INSPIRE, EC Water Standards and WaterML Workshop Keiran Millard Keiran Millard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 GlobModel The GlobModel study, initial findings and objectives of the day Zofia Stott 13 September 2007.
Advertisements

Routemap to derive ISO models from BUFR Why do we need both ISO and BUFR models? –The BUFR data model is very large – much larger in principle than most.
Information Modelling MOLES Metadata Objects for Linking Environmental Sciences S. Ventouras Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
® Hosted and Sponsored by ESA/ESRIN Progress towards a standard WMO Hydrologic Metadata Model 86th OGC Technical Committee Frascati, Italy Irina Dornblut,
Task WA-01 GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 Managing and Sharing Data WA-01 R. Lawford and M. Schlummer based on contributions from D. Arctur, D. Maidment,
© MarineXML 2006 Slide 1 of 16 MOTIIVE : RISE HAC-PB EC, Brussels, 6 th June 2007 MOTIIVE:RISE Harmonisation Advisory Committee and Project Board European.
NCAR GIS Program : Bridging Gaps
Development of a database of intensively monitored groundwater systems in Australia Barry Croke National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training Australian.
1 Fourth GO-ESSP Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Chilton, UK 7 June, 2005 Data integration with the Climate Science Modelling.
New ways to geo-reference and classify spatial data in Annex II & III data specifications Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Drafting Team „Data.
® Initiatives in Interoperability in New Zealand Compiled for OGC Hydro DWG Arlington, March 2014 By Jochen Schmidt, NIWA, New Zealand On behalf of many.
Page 1 LAITS Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology and Standards 9/6/04 Briefing on Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)’s Web Services (OWS) Initiative.
Modelling INSPIRE based data specifications for NATURE-SDIplus Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
NERC DataGrid and CSML NDG Team. CSML: Context NERC DataGrid: the integration problem –multiple organisations, formats, storage mechanisms (file, relational)
EuroMISS, EuroDSS and DMS Update of Progress Keiran Millard Keiran Millard
© MarineXML 2006 Slide 1 of 14 AGI Marine and Coastal Zone SIG – Oceans of Change ExCeL, London 22 nd March 2006, Developments in Marine Standards Keiran.
Bryan Lawrence on behalf of BADC, BODC, CCLRC, PML and SOC An Introduction to NDG concepts [ ]=
GWML IGC August 10, 2008, Oslo 1 Groundwater Markup Language (GWML) Extending GeoSciML for Groundwater Eric Boisvert Boyan Brodaric Groundwater Program.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
1 NESC workshop Grid and Geospatial Standards 7-Sep-2005 Data integration with the Climate Science Modelling Language Andrew Woolf 1, Bryan Lawrence 2,
EuroRoadS for JRC Workshop Lars Wikström, Triona Editor of EuroRoadS deliverables D6.3, D6.6, D6.7.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
Contribution of GeoScienceML to INSPIRE and link with european R&D activities (eContentplus – FP7) François Robida - BRGM.
NOCS, PML, STFC, BODC, BADC The NERC DataGrid = Bryan Lawrence Director of the STFC Centre for Environmental Data Archival (BADC, NEODC, IPCC-DDC.
What is Information Modelling (and why do we need it in NEII…)? Dominic Lowe, Bureau of Meteorology, 29 October 2013.
Page 1 LAITS Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology and Standards ISO & Status Liping Di Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology.
1 Global Systems Division (GSD) Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) NextGen Weather Data Cube Chris MacDermaid October, 2010.
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
© MarineXML 2006 Slide 1 of 16 RISE / MOTIIVE HAB+PB Brussels, Belgium, 4 th October 2006 MOTIIVE 12 Month Summary Keiran Millard 1, Andrew Woolf 2, Jeremy.
Interoperable sharing of groundwater data across international boarders is essential for the proper management of global water resources. However storage.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
Integrating the Climate Science Modelling Language with geospatial software and services Dominic Lowe British Atmospheric Data
Aristeidis K. Georgoulias Contribution of Democritus University of Thrace-DUTH in AMFIC-Project Democritus University of Thrace Laboratory of Atmospheric.
Develop Use Cases Evaluate Existing Models Develop/Extend Model Test ModelDocument 1. Commercial This use-case involves identifying the location and properties.
Observations & Measurements & SWE in Inspire OGC Hydro DWG Workshop – Reading – Sylvain Grellet Office International de l’Eau.
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
© MarineXML 2005 Slide 1 of 19 Geospatial Standards for Earth System Science Data Edinburgh, Scotland, 6 th -8 th September 2005 MarineXML & MOTIIVE Keiran.
© University of Reading 2008www.reading.ac.uk Reading e-Science Centre 9 September 2008 Harmonization of environmental data using the Climate Science Modelling.
Hydro DWG at the RDA Plenary BoF - Improve sharing of water resource data globally 24 September BREAKOUT :30-15:00.
Implementing Marine XML for NOAA Observing Data Nazila Merati and Eugene Burger NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Seattle, WA.
GO-ESSP LLNL, June 2006 CSML – Stocktake and Forward Look Andrew Woolf Dominic CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Interoperability in GSDI: Standards, Solutions, and Futures Douglas Nebert GSDI Secretariat.
WaterML 2.0 Part 1 - Time Series Hydro Informatics Conference Workshop *Standardization of Water Data Exchange: WaterML2.0 and Beyond* Presented by : Open.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
NOAA Vision and Mission Goals Pedro J. Restrepo, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Scientist, Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA/NWS First Q2 Workshop (Q2 - "Next.
Interoperability Day Introduction Standards-based Web Services Interfaces to Existing Atmospheric/Oceanographic Data Systems Ben Domenico Unidata Program.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation INSPIRE: Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe Michael Lutz.
NOAA EDMC Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Karen Stocks OOI CI Data Curator University of California, San Diego Ocean Observatories.
Page 1Overview of the HMA Project, 8 March 2010 Overview of the HMA Project OGC TC Opening Plenary Pier Giorgio Marchetti European Space Agency.
Implementing distributed geoscience information systems using Open GIS Web Services Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey WaterML Presentation to FGDC SWG Nate Booth January 30, 2013.
Develop Use Cases Evaluate Existing Models Develop/Extend Model Test ModelDocument Use Cases 1. Commercial This use-case involves identifying the location.
The Global Soil Information System
Meeting on OGC Sensor Observation Service (SOS) for INSPIRE
Introduction to Cadcorp SIS 6.2 SeaZone Solutions
MOTIIVE: Marine Overlays on Topography
Introduction to the WMO/OGC Hydrology Domain Working Group
Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
MOTIIVE / RISE More Services at Lower Cost - The role of INSPIRE in GMES Keiran Millard1, Andrew Woolf2, Jeremy Tandy3 ,Chris Higgins4, Roger Longhorn5,
Session 3: Information Modelling and Information Communities
WISE & INSPIRE FloodsDirective
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
21 November Data Science Capabilities
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Presentation transcript:

