IT State Conference Update Eau Claire, March 1, 2012 Hal Zenisek WIDS Learning Design System WTCS Foundation, Waunakee, WI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fall Agricultural Education Professional Development Conference Developing a Program of Study September 30, 2011.
Advertisements

August 1, 2011 SD ACTE Summer Conference Update. New and Upcoming Projects SD Advisory Board for Family and Consumer Sciences Cluster specific workshops.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
CATE UPDATE Susan Flanagan, Director Office of Career and Technology Education March 12, 2013.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
A Presentation For Mojave Unified School District.
The University of Arizona Academic Program Review Orientation April 2015.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
Implemented: November Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM) is the process where Buncombe County Schools shall, based on a body-of-evidence, award.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
WTCS Framework for Student Success WTCS Board Meeting March
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
28 th Annual IT Conference & SCM March 1-2, 2011 Prepared by Moira Lafayette, Education Director, Business & Information Technology programs.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Academic Essentials presents October 31, Program Courses Course Competencies External Standards Program Outcomes Linked Core Abilities Core Abilities.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Documenting How WTCS Colleges Assess Learning Outcomes.
SD Secondary Career & Technical Education (CTE) Perkins Updates – July 2013.
Using WIDS to Document How Colleges Assess Learning Outcomes.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS CSULA Workshop Anne L. Hafner May 12, 2005.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.
Presentation will start at 2:00 If you are using your phone for audio, please put it on mute. Submit questions through the chat feature For assistance.
School of Education California Baptist University Overview of Assessment Project.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
CTAE End-of-Pathway Assessment: Student Credentialing Opportunities Mamie Hanson State CTAE Assessment Coordinator (404)
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Alignment of Course Standards and Assessments Overview of CTE Task Group.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process May 2, 2013.
Set background image for this slide to change picture. A range of photos are available in the graphics folder.
Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.
Assessment Plans Council of Deans, March 22, 2007.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Federal - Perkins IV Programs of Study (Pathways) Secondary/Postsecondary Links Improving Student Performance –Academic and Technical Skills –Graduation/Completion.
The State of Career Pathways in Minnesota Programs of Study Technical Skill Attainment Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Minnesota Department.
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Reporting the Course level RWR Assessment data
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Office of Grant Resources
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Implementing Race to the Top
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
A Quick Carl D. Perkins Act Update
Overview of Academic Staff Title Change Process
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
What is it? Awarded to graduating high school students who complete a series of accomplishments Awarded to students who engage in activities, courses,
Presentation transcript:

IT State Conference Update Eau Claire, March 1, 2012 Hal Zenisek WIDS Learning Design System WTCS Foundation, Waunakee, WI

Today’s Topics… Overview Technical Skill Attainment Review WTCS process and procedures Update on Business & IT division TSA Panel discussion on TSA assessment Prepare for next steps for IT TSAs Review resources available Answer questions and hear concerns

Carl Perkins IV Technical Skills Attainment An assessment that objectively measures a student's attainment of industry recognized skills.

System Level Guiding Principles The “System” has been assessing student performance for 100 years TSA formalizes the assessment and creates a common and shared reporting process Used to meet the federal Carl D Perkins Grant 2006 reporting requirement At some point, a college’s funding status could be effected by their engagement in TSA reporting

Guiding Principles (cont.) Minimally, each aid code 10, 31, 32 and 50 program will use “course completion” as their measure of students’ Technical Skill Attainment –this has been done for many years Over time the number of programs that move to using WTCS Assessment (TSA) or a 3 rd Party assessment should increase Demonstrate a shift to measuring evidence of direct student learning with WTCS approved assessment

I NDIRECT A SSESSMENT S TANDARDS ( COURSE C OMPLETION **) E XTERNAL (3 RD PARTY ) A SSESSMENT S TANDARDS * WTCS A SSESSMENT STANDARDS External Assessment WTCS Assessment **Some programs will continue to use Course Completion, and never move to another type of assessment *3 rd party assessment is hard to implement; a limited # of programs will use this

WTCS Three Phase Approach Colleges with the same program collaborate to: Identify common core program outcomes Identify the type of TSA Assessment In consultation with WIDS, submits documents to System Office System Office Reviews, advises or approves All participating colleges notified of approval, and "invited" to move to phase II. Planning Phase I: Planning Local Colleges complete and submit Phase II documents to System Office System Office Reviews, advises or approves Final documents are posted to Curriculum Bank Local Colleges implement their assessment plan Implementation Phase II: Implementation Local Colleges collect TSA data internally Local Colleges report TSA data via Client System Office uses client data to prepare federal Consolidated Annual Report Reporting Phase III: Reporting

Phase I Recap The Goal is to identify: – Common Program Outcomes to be assessed on a summative basis validated by business & industry –Common Type of Assessment that will be used WTCS Assessment and/or 3 rd Party –Common Assessment Criteria (i.e., rubric) –Artifacts used for assessment at colleges For programs at more than 1 college: –Work is done collaboratively with all colleges holding State Board Program Approval For Unique programs: –Work is done by the college holding State Board Program Approval

Program Outcomes are Valid

Sample

Program Outcome s Related rating criteria

Program Outcomes Threaded

Phase I Approval Request Form Posted on WTCS CurriculumBank when the project is complete Sent to the State Office by the Lead district (in collaboration w/WIDS) Reviewed for approval by the WTCS Education Director and Assoc. Vice President

Phase I: Planning ISA reps for all participating colleges notified by WTCS of Phase I approval (via letter) “Invited" to move to phase II Documents moved on WTCS curriculum bank from WIP to TSA Assessment.

