Program for Accelerated Learning Appoquinimink School District 2010 Plan for Implementation Priority 2, goal 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Appoquinimink School District Succession Benefits the staff person, the school and the district A MIND THAT IS STRETCHED BY A NEW EXPERIENCE.
Gifted and Talented Programming. Programming Options? Pull out –Weekly –Full day a week –Daily Self-contained Push in Acceleration Options Cluster Grouping.
CREDIT BY DEMONSTRATED MASTERY Pilot Program.
Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School Districts New GATE Plan Presented by Robin Ridgeway, MA Ed., GATE Specialist Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District.
Informational GATE Meeting Topic: Identification (LAUSD Policy) Thursday, October 3, 2013.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Gifted Eligibility Process Presented by Annette Simpson and Patti Tashiro Keheley’s Gifted Education Teachers.
Third Grade AIG Nomination and Identification 101 OR: Everything you Wanted to Know about how Students are Identified but were Afraid to Ask.
Advanced Learning Plan Presentation Woodrow Wilson Academy
G/T Identification Parent Orientation January, 2015.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Child Study. What is Child Study? The CSC is a school-based team, convened for the purpose of reviewing any problems (academic/developmental, behavioral,
Academically Gifted and Talented Program for Greenwood District 50 By: Cathy S. Chalmers Toni Justus Harold Moffitt Pacquitta Welton-Wideman Revised July.
Gifted Education West Linn-Wilsonville School District West Linn-Wilsonville School District.
Gifted Education in the Elementary Schools Swarthmore-Rutledge School E.
Austin Elementary School August 20 and 27, 2015
Gifted and Talented Education Neil Cummins School Larkspur School District
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Parent Information Presentation. To nurture potential in all students. To challenge those with advanced learning capabilities through differentiation.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Increasing the Identification of Gifted Students from Underrepresented Populations Instructional Support Team Meeting Sample County Public Schools March.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Assuring Gifted Program Quality Through Self-Study. Gail Hanninen, Ed. D.
Talent Development Initiative: Cate Reed Allison McCarthy Education Committee February 8th, 2011.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
Discover Information. Outline  Definition  Lakeville’s Gifted Program Overview  Discover Curriculum  Nuts and Bolts  Questions?
Huffman I.S.D. Gifted and Talented Information Meeting Thursday, September 17, 2015.
Gifted Identification Process
Parent Information Meeting Gifted & Talented Education Pam Cernocky Gifted Education Coordinator Eau Claire Area School District
Huffman I.S.D. Gifted and Talented Information Meeting Thursday, March 12, 2015.
Kindergarten Gifted and Talented Information Meeting
Achieving Cultural Proficiency – A Leadership Perspective Friday, October 2, 2015 Presenters: Dr. James P. Lee, Superintendent Dr. Drew Davis, Director.
GATE/SAS Gifted and Talented Education and School for Advanced Studies Cowan Avenue Elementary.
Understanding the AIG Program Acceleration Challenge Honors Innovation Enrichment Visionary Excellence PCS Parent/Guardian Meeting October 10, 2011 PCS.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Central Kitsap School District SHARED DECISION MAKING Central Kitsap High School March 2, 2006.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. THE.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Created by: AIG Specialists Onslow County Schools.
The Morris School District’s mission is to serve the needs of all students, to accommodate equity, to provide a challenging education and innovative academic.
Huffman I.S.D. Gifted and Talented Information Meeting Thursday, September 22, 2011.
COMPREHENSIVE GIFTED PROGRAM Nathan Hale School Year.
Welcome to the Gifted Services Information Night  Swanson Middle School  Ms. Sharen Humann  Resource Teacher for the Gifted.
Strategic Plan Proposal The Challenge This strategic plan identifies what must be done, pre- school through grade 12, over the next three.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 A REPORT TO THE ARKANSAS JOINT EDUCATION COMMITTEE.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Division of Student Support Services
Assessment and Identification
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ABSS ACADEMICALLY INTELLECTUALLY GIFTED PROGRAM
DeSoto County Schools’ Intellectually Gifted Mission Statement
Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) program information
Highly Capable Education
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
WCPSS 3rd Grade Explorers
School Year Nevin Hartman, AP Corbin Franklin, RT Lisa Koprowski, GRT
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program Application Process
Global screening - parent meeting, Spring 2006
Parent Informational Meeting
Baltimore City Schools Definition and Vision
TAG and the Law
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Family Engagement Policy
Curriculum Selection Process
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Program for Accelerated Learning Appoquinimink School District 2010 Plan for Implementation Priority 2, goal 1

Strategic Plan Scope of Work Provide more learning opportunities that engage, challenge and advance the achievement of our more academically talented students.