INSPIRE, EC Water Standards and WaterML Workshop Keiran Millard Keiran Millard

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 2 HR Wallingford Not for profit research, consultancy and software organisation in hydraulic engineering Floods, water, energy, maritime, coasts Key role in the (on going) development of MarineXML Marine data exchange (issues) are not much different to water data exchange Leading INSPIRE Implementation Project MOTIIVE Specifications for data exchange Invited to contribute these findings to WaterML workshop and report on water data exchange in Europe

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 3 MOTIIVE Scope Premise (of call) GMES Service will be more cost-effective to deploy through the use and adoption of OGC/ISO Interoperability standards This interoperability will entail true ‘mix and match’ between (and amongst) ‘core’ and ‘downstream’ data processors. Scope (of Motiive) How do you apply ISO/OGC Standards to the coastal/marine community? −Land:sea interaction (Marine Overlays on Topology) What do the standards look like and how does a ‘cost benefit’ manifest itself?

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 4 Motiive Outputs What has Motiive achieved? Development and Testing of INSPIRE Data Product Methodology Community needs for harmonisation Community Feature Types (published as UML and XSD) Feature Type Catalogue implementation Motiive, INSPIRE and OGC MOTIIVE provides an ‘ earth science’ perspective on Inspire Delivery of a web-enabled catalogue for the Inspire Themes to lodge their FT’s These findings will be useful to any community where datasets exchanged between members are ‘representation on environmental phenomena’ such as water quality, air temperature, water flows...

