The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Networking and Cooperation
Advertisements

OPEN DAYS 2007 PARTNERSHIP Technical Assistance as a Catalyst in Partnership Building for Social Inclusion Ray Phillips Director, London Voluntary Sector.
Open Days Brussels 10 October 2006 Structural Funds Management: the Western Scotland Partnership Experience Laurie Russell Formerly Chief Executive Strathclyde.
Planning and use of funding instruments
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Lifelong Guidance: A Key to Lifelong Learning – EU Policy Perspective John McCarthy European Commission DG EAC Vocational Training Policy Unit.
The Cohesion Fund: Programming and link to the Structural Funds Annual Meeting of ISPA Partners 2003: From ISPA to Cohesion Fund and Structural Funds Angela.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 ANNUAL MEETING OF ISPA PARTNERS 2003 FROM ISPA TO COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS BRUSSELS,
Stefano Fontana European Commission DG RTD Research for the benefit of SMEs SMEs in the.
Support for Micro-enterprise in the Border, Midland and Western Region of Ireland 9 th October, 2003 Kieran Moylan, BMW Regional Assembly.
Coast2capital.org.uk European Structural and Investment Funds Coast to Capital Shadow ESIF Committee 1 st Meeting, December 5 th 2014.
Cyprus Project Management Society
ESIF Business Process and Simplification Nic Suggit Department of Communities and Local Government 24 April 2014.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
Transnational co-operation to promote new means of combating all forms of discrimination and inequalities in connection with the labour market.
Evidence Based Cohesion Policy Focus on performance incentives Thomas Tandskov Dissing Senior Adviser Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs Danish.
URBACT III LAUNCH EVENT Brussels, 16 March The URBACT III programme  Objectives & Activities  Thematic coverage  3 Types of network  Beneficiaries.
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
EU Funds Knowledge Building across Community Land Trusts July,
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG NOVEMBER 2012.
Workshop on the Legal Framework of EU Structural Funds’ Management for the Period Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006 Head of Division, Preben.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
Josefina Lindblom European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs SMEs in the.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Health challenges in an enlarged Europe Report from Parallel Session A1 Dr. Natasha Azzopardi Muscat Ministry of Health - Malta.
North-West Agency of International Projects Promoting HRD, developing networks.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Introduction to SEPA The Scottish Environment Agency For CaSPr Waste Workshop Glasgow 19 October 2006 Claudette Hudes NetRegs Team Leader.
The Enterprise Europe Network Brigitte Tanti Malta Enterprise European Commission Enterprise and Industry.
Employment and Skills Partnership Board David Fletcher Executive Director 15 th June Degrees Limited – Registered in England and Wales – Registration.
Maximising Opportunities for London Patricia Muotto Regeneration Manager, Structural Funds 00 Month 2004.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
World Bank Seminar Latvia 8-9 June 2004 Using European Funds in Western Scotland Presented By: Laurie Russell Chief Executive Strathclyde European Partnership.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
The European Social Fund in Flanders Europe Day – Association KULeuven 06/11/2012.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
The Structural Funds in the EU are intended to help increase economic and social cohesion between Member States and constitute an important instrument.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
The European Science Foundation is a non-governmental organisation based in Strasbourg, France.
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
Overview of the Ability Programme
Presentation on the Application Process
Cohesion Policy Information and Communication rules The state of play
URBACT III LAUNCH EVENT Brussels, 16 March 2015
EU instruments of funding and technical assistance
European Environment Agency
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development
Main results from the Interreg IVC Capitalisation project Winnet8
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
European Innovation Platform for Knowledge Intensive Services Elke Van Tendeloo DG Enterprise and Industry Brussels, 04 June 2007.
Planning for Place.
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
Embedding Governance & Participation in the European Structural Funds
New EU funds for the North West the Programme
Presentation transcript:

The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership

SCOTLAND?

Objective 1 transition 310m euro Objective 2 73m euro Objective 2 480m euro EUROPEAN FUNDS MAP Objective 2 250m euro Objective 3 310m euro

INSTITUTIONS Scottish Executive Managing Authority UK Parliament Scottish Parliament and Executive of Ministers PoliticiansCivil servantsAgencies Local councils National enterprise agency Universities and colleges Wide range of non government organisations

Partners European Commission Scottish Executive SEP Ltd PROCESS

ROLES SPD developed in partnership by Scottish Executive, SEP Ltd, local partners and EC Administration of the Programmes: – Scottish Executive is the managing authority – Day to day management devolved to SEP Ltd Public sector bodies (local councils, universities, colleges, enterprise agencies) develop projects and bid for European Funds support Decisions on funding awards are taken by partnership committees

Devolved Programme management in Strathclyde since similar model in other Scottish regions since 1994 Company limited by guarantee - not for profit with clear public sector values Programme experience: –Objectives 2, –ERDF & ESF –Community Initiatives - RECHAR, URBAN, RESIDER, EQUAL –Regional Innovation Strategy, TEP WHAT IS SEP LTD?

WHAT DOES SEP LTD DO? Pre-application advice and assistance Managing the project life cycle Managing the decision making process and committee system Processing project applications, issuing offers of grant, processing claims, carrying out monitoring visits Specialist support on horizontal themes Disseminating good practice & learning Publicising European Funds

HOW IS THIS FUNDED? Technical Assistance and Co-finance: –50% from ERDF and ESF technical assistance –50% from partners Partners contributions: –Percentage of the Funds each is awarded –Set by SEP Ltd Board of Directors, agreed with Monitoring Committee –Fixed for duration of Programme –Not eligible for European Funds Budget covers: –All office, staff and equipment –Publicity and marketing –Research into Programme issues

HOW ARE FUNDS DISTRIBUTED? Development Application Assessment Appraisal Decision Offer SEP Ltd staff working with partners pre-submission Projects received, referenced and acknowledged Technical eligibility, horizontal themes, suitability Selection criteria, scoring system, recommendations Programme Implementing Committee considers all recommendations Approved projects grant offer within 10 days of Ministerial approval of decisions

APPLICATION PROCESS PROGRAMMEIMPLEMENTINGCOMMITTEE ECONOMIC & SOCIAL COHESION COMPETITIVE LOCATION LABOUR MARKET COMPETITIVE SMEs PARTNERS Apply Decide Appraise Assess

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTISH SYSTEM Regional economic planning - closer to problems leads to appropriate solutions Flexible co-finance for projects - bottom up approach Partnership - every agency has equal status Decisions are made by consensus Targeting resources on areas of economic need - strong local area development focus Monitoring and evaluation built in Sharing our knowledge / experience Visibility of Europe on the ground

ADVANTAGES Consistent with and sensitive to but not driven by political priorities Able to survive institutional or political change Positive Scottish Parliament independent review in 2000 Transparent and accountable Equitable - all partners involved and have equal voice Balances objective appraisal criteria with expertise and experience of partners

DOWNSIDE? Participation takes time, consultation takes longer Effort needed to develop partnerships - they dont happen naturally or quickly Will need new skills and training needed Some agencies will argue against transparency Need to be clear about lines of accountability and who does what Genuine regional policy will require the centre to relinquish power

CONCLUSION Partnership can be slower and therefore more expensive But the long-term benefits outweigh the short-term issues –High level of positive outcomes –Innovative Programme management and projects –EC policy themes can be needed to mainstream at member state level –Exchanging policies, ideas and projects between regions and with the EC

Up to date information… Register to receive regular updates