Load Distribution Factor Calculation Update for Market Applications and studies a Presentation for NATF 11/2/2010 - NATF1Texas Nodal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Distributed Generation Task Force November 5, 2007.
Advertisements

Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
California Energy Commission Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments R Resource Adequacy Workshop January.
1 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
2011 Long-Term Load Forecast Review ERCOT Calvin Opheim June 17, 2011.
June 12, 2008 ROS SEM Go-Live procedure Linda Clarke.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
May 29, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott June 3, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
ERS Procurement Methodology 09/04/2013 ERS Workshop Presented By: ERCOT Staff.
Market Trials - Friday call Credit and Treasury Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2010.
TAC Meeting Update. TAC 9-2 Meeting Agenda and Related Discussion Items ERCOT Board Update including Subcommittee Restructure Nodal Advisory Task.
1 Presented to ERCOT Retail Market Subcommittee January 9, 2002 Profiling Working Group Darryl Nelson, Chair Load Profiling Operating Guides (LPOG)
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 Release 5 Monday / Friday Market Updates November 30, 2007.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR Part A/S Bidding Proposed Methodology.
CRR Auction Scope John Moseley. To outline aspects of the CRR market process to assure that these proposed CRR market protocols (as interpreted by ERCOT.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2012 ERCOT Dynamic Ratings Application.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee March 4, 2010.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
PRR 547 – Trading Hubs CMWG Presentation to WMS October 21, 2004.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal LFC Testing Review Review of materials presented at TAC Changes in Market Trials schedule and activities.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
January 15, 2008 Monthly Board of Directors Meeting Texas Nodal Market Implementation Program Update Jerry Sullivan.
RCWG Update to WMS May 6, Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 – Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events When ERCOT.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC September 2 nd, 2010.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 NPRR to Clarify RUC Capacity Shortfall Ratio Share Formula.
CRR Issues Transparency provided by CRR Reports CRR EDS handbook Business process NPRR TPTF November 27, 2007.
Reconfiguring Nodal Stakeholder Participation Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee Texas Nodal Transition Planning Task Force February.
Nodal Credit DAM Non-Business Day Treatment of Available Credit Limit (ACL)
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDW Update to TPTF November 5, 2007 Janet Ply EIS Nodal EDW Project Manager.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
1 Next Steps to Reduce the RTM Settlement Timeline COPS Workshop August 29, 2013 Mandy Bauld ERCOT Director, Settlement & Retail Operations (512)
Outage Scheduler Transition Plan Kenneth Ragsdale NATF.
Analysis of Demand Response Modeling in GridView Andy Satchwell and Sarah Smith Modeling Work Group December 21, 2015 The work described in this presentation.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
1 State Estimator performance. 2 State of Technology Many metrics have been proposed for measuring State Estimator performance.. PI = min Σ( Z – h i (x))^
1 ERCOT Pricing and Dashboard Updates NATF Sept 30, 2010.
Congestion Revenue Rights 1 Texas Nodal Market Implementation Program CRR Requirements Updates CRR Project Team – Presented by Beth.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
MISUG TAC Update Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT 3/7/ TAC3/7/ /22/2011 Meeting Focus on the high priority items from MISUG: Review task list prioritization.
Cutover Update NATF 2 November Today’s Agenda Reminders Program Status 24 Hour LFC Test Update Cutover Update Soft Launch 2 November 2010NATF.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
Analysis for the Determination of X, Y, and Z for Compliance Monitoring NATF.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke January 3, 2013.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
Network Operations Model Go-Live Decision Kenneth Ragsdale TAC July 1, 2010.
Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee July 1, 2010.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
TPTF Update Trip Doggett TAC March 9, TPTF Update Meetings February 6 & 7, February 20 Attendance approximately 40 Completed review of ERCOT’s clarification.
Approval of Important Station Voltages for State Estimator Reporting Review of SE and Telemetry Standards Alex Sills Advanced Network Applications 10/13/11.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
Load Distribution Factor Calculation for Market Applications and Studies a Presentation for NATF 9/21/ NATF 1 Texas Nodal.
September Protocol Transition Plan
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Presentation transcript:

Load Distribution Factor Calculation Update for Market Applications and studies a Presentation for NATF 11/2/ NATF1Texas Nodal

History On 9/21 ERCOT notified NATF of our intention to implement Static load distribution factors at market opening. On October 7 th ERCOT briefed TAC on this intention, and received approval to this approach and the implementation document “Generating and Maintaining Load Distribution Factor Library from PI Historian” Since these announcements an interest in how ERCOT assure the quality of these Load Distribution factors has been expressed in several forums. 11/2/20102Texas Nodal

3Texas Nodal Nodal Protocols state in section 4.5 – Dam Execution and Results (5) ERCOT shall determine the appropriate Load distributions to allocate offers, bids, and source and sink of CRRs at a Load Zone across the Electrical Buses that are modeled with Load in that Load Zone. The default distribution is the State Estimator hourly distribution for the seven days before the Operating Day. If ERCOT decides, in its sole discretion, to change this distribution for reasons such as anticipated weather events or holidays, ERCOT shall select a State Estimator distribution from a proxy day reasonably reflecting the anticipated distribution in the Operating Day. ERCOT may also modify this distribution to account for predicted differences in network topology between the proxy day and Operating Day. ERCOT shall develop a methodology, subject to Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) approval to describe the modification of the proxy day bus-load distribution for this purpose. Load Distribution Factors

4Texas Nodal ERCOT has concluded from the results of the market trials, that it is advisable to open the nodal DAM market using a stable set of bus-load distribution factors in place of the state estimator hourly distribution from 7 days prior to the operating day. Use of filtered load distribution factors from 7 days previous allows telemetry errors to propagate into the DAM model Through capture and testing of LDF’s for a proxy day, ERCOT can reduce or eliminate unexpected DAM results caused by load distribution factors. ERCOT intents to open the market using a set of static, tested Load distribution factors. ERCOT will capture state estimator results from a “proxy” day, and test these LDF’s with sample DAM executions in the lab with “typical” bid information. ERCOT will examine the results, and iterate with adjusted distributions where unreasonable load distributions result. ERCOT will utilize these “proxy” distributions for each day of the target month, or until revisions are required. ERCOTs Proposal

Quality Assurance at Nodal go-live ERCOT is currently calculating the expected load distribution for RUC and comparing to actual loads for the equivalent time period on 1 weekday hour and one weekend hour each week. This process is manual, and allows a review of the top ~20 residuals for the selected hours each week. Thus far, the largest residuals have consistently been at locations representing large industrial facilities, DC tie lines, and other locations characterized by variable load. Some locations appear to be associated with loss of telemetry and are being investigated. Weather zones are being scaled to match the load forecast, and the tracking at the weather zone level is good. Delivery of the EMIL report associated with load forecast may eliminate the need for this manual process. 11/2/20105Texas Nodal

Quality Assurance sample 11/2/20106Texas Nodal Weather ZoneForec ast Sum of LDF Sum of Non Conforming RTNET Actual Forecast vs RTNET actual STHRN WEST StnLoadLDFRUC LdRTN ActRUC vs. ACT Adj % diff DHTR Not found********* LCRAFRLOAD No Data********* DCTMDCTMLD DIV/0! CHPSWLD