Stakeholder involvement Parent input is an essential first step and therefore the decision was made to hold a parent focus group. Each principal was contacted to submit at least two parent recommendations for participation on the focus group. Fourteen parents were invited and nine accepted

Questions Cont’d Wednesday, June 23 rd the focus group was held at the training center. Parents were grateful that the district is exploring additional ways to challenge this group of students. The following questions were asked for parental response:

Questions: What are the greatest concerns that your child has expressed about their academics? What experiences have you had that have led to your concerns about your child’s academic experience? How do you want your child’s instruction to be different from what they are currently experiencing?

Questions cont’d: What characteristics does your child demonstrate that makes you believe he/she should be in an accelerated program? What type of program would you like to see your child involved in? What areas would you like to see us address when the program is designed?

District-wide committee: Board member-Mrs. Joanne M. Christian Parents----Karen Aniunas and Carolyn Recla Teachers: Ana Anderson,Cheryle Spells, Kerri Roesch, Patti Pyle, Jesse Lauver,Katherine Bin - Yusef and Sandra Smithers Administrators: T.J.Vari, S.Pepukayi, R.Grauver,V.Perrine,D.Kolakowski,L.Lybarger, D.Panchisin Facilitator---Marion E.Proffitt

Our plan of action: Develop a common definition/ profile of the student identified for accelerated learning Develop a criteria for student selection Research and review various forms of acceleration Decide by levels what our initial launch activities will be for the first year ( )

Plan of action ( completed) Compile a list of the most commonly asked questions regarding acceleration and research for information Compare responses/concerns from the parent focus group and district wide committee Present program status to the full board Hold district -wide informational meetings Visit and solicit information on successful programs from neighboring states

What would the numbers look like today? 97th%ile and above? *DSTP Reading students % Math students % Both students % Math or Read students % *MAP: Reading students---4.9% Math students % Both students % Math or Read students % Not including 1st, 8 th, 9 th, or 10th grade

Demographic Analysis for Students Identified as in the 97 th Percentile in Math OR Reading Group % at Appo (grades 2-7) % ID’d using MAP% ID’s using DSTP Low Income19.8%3.4%7.4% Not Low Income80.2%96.6%92.6% Asian3.4%17.0%11.7% Black26.1%8.0%12.9% Hispanic3.4%1.9%2.5% White66.5%73.1%72.7%

Program Name and Definition: The program will be entitled: Accelerated Learning Program. (ALP) What is the defining purpose? The purpose of the Appoquinimink Accelerated Learning program is to provide opportunities which will advance the education of students who demonstrate a compliment of high academic ability, task commitment, maturity and creativity.

Student selection criteria: 100 points possible—95 points required* 80 points—97%ile on standardized test math or reading—spring scores 20 points—Portfolio work samples---10 points teacher recommendations-5 points report cards---5 points * No appeal process

Are there exceptions? Consideration will be granted to the students who fall between the 95th and 97%ile If those students are to be considered they will take the Otis Lennon (OLSAT) which is a cognitive abilities test. Cut scores will be established with the guidance of a team of our psychologists: Test consist of various areas depending upon grade level such as: reasoning, classifications, analogies, verbal comprehension and verbal reasoning and other areas.

How will the process work Each building will have a team to facilitate the ALP identification process. Categories for membership will be identified for committee make-up.i.e. teacher, administrators,psychologist etc. Process will be monitored by the superintendent’s designee

When can students be considered Students will be considered each year through grade seven. The same criteria will be in force unless changes are made through the superintendent or his designee. School level adjustments will not be recognized. Planning meetings will be held monthly through June 2011 A district wide committee will plan the program launch for August 2011

Why have an Accelerated Learning program? According to Megan Dobyns: Identifying the most gifted and talented students is incredibly important if we hope to cultivate our country’s most valuable resources. Many criticize it as elitist and unfair (Gallagher &Gallagher ).

Why an accelerated program? cont’d On the contrary, not identifying them so they can have the proper program can be unfair to the children who need the program as well as to our society that will ultimately benefit from cultivating their potential (Colangelo & Davis,2003).

Why do we need this? No one wins when our system does not match the educational program offerings to the needs of our diverse population of students.

In the future C ommunity informational meetings will be held. District psychologist will serve as consultants for alternative testing process. Tentative Spring 2011 deadline: Program designs will be completed by design teams (teachers, specialists and administrators) Program components will be announced. Timeline for phase -in will be submitted to the superintendent Other areas for discussion –considerations at the high school level for advice on course selections Thanks to Jeff Klein for researching the data to support the need for program development.