National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs and the A.P.P.L.E. Project Models of Parent Leadership Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating Partnerships from Apples and Oranges 2006 National Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Conference, Washington, DC Beth S. Benedict, Ph.D.,
Advertisements

Transition to Kindergarten: A Collaboration RIDE Winter Leadership Institute RI Convention Center February 9, 2007.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
MASFAA Strategic Plan Mission Statement The Massachusetts Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators empowers its members to be educated,
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
A Focus on Team Meetings 1. 2 Think about the individual. Remember that each student has individual needs, based upon the impact of his/her disability.
Aging & Disability Resource Consortiums February 14, 2007 San Diego Long Term Care Integration Project The Massachusetts Experience.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
The Family Support Model Strengthening and Empowering Families for a Healthy Development.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Using Parent Training and Information Centers to Support Families Receiving Early Intervention Washington PAVE Cassie Johnston Parent Participation Coordinator.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Talbert House Project PASS Goals and Outcomes.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning | Touching Hearts, Changing Minds Parents as Professional Development.
DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Leadership I and II February, 2011 Providing Services to Students, Families and Community through.
The Role of Family Organizations in Reaching & Supporting Immigrant Families to Access Services Immigrant children in the US are more likely to be poor,
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
World Food Prize International Symposium October 12 – 14, 2005 NASULGC Food and Society Initiative Mortimer H. Neufville.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
COLORADO SPECIALQUEST BIRTH-FIVE INITIATIVE Colorado Head Start Association Conference February 2009.
The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Sustainability of PBS Implementation: State-wide Planning in Kansas March 27, 2008 Rachel Freeman University of Kansas.
The challenge and promise of community based participatory research 1.
Barbara J. Smith, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver OSEP, July, 2014 Promoting Social Emotional Competence in All Young Children Through Collaboration.
Call to Community: Building Connections that Make a Difference for Students with Disabilities CA Community Meeting April 28, 2008.
National MEDICAL HOME Autism Initiative Poster Presentation for DEC Conference 2005 Linda Tuchman Ginsberg, PhD
DIPLOMAS NOW SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-9, 2011 BOSTON, MA Welcome to Day 2!
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
Best Practices in Parent Center – State Collaboration to Improve Student Achievement Federation for Children with Special Needs and Massachusetts Department.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
Kansas Youth Vision Team: Serving Our Neediest Youth Atlanta, GA September, 2006.
2012 Summer Institute THE PIVOT FROM RECRUITMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION.
OREGON EARLY CHILDHOOD INCLUSION COLLABORATIVE THE TEACHING RESEARCH INSTITUTE CENTER ON INCLUSION AND EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE & EDUCATION WESTERN OREGON.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Towards a health and wellbeing service framework a discussion paper for consultation.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Reaching & Supporting Immigrant Families: The Role of Family Organizations Presented by Mercedes Rosa, Director Family to Family Health Information Resource.
Together We Grow North Carolina Early Intervention Services EISAS Parent Survey: Assessment of Early Intervention Service Provider Quality Presenters:
Good Start, Grow Smart Inter-American Symposium Understanding the State of the Art in Early Childhood Education and Care: The First Three Years of Life.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Expanding Opportunities Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children With Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP/NECTAC National Early Childhood.
OSEP 2009 National Early Childhood Conference The Use and Reporting of ARRA Funds for Preschool Special Education Jim O’Brien Office of Head Start/ACF/HHS.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Effective Collaboration between Parent Centers and Early Childhood.
Donata Mikulik Volunteer & Community Services Manager Volunteer Center of Sonoma County.
School Counselors & Assignments \ Elementary Schools Demographic Information.
SIX PLUS ONE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF PARENT ENGAGEMENT = 7.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Peer to Peer Session on Parent Leadership Jim Redmon, Kansas Children’s Cabinet and Trust Fund Jackie Counts, Institute of Educational Research & Public.
Introductions Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Recommended Practices for Engaging Families September 11, 2019
Presentation transcript:

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs and the A.P.P.L.E. Project Models of Parent Leadership Development

2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference February 6, 2005, Washington, DC Presented by: Richard Robison and Barbara Popper Project Co-Directors at the Federation for Children with Special Needs, Boston, MA

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Purpose of ICC Project Provide leadership support for parents serving on state Interagency Coordinating Councils Develop a cadre of parents prepared for involvement with professionals at the program and policy levels

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Goal One Prepare parents for effective participation at the program and policy levels: 14 state teams participated in Leadership Institutes during the first project (2000 to 2002) 4 states participated in 2003: Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Iowa 6 states participated in 2004: Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Rhode Island and Vermont

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Institute Modules The Leadership Institute incorporates three training modules: True Colors (Cassie Johnston) Reciprocal Outreach and Conflict Resolution (Roberto Chene) Facilitated Conversation Method (Kathleen Osta)

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Additional Features of the Leadership Institute Facilitators add context of history of the parent movement and offer techniques for parents to pace their involvement Participants share family stories to provide personal context for leadership training Families explore how to appropriately become involved in policy level discussions

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Goal Two Ensure and support the replication of the leadership training and the implementation of the state teams’ action plans through technical assistance Replication is determined by state teams and their early intervention programs based on need, resources, and ingenuity. Outcomes publicized by the project. Turnover in state parent involvement means constant recruiting and nurturing of new parents.

