16 th Annual Meeting 2002-2003 Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uncertainty in reservoirs
Advertisements

Multipoint Statistics to Generate Geologically Realistic Networks 1 Hiroshi Okabe supervised by Prof. Martin J Blunt Petroleum Engineering and Rock Mechanics.
Data Mining & Oil-Field Modeling Y.Chang. Outline Background Reservoir Simulation Modeling Examples and Projects.
2012 SEG/SPE/AAPG Summer Research Workshop
A multi-scale, pattern-based approach to sequential simulation annual scrf meeting, may 2003 stanford university burc arpat ( coaching provided by jef.
1 (from Optimization of Advanced Well Type and Performance Louis J. Durlofsky Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University.
A Workflow Approach to Designed Reservoir Study Presented by Zhou Lei Center for Computation and Technology Louisiana State University June 25, 2007.
Science for a changing world The USGS and the Development of the Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model.
BP Workshop July 17, 2001 GEMINI Geo-Engineering Modeling through INternet Informatics by John Victorine and Lynn Watney Kansas Geological Survey Lawrence,
Upscaling and History Matching of Fractured Reservoirs Pål Næverlid Sævik Department of Mathematics University of Bergen Modeling and Inversion of Geophysical.
OVERVIEW OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Using the EnKF for combined state and parameter estimation Geir Evensen.
Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs 2nd Edition, R. A
FUTURE EMPLOYEES FOR THE ENERGY INDUSTRY BY C HARLES J. M ANKIN, Director, University of Oklahoma Sarkeys Energy Center and the Oklahoma Geological Survey.
Marginal Field Development Advances in 3D Geological Modeling: How it can help?
Sedimentology & Stratigraphy:
ENGINE Leiden Combining Areal Underground and Infrastructure Data to Minimize Exploration and Economic Risks Thomas Kohl, GEOWATT AG Clément Baujard,
International Shale Development Optimization
Workflow for Finding Bypassed Reserves in Mature Assets  Real Time Integration of Simulation, Seismic Interpretation, and Geophysics  Best Answers Possible.
Introduction to Petroleum Design
2010 Geophysics paper: Figures Distance (m) Depth (m) salt reservoir.
History Matching of Heavy Oil Production for Comparing New Approaches to Generating Reservoir Property Distributions, West Coalinga Field, California S.E.
Bed Contained Tectonic Fold-Related Fractures Flank of Teton Anticline Sawtooth Mnts. W. Montana Miss. Madison Ls.
Stochastic inverse modeling under realistic prior model constraints with multiple-point geostatistics Jef Caers Petroleum Engineering Department Stanford.
Computational Science & Engineering meeting national needs Steven F. Ashby SIAG-CSE Chair March 24, 2003.
A of Bureau Economic Geology a Fracture Research and Application Consortium Selected Overview Slides 2005
Careers in Petroleum Geology Slides from aapg.org Presented by Rick Abegg Chevron.
Soft Computing methods for High frequency tradin.
Adaptive Spatial Resampling as a McMC Method for Uncertainty Quantification in Seismic Reservoir Modeling Cheolkyun Jeong*, Tapan Mukerji, and Gregoire.
Using multidimensional scaling and kernel principal component analysis to interpret seismic signatures of thin shaly-sand reservoirs Piyapa Dejtrakulwong1,
SCRF 2012 Erosion in Surface-based Modeling Using Tank Experiment Data Siyao Xu, Andre Jung, Tapan Mukerji, Jef Caers.
Hyucksoo Park, Céline Scheidt and Jef Caers Stanford University Scenario Uncertainty from Production Data: Methodology and Case Study.
Earth models for early exploration stages PETROLEUM ENGINEERING ÂNGELA PEREIRA Introduction Frontier basins and unexplored.
A Systematic Workflow for Modelling and Upscaling Force Upscaling Workshop 2004 Tor Barkve and Jan C Rivenæs Force Upscaling Workshop 2004 Tor Barkve and.
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
Geostatistical History Matching Methodology using Block-DSS for Multi-Scale Consistent Models PHD PROGRAM IN PETROLUM ENGINEERING CATARINA MARQUES
OBTAINING LOCAL PROPORTIONS FROM INVERTED SEISMIC DATA TOWARD PATTERN-BASED DOWNSCALING OF SEISMIC DATA Lisa Stright and Alexandre Boucher School of Earth.
Yao Tong, Tapan Mukerji Stanford University
John H. Shaw and Andreas Plesch, Harvard University
Thin sub-resolution shaly-sands
Petroleum Engineering 631 — Petroleum Reservoir Description
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
Cheolkyun Jeong, Céline Scheidt, Jef Caers, and Tapan Mukerji
A strategy for managing uncertainty
Petroleum Engineering
Peipei Li, Tapan Mukerji
SCRF 26th Annual Meeting May
Pejman Tahmasebi and Jef Caers
Jincong He, Louis Durlofsky, Pallav Sarma (Chevron ETC)
S-GEMS-UQ: An Uncertainty Quantification Toolkit for SGEMS
Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji
Modeling sub-seismic depositional lobes using spatial statistics
Céline Scheidt, Jef Caers and Philippe Renard
Assessing uncertainties on production forecasting based on production Profile reconstruction from a few Dynamic simulations Gaétan Bardy – PhD Student.
Fast Pattern Simulation Using Multi‐Scale Search
Topological Ordering Algorithm: Example
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
Brent Lowry & Jef Caers Stanford University, USA
Yao Tong, Tapan Mukerji Stanford University
Siyao Xu Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences (EEES)
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting
SCRF High-order stochastic simulations and some effects on flow through heterogeneous media Roussos Dimitrakopoulos COSMO – Stochastic Mine Planning.
Energy Resources Engineering Department Stanford University, CA, USA
Topological Ordering Algorithm: Example
Topological Ordering Algorithm: Example
Year 2 Number – number and place value
The three fracture end members (microfractures, joints and seismically identified faults) that comprise the Lancaster conceptual model. The three fracture.
Topological Ordering Algorithm: Example
Presentation transcript:

