Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processes Presentation at ESF TED Workshop Helsinki, May, 20th 2004 Robert Krimmer University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICT IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS: LESSONS LEARNED Susanne Caarls International Electoral Affairs Symposium May 2012.
Advertisements

LEFIS WORKGROUP 5: QUALITY Quality in high education teaching European Union resolutions and recommendations concerning teaching in the field of Computers.
ACEEEO Association of European Election Officials discussions on e-voting Jenő Szép Council of Europe Meeting to Review Developments in e-voting November.
Current status of the recognition of the clinical / medical genetics specialty Milan Macek Department of Biology and Medical Genetics Charles University.
Decision-making process in the Nikolay Kaveshnikov, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
European online voting experiences Andreu Riera, PhD Chairman Scytl Online World Security S.A. DIMACS Voting Workshop Rutgers University May 2004.
EP/Council Division of Power Commission proposes law, EP response based on one of three models: Co-decision (most issues, currently) – policy goes to EP,
ICT TOOLS AND SOCIETY INVOLVEMENT AMONG THE EUPAN NETWORK HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE SURVEY RESULTS TANYA CHETCUTI EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Delegations ICM Cluj-Napoca, 20th April The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Delegations III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
OSH professionals in European countries: an overview Andrew Hale Chairman Certification Committee ENSHPO Emeritus professor TU Delft, Netherlands Chairman:
Informatics Online Voting Opportunities and Risks STOA Workshop at the European Parliament Brussels, 17 March 2011 Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Grimm IT Risk Management.
Author: Michał Rajkowski Tutor: prof. dr hab. inż. Zbigniew Kotulski.
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
An introduction to the EU and its legislation. Member States currently 15 –Austria- Ireland –Belgium- Luxembourg –Denmark- Netherlands –Finland- Portugal.
Institutional Visits IV KAM Prague, 3 rd to 7th September.
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
Institutional Visits ICM Cluj Napoca, 19 th to 26 th April 2015 Patrick Zischeck, Assistant for IV and SV.
Scholarship Opportunities in the European Union and EFTA for Western Balkans Students Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports the Czech Republic.
European Commission TACIS programme. European Business Registration Survey 2005.
AP Comparative Government Watkins
1 FP6 into perspective. 2 Understanding the context and exploiting the opportunities FP6 into Perspective The European Union.
Institutional Visits III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
European Federation of Geologists Christian Boissavy, member of EFG Expert Panel on Geothermal Energy, France Herald Ligtenberg, EFG EU Delegate, the Netherlands.
EReg Association of European Vehicle and Driver Registration Authorities Fleur Pullen – EReg Secretariat.
Political Disengagemen t and Trust in Europe. 1 Do patterns of engagement and trust differ across countries? And what about between different generations?
Pearle conference Tallinn November 2011 Agenda point 7.
OECD Review of Russian Statistics Peer Review Mission to Russia April 2012 Tim Davis Head, Global Relations, Statistics Directorate.
INSPIRE/GINIE Workshop Objectives To discuss directions for the construction of a European Spatial Data Infrastructure (ESDI) Share the current State of.
Political Participation An Introduction. Voting Rates Voting-Age Population Austria89% Sweden87 Australia83 Germany81 France78 UK76 Japan74 Canada67 USA53.
A general view Place, Date The Council of European Geodetic Surveyors Comité de Liaison des Géomètres Européens Surveying Curriculum from the Point of.
Slide 1 Begix Online -Tool Bertelsmann Stiftung Begix Europe Carolin Welzel Bertelsmann Foundation Stefan Friedrichs Public Management Consultant.
EU Enlargement. The EU Quick History  1950s – The European coal community begins to unite European countries politically and economically, the founders.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. EU  1993 European Union  Main Aims  All states in the EU = a single market  One currency throughout the EU = the Euro  To have.
European Union European Union EU built on treaties.
© World Energy Council 2014 Energy Security in Focus: from Local to Global The Baltic States as the testing ground for more balanced energy policy Einari.
Model European Union. What is Model EU? Simulation of the EU.
EIE065-EUBIONET II – 1 EUBIONET II EUBIONET II Efficient trading of biomass fuels and analysis of fuel supply chains and business models.
ELSA Summer Law Schools IV KAM Prague, 3rd to 7th September 2014.
© Enterprise Europe Network South West 2009 The Eurostars Programme Kenny Legg R&D Funding for the Environmental Sector – 29 June 2010 European Commission.
European Union. Refresher  Market: the interaction of buyers and sellers exchanging goods and services  Trade: the process of buying, selling, or exchanging.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 11:30-12:30 Session 10.
Information Security Systems Cost Effective Authenticity & Integrity in CEN/FISCALIS eInvoicing Good Practice Guidelines Nick Pope – Principal Consultant,
Three key players The European Parliament - voice of the people Jerzy Buzek, President of of the European Parliament The council of Ministers - voice of.
European Union Institutions
E-Government, E-Voting, and the Future Jordan Weiler.
ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION presentation JOHN HONTELEZ, SECRETARY GENERAL EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL BUREAU Seminar Dublin 26 February 2010.
Maps of Topic 2B Multilingualism in Europe Europe A Story of Empire (a united Europe) & Language.
The Role of the Rectors’ Conferences in Europe Henriette Stöber Central European University & University of York Erasmus Mundus MAPP - Master of Public.
Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security UV-B radiation: A Specific Regulator of Plant Growth and Food Quality in a Changing Climate The.
Who Rules Britain? The Queen? The Government? The Police? The Army? The People?
CES Road Map on statistics for SDGs
THE EUROPEAN UNION How does the structure of government within the EU compare with the structure of government in the United States?
European Union Duy Trinh.
Week 6: The institutional structure of the EU
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Support to National Helpdesks
Activities of the Human Resources Working Group
The European Union in Review
Role-play on EU decision-making
Sylvia Archmann European Institute of Public Administration, NL
Rapporteur: Krzysztof PATER
Current Status and Recent Developments
Dissemination Working Group Luxemburg 15 & 16 October User support
European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education (EASIE) www
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processes Presentation at ESF TED Workshop Helsinki, May, 20th 2004 Robert Krimmer University of Linz, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 2 How come Electronic Voting has become such a big issue, when it‘s just about counting 1 and 1?