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Goal Three Establish collaborative relationships to support Leadership Institutes and replication efforts Attend meetings, conferences, FICC meetings Remain available to Part C Directors Promote Leadership Institutes to parents directly Use all forums to keep parent issues on the agenda

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Goal Four Facilitate networking and linkages among ICC parents nationally. Listserv (“ICCParent”) Website ( Leadership Notes, our project newsletter (English and Spanish versions) Resource database Survey of programs regarding: parent involvement and leadership, parent issues, stipends, career development, etc.

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Project Results and Evaluation Evaluations indicate that the Institute has met the needs and expectations of the participants. In 2003 and 2004, 90% of participants rated the Institute as either “very good” or “excellent” in terms of its usefulness to state ICC planning and to personal leadership development.

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Project Results and Evaluation Pre- and Post-Assessments of how well teams worked together: 2003 RatingPre-AssessmentPost-Assessment Very Well21.4%52.4% Well28.5%33.3% Not Well50.0%14.3%

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Project Results and Evaluation Pre- and Post-Assessments of how well teams worked together (cont.): 2004 RatingPre-AssessmentPost-Assessment Very Well21%73% Well50%27% Not Well14%0%

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Project Results and Evaluation Significant accomplishments: “Our team has created a powerful vehicle which will provide a forum for accomplishing tasks we’ve identified to strengthen services to families.” “This event brought our state team together…We are much more focused and have taken responsibility for our ICC.” “Our team developed a parent involvement strategy.” “I learned more about myself.”

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Project Results and Evaluation Focused Conversation Method: Participants in 2003 listed 62 ways in which they could use the method in their personal and professional lives, for facilitation or conflict mediation. In 2004, participants listed 73 ways.

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Project Results and Evaluation True Colors: 2003: 90% of participants report enhanced ability to identify different leadership styles; 100% felt that True Colors would improve their communication style 2004: 100% of participants report they are better able to identify their own and others’ leadership styles, and that True Colors will improve their communication style.

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Project Results and Evaluation Reciprocal Outreach: 2003 and 2004: 90% of participants indicated an improved understanding of how differences are socially structured Participants committed to: – Reaching out to unknown groups – Becoming more thoughtful, open, and analytical – Sharing the burdens and responsibilities of conflict resolution

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Over 90% of participants in 2003 and 2004 indicated that the Institute would be useful in their: – Outreach efforts – Leadership roles – Family life – Community life Project Results and Evaluation

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Developing the A.P.P.L.E. Project Responding to the request for a research project on increasing parent/professional collaboration Using lessons learned and a workable model Applying the model to a new population

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs A.P.P.L.E. Project Features Targeting public school parent advisory councils (mandatory in Massachusetts School Districts) in our state Applying ICC model, recognizing the challenges Working with a research partner at the University of Massachusetts

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs A.P.P.L.E. Project Features Current faculty participating with us—no change in staffing Modifying content for the new population of families, children in public school programs Expect to have more direct contact after Institute with teams

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Parents as Allies Parents as potential partners—training together, working together, setting the agenda Parents as policy advocates, helping determine the future of early intervention

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Parents as Allies Parents can help forge partnerships with programs Parents can participate in discussions about who provides services, what is needed, gaps, and service coordination Outreach can be done by parents

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Parents as Allies Parent Leadership Development—a process involving state commitment and family interest. Support Parent Leaders as they learn their roles, develop their strengths, and receive support for their efforts Strengthen the efforts of state teams to accomplish their state goals for parent leadership development.

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs What Can Parent Leaders Accomplish? Keep the focus on kids and families Seek input from all families served Represent Early Intervention to the public Tell their stories to make EI real to others Keep it real for those not directly involved with children’s needs

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Issues Parents Face What does it mean to be visible? What are the risks personally? What are the possible positive outcomes? When is the right time, or wrong time to be active? How do you plan to measure success?

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs Involve Families In Policy Include families in all aspects of plans developed Provide feedback to families on impact they have had Promote input into other state programs and agencies (often required) Track satisfaction