Phase II Recap Planning for the use of common program outcomes, assessment criteria & assessment type developed under phase I Each college creates a TSA Local Implementation Plan 1.Link between Program Outcomes, Program Curriculum & Assessment Criteria 2.Assessment strategy* that will be done –portfolio, skill demonstration, capstone course project, licensure exam … –mechanism to complete the assessment Who does it –Faculty, an Assessment Committee, etc. When it happens –1 st semester, throughout the program, end of program, etc. How it happens –Part of an existing course, a stand alone “course”, etc. The exact process to get student level assessment data (i.e., passed, not passed, not assessed) into the college’s course management system. 3.Phase 2 plan submitting to WTCS & approved *Note: Identification of Assessment Strategy is applicable for WTCS Assessment Type only. The Assessment Strategy for 3 rd Party is identified by the 3 rd party.

Phase II: Implementation Phase 1 complete Final documents now available under the TSA Assessment tab on CurriculumBank Organized by Career Clusters

Phase II: Implementation Download Phase II Document s

Phase II: Implementation Each College Completes TSA Phase II Request Form as applicable to their own district (use the Completion Guide to help you) View Samples

Phase II: Implementation Your College’s Plan for Implementing the TSA

Phase II Plan Show how the program outcomes link to the courses in your program Complete the Analyzer report in WIDS or provide documentation referencing the exit learning outcomes with the program courses

WIDS Analyzer Report Courses Program Outcomes

Phase II Plan What’s your strategy? Each college may define its own How will you use the rubric?

Assessment Strategies –Portfolio –Capstone –Internship Rubric with program outcomes and criteria –Reflective paper in course xx –Outcomes/performance standards with each formative assessment –Align outcomes assessment to external standards

Phase II: Implementation Colleges complete the Phase II form Colleges submit the form through as a SINGLE DOCUMENT (attach all files) Routed thru the WTCS approval process –Review –Complete Checklist –Make Recommendation

Phase III Recap With approved Phase II assessment Colleges begin reporting student data –1 = Assessed, passed –2= Assessed, not passed –9= Not assessed »Client Guide

TSA Reporting Once Phase II is approved by the state the program will begin reporting TSA on all program students In the Phase II documentation you will identify when you will start the TSA, until then all students will be reported as “not assessed” or 9 in client reporting Projected dates are estimates, if colleges have data to report earlier, they can

TSA Current Status-Next Steps 69 programs have received Phase I approval –Duplicated count = 421 programs 10 programs have received Phase II approval 2012 Goals : –Significantly increase –Significantly increase the number of programs achieving Phase II approval –Continue to support programs entering Phase I

Business & IT Division Phase I Complete Business Management Accounting Paralegal Marketing Administrative Professional Office Assistant IT-CSS & IT-NS (in process)

Business & IT Division Phase II Accounting – NATC, MSTC, BTC, NWTC Curriculum Bank: p=show p=show Resources for TSA –Overview, Resources, Sample College Plans –Scoring Guides, Program Outcomes, Criteria –WIDS files and documents

Phase 1 – IT Computer Support Non-aligned, multi-college program under Common program outcomes, criteria, scoring standard, and scoring guide Individual college Phase 2 Under review: one-year and two-year related diploma programs

Phase 1 – IT Computer Support Scoring Guide Review (Team Reps) –Program Outcomes –Outcome Criteria –Scoring Scale –Scoring Standard –Common assessment for AAS degree programs

Phase 1 – IT Computer Support

Phase 1 – IT Network Specialist Non-aligned, multi-college program under Common agreed upon program outcomes, criteria, scoring standard, and scoring guide Individual college Phase 2 External standards identified Under consideration: & others

Phase 1 – IT Network Specialist Scoring Guide Review (Team Reps) –Program Outcomes –Outcome Criteria –Scoring Scale –Scoring Standard –Reference to External Standards –Common assessment for AAS degree programs

Phase 1 – IT Network Specialist

IT TSA Next Steps - Current Projects Dean review webinar (CSS and NS) –March 2012 Final review webinar –April 2012 TSA documentation finalized and submitted to WTCS –May/June 2012 Phase 1 approval – summer 2012 Phase 2 plans from colleges to WTCS -fall/spring Phase 2 assessment – new student cohorts in 2013 who complete programs 2-3 years ( ) Phase 3 reporting - December 2016

IT Phase 1 Questions & Comments

IT Related TSA Opportunities IT-Computer Support Specialist ( ) –Work on Phase 2 local plans IT-Network Specialist ( ) –Work on Phase 2 local plans Identify other 150, 152, 154 associate degrees –Consider Phase 1 planning efforts Identify other IT 1- and 2-year diploma programs –Consider Phase 1 planning 25+ IT state-approved programs (Phase 1)

Future TSA Strategies Coordinate plans with Ed Director Adapt the phase 1 process for your college and/or other colleges with the same IT program –IT-Security (BTC and MILW)? –IT-Network Systems Administration (WTC and FVTC)? Others? Checklists for Phase 1 and Phase 2 WIDS staff can help

TSA in Review

Phase II: Implementation

Where are my programs?

Thank-you! Hal Zenisek WIDS Learning Design Consultant (800)