An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance with the WFD An Overview An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Role of monitoring programmes developed under the Water Framework Directive for future data flow Tim Lack.
Advertisements

Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Setting the scene for Session 1 National information systems.
The European Eutrophication Activity and the UWWT and Nitrate Directives Ana Cristina Cardoso.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Aquaculture in Scotland the potential effects of the Water framework Directive the potential effects of the Water framework Directive Peter Holmes Marine.
Draft River Basin Management Plan Workshop Freshwater Pearl Mussel December 2008.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Integrated thematic assessments: outlook on water, data and.
GIS development. Danube Commission+ISRBC meeting Sava GIS Sava GIS establishment –Performed in accordance with the Sava GIS Strategy EU WFD INSPIRE Directive.
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive - Uncertainty issues - Michiel Blind, RWS-RIZA.
Rivers Intercalibration Phase 2 Key Cross-GIG activities  Refining Reference Conditions  Intercalibrating Large River Ecological Status  Initial.
Information and international biodiversity conventions Eliezer Frankenberg Nature and Parks Authority.
EU Water Policy Sustainable water management for generations to come.
National Environmental Research Institute Department of Freshwater Ecology WFD-Monitoring in Denmark NOVANA Brian Kronvang NERI.
Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water Norman Green, NIVA Nov 2006, Belgrade.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
Monitoring Principles Stella Swanson, Ph.D.. Principle #1: Know Why We Are Monitoring Four basic reasons to monitor:  Compliance Monitoring: to demonstrate.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES & IMPACTS INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES & IMPACTS INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES & IMPACTS INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
LVĢMA, 2006 LATVIJAS VIDES, ĢEOLOĢIJAS UN METEOROLOĢIJAS AĢENTŪRA Water data availability Normunds Kadiķis.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
Biodiversity Health Index Main Streams for Life John MacKinnon UNDP consultant June 2012.
A Practical Approach: The General Physico-Chemical Quality Elements and the Classification of Ecological Status.
COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Horizontal Guidance on Water Bodies.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ON THE BASIS OF WATERSHED IN TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Water quality and water pollution – data for old and new policy questions 5th World Water Forum Session Data integration and dissemination: From.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
MONITORING FREQUENCIES AND OPTIMIZATIONS.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
CONCEPTS OF MONITORING 3.1. CONCEPTS OF MONITORING Diederik Rousseau/Peter Kelderman UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education Online Module Water.
1 SoE content review - Maintenance and content development of data flows (SoE and WFD) Freshwater Eionet Workshop, June 2015 Ursula Schmedtje, Federal.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
Corina Carpentier AquaLife Workshop, Kiel, Germany 2nd June 2010
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Types of information and data required
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Principles and Key Issues
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Daughter Directive Groundwater - Working Procedure -
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR THE WFD UK approach
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Design of monitoring networks for rivers in Austria
The normal balance of ingredients
SURFACE WATER /GROUNDWATER INTERACTIONS
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Umweltbundesamt, Austria
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
confidence in classification
EU Water Framework Directive
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
Uli Claussen Co-lead ECOSTAT
Presentation transcript:

An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance with the WFD An Overview An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance with the WFD An Overview Michael Jackman Chemical Expert Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report

Monitoring Schemes according to EU Water Framework Directive 1) Surveillance 2) Operational 3) Investigative

1) Surveillance Monitoring An initial baseline assessment of the water basin. Monitor the impacts of natural conditions and anthropogenic activities. E.g. long range transport and deposition of pollutants from the atmosphere Supplementing and validating the Annex II risk assessment procedure. The assessment of long-term changes in natural conditions especially of reference sites; From this derive: The efficient and effective design of future monitoring programmes which can highlight water quality trends.

Sufficient water bodies should be monitored to provide an assessment of the overall surface water status within each catchment and sub-catchment of the river basin district. Monitoring should be carried out at least at the points where: The volume of water present is significant within the river basin district, including large lakes and reservoirs. Significant bodies of water cross a Member State boundary; At such other sites as are required to estimate the pollutant load which is transferred across Member States boundaries, At points where the water is transferred into the marine environment. Sampling Pointss

Selection of Support Quality Elements Any priority list substances discharged into the river basin or sub-basins must be monitored. Other pollutants also need to be monitored if they are discharged in significant quantities in the river basin or sub-basin. The selection should also be derived from information on the ecological status where indications of toxic impacts are found or from ecotoxicological evidence.

Biological Quality elements Biological quality elements are the core of WFD compliant monitoring of ecological status. The development of national methods or the adaptation of existing methods to the specific regional conditions is of utmost importance for comparability and consistency of IRBM. The national BQE methods are not only a formal requirement for the WFD but they are the new benchmark for almost all aspects of future international water management with the continued assessment of chemical status. Therefore, the development and continuous improvement of assessment methods needs specific attention.

Frequency Of Surveillance Monitoring Surveillance monitoring must be carried out for each monitoring site for at least a period of one year all biological quality elements and all general physico-chemical quality elements.

Frequency of Physico-Chemical Sampling

Frequency of BQE Sampling

Timing of sampling Samples should therefore be taken at times which will adequately represent the quality and its variations with minimum effort. The sampling programme should be designed to account for seasonal and diurnal cycles and consider business week cycles, random or transient events, and long- term persistence or trends. It might be necessary to increase sampling frequency while abnormal conditions persist, for example, during process plant start-up, during flood conditions in a river or at times of algal blooms

2) Operational Monitoring The national river basin management scheme to monitor water bodies that are at risk. The location of the sampling points for operational monitoring ideally should points where there is a change in the water source conditions e.g. after a major effluent producer.

