Process and Experiences Dr. James Simpson Dr. Yeqing Bao College of Business University of Alabama in Huntsville

AACSB Accreditation Process  Establish membership in AACSB  Retain consultant  Submit Eligibility Application to PreAccreditation Committee  AACSB will assign a mentor  Mentor visits campus  University submits an strategic plan and accreditation plan for review and approval.  Once plan is approved, mentor works with university up to three years as plan is implemented.  A team Chair will be appointed two years in advance of the anticipated accreditation review team visit.  Visit occurs within five years of acceptance of plan by the initial (not PreAccreditation) accreditation acceptance of initial accreditation plan.

Strategic Planning  Strategic Planning Should guide decisions, practice, and resource allocation Should guide decisions, practice, and resource allocation Accreditation is linked to school’s mission Accreditation is linked to school’s mission Mission Mission must be consistent with institution’s missionmust be consistent with institution’s mission determines the balance of the three types of intellectual contributionsdetermines the balance of the three types of intellectual contributions type of student servedtype of student served match resources available to the schoolmatch resources available to the school consistent with faculty capabilityconsistent with faculty capability

Faculty Qualifications  Faculty Qualifications must have sufficient faculty to manage instruction, curriculum & course development, assessment of learning must have sufficient faculty to manage instruction, curriculum & course development, assessment of learning Must have Academic Qualification (AQ) and Professional Qualification (PQ) policies Must have Academic Qualification (AQ) and Professional Qualification (PQ) policies define required level of intellectual contributions (Ph.D.)define required level of intellectual contributions (Ph.D.) 90% of faculty must be either AQ or PQ90% of faculty must be either AQ or PQ 50% must be AQ50% must be AQ Standard is 3-4 peer reviewed articles over 5 years for Ph.D. programs Standard is 3-4 peer reviewed articles over 5 years for Ph.D. programs AQ must be distributed across facultyAQ must be distributed across faculty

Assurance of Learning & Assessment  Assurance of Learning: Define learning expectations (skills & knowledge) and assure the graduates achieve learning expectations (undergraduate, MS and Ph.D. oral presentation skills oral presentation skills written communication skills written communication skills second language skills second language skills ability to integrate concepts ability to integrate concepts Assessment: Are you accomplishing what you want to accomplish Assessment: Are you accomplishing what you want to accomplish select students based on knowledge and skills select students based on knowledge and skills language, communication, quantitative skillslanguage, communication, quantitative skills course embedded measurement in class exercises for specific courses course embedded measurement in class exercises for specific courses In class exercises for specific coursesIn class exercises for specific courses Writing, integration, critical thinking Writing, integration, critical thinking stand-along testing or performance stand-along testing or performance Thesis, ETS exam, comprehensive exam Thesis, ETS exam, comprehensive exam