The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pennsylvania Nonpoint Source BMP Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Potential for Reducing Loads Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland PA Chesapeake Bay.
Advertisements

Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Land use effect on nutrient loading – nutrient models new assessment tools Inese Huttunen, Markus Huttunen and Bertel Vehviläinen Finnish Environment Institute.
The Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Watershed Model Gary Shenk Presentation to COG 10/4/2012.
Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee July 9, 2009 Briefing to the Water Resources Technical.
Scenario Builder and Watershed Model Progress toward the MPA Gary Shenk, Guido Yactayo, Gopal Bhatt Modeling Workgroup 12/2/14 1.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Primer: Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Bay Water Quality Models The Economics of Water Quality Improvements in Chesapeake Bay Workshop.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory.
Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model 101.
Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
2006 Network Users’ Meeting Chesapeake Bay Program Regional Exchange for Non Point Source Best Management Practices April 18, 2006 Nancie L. Imler PA DEP.
Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.
Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST Olivia H. Devereux Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 12/13/2011.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Review of Scenario Builder BMP crediting Christopher F. Brosch University of Maryland Extension Chesapeake Bay Program Office
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Larry Theller, Bernie Engel, Youn Shik Park for Purdue University ABE and Office of Indiana State Chemist September 27-28, 2012 “Empowering Water Quality.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Support System Management Actions Watershed Model Bay Model Criteria Assessment Procedures Effects Allocations Airshed.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Western Washington Hydrology Model 2005 AWRA Annual Conference Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
State Board Modeling Needs and Interests Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
1 Phase 5.3 Calibration Gary Shenk 3/31/ Calibration Method Calibration method largely unchanged for several years –P5.1 – 8/ first automated.
Purdue Status Report Summer Meeting 2012 Midwest Spatial Decision Support Interest Group EPA Region 5 July 9, 2012 Bernie Engel, Larry Theller, Youn Shik.
Answering the Question: Why? Factors Affecting Change in Water Quality Exceptional challenge to explain “why” Poor quality of pollution source information.
Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ensuring Full Access to Federal Cost Shared Conservation Practices W. Dean Hively, Ph.D. U.S. Geological.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
1 Distributed Geospatial Information Processing (DGIP): An Introduction DGIP Cyberinfrastructure, AAG Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 4/20/2007 Chaowei.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Exchanges of Aggregate Air Nitrogen Emissions and Watershed Nitrogen Loads Robin L. Dennis, Sergey L. Napelenok Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Improvements in Phase 5 Historical Look at Tributary Strategy Concerns and the mechanics of the Phase 5 Model.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Gopal Bhatt1 and Lewis Linker2 1 Penn State, 2 US EPA
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010

2 Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Support System Management Actions Watershed Model Bay Model Criteria Assessment Procedures Effects Allocations Airshed Model Land Use Change Model Scenario Builder

3 3 Snapshot: Land Use Acreage BMPs Fertilizer Manure Atmospheric Deposition Point Sources Septic Loads Hourly Values: Rainfall Snowfall Temperature Evapotranspiration Wind Solar Radiation Dewpoint Cloud Cover “Average Annual Flow-Adjusted Loads” Quick Overview of Watershed Model Scenarios Hourly output is summed over 10 years of hydrology to compare against other management scenarios HSPF

4 Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Runoff Load reductions attributed to upland benefit employing “efficiencies” Efficiencies can vary by hydro- geomorphic region Non-Point Source Practices and Programs Practices With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies 25 land uses

5 5 Scenario Builder Software that simulates land use and management for input to the Phase 5 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model

66 Watershed Model History

7 7 Management questions and model have been both increasing exponentially in complexity. Watershed Model History

8 8 Number of Scenarios Mid 1980s – 0 Early 1990s – fewer than 10 Late 1990s – 37 Early 2000s – model – about 100 pre-finalization – 1000s?

9 Scenario Generation History 1982 – no scenarios – Aquaterra and SAIC – simple scenarios through hand calculation and spreadsheets – modified watershed model by hand 1995 – 2009 – series of increasingly interconnected spreadsheets – Automated Modification of watershed model 2010 – Scenario Builder

10

11 Non-Point Source Practices and Programs Practices that Alter Nutrient Applications to Agriculture Land Phytase Precision Feeding/Forage Management Manure Transport

12 Watershed Wide Crops by Acreage Approximately 100 crop types and 10 growing regions with different parameters for each Tracking yields and acreages on a county basis

13 Outputs to Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model BMPs – Descriptions – Acres – Pounds nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment reduced Land uses Manure (nutrient species/land use/month) Septic system loads Vegetative Cover Fertilizer application Legumes (pounds nitrogen) Maximum crop uptake Uptake curve (monthly nutrient uptake by land use)

Scenario Builder Versions 1Land use and Nutrient Inputs 2BMPs, point source, septic 3NEIEN implementation 4Summarized reports 5Web interface

15 Scenario Builder Planned Enhancements Version 2.2a: System Maintenance and Documentation Release – System documentation updated Version 2.3: Septic and Atmospheric Deposition – Add these are two new sub-systems Version 2.4: BMP Descriptions and Other BMP Files – Accessory BMP files that the model needs to process BMP data from Scenario Builder. – Input the Phase 5.3 watershed model outputs Version 2.5: Improve Animal Waste Management System BMPs and Dead Birds – Both are being addressed by BMPs now—will be addressed more accurately Version 2.6: Wastewater Sub System – Will automate input data generation over 3,000 facilities Version 3: NEIEN Exchange – Conversion of NEIEN BMP exchange data into Scenario Builder formats. Version 4: Data Products – Developing reports or other data products that will stream-line the process for states, locals and other partners/stakeholders to request information Version 5: User Interface – Evolution of version 2.2 User Interface for running “what if” scenarios

16 Co-Developers of the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Developers EPA U of MD TreCom USGS NRCS CRC VaTech Chesapeake Bay Program Advisors and data suppliers NY, PA, MD, DE, VA, WV, DC