Europeana Data Exchange Agreements MSEG JUNE 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

Lecture 2 - Revenue Models
Amman, 13/12/2011 Antonella FRESA DC-NET and INDICATE Technical Coordinator Central Institute Union Catalogue Italian Libraries Towards a Digital Cultural.
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Orphan works and the cultural sector. A governmental organisation perspective Rossella Caffo Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali – Italy Coordinator.
WDL Technical Architecture Working Group (TAWG) June 2010 Achievements and Recommendations Co-chaired by Noha Adly, Bibliotheca Alexandrina Babak Hamidzadeh,
Programs and Research Public Private Agreements for Mass Digitisation Ricky Erway JISC Digitisation Conference July 2007.
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
Digital innovation and access to Europe's heritage online: the strategy of Europeana.eu Jon Purday Senior Communications Advisor.
ICT PSP Infoday Luxembourg Call 2011 – 2.4 eLearning ICT-PSP Call Objective eLearning Marc Röder Infso E6/eContent and Safer Internet Luxembourg,
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
Session 3 ICT for Quality Education Services Davide Storti UNESCO Communication and Information Sector (CI)
Survey of Research Libraries on Aggregation of Digital Content Kathy Sadler, UCL Plenary Board Meeting Bratislava, 8 May 2010.
2 Cataloguing and retroconversion: what do we need to know as a community ? Patricia Methven.
Collection-level description & the Information Landscape: users evaluate strategies for resource discovery Collection Description Focus Workshop 5 Cambridge,
Knowledge Management at the Gordon – Staff Portal Project Presented by Deirdre Carmichael 12 September 2008.
Harnessing and Enabling Community Enterprises Orla Flynn Head of CIT Crawford College of Art & Design November 2012.
The Europeana ecosystem and the role of libraries Jill Cousins The Researcher of Tomorrow, Europeana Libraries Final Conference, Madrid, December 4, 2012.
CCPA Annual General Meeting, Rotterdam 6 December 2011 Henning Scholz, Museum für Naturkunde Berlin & CCPA Secretary Proposal for Change to the CCPA.
- 1 - Community building and new initiatives: Laying a successful path and how to be on target experiencing from pitfalls, successes and lessons learnt.
European Clearing-House Mechanism Portal Toolkit Expert Group Meeting
SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.
WIIFM? The LAI and You LAI Action Plan: Promoting Libraries, Supporting Members Philip Cohen, Vice President.
Interoperability Aspects in Europeana Antoine Isaac Workshop on Research Metadata in Context 7./8. September 2010, Nijmegen.
Can public libraries & their users benefit & profit from Europeana ?
National Digital Library of Finland: How to Enable Access to Digital Cultural Material to Users of Today and to Future Generations Minna Karvonen IASSIST.
IASA-AMIA 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE PHILADELPHIA EUROPEANAEUROPEANA Benefits and progress.
Networking Session: Global Information Structures for Science & Cultural Heritage - The Interoperability Challenge «INTEROPERABILITY FROM THE CULTURAL.
Milena Popova 3 April 2012, Plovdiv New initiatives of Europeana.
Creating Access to Europe’s Television Heritage Prof. Dr. Sonja de Leeuw (project-coordinator, Utrecht University) Johan Oomen MA (technical director,
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
Re – use of PSI in Slovenia Kristina Kotnik Šumah Deputy of the Information Commisoner.
Europeana Libraries: what is the value of a library domain aggregator? Susan Reilly (LIBER) LIBER 2012, Tartu.
EU budget for culture: consultation on the European Culture Programme Pearle conference Frankfurt – november 2010 Agenda point 10.
Value to organisations: the research library view point Susan APA, Frascati, Nov 6, 2012.
METADATA QUALITY IN EUROPEANA , Den Haag.
ICT PSP Infoday Brussels Call 2011 – Theme 2 Digital Content ICT-PSP Call Theme 2: Digital Content Federico Milani, Marc Röder Infso E6/eContent.
WSIS + 10 Session 16 Zeynep Varoglu Hamet Communication and Information Sector (CI) UNESCO.
27. August Kyung-Ho Choi Manager of Digital Archiving Division The National Library of Korea Sang-hoon Oh Secretary of General in.
Cross-domain access to Europe’s heritage Jon Purday Senior Communications Advisor, Europeana Doom or Bloom: reinventing the library in the digital age.
Europeana Libraries: building a pan-European aggregator Wouter Schallier, LIBER Executive Director Eva/Minerva 15/11/2011.
First Generation Magnox Storage Pond (FGMSP) Programme Partner Requirements February 2014 Steve Topping.
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
Collaborative Insight BrubakerHR Gareth Jones Inmate BHR.
Opening up access to cultural heritage Jonathan Purday Senior Communications Advisor, Europeana.
Information Asset Registers Jo Ellis 12 September 2008.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Why? To facilitate innovation in the cultural heritage sector To nurture a developer community To reach and engage with users To show the rewards of.
Local content in a Europeana cloud Kate Fernie, 2Culture Associates, Project Manager LoCloud is funded by the European Commission's ICT Policy Support.
Asia Pacific Regional Council OCLC Record Use Policy Some Recent Developments OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Council Meeting National Library of Australia.
Research libraries in a European e-science infrastructure Wouter Schallier Executive Director LIBER (Association of European Research Libraries)
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
National Library of the Czech Republic Integration of digital materials into EDL Adolf Knoll National Library of the Czech Republic Helsinki CENL Workshop.
NAPLE & Europeana NAPLE Forum Annual Assembly May 13th 2014 Rianne Brouwers – Netherlands Institute for Public Libraries.
China July 2004 The European Union Programmes for EU-China Cooperation in ICT.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
Open Access and Institutional Repositories. Accra, June 2007 Institutional repositories in SA research institutions: the DISA experience Dr D Peters.
INTRODUCTION TO IDENTITY FEDERATIONS Heather Flanagan, NSRC.
IPR and the EThOS Project 28 th October 2008 Dr. Susan Copeland Senior Information Adviser (Research)
Open data Program pp.kk.vvvv Osasto Finland Open data policy in Finland  Long history of Open Government  Freedom of Information Act in 1766.
MICHAEL Culture Association WP4 Integration of existing data structure into Europeana ATHENA, WP4 Working group technical meeting Konstanz, 7th of May.
eContentplus 2008 Work Programme
« Out of commerce works » The French system
Credit Risk Skills Workshop Training Evaluation Report
CREATIVE COMMONS FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE
Getting Innovative with OER
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Antoine Isaac SEMIC conference
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
Presentation transcript:

