Current, Innovative, and Standardized Elevation Data for Flood Modeling in Australia: The Murray-Darling Basin Kea M. Beiningen, CFM, GISP Intermap Technologies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lars Arge 1/43 Big Terrain Data Analysis Algorithms in the Field Workshop SoCG June 19, 2012 Lars Arge.
Advertisements

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Low Head / Low Power Resource Assessment of Hydrologic Units 11 and 17 Randy D. Lee December 18,
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Accuracy Assessment of NEXTMap Elevation Data for the State of Alabama M. Lorraine Tighe PhD Candidate Director, Geospatial Solutions - Intermap November.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.
Approximate Floodplain Mapping - Procedures and Approaches to Data Challenges Troy Thielen, CFM Brett Addams, CFM May 18, 2010.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
Geographic Information Systems : Data Types, Sources and the ArcView Program.
Evaluating river cross section for SPRINT: Guadalupe and San Antonio River Basins Alfredo Hijar Flood Forecasting.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Processing Terrain Data in the River Proximity Arc Hydro River Workshop December 1, 2010 Erin Atkinson, PE, CFM, GISP Halff Associates, Inc.
FIELD METHODS IN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY GEOS 3110.
Accessing LIDAR GIS day 2012 Larry Theller ABE Purdue University.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
David Knipe Engineering Section Manager Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
APPLICATION OF LIDAR IN FLOODPLAIN MAPPING Imane MRINI GIS in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Source. Optech,Inc.
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey DEM Preparation Using the New England Method Streamstats Data Preparation Workshop Pete Steeves.
Frank Kenny and Bryce Matthews Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
DEM’s, Watershed and Stream Network Delineation DEM Data Sources Study Area in West Austin with a USGS 30m DEM from a 1:24,000 scale map Eight direction.
DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS Jason Christian, P.E. National Flood Workshop October 24-26, 2010 – Houston, Texas PROBABILISTIC FLOODPLAIN.
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
Automated H&H and Advanced Terrain Processing
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
DRAFT MURRAY DARLING BASIN PLAN. Where is the Murray–Darling Basin? Large system in south-eastern Australia 1 million km 2 1/7 area of Australia Contains.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Floodplain Delineation of Unsteady Flow Using HEC-RAS Final Presentation Presented By: Kevin Donnelly.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Processing ArcHydro Datasets with NHDPlus Version 2, Emphasizing StreamStats Data Development Webinar.
Development of a Geographic Framework for an Integrated Flood Modeling System Oscar Robayo Tim Whiteaker August 10, 2004 University of Texas at Austin.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
1-Day of 2-D How Are The Results Of Hydraulic Models Used To Manage Floodplain Development Under The NFIP? Eric Simmons, FEMA Region IX.
Arc Hydro for SFWMD Hydroperiod Estimation Operations Decision
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Arc Hydro and hydrologic models
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
David Tarboton Digital Elevation Models, Flood Inundation Mapping and River Hydraulic Properties David Tarboton
Creating Hydrologic Information Systems David R. Maidment Utah State University 9 February 2004.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Idaho District Office (208) Estimating Hydropower Potential Using EDNA Stage.
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS AWRA Specialty Conference Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and.
LIDAR Flood mapping for Brownsville and Matamoros Gueudet Pierre GIS in Water Resources University of Texas Austin Fall 2002.
DEVELOPMENT OF A CELL BASED MODEL FOR STREAM FLOW PREDICTION IN UNGAUGED BASINS USING GIS DATA P B Hunukumbura & S B Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering,
[Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis Utilizing Terrain Data] [Barrett Goodwin]
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Integrating ArcHydro and HEC Models by David R
Terrain modelling: the basics
National Hydro Data Programs
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Introduction to River Systems
GIS and SMS in Numerical Modeling of Open Channel Flow
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Hydrotechnical Design Guidelines for Stream Crossings
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Chapter Four RUNOFF When a storm occurs, a portion of rainfall infiltrates into the ground and some portion may evaporate. The rest flows as a thin sheet.
Flood Inundation Mapping
Presentation transcript:

Current, Innovative, and Standardized Elevation Data for Flood Modeling in Australia: The Murray-Darling Basin Kea M. Beiningen, CFM, GISP Intermap Technologies May 19, 2010

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 2 Water Act 2007 The purpose of the Basin Plan is to provide for the integrated management of the Basin water resources in a way that promotes the objects of this Act, in particular by providing for: (a) giving effect to relevant international agreements (to the extent to which those agreements are relevant to the use and management of the Basin water resources); and (b) the establishment and enforcement of environmentally sustainable limits on the quantities of surface water and ground water that may be taken from the Basin water resources (including by interception activities); and (c) Basin-wide environmental objectives for water-dependent ecosystems of the Murray-Darling Basin and water quality and salinity objectives; and (d) the use and management of the Basin water resources in a way that optimizes economic, social and environmental outcomes; and (e) water to reach its most productive use through the development of an efficient water trading regime across the Murray-Darling Basin; and (f) requirements that a water resource plan for a water resource plan area must meet if it is to be accredited or adopted under Division 2; and (g) improved water security for all uses of Basin water resources.

