Dr Dennis R VAN PUYVELDE Technical and International Project Manager Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) Onshore storage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon: Problems And Effects IB SL C.C.S: Carbon Capture and Storage.
Advertisements

1 Microseismic Monitoring of CO 2 Storage at Weyburn James Verdon University of Bristol, U.K Microseismic Monitoring.
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group UKCCSC Meeting 18 th April Nottingham Natural analogues of CO 2 leakage from the Colorado Plateau Stuart.
The University of Nottingham Karon L Smith Michael D Steven Jeremy J Colls.
Introduction to Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The.
Geologic Storage of CO 2 : Leakage Pathways and Environmental Risks Michael A. Celia, Catherine A. Peters, and Stefan Bachu Princeton University and Alberta.
T Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO - National Geological Survey How can injected CO 2 be monitored? OSPAR Workshop, Trondheim, November.
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
GHG Verification & the Carbon Cycle 28 September 2010 JH Butler, NOAA CAS Management Group Meeting Page 1 Global Monitoring, Carbon Cycle Science, and.
Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
Carbon Storage. Presentation titlePage 2 Overview of Geological Storage.
A Workflow Approach to Designed Reservoir Study Presented by Zhou Lei Center for Computation and Technology Louisiana State University June 25, 2007.
What Needs to be Done? Environmental Impacts Carol Turley and Jerry Blackford Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK CCS R & D Workshop, Royal Academy of Engineering,
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
1 Carbon Capture and Storage Martin Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London.
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Reservoirs
Overview of Oil & Gas Sector The following slides are not a tutorial but merely an overview of the various phases involved in an oil & gas development.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Profiling Transmissivity and Contamination in Fractures Intersecting Boreholes USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14 January 2014 Claire Tiedeman.
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
Carbon Capture & Storage(CCS)
09.35 Task 1: Overall monitoring objectives. Andy Chadwick, BGS (10 mins) 1.
The Edinburgh Research Partnership in Engineering and Mathematics Heriot-Watt University EH14 4AS University of Edinburgh EH9 3LA ECOSSE.
The Full Use of FLUTe Liner Technology in Fractured Rock Boreholes BY CARL KELLER.
Improving the knowledge of carbon storage and coal bed methane production by in situ underground tests HUNOSA:N. C ANTO A. G ONZÁLEZ,
Earth Science Division E RNEST O RLANDO L AWRENCE B ERKELEY N ATIONAL L ABORATORY B ERKELEY L AB 9/30/03 G. Michael Hoversten Sally Benson Erika Gasperikova.
Bonn, Germany Sunday, 25 March 2012 The Carbon dioxide Capture and geological Storage As project activities Under CDM – The Durban Regulation First SDM.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
© CO2CRC. All rights reserved. Dr Dennis R Van Puyvelde Technical & International Projects Manager Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Policy and regulatory challenges for CCS Dr Paul Zakkour, ERM Energy & Climate Change Services,
© NERC All rights reserved Task 3: Review of findings from experimental and natural seepage sites and modelling Comparison with onshore sites.
Direct-Heat Geothermal Systems: steps to improve understanding about the source of heat Rick Allis Utah Geological Survey March Workshop.
HSE Screening Risk Assessment (SRA) for Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Curtis M. Oldenburg Earth Sciences Division WESTCARB Meeting Portland, OR October 27-28,
Professor Peter Styles Keele University United Kingdom.
MICROSEISMICITY MONITORING IN ENI. 2 Seisan Workshop Microseismicity monitoring in ENI Environmental Monitoring: local authorities often requires monitoring.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
Remediation of Seepage from Geological Storage (GHG/07/43) Aim of study was to: Identify remediation approaches and techniques that.
DRAFT Proposal for a European Directive on the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide Subject to modification on adoption by the Commission.
RCS Partnerships Annual Meeting Pittsburg December 2007 Gulf Coast Stacked Storage SECARB Phase II Test #1 Susan Hovorka, Tip Meckel, JP Nicot, Fred Wang,
R K Jain. CO 2 emission responsible for global warming Development process to go unhalted. Ways and means to be found for controlling and abating CO 2.
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Your name Your institute Date, place.
CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage Demonstration at In Salah, Algeria Iain Wright (CO2 Project Manager, BP Group Technology) UNCTAD Africa Oil & Gas Conference.
Delhi CCS R&D prorities CO 2 geological storage: Road Map, EOR, aquifers, mineral Stuart Haszeldine School of GeoSciences.
Schlumberger Carbon Services Economics & Risk of Scaling Up for Carbon Storage John Tombari Vice President North & South America Schlumberger Carbon Services.
Midterm results Average mark 73.7% (29.5 / 40) Median mark 30 / 40.
Computational Modeling of Carbon Dioxide in Saline Reservoirs Caitlin M. Augustin Peter K. Swart Timothy H. Dixon Augustin et al., 2010.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.
Microseismic Event Analysis From the Earnest Stocker 4H & 5H Wells Seismic Analysis Group January 2011.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
Demonstration of oxy-fuel combustion in once-through steam generators for CO 2 capture Carbon Capture & Storage Workshop 28 March, 2013 The High Commission.
Gary J. Pendergrass, PE, RG Washington Hydrogeology Symposium April 14, 2015 | Tacoma, WA The Missouri Carbon Sequestration Project – A Model for State.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
The Aquistore Project: Making CCS a Reality Dr. Malcolm Wilson, CEO PTRC Canadian Carbon Capture & Storage Workshop: Progress Report, Challenges Faced,
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes in a Forest Soil in the Citronelle Oil Field of South Alabama Latasha Lyte and E.Z. Nyakatawa Department of Natural Resources and.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
Carbon Capture and Storage In Texas Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The University.
Copyright 2003 SIEP B.V. Shell Exploration & Production Risk Assessment for Geological CO 2 Storage Wolf Heidug.
- Environmental Impact Assessment and Leakage detection -
Recent Advances in Well-Based Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration
Carbon Capture & Sequestration
Presentation transcript:

Dr Dennis R VAN PUYVELDE Technical and International Project Manager Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) Onshore storage and monitoring: the Otway Basin Project International Workshop on Power Generation with Carbon Capture and Storage January 2008 Ashok Hotel Delhi © CO2CRC. All rights reserved.

Project Description Site Selection Monitoring & Verification Atmospheric monitoring Geochemical monitoring Geophysical monitoring Naylor 1 assemble Conclusion Presentation Outline

CO2CRC Otway Project

Otway Project Goals Contribute towards CO2CRC Vision and Mission. –Demonstrate that CCS is technically feasible and environmentally safe. –Facilitate research into new monitoring technologies –Offer opportunities for trial and experimentation thereby supporting education/training in greenhouse gas technologies Specifically demonstrate to the satisfaction of stakeholders that –CO 2 can be safely produced, transported and injected into the sub-surface –CO 2 can be safely stored –Subsurface behaviour of the injected CO 2 can be effectively modeled and monitored –Storage Volume can be verified as far as possible –Build public support for CCS as a mitigation mechanism

Project Location

A source of carbon dioxide Oil and gas tenements available at an affordable price Large amount of exploration and production data Infrastructure in place Gas had demonstrably been trapped for a long time Community familiar with the oil industry (plus and minus) Logistically accessible Adequate storage capacity & favourable geology © CO2CRC. All rights reserved. What were factors that led to the choice of the Otway Project site?

Reservoir Modelling & Simulation Objectives: To address risk in the inherent uncertainty of reservoir heterogeneity To assess likely flow behaviour of any injected CO2 How to reduce uncertainties? CRC-1 findings (cores & logs) to refine the reservoir modeling & simulation Other data (i.e. seismics) How to be sure? Reservoir modeling & simulation peer-reviewed = certification of injection plan Results from reservoir modeling & simulation to be confirmed by M&V

March 2008 Dec Dec Simulation Results: CO 2 in Cross-sectional View CO 2 arrival CO 2 around CRC-1 CO 2 in Naylor-1 3 MMscf/d Breakthrough 6-8 months Up 100,000 tonnes of CO 2 to be injected Gas mixture from Buttress-1 is to be injected (78.8 mol% CO 2 ) Dissolution, residual trapping, diffusion are considered in model

Monitoring and Verification is a key part of CCS lateral migration Injected Carbon Dioxide Surface Ecosystems Confining Layer(s) Saline Water Atmosphere buoyant vertical migration localised seepage Hydrology Geochemistry Soil gas Atmospheric Assurance Monitoring Storage Integrity Monitoring Remote Geophysics Geochemical Sampling Seal