Europeana Data Exchange Agreements MSEG JUNE 2011

Strategy

Europeanas Stakeholder Value Proposition Survey 2010

AGGREGATE DISTRIBUTE FACILITATE ENGAGE 4 Europeana Strategic Plan

Become THE trusted source for cultural heritage AGGREGATE Expand the networkSource content Improve data quality

FACILITATE Support the cultural heritage sector through knowledge transfer, innovation & advocacy Strengthen advocacy Share knowledge Foster R&D

Make heritage available wherever users are whenever they want it DISTRIBUTE Upgrade portal Develop partnerships Put content in user workflow

Cultivate new ways for users to participate in their cultural heritage ENGAGE

However, current Provider and Aggregator Agreements grant Europeana the right to enable re-use of data outside Europeana only for non-commercial purposes. This means that… However, current Provider and Aggregator Agreements grant Europeana the right to enable re-use of data outside Europeana only for non-commercial purposes. This means that…

Europeana data cannot be published as LOD- full use of the semantic potential of the web is not possible

Europeana API cant be used on partners sites that demonstrate some commercial activity

Europeana API cant be used on cultural blogs that display some commercial activity

Europeana data cannot be shared with Wikipedia as all information posted there needs to be available also for commercial re-use

Europeana API cant be used by commercial companies- ones that could generate income for partners

Europeana API cannot be used for the development of apps by commercial companies including for educational purposes

The Process 5 workshops on risks and rewards of open licenses – one for each domain and one for a mixed group (September 2010-December 2010) Online consultation with the network between December 2010 and January 2011 Lots of useful input processed & discussed in Aggregators workshop (January 17) New version called Data Exchange Agreement endorsed by the CCPA Legal Working Group (April 7) Workshops and presentations (APENET, ATHENA, EFG, EUSCREEN) Second round of consultation with whole network in May DEA based on latest analysis was endorsed by the CCPA Legal Working Group (June 7)and by Europeana Foundation Executive (June 21)

Result of long series of negotiations with content providers & aggregators.

My organization will sign the new DEA (N=104): Overall response clearly positive

My organization will sign the new DEA (data providers N=87): Data providers: positive

My organization will sign the new DEA (data aggregatorsN=49): Data aggregators: slightly less positive

Cross Domain My organization will sign the new DEA (cross domain providers N=18):

My organization will sign the new DEA (libraries N=51): Libraries

Archives (including images and audio-visual) My organization will sign the new DEA (archives N=13):

Museums My organization will sign the new DEA (museums N=14):

104 responses, out of 189 direct contributors 88% of the responses are positive Work still needed with Aggregators, with Museums and with some Ministries on timing and perceived risks Feedback summary