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 3 NEXTMap® Data Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (IFSAR) © 2010 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 3

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 4 Intermap’s Core Products ORI Orthorectified Radar Image Image pixel size of 0.62 Meters DSM Digital Surface Model DTM Digital Terrain Model 4 © 2010 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. Pixel Size (m)RMSE (m)

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 5 Travellers Lake, Australia Google Earth, Spot ImageDSM on top of image

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 6 NEXTMap Specs Measures of Accuracy (Meters) Product TypeRMSE95%Mean and Standard Deviation I II DTM: Measures of Accuracy Product TypeRMSE95%MeanStandard Deviation I II III DSM:

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 7 Source Data Used Base data provided by MDBA 568 tiles of NEXTMap data from Intermap MGA Zone 54 projection (same as UTM 54 South) GDA 1994 datum Each tile 10 km by 10 km Array of 2000 x meter cells Vertical datum is AUSGeoid98 Vertical and horizontal units are meters Orthorectified radar images (ORI)

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 8 Overview Analyzed basin: ~46,000 sq km Hydrology: Regression equations function of drainage area in square kilometers Riverine-Like Hydraulics: 2-, 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year return intervals for riverine areas Non-Riverine Hydraulics: Pits and ponds Floodplain Mapping: Pits & Ponds + Riverine ArcHydro data model

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 9 Assumptions & Limitations Pilot-level study, test purposes only Highly automated, minimal human intervention Broad assumptions in certain input values Very short production time frame (December 2009) Used best available input data at time of work

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 10 Riverine-like Portions of Study Area Steady flow hydraulic models and mapping developed where: Drainage areas 20 sq km or more Contributing area completely contained by the supplied topography. Where the reaches somewhat riverine in nature PBS&J Rapid Floodplain Delineation (RFD) tool used Step-backwater computation Ability to write HEC-RAS files

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 11 Topography Used Common industry standard for hydrologic analysis is 30- meter cells used to develop basins and flowpaths for hydrology. For this project, topography resampled to 25-meters (slightly smaller than typical 30-meter cell size) Hydraulics Resampled to a 10-meter cell size for speed of analysis reasons Flowpaths were "splined" to smooth them out

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 12 Regression Equations for Flows Annual peak flow gage data available for portions of region Gage annual maximum peak flow series fitted to the Gumbel (Type 1) Extreme Value distribution. 2-, 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year Flow equation developed where drainage area was only variable

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 13 Cross Sections (XS) Cross Sections RFD has several parameters that impact XS placement For this pilot study, values set reach- by-reach in GIS Very minimal manual manipulation of XS for this study Standard Manning n value used

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 14 Dry Lakes and Pits / Ponds Only about 25% of the basin riverine-like Rest appears has few or no discernable channels—is not riverine flow. “Ponding" layer shows ponds & pits In excess of about 0.3 meters in depth And, approximately 1 hectare in surface area. Over 50,000 polygons in the study area Use pits-ponds layer from riverine models in conjunction with the ponding layer. Greater extent of two layers is estimated floodplain

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 15 Murray and Darling Rivers Majority of contributing basins outside the study area Effects of regulation Modeled using historic peak flows from early 1990s For Murray River Flows roughly equal to 1956 flooding extents also used ~2,265 cms U/S of the Darling ~2,549 cms D/S of the Darling

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 16 Murray and Darling Rivers

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 17 Floodplain Mapping Flow Contained

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 18 Floodplain Mapping Murray River + Pits and Ponds

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 19 Floodplain Mapping Overlaid With Basin Boundaries

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 20 ArcHydro Arc Hydro Tools version 1.3 used Created after H&H modeling complete Arc Hydro preprocessing workflow used In this case, workflow begins with the flow direction grid

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 21 ArcHydro Drainage, Hydrography, and Network feature datasets These are standard feature datasets in the Arc Hydro schema Drainage feature dataset watershed, catchment, and drainage line features Network dataset connectivity of the system Hydrography dataset Monitoring point features (gauges) Channel feature dataset Not included, no channel data available

© 2009 Intermap Technologies. All rights reserved. 22 What’s next??? Intermap continuing to collect IfSAR for the rest of Murray Darling Basin & now for the Eastern part of New South Wales.