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 3 Overview What is E-Voting? Why is E-Voting interesting? How to preserve anonymity? The European experience Standardization efforts

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 4 E-Governance E-DemocracyE-Government E-Participation E-Voting E-Administration

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 5

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 6 Instruments of E-Democracy 0 Technical Complexity Political Process (iii) Decision (ii) Formation of an opinion (i) Information acquisition Infor-Uni-Bi-Trans- mationdirectional actional Web- sites Chat E- Voting

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 7 What is E-Voting? LocalRemote Paper- based Polling stationPostal Voting Electronic Voting Electronic Voting Machines Internet Voting (RVEM)

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 8 Why is E-Voting interesting? Elections are a major administrative work  require trained persons Election procedures are complex  counting may take multiple days More and more citizens are on the move  need for flexible registration schemes

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 9 Uneqivocal identification of the Voter With absolute anonymity at the point of casting the vote and No possibility for the election administration to change votes or to break the anonymity Basic Issues

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 10 Solutions Preserving anonymity by hiding the vote: Homomorphism VoterServer Ballot Sheet (yes/no): sum yes/no

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 11 Solutions 2.Preserving anonymity by hiding the voter: TAN VoterServer Enter TAN & Ballot sheet Receives TAN by mail

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 12 Solutions 3.Preserving anonymity by hiding the voter: Blind signature One-step procedures Two-step procedures Election Day Identification & Vote casting Election Dayx days beforehand (1) Identification(2) Vote casting Voting token

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 13 European Experience Switzerland – three pilots (referenda) Germany – pilots with public „non-political“ elections United Kingdom – large-scale pilots in 2002/03, none in 2004 France – CSFE, professional bodies etc. Spain – three tests (one from abroad)

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 14 European Experience Ireland – frozen/postponed Netherlands – EP elections, from abroad Slovenia, Hungary, Czech Republic – drafts Estonia – legally binding e-voting for regional elections Austria: two tests, one road-map: private initiatives Min/Int working group on e-voting

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 15 Council of Europe Standardization efforts started end of member countries aims: Council of Ministers Recommendation legal, operational and technical standards more difficult than initially expected but: close co-operation / mutual understanding between legal and technology experts

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 16 Council of Europe Standardization efforts minimum standards for legislation and product requirements for member states and third parties (industry) broad and clear definitions focus on e-voting specificities no recommendation on usefulness / introduction

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 17 Resume No unique trend towards electronic voting machines or electronic voting via the Internet. Many experiments on local/institutional level Only few large-scale tests (UK, NL) Countries with frozen projects (B) Academic work with tests (D, A) CoE standardization efforts will drive development

Citizen participation using electronic voting for decision making processesSlide 18 Contact Robert Krimmer University of Linz Institute for Informatics in Business and Government Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration Institute for Information Processing, Information Economics and Process Management