16 th Annual Meeting Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting

The state of SCRF… …is healthy ! Consider Record 19 students Strong funding from more than 20 members Additional funding through projects Effort to use SCRF software by individual members Consider the following statistics from SPE ATCE2002 ½ of all papers in “Geostatistics” section from SCRF 5/6 from SCRF related authors Rami won Ms division student paper contest

SCRF Meetings organized 2002 – 2003 Best-of-SCRF Houston, October 2002, ROXAR Best-of-SCRF Caracas, Postponed to March 2003, PDVSA Annual Meeting, May 8-9, Stanford Optimization Workshop, May 12, Stanford Best-of-SCRF Houston, October 2003, KERR-McGee

Petroleum Geostatistics, now Geostatistics Multiple Reservoir models Flexible gridding, Upscaling and History matching Geophysics 3D/4Dseismic Rock physics data Geology Outcrops Concepts Petro-physics Well-logs Flow Simulation, Optimization, Management & Decision Geometry Topology

Petroleum Geostatistics, the future Geostatistics Multiple Reservoir models Geophysics 3D/4Dseismic Rock physics data Geology Outcrop s Concept s Petro- physics Well-logs Gridding/Upscale Flexible mesh Effective bl. props. Optimization & Decision Dynamic data History matching Geometry Topology

Broad area of topics New algorithms in mp-geostatistics Rethinking on the uncertainty question Building on History matching under geological control Software development Reservoir applications 4D seismic 3D reservoir models Extract relevant patterns Import geo-patterns constrained to well-log and seismic data Import geo-patterns constrained to well-log and seismic data Training imageSimpat realization P1 P2 P6 P5 P4 P3 I1 I2 I3 P1 P2 P6 P5 P4 P3 I1 I2 I3 P1 P2 P6 P5 P4 P3 I1 I2 I3 Initial guess realization Eclipse History match Maintaining Geological realism