Selection of monitoring sites Operational monitoring has to be undertaken for all water bodies that have been identified by the risk assessment From the results of the surveillance monitoring, as being at risk of failing All water bodies into which priority substances

Quality elements for Operational Monitoring Monitor for those biological elements most sensitive to the known pressures E.g. for organic pollution then benthic invertebrates might be the most sensitive indicator

Non-biological indicators Non biological quality element may complement the use of biological indicators but it cannot replace it. However of non-biological indicators (such as physicochemical parameters) can be used operationally to derive limits to reduce pressures (e.g. discharges from Urban Waste Water Treatment Works) are related to specific physico-chemical parameters (e.g. total organic carbon, BOD or nutrients). In this case one could monitor non-biological indicators and other biological indicators (e.g. benthic invertebrates) at different frequencies with the results from the physico-chemical monitoring being periodically validated by the results of the biological monitoring

Determinant selection The criteria for determinant selection are considered to reflect the probability to detect a substance. These criteria are: ‘Detectability’, described as the ratio between the parameter and its LOD. Large numbers indicate ‘easily detectable’ and vice versa Degradability; a half quantitative criterion that describes whether a substance is refractory and shows conservative behaviour or whether t is rather easily degradable. Conservative substances need only limited sites while degradable substances need to be monitored in more locations or closer to the source.

Frequency of Operational Sampling Monitoring Frequencies should provide a reliable assessment of the status of the relevant quality element. The more frequent monitoring will mostly likely be necessary than surveillance monitoring in many cases. The way data arising from traditional sampling programmes (e.g. regular monthly sampling) and from more targeted sampling, as might be used in operational monitoring, must be treated appropriately. To confirm this statistical analysis can be used.

Protected Areas e.g. Drinking water abstraction points Bodies of surface water which provide more than 100 m3 a day as drinking water an average shall be designated as monitoring sites Such bodies shall be monitored for all priority substances discharged and all other substances discharged in significant quantities which could affect the status of the body of water and which are controlled under the provisions of the Drinking Water Directive.

Key Features of each BQE for Rivers Aspect/featureBenthic invertebratesMacrophytesBenthic AlgaeFishPhytoplankton Measured parameters indicative of QE Composition, abundance diversity, and presence of sensitive taxa. Composition and abundance, and presence of sensitive taxa Composition and abundance,, and presence of sensitive taxa Composition and abundance, sensitive species diversity, age structure, Composition, abundance and planktonic blooms, and presence of sensitive taxa Supportive/interpretativ e parameters measured or sampled at the same time Morphology, physico- chemical parameters (e.g. Temp/DO, nutrients, pH etc), river flow, substrate/habitat sampled Morphology, river flow, depth, transparency Substrate/habitat sampled, morphology, nutrients (N, P, Si), TOC, pH, hydrological regime, light conditions Substrate/habitat sampled, river size (depth/width), river flow, temp, oxygen Chlorophyll a, flow, physico-chemical parameters (e.g. temp, DO, N, P, Si) Pressures to which QE responds Mainly developed to detect organic pollution or acidity, can be modified to detect full range of impacts. Mainly used to detect eutrophication, river dynamics including hydropower effects. Mainly used as an indicator of productivity. Can be used to detect eutrophication, acidification, river dynamics. Can be used to detect habitat and morphological changes, acidification and eutrophication. Used as indicator of productivity/eutrophicat ion. Mobility of QE Low, although unfavourable conditions may cause drift Low. Generally fixed position. LowHigh. Tendency to avoid undesirable conditions (e.g. low oxygen conditions). High. Drifting with river water

Aspect/featureBenthic invertebratesMacrophytesBenthic AlgaeFishPhytoplankton Level and sources of variability of QE High seasonal variation in community structure. Influenced by climatic events e.g. rainfall/flooding High seasonal variation in community structure and abundance. High seasonal variation in community structure. Limited by light and nutrient availability and available substrate for colonisation. Influenced by climatic events High seasonal variation in community structure (e.g. spawning/migration) and abundance. High interannual variation due to age structure. High inter and intra- seasonal variation in community structure and biomass. Influenced by climatic events, light, nutrient availability, stability and residence time Presence in rivers AbundantAbundant if suitable habitat. Limited in fast flowing streams. Abundant if suitable habitat. Limited in large, deep rivers with poor habitat AbundantGenerally low. May be abundant if conditions conducive to growth Sampling methodology ISO 8265, 7828, 9391 (surber sampler, handnet, grab) CEN – standard under development Depending on habitats – nets, electrofisher Integrated sample (3- 4m), depth sampler Habitats sampled Riffle, pool (rocks/logs), edge (littoral), macrophytes, Littoral, deposition areas (eg pools) Benthic substrate/artificial substrate All habitatsWater column Typical sampling frequency 6 monthly/AnnualAnnual/6 monthlyQuarterly/6 monthlyAnnualMonthly/Quarterly

Key Features of each BQE for Rivers

Key Features of each physico-chemical element for Rivers

Investigative Monitoring When a problem is indicated from the above monitoring schemes, it may be necessary to concentrate on monitoring water in a specific area. This entails taking extra samples from additional locations and analysing specific parameters to obtain more detailed information. An important aspect of investigative monitoring is to list the procedures for responding to pollution incidents.

Investigative Monitoring An important type of investigative monitoring is part of Early Warning & Emergency Response Systems (EWER) This consist of the procedures for responding to pollution incidents including monitoring this will be the subject of another presentation. Thank you for your attention