Surprisingly little negative feedback based on out right rejection of the terms established by the CC0 PD dedication (only 4 parties that link their no to their rejection of commercial re-use by third parties) Analysis of detailed Feedback: commercial reuse

Aggregators who have indicated that they will not sign the DEA have qualified this by adding that they are not ready to sign it yet. main reason is that they have not yet been able consult with their partners Encourage them to do so between now and December Develop example arrangements and private workshops. Analysis of detailed feedback: aggregators

One other recurring motivation for a negative response is the perception that the CC0 PD declaration is not legal in the jurisdiction of the provider, which makes it impossible for them to sign the DEA. we might want to publish a position paper or something similar dealing with this particular concern. Some providers have concerns that the CCPA is not a good dispute mediation body. relatively small number, probably no action required. Analysis of detailed feedback: other recurring

The notice and take down procedure and liability disclaimers set out in article 6 are not sufficiently clear for a number of providers. Some providers would favour Europeana immediately complying with requests and look into the merits of the request later. More emphasis on the reason for this is to protect Europeana and its providers against ungrounded takedown requests. Analysis of detailed feedback: Article 6

Based on the feedback received it appears reasonable to proceed with the planned introduction of the new Europeana Data Provider Agreement from September There is no need for substantial changes to the language of the current draft. A final version would contain only a limited number of small changes (Article 6). The time between now and September should be used to address the issues identified in the preceding slides by working on supporting documentation dealing with the legality of CC0, the specific needs of museums and example arrangements for data aggregators. Conclusion:

THANK YOU

The Rewards Increased data use & visibility drives traffic to content holders site. Increases Routes to Users. Data can be used where users are- ie in social networks and in users workflows. Providers can still commercially exploit own metadata. Europeana LOD helps populate linked data cloud with trusted, quality resource. Enhances context of information through increased data interlinking. Shows cultural heritage organisations at vanguard of innovation & stimulating digital research. Leads to funding. Enriched data back to provider, for own applications & users. Reinforces relevance of their cultural heritage to new generations.

The Risks Loss of control over the channels of access and of authority Loss of potential income Loss of reputation Loss of branding Loss of context and of the control over the integrity of the data Additional work required …workshop participants acknowledged that rather than real risks, these are fears related to change…

Drops Non-commercial use only (NC) Drops Share-alike restriction (SA) Adopts CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication Uses more appropriate legal wording Uses a standard license which future-proofs and makes Europeana data more compatible with lots of other projects and platforms Combines data provider and data aggregator agreement in one States: « Only give to Europeana what you are comfortable with, ie, no need to provide metadata for complete or all collections » Translations should be marked as translations and linked to original metadata Main changes

Metadata related to the digitised objects produced by the cultural institutions should be widely and freely available for re-use. Key recommendations, p5

40 Public Sector Data - Changing Expectations The advent of the Web accelerated the development of a collaboration culture & fostered an expectation that information, metadata & content should be as freely available as the Internet itself Many wider benefit arguments have been advanced for public bodies to make their data freely available 2009 saw an increasing Government commitment to the principle of opening up public data for wider re-use. The Putting the Frontline First: smarter government report requires the majority of government- published information to be reusable, linked data by June 2011Putting the Frontline First: smarter government Benefit for stateBenefit for public body Stimulation of knowledge economy will generate tax revenue, business opportunities & jobs via innovation Public sector information is an underexploited resource & governments should maximise state benefits from their initial investment Encourages diversity of resources – no single supplier can create all services or content Taxpayers have already paid once for data creation, why pay again? Minimal development required since the data is already created Possible data cleanup for re-harvesting by organisation User generated or added linked content may enhance internal data Offers free R&D & Management Information opportunities New opportunities for collaboration to assist internal efficiencies Increased reputation/relevance seen as inclusive community partner Opportunities to offer new value added services on back of free offering

Related Europeana activities

Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot Asked for volunteers from those already delivering metadata to Europeana. So far 20 joined – word of mouth & a couple of direct s 2,5-3m records coming from national libraries, archives, museums (mainly via the Swedish Open Heritage aggregator) and film archives Pilot to go live in June Proof that nothing bad will happen Proof, maybe, that new things can happen

Digital Agenda Day API Hackathons Hack4Europe! What: Hackathon roadshow in 4 cities (Barcelona, London, Poznan, Stockholm) 120 developers, 18 million objects (all through API/some through LOD), 48 hours of coding When: 7-11 June Why: to showcase the social and commercial value of open cultural data Results will be presented at the Digital Agenda Assembly in Brussels, June 16. Prizes will be awarded by Commissioner Ms. Neelie Kroes

Whats next? Respond to the 2nd round of Consultation with the Europeana network (may 2011) Get informed via the Data Exchange Agreement pages! Sign from September onwards!