© HR Wallingford 2007 INSPIRE and GMES GMES / GEOSS…. Pull together different data sources, processing services and users in a cost- effective (interoperable) manner. INSPIRE… How do you use ISO & OGC standards to deploy cost-effective services? -Extend service to new jurisdiction (region) -Add New data sources -Add new processing models -Add new customer

© HR Wallingford 2007 INSPIRE Methodology for Data Products Work within your community (SDIC – Spatial Data Interest Community) to develop these specifications

© HR Wallingford 2007 ISO – Data Product Specification

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 8 ‘Observation’ Feature Types Data Product Specification related to measuring and observations requires Feature Types based on: Scientific utility of the sampling regime Limitations of the observation process CSML (Climate Science Modelling Language) Consistent with community practice −ESRI, UniData, NOAA Feature types and storage descriptors −Binding to NetCDF, GRIB etc. Implemented in UML and GML

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 9 CSML Feature Types CSML feature typeDescriptionExamples TrajectoryFeature Discrete path in time and space of a platform or instrument. ship’s cruise track, aircraft’s flight path PointFeatureSingle point measurement.raingauge measurement ProfileFeature Single ‘profile’ of some parameter along a directed line in space. wind sounding, XBT, CTD, radiosonde GridFeatureSingle time-snapshot of a gridded field.gridded analysis field PointSeriesFeatureSeries of single datum measurements.tidegauge, rainfall timeseries ProfileSeriesFeatureSeries of profile-type measurements. vertical or scanning radar, shipborne ADCP, thermistor chain timeseries GridSeriesFeatureTimeseries of gridded parameter fields. numerical weather prediction model, ocean general circulation model Presently in Release 2

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 10 CSML Feature Types (Grid Series) INSPIRE does not mandate operations for FTs – but most communities will require this

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 11 ‘Observation’ Feature Types Motiive Testbed Generic (CSML) Time Series TidalWaterLevel TimeSeries Graph and Table Service

© HR Wallingford 2007 WFS Implementation

© HR Wallingford 2007 WFS Implementation

© HR Wallingford 2007 FTC Implementation (19110)

© HR Wallingford 2007 FTC Implementation 19110

© HR Wallingford 2007 WISE (Water Information System Europe)

© HR Wallingford 2007 WISE (Water Information System Europe)

© HR Wallingford 2007 WISE (Water Information System Europe)

© HR Wallingford 2007 But what is the Water Community? Science Physical Chemical Biological Sewerage Conservation Fisheries Aquaculture Water Quality Energy = Meteorology Resources Asset Management Numerical Modelling WhataML !

© HR Wallingford 2007 WaterML Workshop Water Resources Information Model Workshop Canberra, Australia, September, 2007 There were 34 participants representing 18 organizations from 3 geographical areas (Australia-New Zealand, USA,-Canada, and Europe). The workshop was convened in response to developments in: the institutional environment, with increased expectations and demands for more extensive, integrated and timely information, frequently across organisational boundaries; the technological environment, with improvements in information networks, sensor technologies, processing services, and with a proliferation of information models and exchange formats for water resources information. In a nutshell… XML is great. Everyone is using XML as a exchange mechanism for water data; but everyone is doing this differently. This negates the bigger benefits of shared applications and information aggregation How can we work together?

© HR Wallingford 2007 Page 21 WISE and WaterML Workshop In addition to MOTIIVE, presented the WISE data exchange schemas and the WISE services. This was not to comment on the schema design process, but to highlight the type of information that needs to be exchanged.

© HR Wallingford 2007 WaterML Workshop Outputs What should be the thematic scope for a harmonized water resources information model? What key feature types should be included, and at what stage? The scope for the water resources information model should contain a core set of entities that are not governed by other standards authorities. These should include themes such as: surface water, atmospheric water and groundwater, and involve aspects such as water quality, quantity, water use including consumption, management and transport, as well as scientific modelling of water resources. Key entities involved in these themes include: observations and measurements, properties that are observed and measured (e.g. porosity), features that possess properties (aquifer), processes and events (water flow, flood), human artefacts (instruments, wells).

© HR Wallingford 2007 WaterML Workshop Outputs How should the harmonized model be achieved? What is the target level of abstraction for the model (conceptual, logical, physical). Should the model be an aggregation, conflation, or selection of existing initiatives? A common conceptual data model should be developed for core entities; the model should be drawn from existing efforts (by re- using and harmonising existing content) and be modular, extensible and well-defined. A small number of exchange formats (e.g. XML) should be developed to exploit the model, which should be hosted in a common registry alongside the model and related vocabularies. The common conceptual model and exchange format should be tested by existing information systems in a coordinated testbed.

© HR Wallingford 2007 WaterML – Where next

© HR Wallingford 2007 Links Motiive WaterML Keiran Millard