ASCA PBMS Implementation Is your agency ready to participate in PBMS? Let’s look at the issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

PBMS 2014 Audit Schedule Jan FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Regular Audits ARAZIAKYMDMSNENVPATNVAWY AKCTGALAMIMONDNYOHRIUTWA ALCOKSMAINMEMTNMORSDTXWV.
During the ’90s, these issues were regularly discussed at ASCA meetings and trainings. Everyone agreed that ASCA jurisdictions should come together.
For the project to be effective, all ASCA member agencies must be trained and committed to entering PBMS data each month. Participation.
ASCA PBMS Implementation Is your agency ready to participate in PBMS? Let’s look at the issues.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Performance Based Measures System (PBMS) PBMS was established by ASCA to enable agencies to: Measure agency and facility performance against correctional.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
House Price
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Comprehensive Medicaid Managed Care Models in the States, 2014
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
PRACTICA & ONLINE ED AUTHORIZATION STATUS
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 250 sessions with 8,352 participants
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

ASCA PBMS Implementation Is your agency ready to participate in PBMS? Let’s look at the issues.

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Issues 1. Commitment 2. Organizational Buy-In 3. Change in Measurement 4. Organization of Project 5. Allocation of Resources

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Issues 5. Training 6. Start-up Approaches 7. Quality Control 8. Time Considerations 9. Cost Considerations

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Commitment Issue #1: What is the degree of top management’s commitment to adopt and implement ASCA’s PBMS?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Organizational Buy-In Issue #2: What, if any, are the implementation roles of the various staff that must buy-in to the PBMS to ensure a successful implementation? How difficult will it be to achieve that buy-in?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Organizational Buy-In Directors Wardens Records Policy MIS Health (& other special units) Operations Programs Research

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Change in Measurement Issue # 3: Guess the percentage of PBMS measures and indicators that will require policy development or modification. Will you have to maintain dual/multiple measures of performance in order to satisfy legislative requirements?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Organization of Project Issue #4: How will you organize the project?  Centralize  Decentralize  Combination of both?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Allocation of Resources Issue #5: How will you arrange staff time for the project? For examples……..

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Resources Required Supervisory time MIS Programming time Research time Data retrieval time Data entry/upload time Etc.

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Training Issue #6: 1. What types of staff, in addition to PBMS staff, will be required to receive training on producing and maintaining PBMS data? 2. Will training be tailored to the types of staff involved in PBMS?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Start-Up Approaches Issue #7: 1. What start-up approach will you use? the “big bang?” (All data at once) Phased data entry? Other? 2. How much change in data definitions and methods of input is acceptable/ reasonable at start-up?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Quality Control Issue #8: What is a reasonable plan for controlling the quality of the data and maintaining regular uploading?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Time Considerations Issue #9: How long will it take 1) to develop or modify policy 2) to program MIS 3) to train all affected staff What is a realistic “guesstimate” of the “start up” date?

ASCA PBMS Implementation: Costs Issue #10: A. Do you foresee considerable costs to implement the project? B. How do such costs fit into your timeframe for start up? C. Who will make the decisions related to costs?

Other Issues?

1.Enter All Agency Characteristics, 2.Enter All Facility Characteristics, 3.Enter ALL Agency indicators, and 4.Enter All Facility indicators.

AQUA – Eligibility Criteria

1.Enter all required Agency Characteristics 2.Enter all required Facility Characteristics 3.Enter 24 of 48 (50%) key agency indicators, with one or more in Public Safety, Substance Abuse, Mental Health, Justice, Academic Education, and Health Care 4.Enter 28 of 56 (50%) Facility indicators, with one or more in Public Safety, Institutional Safety, Justice, and Health Care.

1.Enter all required Agency Characteristics 2.Enter all required Facility Characteristics 3.Enter 12 of 48 (25%) key agency indicators, with one or more in Public Safety, Substance Abuse, Mental Health, Justice, Academic Education, and Health Care 4.Enter 14 of 56 (25%) Facility indicators, with one or more in Public Safety, Institutional Safety, Justice, and Health Care.

Enter monthly data for one or more of the four types of data: agency characteristics, facility characteristics, agency key indicators, and facility key indicators.

 Communicate PBMS as a top priority to all divisions in your agency – administrative, operational, programs, MIS, planning and research etc.  Identify a PBMS champion in your agency to oversee inputting, retrieval, and maintenance of data in the system.  Review and revise agency policies, procedures, and measures to conform with PBMS counting rules (most difficult and time consuming).  Allocate sufficient time for staff to participate in PBMS in addition to their other duties.

 Monitor participation – are institutional and agency-level data inputted on a timely basis? Are data accurate? (Dashboard being developed.)  Generate reports to compare your Agency and Facilities with other agencies and facilities.  Participate in the Performance Measures Committee.  Provide feedback to the Performance Measures Committee’s requests for input regarding standards and key indicators.  Formulate policy and “institutionalize” your agency’s participation in PBMS.

Agencies’ Participation in PBMS August 27, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (18) Required Characteristics & 75% of KIs (8) OH LA MS VA NC TN SC GA ME AL FL MO MI AR IN WI MN ID WA OR NV UT WY SD NDMT NM OK HI AKAK KS CO NE IA KY NY MA RI MD DE VT NHNH WV Philadelphia, PA NYC No Data Entry (6) NJ DC FBOP All Characteristics & All Key Indicators (10) CT Required Characteristics & 50% of KIs (6) Required Characteristics & 25% of KIs (6) LA County Not Trained (1)

PBMS Participation by ASCA Region August 27, /27/2015

PBMS Participation by Agency Region and Type August 27, 2015

PBMS Participation Levels and Goals 2009 – /27/2015

Good Luck! Shoot for BLUE!