Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSTITUTE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY (IZIIS) University SS. Cyril and Methodius Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Advertisements

Seismic analysis and design of
During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.
Seismology and Earthquake Engineering :Introduction Lecture 3
Experimental Testing of Drift- Sensitive Nonstructural Systems – Year 4 The Pathways Project San Jose State University Equip Site:
Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings SPEAR International Workshop Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 4 th -5 th April 2005.
Y.P. Wang 1, W.H. Liao 2 and C.L. Lee 2 1 Professor of Civil Engineering 2 Research Assistant Professor of NHMRC National Chiao-Tung University Y.P. Wang.
An-Najah National University
Rigid-Frame Structures
1. 2 World seismic activity British Geological Survey 2.
MUSE 11B Buildings in Earthquakes Why do buildings do the things they do?
ATHENS 12 th of April, M. Eng. Velyan Petkov The European Center for Risk Prevention, Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgarian seismic design codes and civil construction.
Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.
Bridge Vulnerabilities Oct What puts bridges at risk? Ability to withstand seismic forces and displacements.
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
FEMA HAZUS Risk Assessment Capabilities Project, SCEC Presentation Damage Estimation for Buildings and Lifelines Brian Kehoe, S.E. Wiss, Janney, Elstner.
Quantifying risk by performance- based earthquake engineering, Cont’d Greg Deierlein Stanford University …with contributions by many 2006 IRCC Workshop.
The use of risk in design: ATC 58 performance assessment procedure Craig D. Comartin.
Demand and Capacity Factor Design: A Performance-based Analytic Approach to Design and Assessment Sharif University of Technology, 25 April 2011 Demand.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/ Izmit Earthquake August 17, 3:02am, 1999 Mw 7.4 Mw earthquake: >18,000 fatalities >300,000 homeless.
Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.
SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE, GROUND SHAKING, GROUND FAILURE (LIQUEFACTION, LANDSLIDES), AFTERSHOCKS.
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
IMPACTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University.
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS A KEY ELEMENT OF BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS MEXICO PART 3B: EARTHQUAKE VULNERABILITY OF BUILDINGS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
Turkey Earthquake Risk Model Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World Bank Washington, DC, June 2-3, 2003 Dennis E. Kuzak Senior Vice President,
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 8414 – Structural Dynamics Northridge Earthquake 1 Northridge Earthquake - Concrete.
Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.
Earthquakes and Modeling Chris Van Horn and Kyle Eli.
Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.
Making better reinsurance decisions… Measuring seismic risk in Turkey: Latest modelling techniques Karl Jones June 3, 2003 ©Copyright 2003 Willis Limited.
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013 Recent Greek Provisions for RC Structures with URM Infills M. Chronopoulos and P. Chronopoulos,
Static Pushover Analysis
MAE CENTER RESEARCH SUCCESS WITH DOTs Past and Future Neil M. Hawkins - Professor Emeritus University of Illinois MAE Center Annual Meeting With.
VULNERABILITY OF BUILDINGS TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND SHAKING GENERALIZED VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN A BUILDING’S ELEVATION AND FLOOR PLAN.
FEMA Nonstructural Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Training
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
Opportunities for NEES Research Utilization Robert D Hanson Professor Emeritus University of Michigan.
Earthquake Load Some Basic Definitions:
FEMA/ EARTH SCIENCE ASPECTS OF HAZUS Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation Oakland, CA.
University of Palestine
Paper Presented at World Bank Conference on Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters: A New Perspective on Country Risk Management June 2-3, 2003 Washington,
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
MAGNITUDE 6.7 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES CENTRAL JAPAN Saturday, November 22, 2014 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Earthquake Engineering
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Review of Indian Seismic Codes
QuakeCore Alpine Fault case study
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
M7.1 RABOSA EARTHQUAKE 1:15 PM; September 19, 2017
NUMERICAL SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RC BRIDGES WITH HOLLOW PIERS
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013
More lectures at Disasters Supercourse - 
10 DEAD; DOZENS INJURED IN TOWN OF 85,000
A Brief Idea on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
Forces Within Earth Earthquakes are natural vibrations of the ground caused by movement along fractures in Earth’s crust, or sometimes, by volcanic eruptions.
Earthquake resistant buildings
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Forces Within Earth Earthquakes are natural vibrations of the ground caused by movement along fractures in Earth’s crust, or sometimes, by volcanic eruptions.
Presentation transcript:

Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University

Residential/Commercial Building under Construction

DAMAGE IS ALWAYS ATTRIBUTABLE TO A COMBINATION OF ADVERSE CONDITIONS

Code violations

DAMAGE RELATIONSHIP WITH HEIGHT: R/C BUILDINGS IN GÖLCÜK

REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS IN GÖLCÜK

R/C BUILDINGS UP TO THREE STORIES TALL

R/C BUILDINGS TALLER THAN THREE STORIES

OVERCAPACITY GIRDERS BREAK COLUMNS

SOFT/WEAK GROUND STORIES

POOR ANCHORAGE OF REINFORCEMENT

COLUMN HINGING MECHANISM

COLUMN SHEAR FAILURE

CAPTIVE SHORT COLUMNS FAIL IN SHEAR

IMPROPERLY DETAILED JOINTS CAN DISINTEGRATE

NON-ENFORCEMENT OF HEIGHT ZONING MAY LEAD TO POUNDING BETWEEN BUILDINGS

Loss Estimation requires team-work among: q Geology q Seismology q Earthquake and structural engineering q Geotechnical engineering

Principal Components of Risk Analysis Hazard Analysis Modeling seismic sources Soil type and geological factors Attenuation modeling Vulnerability Analysis Assessment of the building stock Earthquake analysis Develop vulnerability curves Risk Analysis Calculation of Probabilistic Risk Curves

Calc. material losses Hazard Event nucleation Calculation of intensity Vulnerability Damage calculation Building stock Geotechnical background Principal Components of Earthquake Models

Hazard Assessment Softer formation Bedrock Attenuation Amplification

Modeling Seismic Sources Gutenberg-Richter

Attenuation Relations Strike-Slip Faults Joyner and Boore (1997) Sadigh (1997) Abrahamson and Silva (1997) Ambraseys et al (1999) Gülkan and Kalkan (2002) Subduction Zone Youngs (1997) Gregor (1997) Spudich et al. (1999) Dependent on: Earthq. Mag. Rupture Mech. Distance Signal Prop.

Estimation of Ground Motions during Probable Earthquakes

Soil Type and Amplification Sand and silt Stiff clay Rock Stiff clay Rock

Comparison of Vulnerability Analyses ATC Intensity is MMI Expert Opinion Curves HAZUS 1997 Spectral Intensity Expert Opinion Curves Expert Opinion Vulnerability Analytic Vulnerability Judgment Based Hazard Parameter Empirical Hazard Parameter ACM 2000 Spectral Intensity Objectively Developed Curves

Development of Damage Functions q Determination of typical structural types and their features based on design drawings q Analysis of earthquake response q Development of damage functions for each building type on basis of member damage q Determination of retrofit strategies and associated costs q Assembly of damage functions for each building type

Typical Structural Features q Structural characteristics ä Material type ä Plan area, story height, span widths, number of spans ä Number of stories q Design of Typical Buildings ä Design calculations ä Material properties ä Blueprint drawings

USA: Building Types q Steel ä Moment resisting ä Braced Frame q Reinforced concrete ä Moment resisting ä Shear wall q Precast concrete ä Frame ä Panel ä Tilt-Up Timber Reinf. Conc. Frame/Wall Steel frame Tilt-up Reinf. Conc. frame 35 building types

Modeling and Analysis of Building SAP 2000

Structural Engineering Is: The Art of Using Materials (with properties that can only be estimated) To Build Real Structures (that can only be approximately analyzed) To Withstand Forces (that are not accurately known) So That Our Responsibility to Public Safety Is Satisfied!

Considering Uncertainties

Push-over Analysis

Element Level Damageability D%

ANALYTICAL ESTIMATION OF FRAGILITY

Transition from Physical Damage to Financial Loss q There exists for each member type a damage level corresponding to the drift q There exists for each member type a retrofit procedure corresponding to each damage level q There exists for each retrofit procedure a corresponding retrofit cost %$

Retrofit Options Reinforced Concrete Column: Slight damage: Damage: Hairline cracks. Repair: Epoxy injection. Moderate: Damage: Extensive wide Repair: jacketing, epoxy injection. Severe: Damage: Repair:? Collapsed: Damage: Repair: ?

Retrofit Cost at Story Level Based on Member Damage Repair Cost Repair/Intervention Cost

Damage Functions (Physical and Material) Material Loss Physical Damage Spectral DIsplacement, in Damage, million $ mean mean+ mean-

Calibrated Damage Curves

Risk Analysis q Calculation of material losses for probable (scenario) earthquakes q Calculation of risk curves q Assessment of regional risk q Determination of premiums based on regional risk by insurers

Column/Wall as Ratios Vulnerability Indexes

Judgment for Adequacy Checked by Complete 3-D Analysis - Horizontal Axis >

Horizontal Axis Generally <

Judgment for Adequacy Checked by Complete 3-D Analysis - Horizontal Axis >

Horizontal Axis Generally <