M&V activities for Otway Project ActivitiesPre-injectionDuring inj. (16 months)Post Injection Static & Dynamic ModelingYes (updated & peer-reviewed)To be updatedNo Geomechanical ModelingYes (updated with CRC-1 data)To be updatedNo Risk AssessmentQRA 1 & 2QRA 3 & 4QRA 5 Atmospheric Monitoring Lo Flo/ Flux Tower Flask sampling CO2 sniffers Continuous Once/ month Not installed Continuous Once/month Continuous Twice a year Continuous Surface Monitoring Water levels Water chemistry Soil gas Headspace gas Continuous Twice a year 4 trips 1 trip Continuous Twice a year Once/year 4 times Continuous Twice  once/yr One/year  No Twice a year Downhole Geochemistry Monitoring U-tube (*3) P/T measurements (CRC-1 & Naylor-1) Once Continuous Once/week to breakthrough Continuous TBD  No TBD Geophysics 3D surface seismic VSPs (CRC-1 & Naylor-1) HRTT Microseismic Logging (CRC-1 & Naylor-1) One survey Continuous Once Periodically for Naylor-1 TBD Continuous No Once Periodically (N1) No Continuous Once

Sampling Flux Tower & Lo-Flo Tower Flask sampling Continuous in situ air and soil flux sampling (CO 2 sniffers) Results Large pre-existing background variation in CO 2 + other gases’ concentrations (Lo-Flo measurements + flask samples) Emissions from CO 2 storage: likely to be small Leakage of stored CO 2 could be discriminated isotopically ( 13 C) 3 ppm elevation of CO 2 detected during CRC-1 drilling operation Atmospheric Monitoring

Towards CRC-1 site Flux Tower Air Monitoring (Lo Flo & Flux Tower) Lo-Flo & air monitoring centre Atmospheric Monitoring

Groundwater/Gas Monitoring Groundwater level measurements: Dataloggers installed in Feb 07 and downloaded twice per year until 2010 Groundwater chemistry: –Characterisation of the shallow waters: low salinity, pH neutral, Na-Ca-HCO 3 -Cl composition –Frequency: once per year until baseline soil gas trips completed –Frequency: once per year until 2010 Head Space Gas Survey –Presence, concentration and distribution of gases (including CO 2 ) within selected boreholes –One baseline trip undertaken, 4 time per year until 2010 Downhole sampling Tracers plan finalised (Kr, CD 4, SF 6 ) Downhole Geochemical Monitoring (U-tube) Geochemical Monitoring

Geophysical Monitoring Techniques –3D Surface seismic –3D Vertical seismic profiling (Naylor-1 & CRC-1) –High Resolution Travel Time (Naylor-1) –Continuous microseismic Seismic tested Baseline seismic completed by Feb 2008

Patch 2.375” ID; 27’ long m Rod 0.75” O.D m Depth Casing 2.9” I.D. 80 o C 17 MPa (2500psi) 2055 m 2050 m 2045 m 2030 m 2025 m 2020 m Bottom hole assembly Naylor 1 Total Depth: 2060 m Perf Packer Geophone with clamp (1.125 V - 1.5”? 3C) Hydrophone (1.25”) Pressure/Temp and U-tube Inlet Integrated Sonde Gas Water Integrated monitoring assembly 3 geophones, 3 hydrophones and 2 P/T sensors below the packer 3 U-Tubes: – In the gas, below GWC, Water 3 three-component geophones above the packer An array of 8 single component geophones above these

Down hole seismic and U-tube sampling successfully installed & tested by LBNL and CO2CRC researchers in Oct 07. Inlet gas processing equipment is now on site. We will soon be completing pipeline constructions. Long term liability issues resolved. Expect to start injection in March CO2CRC Otway Project – Summary

CO2CRC Project OPERATIONS –CRC-1 successfully drilled (Feb 2007) –Downhole geochemical and geophysical assembly installed and tested at Naylor 1 –Surface plant currently under construction (to be commissioned in Feb 2008) –Pipeline to be installed by end Jan –Expect to start injection in March 2008 SCIENCE –Baseline monitoring studies completed by Feb 2008 APPROVALS –All regulatory approvals granted –CPPL approval to start injection –Long term liability issues resolved –Landowner issues resolved

Industry Contributors: OBPP Financial contributors Research Contributors: Government Contributors:

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dr Sandeep Sharma Dr Peter Cook Dr Thomas Berly CO2CRC Otway Researchers Information